South Africa in England 2012 July 11, 2012

From keeper to clerk and back again

Thami Tsolekile's first taste of Test cricket, eight years ago, set his career back and for a time he left the game behind. But a second chance came his way and he has grabbed it
  shares 20

There is a desk in the Western Province Cricket Association offices that once belonged to Thami Tsolekile. Not a kit bag or a piece of cricket equipment - a desk. And a chair, and a computer, and a few notebooks and some pens. Four seasons ago, Tsolekile was a clerk. He was dropped by his home franchise, unwanted by any of the others and his cricket career seemed to be over.

It was an anti-climax for a man who had promised so much. As a double international - having also played hockey for South Africa - Tsolekile was a true athlete. He had exceptional hand-eye co-ordination, was fit, fast and skilled and cricket considered itself lucky that he had opted to use the bulk of his talent on it.

He was identified as a potential challenger for Mark Boucher - at that stage the word successor was not being used - and was picked for South Africa in 2004. At 23 years old, Tsolekile knew relatively little of the world but enough to realise he was largely not wanted. A public outcry and even internal administrative strife followed his call-up, tainting his short stint.

Boucher had played 75 consecutive Tests and was sent to the sidelines as punishment for his rapidly growing sense of self rather than as a response to his loss of form with the bat. He was never expected to be out of the side for very long. Tsolekile knew his inclusion was merely an experiment to see if anyone else had could play in the wicketkeeper's role.

After three Tests, the selection panel was convinced no-one could. Tsolekile made his debut in India and was dropped after one Test at home against England, although AB de Villiers briefly had the gloves before Boucher returned. His self-confessed "lack of experience," showed, especially with the bat, where he managed just 47 runs five innings. He was not as bad with gloves on but South Africa had lost the Test at Port Elizabeth, the first of the series, and wanted a quick fix. Boucher had been considered reprimanded so two Tests later was recalled and Tsolekile faded, as far away as he could, into an office job.

Being managed carelessly formed a large part of Tsolekile's retreat into anonymity. He was young and enthusiastic and having a small chance snatched away from him hurt. Although he continued play for Cobras, his spirit had been noticeably squashed. It took a call from up country to revive it.

In 2009 the Highveld Lions franchise, then a struggling team, needed a wicketkeeper after Matthew Harris retired. With a history of importing players from the Cape, they asked Tsolekile if he could be lured onto the cricket field again. A new chance with a new team in a new city beckoned and even someone as disillusioned as Tsolekile could see that it would be foolish to turn them down.

The change immediately paid dividends. Tsolekile took more catches than any gloveman across the franchise system in his comeback season. Given the tame nature of the Lions bowling attack then, it is not impossible to suggest that Tsolekile's success meant he took every chance that came his way in that period. His batting had also improved - he scored his second first-class century that summer - and starred in a record partnership with Stephen Cook to the end the season with an average of 58.10.

Maturity was the standout improvement in Tsolekile's game. Once so hot headed - he was suspended by Western Province hockey for ill-discipline - Tsolekile had grown into a respectful adult. Administrators at Lions hailed and rewarded him for his leadership skills. He was picked as captain of the South Africa A side, elevated to vice-captain of the franchise and installed as leader when Alviro Petersen was on national duty. Under him, Lions qualified for the Champions League T20 in 2010, ending months of sub-standard showings.

Being managed carelessly formed a large part of Tsolekile's retreat into anonymity. He was young and enthusiastic and having a small chance snatched away from him hurt

Tsolekile's glovework has remained his strongest asset but with a top heavy domestic batting line-up that aspect of his game has not developed much further. Still, the selectors were satisfied enough with his progression to hand him a national contract earlier this year, something that identified him again as a successor to Boucher, who announced his intention to retire after the England series.

A roadmap was laid out - in which would Boucher mentor Tsolekile - but it seemed to change course swiftly. Instead, Tsolekile was included in various A sides, such as the one that played Australia A in Potchefstroom. On a pitch that was green and where the North West Cricket Union apologised to Michael Clarke for the lack of batting practice his side had had there, Tsolekile scored a half-century. He also played in the recent two match series against Sri Lanka A, where he equalled the South African record for the most catches in a first-class innings with eight.

Vincent Barnes, coach of the A side, said Tsolekile was "exceptional," in those matches and was "definitely ready for international cricket." Tsolekile was also due to travel to Ireland with the A side that will shadow the senior side from August. His plans have been fast-forwarded because of the enforced retirement of Boucher and he now finds himself on the cusp of playing in the year's most anticipated Test contest.

