Sachin Tendulkar's ODI stats analysis December 23, 2012

Way ahead of the pack

Sachin Tendulkar achieved the kind of batting numbers which are likely to remain records by some distance

Sachin Tendulkar's numbers are staggering in both forms of the game, but the margin by which he is ahead of the pack in ODIs is truly mindboggling. Let alone equalling or surpassing some of his records, it's possible that no batsman will even come close to his stats. To start with, Tendulkar's overall ODI aggregate is 18,426, which is almost 35% more than the next-best, Ricky Ponting's 13,704. His 49 ODI centuries is 63% better than the second-highest, Ponting's 30. With Sourav Ganguly, he added 8227 partnership runs, 50% more than Marvan Atapattu and Sanath Jayasuriya's 5462. His 26 century stands with Ganguly is 62.5% better than the 16 that Matthew Hayden and Adam Gilchrist managed. (There are several others - biggest partnership, most matches, most Man-of-the-Match awards, for example - which are available with a few clicks on ESPNcricinfo's record pages.)

Tendulkar was able to create such a distance between him and the next-best by, obviously, playing over a long period - his is the longest career in ODI history - but also by doing so at a ridiculously high standard almost throughout that period. It helped also, that he opened the innings through most of his career as an ODI batsman, which gave him the best opportunity to score runs and rack up hundreds. His outstanding batsmanship, which combined tight defence with an ability to score freely all round the wicket with minimal risk against different bowling attacks in different conditions, ensured he maximised those opportunities to score runs. Along the way he also became the first batsman to score 200 in an ODI innings.

Tendulkar's ODI career changed when he moved from the middle order to open the innings. The first time he did so was in his fifth match of 1994, against New Zealand in Auckland. He scored 82 off 49 balls - a strike rate of 167.34 - in a match in which no other batsman who faced more than 12 balls managed a rate of 75. India won the match with 160 balls to spare - their eighth-largest victory margin in terms of balls remaining - and it was clear that India had unearthed an option which could be of immense value to them in limited-overs cricket. None could have imagined at the time, though, that Tendulkar would end with such staggering numbers.

From the moment he started opening, his ODI career graph swung upwards and stayed high almost throughout his career. From March 27, 1994, which was the first time he opened, he averaged 47.08 in 394 matches, at a strike rate of 87.71. During this period he didn't open the batting in 50 matches, and in those games his average fell to 36.70.

Sachin Tendulkar's ODI career
Period ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Before 1994 65 1679 31.09 74.32 0/ 12
1994 to Dec 2000 198 8220 45.66 88.96 27/ 38
Jan 2001 onwards 200 8527 48.17 86.41 22/ 46
Career 463 18,426 44.83 86.23 49/ 96

The opening act
Among all openers who scored 8000-plus ODI runs, Tendulkar's average is the highest; in fact, even with a 6000-run cut-off, no opener has an average of more than 42 - Gary Kirsten's 41.80 is the second-best. Apart from the high average and strike rate, the other stat that stands out for Tendulkar is his conversion rate of fifties into hundreds: he has 45 centuries and 75 half-centuries, a fifties to hundreds ratio of 1.67. Among openers with at least 6000 runs, the only ones with comparable ratios were Herschelle Gibbs (18 centuries and 24 fifties, ratio 1.33) and Saeed Anwar (20 hundreds and 37 fifties, ratio 1.85). All the others had ratios of more than two, with some of the top names (Haynes, Ganguly, Gilchrist) scoring three fifties per century. Thus, while it's true that Tendulkar was given the opportunity to make big scores thanks to his batting position, he also utilised that much better than most other openers.

Openers with more than 8000 runs in ODIs
Batsman Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar 340 15,310 48.29 88.05 45/ 75
Sanath Jayasuriya 383 12,740 34.61 92.48 28/ 66
Adam Gilchrist 259 9200 36.50 98.02 16/ 53
Sourav Ganguly 236 9146 41.57 73.59 19/ 58
Desmond Haynes 237 8648 41.37 63.09 17/ 57
Chris Gayle 217 8184 40.71 84.83 20/ 44
Saeed Anwar 220 8156 39.98 79.93 20/ 37

Australia's tormentor
Tendulkar was often at his best against the best team of his generation, Australia. He scored 3077 runs against them at 44.59, which is 36% more than the second-best aggregate against them. The highlights were obviously the 143 and 134 in Sharjah in 1998, a year which was his best in ODIs: he scored 1894 runs at 65.31, including nine centuries. Both, the runs scored and the hundreds remain a record for a calendar year.

Even apart from those two Sharjah classics, he had seven hundreds against Australia, the last one being 175 - his highest against Australia - three years ago in Hyderabad. Tendulkar's nine hundreds is also record for a batsman against one opposition. (Tendulkar also has eight hundreds against Sri Lanka, while no other batsman has more than seven against an opposition.)

