England v Sri Lanka, 1st Investec Test, Lord's

Cook confirms Bell, Ballance roles

Andrew McGlashan

June 11, 2014

Comments: 7 | Text size: A | A

Ian Bell played with a calm air that deserted his colleagues for 72 not out, Australia v England, 2nd Test, Adelaide, 3rd day, December 7, 2013
Ian Bell will bat at No. 4 and serve as the de facto vice-captain © PA Photos
Enlarge

The eve of England's first Test in six months did not see Alastair Cook entirely rip up his usual script and name his XI early - although it will be a big surprise if Liam Plunkett is not preferred ahead of Chris Woakes - but he did reveal two noteworthy pieces of information.

Gary Ballance will fill the No. 3 spot - the void created by Jonathan Trott's withdrawal from international cricket - as he did in the one-day series, and while there is no official vice-captain, Ian Bell will assume the responsibility of captaincy should Cook have to leave the field. Bell, recently named England's Player of the Year, has also got what he wanted with a chance to bat at No. 4 in place of Kevin Pietersen.

There are strong arguments to say that it should have been Bell filling the No. 3 role given his senior position in the team, but there could have been a desire to split up some of the inexperience in the order rather than having Ballance, Joe Root (an option for No. 3) and Moeen Ali following each other. And, of course, some of the most prolific Test careers have also been forged at No. 4.

When Trott left the Ashes last November, Root was initially promoted to No. 3 before Bell filled in for the final Test in Sydney. The fact England will have had three batsmen in that position in five matches just goes to emphasise the stability that Trott brought to the team. Neither is it Ballance's role for Yorkshire in the County Championship, where he normally finds himself at No. 5. There is a sense of a square peg for a round hole.

Bell's unofficial position as Cook's lieutenant also means Matt Prior's recall has not come with the role that was his when he was dropped in Australia. He has previously admitted that he struggled to combine the multiple tasks of vice-captaincy, batting and keeping, and there must remain a degree of uncertainty about how long-term his comeback can be with a troublesome Achilles.

But Cook left no one in any doubt about the high esteem Prior is still held under. "We've got a guy in Matt Prior who averages over 40 in his Test career, he's an outstanding batsman who had a tough six months. I'm backing his ability at the moment and the quality we know he's got.

"He's played almost 80 games, that's a wealth of experience in a side which is changing. Matt is a senior guy who knows his game. Of course we've been in constant communication with his fitness to make sure he's 100% right and he is. He should be very proud of his record, it's outstanding, and he has a lot more to offer and we should support that."

Although the words "new" and "fresh" have been thrown around like confetti in the build-up to this series, Cook sees a bigger role than ever for the senior players who remain in the team.

"I was talking to Ian Bell about it the other day and he said he didn't really feel comfortable until he'd played 40 games," Cook said. "I think that can lead to a bit of inconsistency at the start and a lot of the senior guys have had their ups and downs until they've got to where they are now."

There has been almost as much reaction to those players not in the squad than those who have made it. Jos Buttler would have probably won the popular vote and the explanation that Ben Stokes is just a bit short on bowling has not been universally accepted.

"He's gone for four-and-a-half, almost five runs an over so when you're playing an all-seam attack you've got to be very confident about all the bowlers," Cook said of Stokes. "We've got no doubt how good he will be for England but unfortunately with that injury he received he hasn't played much cricket and it's a big ask to come back quickly from something like that at this stage of his development as a player."

Punching a locker has delayed Stokes a first home Test appearance, but for three others - Sam Robson, Moeen and Chris Jordan - their careers will begin at Lord's on Thursday. Cook also made his debut in a match of three new caps, alongside Monty Panesar and Ian Blackwell in Nagpur, and has been energised by the influx of new faces.

"It feels like a fresh start, it feels good," he said. "It's a really exciting time for the players. When you look around the changing room and see guys who are about to make their debut at Lord's - you don't get that opportunity too often."