However, before he even got here, it seemed Tsolekile may find himself an outsider again. Both Gary Kirsten and Allan Donald said AB de Villiers will be the team's wicketkeeper in the first Test. The national selectors would not confirm that they agreed with those thoughts. Instead, they announced Tsolekile as Boucher's replacement the next day and named De Villiers as an "option". While the selection panel picks the squad, the starting XI is chosen by Kirsten, Graeme Smith and the touring selector which leaves uncertainty over whether Tsolekile will play at all.

With South Africa likely to want to include an extra batsman, he may not feature initially and judging by the reaction his call up has received in South Africa some would prefer him not feature at all. Tsolekile is not a popular choice. There have been calls for Dane Vilas, who was unimpressive in the recent Twenty20 tri-series in Zimbabwe, and Quinton de Kock, who will captain the Under-19 side and has yet to play a full season of franchise cricket, to replace Boucher and Tsolekile's support has been slim and grudgingly given.

After years of playing cricket, it is something he is used to. When he was first called up, Tsokelile was labelled a quota player. It is a term he and others of his skin colour - such as Vernon Philander - will have to put up with for years to come. In 2004, it stuck a stigma to him that he could not overcome. Eight years later, Tsolekile no longer flinches when he hears that word. He is more secure than that.

In an interview with ESPNcricinfo in December he said: "I am a much better player than I was when I first played international cricket." It is something that has also been acknowledged by selection convenor Andrew Hudson. Tsolekile feels he knows his game well enough to make an impact and even though his age, he will soon be 32, may mean he cannot think of spending the amount of time Boucher did in the international game he believes he has something to offer. Now all he needs is a chance to do that.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Saurusii on July 13, 2012, 8:18 GMT

    Firdose Moonda - I'd like to correct you on one point. I'm sure that no-one in their right mind would call Vernon Philander a "quota player". He is there PURELY on merit and his incredible test record attests to that. I'm not sure the same could be said for Tsolelike though.

  • sharidas on July 13, 2012, 6:42 GMT

    I think, the question here really is, who is going to be drafted in if AB De Villiers is going to keep wickets. - obviously, a batsman. And who would that be ? I think, the selectors do not have much faith in Thami as a batsman and that is the reason, De Villiers is keeping wickets.

  • Castle94 on July 13, 2012, 1:05 GMT

    Making AB keeper would be a huge mistake!! Such an important batsman should not have that added responsibility. Tsolekile should be picked, I think most people are forgetting that Boucher's batting wasn't extraordinaty, his last hundred was in 2008, yet no one questioned him because he contributed enough to an already strong SA batting line-up. Tsolekile will provide enough with the bat if the top order remains strong, and that can only happen if they can focus solely on batting. Which is why de Villiers must NOT take the gloves.

  • on July 12, 2012, 23:01 GMT

    Tsolekile has definitely been an entirely different player over the past couple of seasons than he was earlier in his career. I don't believe he's the long-term solution here - there are a number of great young glovemen who are also far better batsmen than he is playing in SA right now - but I don't think he'll let us down while the likes of Vilas, Kuhn, or (dare I say it) de Kock are blooded. And there's always de Villiers to fill the gaps if anything goes wrong. All the luck to you, Thami!

  • on July 12, 2012, 21:48 GMT

    SA should play him no matter because if ABD keeps,it makes him mentally and physically tired before his batting compared to what he would have been had be been juss their as a fielder and SA doesn't want this coz ABD is a massive player. Also,England is a tough place to keep and u need ur best keeper in test cricket. ABD is a fine keeper but Tsolekile is the best SA have in the country. Yes,maybe he won't score much runs with the bat but if ABD spills some catches down? That will affect his batting later on as well and Tsolekile is a gritty customer. If he avgs 20-30 and keeps well,then it's fine. Even boucher used to get those 30s and 40s,he was never a gilly wid d bat too. SA should stick with this guy atleast for the 2nd,3rd test now that ABD is keeping in the 1st test.

  • djdrastic on July 12, 2012, 20:13 GMT

    @BlackInWhites , you seem to be awfully worked up about this.He's already in the squad , chill out dude.

  • SCC08 on July 12, 2012, 17:08 GMT

    BlackinWhites... - Even your name suggests your stance on this issue. Lets be honest about this. He doesnt deserve his place on ability nor performance, that cannot be questioned or proven statistically. Wish the selectors would just be honest, we have selected him on the quota selection policy.

  • BlackInWhites on July 12, 2012, 14:00 GMT

    @Xolile, I can see that you engage well with Cricinfo stats, good boy. Not memorable according to who???