The one glitch in Tendulkar's stats, though, are his ODI numbers in Australia: just one century in 46 innings, and a below-par average of 34.67. Unlike in Tests, where he averages more than 50 against Australia both home and away, in ODIs Tendulkar's best against them came in the subcontinent: in Asia he average 55.30 against them in 40 innings, with eight centuries, but outside Asia he averaged 29.82 against them, with one century in 30 innings.

Highest run-scorers in ODIs against Australia
Batsman ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar 71 3077 44.59 84.74 9/ 15
Desmond Haynes 64 2262 40.39 65.14 6/ 13
Viv Richards 54 2187 50.86 84.63 3/ 20
Brian Lara 51 1858 39.53 76.58 3/ 15
Kumar Sangakkara 44 1706 42.65 77.02 1/ 12
Jacques Kallis 50 1660 34.58 72.87 1/ 13
Jonty Rhodes 55 1610 40.25 77.92 0/ 10
Richie Richardson 51 1498 32.56 63.26 0/ 15

World Cup superstar
In the biggest tournament in the format, Tendulkar was usually at his best. His overall World Cup tally of 2278 is the best, and he is also the only batsman to twice aggregate more than 500 in a World Cup tournament - he scored 673 in 2003, a record for a single World Cup, and 523 in 1996. Only four other batsmen have touched 500 even once in a World Cup. Tendulkar's nine Man-of-the-Match awards is also a World Cup record, three clear of the second-placed Glenn McGrath.

Apart from his World Cup heroics, Tendulkar also finished with a great record in tournament finals, though there was a period between 1999 and 2004 when he appeared to struggle in them. Overall he averaged more than 54 in tournament finals, with six hundreds in 39 innings.

Highest averages among batsmen with 1000+ runs in World Cups
Batsman Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Viv Richards 21 1013 63.31 85.05 3/ 5
Sachin Tendulkar 44 2278 56.95 88.98 6/ 15
Herschelle Gibbs 23 1067 56.15 87.38 2/ 8
Sourav Ganguly 21 1006 55.88 77.50 4/ 3
Mark Waugh 22 1004 52.84 83.73 4/ 4
Jacques Kallis 32 1148 45.92 74.40 1/ 9
Ricky Ponting 42 1743 45.86 79.95 5/ 6
Javed Miandad 30 1083 43.32 68.02 1/ 8
Brian Lara 33 1225 42.24 86.26 2/ 7

The matchwinner
It was often said about Tendulkar that his big scores didn't lead to team wins, but stats reveal something quite different: Tendulkar scored 33 of his 49 centuries in wins, and averaged more than 56 in team wins, at a strike rate of 90. Among those who scored at least 5000 runs in wins, only Lara and Richards have higher averages. In terms of hundreds scored in wins, Ponting is next with 25.

However, it's also true that Tendulkar's 14 centuries in defeats is a record too, five clear of Chris Gayle, who's next with nine. In defeats, though, Tendulkar's average dropped to 33.25 at a strike rate of 79.86. Clearly, in the overall context of his lengthy career, his runs led to wins more often that not. As mentioned earlier, no player has won as many Man-of-the-Match awards either - Tendulkar has 62, while the next-best is Jayasuriya with 48.

Highest averages in wins in ODIs (Qual: 5000 runs in wins)
Batsman Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Brian Lara 134 6553 61.82 86.32 16/ 42
Viv Richards 114 5129 56.98 93.01 11/ 32
Sachin Tendulkar 231 11,157 56.63 90.31 33/ 59
Mohammad Yousuf 151 6426 55.87 78.59 14/ 41
Sourav Ganguly 147 6938 55.06 77.87 18/ 41
Michael Clarke 134 5084 52.95 80.62 4/ 42

Partnerships, and percentage of team runs scored
With Ganguly, Tendulkar added 8227 partnership runs at 47.55, with 26 century stands - the runs scored and the hundred stands are the highest. Tendulkar also put together 4000-plus runs with Virender Sehwag (4387 runs at 39.16) and Rahul Dravid (4117 runs at 44.26). Tendulkar's thus the only batsman to put together 4000-plus runs with three different partners; Ganguly and Dravid are the only others to do so with two different partners.

Overall, Tendulkar scored 19.24% of the total bat runs that India scored in the matches he played in his entire ODI career (18,426 runs out of 95,765). After he first opened the batting on March 27, 1994, the percentage increased to 20.08 (16,668 out of 83,008). For Ganguly, that percentage was 17.61%, for Haynes 19.58, for Anwar 18.19, for Hayden 17.49 and for Gayle 18.41%.

Apart from his obvious batting exploits, there was also Tendulkar the bowler, who chipped in quite usefully more than once. His 154 ODI wickets puts him in 11th place among Indian bowlers, just one short of Ashish Nehra and three away from Manoj Prabhakar.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Mike on December 26, 2012, 21:47 GMT

    Tendulkar is the God of patha wickets! Scoring centuries off fearsome attacks on lively pitches like India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka!

