Australia v NZ, Champions Trophy, Group A, Edgbaston

Warner took it on the chin - Bailey

Nagraj Gollapudi at Edgbaston

June 12, 2013

Comments: 27 | Text size: A | A

David Warner performs his 12th man duties, Australia v New Zealand, Champions Trophy, Group A, Edgbaston, June 12, 2013
David Warner was reduced to water-boy against New Zealand © AFP

George Bailey, Australia's stand-in captain, has called the alleged altercation involving David Warner as a "minor" incident and though it was "disappointing" he felt the issue had been dealt with properly by Cricket Australia.

Even before persistent showers in Birmingham had forced the Australia-New Zealand match to be abandoned, the Warner issue had taken centre stage.

Later in the evening Bailey, whose deputising for an injured Michael Clarke, walked into the media conference room with smile that never left his face during the eight minutes his questioning lasted. He knew cricket was the last thing the media was interested in. He did not look nervous. He went about his job in the seamless fashion he had in the morning while repairing the early damage inflicted on the Australia top order by New Zealand. Regardless of what his critics might say, Bailey is your blue collar worker, who will report to work every day, put up a smile, no matter how grave the situation.

And Wednesday was a grave one even if Bailey tried to impress that it was nothing like that. Kate Hutchison, the Australia media manager, alerted the media in a brief and direct message that Bailey would not be allowed to speak publicly on the Warner issue considering the matter was going to be heard at a Cricket Australia's code of conduct hearing soon.

Although it was an expected first line of defence, a brief moment of silence ensued after Hutchison had tried hard to draw the curtain to protect Bailey from making any unwanted comment. Smile intact still, Bailey looked around in anticipation for a reaction as the flash lights dazzled on him. Ian O'Brien, the former New Zealand fast bowler, covering the tournament as a radio commentator, broke the intrigue as he mocked a walkout by saying "right, no questions then," making everyone in the room including Bailey, but barring Hutchsion, erupt into loud laughter.

With everyone at ease, Bailey was asked if the Warner incident had disturbed the team in any point before or during the New Zealand match, considering the news was made public by both Cricket Australia and the ECB on the morning before the game. Bailey said it had not affected the team in any way since the alleged incident had occurred "a few days" ago, which is when he was made aware of it. "It's been dealt with from my point of view," Bailey said. "It's disappointing, but a very minor incident and it's been dealt with in house and that's it."

According to Bailey, it was not at all difficult to arrive at Edgbaston to play what was an important match for Australia, who had lost their first match of the Champions Trophy against England last Saturday: "Very comfortable. Very easy. The situation for us, believe it or not, was bigger than this - it was about making sure we won this game to stay in the tournament and play some better cricket than we had against England. And with this sort of a result I am still not sure if we have done that."

Brendon McCullum on the Warner issue

  • As the day wore along, cricket became insignificant. Even Brendon McCullum, the New Zealand captain admitted that the Warner issue would be the "first question" he would have to address after the match. Although he had heard "whispers" McCullum decided the leave the difficult questions aside.
  • "I don't really want to speak on what is going on with no concrete evidence," McCullum said. "We knew that Australia were a good team regardless whether Dave Warner was opening the batting or not. Our foucs was very much on how we were going to go about playing our game rather than worry about what was going on in the other team."
  • New Zealand are no strangers to off-field incidents. McCullum did not want to play the role of a counselor, but said such incidents did not necessarily destabalise teams, but instead strengthen the unit. "We've had some issues in the past as well. It is never great. It depends on how good your team spirit is and how good your structure is to be able to fight your way through. And sometimes things like these can galvanise the team."

Asked to describe the kind of team-mate Warner was, Bailey gave a positive appraisal. "I love playing cricket with him," he said. "I love his enthusiasm. Love his energy around the group. Love the way he plays. Wish I had the talent that he does. He is a particularly generous team-mate, very giving. I'm looking forward to playing lot more cricket with him in whatever cricket I have."

Even if Hutchison shook her head in annoyance, the questions did not stop. Does Warner have a short fuse? "No, not at all," Bailey said. Were there any occasions where he crossed what Bailey regarded as acceptable line? "No, I don't think so, no. No, not at all. This is the best defense I've got," Bailey said cheekily.

To the surprise of many, Warner had come to the ground despite an early morning CA release which had indicated that he had been dropped for the New Zealand match. He joined the team-mates in the warm-up and acted as twelfth man generously while being pleasant to everyone around.