  • bestbuddy on July 12, 2012, 13:09 GMT

    I am reluctant to back thami tsolekile as his recent record is boosted by an incredible number of not outs; nearly 45% of his innings in fact over the two seasons he batted well (2009, 2011). He was also statistically only the 5th best keeper or keeper/batsman last season (dismissals and runs scored). His inclusion also weakens our batting, something that may be key given England have prior,bresnan, broad, swann at 7-10. That said, on purely keeping terms he is the most reliable in SA, and hopefully he can step up and make the same gritty innings that Boucher used to. Lets not judge him until he has had the chance to prove himself

  • BellCurve on July 12, 2012, 12:16 GMT

    @BlackInWhite -You're grasping as straws. The 58 Tsolekile scored against the Australians was only the fifth highest score in that match! Moreover, he batted at No6, not No7. Also, SA "A" lost that match by 7 wickets. Is that really the best you can do?! The correct answer to that question is a resounding YES. Tsolekile has not produced as much as one memorable batting performance in any format of the game in a career that spans 14 years and 298 innings. NOT EVEN ONE! He does not deserve to be playing Test cricket for his country.

  • Saurusii on July 13, 2012, 8:18 GMT

    Firdose Moonda - I'd like to correct you on one point. I'm sure that no-one in their right mind would call Vernon Philander a "quota player". He is there PURELY on merit and his incredible test record attests to that. I'm not sure the same could be said for Tsolelike though.

  • sharidas on July 13, 2012, 6:42 GMT

    I think, the question here really is, who is going to be drafted in if AB De Villiers is going to keep wickets. - obviously, a batsman. And who would that be ? I think, the selectors do not have much faith in Thami as a batsman and that is the reason, De Villiers is keeping wickets.

  • Castle94 on July 13, 2012, 1:05 GMT

    Making AB keeper would be a huge mistake!! Such an important batsman should not have that added responsibility. Tsolekile should be picked, I think most people are forgetting that Boucher's batting wasn't extraordinaty, his last hundred was in 2008, yet no one questioned him because he contributed enough to an already strong SA batting line-up. Tsolekile will provide enough with the bat if the top order remains strong, and that can only happen if they can focus solely on batting. Which is why de Villiers must NOT take the gloves.

  • on July 12, 2012, 23:01 GMT

    Tsolekile has definitely been an entirely different player over the past couple of seasons than he was earlier in his career. I don't believe he's the long-term solution here - there are a number of great young glovemen who are also far better batsmen than he is playing in SA right now - but I don't think he'll let us down while the likes of Vilas, Kuhn, or (dare I say it) de Kock are blooded. And there's always de Villiers to fill the gaps if anything goes wrong. All the luck to you, Thami!

  • on July 12, 2012, 21:48 GMT

    SA should play him no matter because if ABD keeps,it makes him mentally and physically tired before his batting compared to what he would have been had be been juss their as a fielder and SA doesn't want this coz ABD is a massive player. Also,England is a tough place to keep and u need ur best keeper in test cricket. ABD is a fine keeper but Tsolekile is the best SA have in the country. Yes,maybe he won't score much runs with the bat but if ABD spills some catches down? That will affect his batting later on as well and Tsolekile is a gritty customer. If he avgs 20-30 and keeps well,then it's fine. Even boucher used to get those 30s and 40s,he was never a gilly wid d bat too. SA should stick with this guy atleast for the 2nd,3rd test now that ABD is keeping in the 1st test.

  • djdrastic on July 12, 2012, 20:13 GMT

    @BlackInWhites , you seem to be awfully worked up about this.He's already in the squad , chill out dude.

  • SCC08 on July 12, 2012, 17:08 GMT

    BlackinWhites... - Even your name suggests your stance on this issue. Lets be honest about this. He doesnt deserve his place on ability nor performance, that cannot be questioned or proven statistically. Wish the selectors would just be honest, we have selected him on the quota selection policy.

  • BlackInWhites on July 12, 2012, 14:00 GMT

    @Xolile, I can see that you engage well with Cricinfo stats, good boy. Not memorable according to who???

  • bestbuddy on July 12, 2012, 13:09 GMT

    I am reluctant to back thami tsolekile as his recent record is boosted by an incredible number of not outs; nearly 45% of his innings in fact over the two seasons he batted well (2009, 2011). He was also statistically only the 5th best keeper or keeper/batsman last season (dismissals and runs scored). His inclusion also weakens our batting, something that may be key given England have prior,bresnan, broad, swann at 7-10. That said, on purely keeping terms he is the most reliable in SA, and hopefully he can step up and make the same gritty innings that Boucher used to. Lets not judge him until he has had the chance to prove himself

  • BellCurve on July 12, 2012, 12:16 GMT

    @BlackInWhite -You're grasping as straws. The 58 Tsolekile scored against the Australians was only the fifth highest score in that match! Moreover, he batted at No6, not No7. Also, SA "A" lost that match by 7 wickets. Is that really the best you can do?! The correct answer to that question is a resounding YES. Tsolekile has not produced as much as one memorable batting performance in any format of the game in a career that spans 14 years and 298 innings. NOT EVEN ONE! He does not deserve to be playing Test cricket for his country.