And, although there is precious little teams do not know about each other these days, he hopes to catch Sri Lanka unawares. "Sometimes when you go into the unknown the opposition don't know anything about you."

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Lordy21 on (June 12, 2014, 12:51 GMT)

yorkshire-86 I'm pretty sure Bell has a 200 and 180 batting at 3 with an average touching 40, so to suggest it is an utter abysmal failure is somewhat strange. Think in the past 3 or 4 years the choke thing has been disproven as well, he almost single handily keep the batting going last summer? A baffling statement!

However I don't think he should bat 3 and should bat at 4 if Balance is going to continue at 3 and Root bats at 5 as both will take time to be consistent, something Root needs to address but hopefully will in time.

Posted by yorkshire-86 on (June 12, 2014, 9:09 GMT)

Bell has been tried at three and was a total and utter abysmal failure. He dosnt have it upstairs to bat that high, and even four is probably one place too high. Bell is known as the first player to choke when the pressure is on. Worried about Ali being in the team, he dosnt look good enough to bat at this level, and with a bowling average over 40 at domestic level, not good enough to bowl either. Excited about Robson and Jordan though!

Posted by imtiazjaleel on (June 12, 2014, 8:16 GMT)

England will only succeed when they bowl well. I believe it is their bowling which is letting them down. I think batting is ok. if you can restrict the opposition within 300 then there is a good chance for Eng.

Posted by landl47 on (June 12, 2014, 3:37 GMT)

Good decisions, in fact exactly the order I suggested. Bell is needed to offer stability between the 4 young guys. Ballance is going to be a fine test player once he has experience. People are still getting on Joe Root's case and forgetting that although he has been with the England squad for the last year and threequarters he is still the youngest member. Robson is the best young opener in the country. Moeen is probably a bit lucky to be there; he doesn't have as a good a batting record as Taylor or the promise of Vince, but England's lack of a test-class spinner has given him the job by default.

Plunkett's bowling won't let England down and he's a useful bat. Jordan needs to bowl short spells full out- 138kph won't work for him at test level. One of them will be making way for Stokes in due course, but it's good to see the selectors have not thrown Buttler in yet. Neither his batting nor his keeping are test quality at the moment.

It's a decent young side. I hope they play well.

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (June 11, 2014, 21:24 GMT)

Really happy about this [the batting positions]; Root is neither an opener nor a number 3 for tests (yet!) and if playing should be down in the middle. Also glad they stuck with Prior, but he must get his form back.

Posted by jackiethepen on (June 11, 2014, 18:24 GMT)

Bell wanted to bat at 3 after Trott departed but he was rebuffed. He's been advised to alter his ambitions to No 4. Root is being held in abeyance to see how he will benefit from playing down the order instead of opening/No 3. Bell has always been the dogsbody of the side. He's ready to bat at 3 but won't get the chance. A rubbish decision. As for temporary v/c. What is that supposed to mean? Afraid to identify him as a possible rival to Cook? It's ridiculous, Tresco was v/c but never became captain. It means nothing. Just so Bell knows his place? I thought Moores had more independence but this smacks of Flower's influence behind the scenes - just as he planned when he advanced the case for Moores instead of Giles.

Posted by smartjude on (June 11, 2014, 17:11 GMT)

I think when I see this England side they badly need a player like Graham Thorpe who can attack the spinners well & score some valuable runs playing some classical left-handed shots in the middle order & there is no any pressure to Sri Lanka with this kind of English team, not to forget they don't have any specialist spinner (Moeen Ali 1st class ave more than 40+) tough luck England Good luck Lions

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
England v Sri Lanka at Leeds - Jun 20-24, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 100 runs
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - Jun 12-16, 2014
Match drawn
Northants v Sri Lankans at Northampton - Jun 5-8, 2014
Match drawn
England v Sri Lanka at Birmingham - Jun 3, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - May 31, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 7 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days