Bailey ruled out the suggestion about whether the team management had decided to leave Warner back at the hotel instead of asking him to carry the drinks. "No, certainly not from the team perspective. It's been dealt with. I thought he took it on the chin, and he's had a cheer around the group, so it was outstanding. No pun intended. Sorry about that," Bailey said, insisting the fact the the mood in the Australian dressing room was "very normal".

The absence of Clarke has taken its toll in both the batting and the leadership areas despite the honest work of Bailey. Bailey said that having "Pup" would no doubt inject a heavy dose of inspiration but said there was no point speculating considering he was not yet ready to play.

"Well, as a balance, we'd love to have him around, no doubt about that," Bailey said. "But there's no point in having him around if it's not beneficial to A, his back, or B, him getting into a situation where he cannot play for us, so, not really. I think we're at the stage now where, as a growing team, having one person there or not there shouldn't make or break how we play."

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ygkd on (June 14, 2013, 7:41 GMT)

I have no problem with cheering other teams. I will happily support any team that is deserving of support. The problem I have with Australia, and I indeed am born-and-bred here, is that a number of the players who are temperamentally and behaviourally worthy of support have not had much of a look-in at times. That is why the team lacks leadership. That is why these things happen now. People talk of previous times when a young player or two went awry, only to knuckle down and succeed after all. Yes, but look at the core group in those teams and look at it now and you may see a big difference in team culture. The description of "a giant crèche" is apt and one that the proverbial Blind Freddy could surely see. This is why it should not surprise if a run of ill-from coincides with ill-behaviour. It is far easier to paper over the cracks when you're winning. However, papering over the cracks only allows them, un-noticed, to grow even bigger.

Posted by Fine_Legs on (June 13, 2013, 16:53 GMT)

Adversity always seems to bring out the best in an Australian side - as an Indian who loves watching the Aussies play England, I have no doubt that the Ashes will be hard-fought,whatever the starting premise with regard to relative strengths. Warner is talented, and in the end, talent always comes through. I remember way back in the nineties, Ricky Ponting had a similar episode in an Indian bar, and boy, did he mature fast and well. If I was an Aussie fan, I would look at this whole episode in a positive light.

Posted by Big_Maxy_Walker on (June 13, 2013, 15:11 GMT)

To me Warner, Wade and Hughes do not have the runs on the board for the Ashes. Bailey seems a man of character who rises to a challenge. I would bring him and Steve Smith into the XI. Watson, Rogers, Khawaja, Smith, Clarke, Bailey, Haddin, Pattinson, Harris, Lyon, Bird

Posted by muzika_tchaikovskogo on (June 13, 2013, 13:29 GMT)

I only hope that these off-field events don't cause any unnecessary distractions for the Australians. The last thing anyone wants is a distracted, listless Australian side contesting an ashes. I'm hoping for a tough contest where the better side wins.

Posted by sweetspot on (June 13, 2013, 12:09 GMT)

We're all sure Warner can take this on the chin, but we're not sure if he should be dishing it out for others to take it on their chins! From what we've seen of Warner, he's a pretty sporting character, and a wonderful cricketer, who is sorting out form issues at the moment. Sometimes too much is made out of the physicality of a reaction, and too little is made out of what provoked it. I'm curious to know what might have made him throw that punch. Joe Root isn't particularly big, so I'm not surprised he missed it, but the point has been made on Dave Warner and let's hope he doesn't miss it.

Posted by TSJ07 on (June 13, 2013, 11:54 GMT)

The physical abuse by any PLAYER of any GAME is unacceptable and I'm happy that CA has dealt it appropriately.

Posted by KingOwl on (June 13, 2013, 11:48 GMT)

I can understand that this was a minor matter. Root is a puny guy. He is playing the match today against SL. If Warner, a pretty tough looking guy, really hit Root, I am sure Root would have ended up in hospital, not at the Oval playing SL. Time to move on!

Posted by   on (June 13, 2013, 11:22 GMT)

for a moment I thought Root took it on the chin!

Posted by Chris_P on (June 13, 2013, 10:35 GMT)

Big difference between you, George, & Warner. You have humility, know what it's like to earn your stripes & thankful for the opportunity presented to you. You also present yourself with dignity & accept criticism without issues. The other person is living a life that far outstrips his underperforming deeds & his actions are akin to a wild spoilt brat. Huge difference, bud.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose
Tournament Results
England v India at Birmingham - Jun 23, 2013
India won by 5 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Cardiff - Jun 20, 2013
India won by 8 wickets (with 90 balls remaining)
England v South Africa at The Oval - Jun 19, 2013
England won by 7 wickets (with 75 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at The Oval - Jun 17, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 20 runs
England v New Zealand at Cardiff - Jun 16, 2013
England won by 10 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days