  • Benbow on July 12, 2012, 10:42 GMT

    TT has been performaing consistemtly well for the Lions and is clearly the top keeper in South Afirca after the enforced retirement of MB. From a batting persperctive he can hardly do worse than Bouch has been doing recently so whats the fuss. As usual SA will go for a stop gap instead of promoting the next in line. Frankly i will be surprised if Smithy, Kallis and Kirsten will allow an upstart new keeper to play in "their" team.

  • BlackInWhites on July 12, 2012, 10:27 GMT

    Tsolekile was written off just after he played 3 test matches in which he batted at No9 and No10. Tell me of a player that has been written off after playing so few games. This is a guys that SA "A" recently trusted at No7 against a full strength Australia and score a gutsy 57 in a hard to bat pitch. This showed that his game has matured and is ready to play for the national team. Yes he wont be playing in the first test but i would like to see him playing in the following test....South Africa need AB de Villiers at his best shape...

  • Nuxxy on July 12, 2012, 6:53 GMT

    I'm not going to complain about Tsolekile. His First Class batting average may be low, but those who have been following the results will be aware just how much his batting has improved over the last few seasons. He has deserved his chance, though the same could be said of Vilas. there have been a lot of 'ok' keepers, but none outstanding, so none of them really shout to be picked above any others, just like none of them shouted to be picked above an out-of-form Boucher.

    What I don't like is referring to Tsolekile as Boucher's 'successor'. Simply, he is too old to succeed Boucher and build a legacy. The correct term for him is a 'stop-gap' - something to tide us over until the real solution is found. Which is Quinton de Kock. Get him some time with Boucher (once he's healed) and Ray Jennings, and by 21 he must take over the keeping position.

  • satish619chandar on July 12, 2012, 6:04 GMT

    Tsolekile is a fighter from what i saw him in very minimum games.. Personally, i would have picked a 32 year old Morne Van Wyk who displayed good batting skills and a good keeper too than a Tsolekile.. Just in terms of what i saw..

  • crimson518 on July 12, 2012, 5:38 GMT

    I'm hoping that they are just bringing Tsolekile in as cover in case something happens to AB and that he won't actualy play. Leave AB as keeper and bring in Duminy to replace Boucher. With Peterson fit that would be a hell of a batting lineup with Duminy coming in at 7.

  • BellCurve on July 11, 2012, 19:26 GMT

    For 20 months before Vernon Philander was selected to play Test cricket for SA, I was singing his praises in the CricInfo comment sections. But I am not in favour of the selection of Thami Tsolekile. It makes no difference whether he is black, white, green, blue or purple. The fact is he has done nothing in 14 years of playing cricket to suggest that he will succeed with the bat at Test level. For this reason and this reason alone SA cannot afford to have him at No7. Quiton de Kock may be young. But talent like that only comes along once in a generation.

  • SurlyCynic on July 11, 2012, 18:26 GMT

    A question: if any other top cricket nation selected a 32 yr old wicket keeper who had a FC average below 30 and had previously failed at test level, would there not be a debate about his inclusion? Of course there would, so why can't we have this debate about the SA team?

  • on July 11, 2012, 18:16 GMT

    I'm happy for Thami..No one can replace Bouchy,but someone can make history and Thami has deserved his chance..de Cock is too young to handle Steyn or Morne or vernon for that matter..But Vilas maybe a good choice..Well if they picked him well Thami might as well use his time to prove others wrong..

  • Coolbawn on July 11, 2012, 17:49 GMT

    Interesting background info for those of us in Europe who don't know the SA domestic scene in detail. It's a big shame that MB is out injured but it would be refreshing to see TT play and succeed on this tour. Interesting how many hockey and rugby all-rounders there are / have been in recent SA cricket eg I seem to remember people have commented on Rhodes, Madsen, AB, Kallis, Smith, TT and probably others.