  • Mike on December 26, 2012, 21:46 GMT

    Jacques Kallis is the TRUE God of cricket. Batting, bowling and fielding. SRT is a false prophet!

  • Harmon on December 26, 2012, 18:48 GMT

    @Jonty King: On what basis do you say that it was Sachin who did not fancy it? You were not privy to the discussions the team would have had at that time. May be Sachin said yes to opening but Dravid felt he was more suited to do it and so asked for it? May be the captain and coach too felt Dravid was most suitable for the job. I now ask you one thing - why did Dravid never ask for the ball when India were in the need of wickets? Why was Sachin the usual go-to bowler to break partnerships when India needed wickets? Why does Sachin have 154 ODI wickets while Dravid has none (may be 2-3). Does this mean Dravid was not concerned about the team? If anything this shows that Sachin was keen to contribute to the team's cause as a batsman as well as a bowler while Dravid wanted to contribute as a batsman only - at most 1 position higher at very rare times. The answer for this is, they all do what they can do the best. Dravid can open much better & Sachin can bowl much better. End of Story.

  • Niles on December 26, 2012, 16:38 GMT

    Why do people even continue to rate Sir Don Bradman in the same class as SRT and BCL? Bradman played in two countries and against England almost always. He never played in sub-continent or West Indies, or even South Africa. No denying he was good but even Stuart Broad has at least 1 run scored in the Caribbean.

  • Ankit on December 26, 2012, 15:16 GMT

    @ bowman11....mate, I haven't seen anyone make a more blatant contradiction of ideas in the same post as you. On the one hand, you claim that most of SRT's records are because of his longevity and his average is falling "b/c everyones does once they are past their best as SRT is well & truely". And in the very next paragraph, you are claiming that "All the above batsman would have similar records to SRT if they played for 23 years".....If everyone's average falls once they are past their best, then how can others have "similar records to SRT" if they played for 23 years? Or are you making the outrageous claim that all of these batsmen would have scored at exactly the same rate for the duration of their careers in today's hectic schedules in as many venues against as many opposition as SRT has played in? Look, there is no denying that Bradman is the greatest of them all but you are seriously kidding only yourself if you don't believe that SRT is one of the top 5-6 batsmen of all time.

  • hot on December 26, 2012, 14:31 GMT

    SRT is the best batsman ever!!carrying burden of more than a billion people is astonishing!!no cricketer EVER had that burden..He has received standing ovation everytime he went out to bat in ENG,AUS,SA for the past 3 tours..have u seen any other batsmen get the same respect?! not even their own players received such applause..POWER of SRT!!agree with HANIF MOHAMMAD,legendery pak cricketer saying that he is better than BRADMAN..listen to the comments of the greats who have played the game rather than voicing ur pointless opinions!!

  • T on December 26, 2012, 14:30 GMT

    @alarky - xyz played in this position, abc played in that ground... but tell me who is GOD of cricket?? is there any one person u recommend, then we can have little talk... all said and done why is none having avg MOM better than the SRT (a.k.a GOD)...76 in 650 matches...

  • T on December 26, 2012, 14:15 GMT

    @bowman11 - read all the comments/history of God, at once before you comes one with stats again.. the bogus stats.. multiply by 4, divide by 3, add few 100s, ignore the stats of those ground, consider only the even dates etc etc....ONE simple question, why were your greats UNABLE to play after whatever time they played? did SRT go and stop them all???? but to talk in ur own mathematics terms (or law of nature), if they had played a little more they wud have had all their avgs age will bring that simple state can be an avg-MOM, GOD has 76 in 650odd all aspects SRT = GOD, period.....

  • T on December 26, 2012, 14:08 GMT

    @Jonty King - if MoMs are subjective, why others did nt get??? when it comes to SRT all things are normal.. but none of your greats could achieve the same... enuff said SRT is the BOSS/ GOD / Maestro..PERIOD..........

  • Harmon on December 26, 2012, 14:04 GMT

    Some ppl here say that Sachin has got these records only cos he played for 23 years (and somehow a 23 year long career does not count, so does that mean a 6 month long career is the best for eg Basit Ali?). I want you to check out how the other stand up vis-a-vis Sachin when it comes to reaching the landmarks. IIRC Sachin has reached 9k, 10k, 11k, 12k, 13k in both formats faster than anyone else. So it is clear that even at mutually equal points in career Sachin has had the better of the others. Yep there will always be someone who will beat Sachin on one parameter or the other but on a whole, Sachin is miles ahead. Based on his record, most ppl would say Sachin is the greatest ODI player of all times and most of the rest would say he is def among the top 3 of all times. It would be a highly biased person or a very blind person who would not see Sachin as either the greatest ODI batsman of all times or amongst the top 2 or 3.....