  • SurlyCynic on July 11, 2012, 17:11 GMT

    Philander has a great first class average, so is not labelled a 'quota player', whereas Tsolekile averages less than 30 with the bat in FC cricket and was clearly out of his depth when he played tests before so inevitably his inclusion generates some debate. His glovework is decent but the days of keepers who can't bat seem to be over, and there are young keepers who are great batsmen, hence the discussion which this author sees fit to disregard. Tsolekile's previous inclusion helped to lose a series against England, so why shouldn't there be a debate? There are arguments over any new player, of any race unless their stats are exceptional, like Philanders.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • SurlyCynic on July 11, 2012, 17:11 GMT

    Philander has a great first class average, so is not labelled a 'quota player', whereas Tsolekile averages less than 30 with the bat in FC cricket and was clearly out of his depth when he played tests before so inevitably his inclusion generates some debate. His glovework is decent but the days of keepers who can't bat seem to be over, and there are young keepers who are great batsmen, hence the discussion which this author sees fit to disregard. Tsolekile's previous inclusion helped to lose a series against England, so why shouldn't there be a debate? There are arguments over any new player, of any race unless their stats are exceptional, like Philanders.

  • Coolbawn on July 11, 2012, 17:49 GMT

    Interesting background info for those of us in Europe who don't know the SA domestic scene in detail. It's a big shame that MB is out injured but it would be refreshing to see TT play and succeed on this tour. Interesting how many hockey and rugby all-rounders there are / have been in recent SA cricket eg I seem to remember people have commented on Rhodes, Madsen, AB, Kallis, Smith, TT and probably others.

  • on July 11, 2012, 18:16 GMT

    I'm happy for Thami..No one can replace Bouchy,but someone can make history and Thami has deserved his chance..de Cock is too young to handle Steyn or Morne or vernon for that matter..But Vilas maybe a good choice..Well if they picked him well Thami might as well use his time to prove others wrong..

  • SurlyCynic on July 11, 2012, 18:26 GMT

    A question: if any other top cricket nation selected a 32 yr old wicket keeper who had a FC average below 30 and had previously failed at test level, would there not be a debate about his inclusion? Of course there would, so why can't we have this debate about the SA team?

  • BellCurve on July 11, 2012, 19:26 GMT

    For 20 months before Vernon Philander was selected to play Test cricket for SA, I was singing his praises in the CricInfo comment sections. But I am not in favour of the selection of Thami Tsolekile. It makes no difference whether he is black, white, green, blue or purple. The fact is he has done nothing in 14 years of playing cricket to suggest that he will succeed with the bat at Test level. For this reason and this reason alone SA cannot afford to have him at No7. Quiton de Kock may be young. But talent like that only comes along once in a generation.

  • crimson518 on July 12, 2012, 5:38 GMT

    I'm hoping that they are just bringing Tsolekile in as cover in case something happens to AB and that he won't actualy play. Leave AB as keeper and bring in Duminy to replace Boucher. With Peterson fit that would be a hell of a batting lineup with Duminy coming in at 7.

  • satish619chandar on July 12, 2012, 6:04 GMT

    Tsolekile is a fighter from what i saw him in very minimum games.. Personally, i would have picked a 32 year old Morne Van Wyk who displayed good batting skills and a good keeper too than a Tsolekile.. Just in terms of what i saw..

  • Nuxxy on July 12, 2012, 6:53 GMT

    I'm not going to complain about Tsolekile. His First Class batting average may be low, but those who have been following the results will be aware just how much his batting has improved over the last few seasons. He has deserved his chance, though the same could be said of Vilas. there have been a lot of 'ok' keepers, but none outstanding, so none of them really shout to be picked above any others, just like none of them shouted to be picked above an out-of-form Boucher.

    What I don't like is referring to Tsolekile as Boucher's 'successor'. Simply, he is too old to succeed Boucher and build a legacy. The correct term for him is a 'stop-gap' - something to tide us over until the real solution is found. Which is Quinton de Kock. Get him some time with Boucher (once he's healed) and Ray Jennings, and by 21 he must take over the keeping position.

  • BlackInWhites on July 12, 2012, 10:27 GMT

    Tsolekile was written off just after he played 3 test matches in which he batted at No9 and No10. Tell me of a player that has been written off after playing so few games. This is a guys that SA "A" recently trusted at No7 against a full strength Australia and score a gutsy 57 in a hard to bat pitch. This showed that his game has matured and is ready to play for the national team. Yes he wont be playing in the first test but i would like to see him playing in the following test....South Africa need AB de Villiers at his best shape...

  • Benbow on July 12, 2012, 10:42 GMT

    TT has been performaing consistemtly well for the Lions and is clearly the top keeper in South Afirca after the enforced retirement of MB. From a batting persperctive he can hardly do worse than Bouch has been doing recently so whats the fuss. As usual SA will go for a stop gap instead of promoting the next in line. Frankly i will be surprised if Smithy, Kallis and Kirsten will allow an upstart new keeper to play in "their" team.