No. 40

Gilchrist walks

An Australian giving his wicket away? At the World Cup? Truth is often stranger than fiction

John Stern

September 20, 2009

Comments: 27 | Text size: A | A

Adam Gilchrist is about to go for his famous walk, Australia v Sri Lanka, World Cup semi-final, Port Elizabeth, 18 March, 2003
Walker on the storm © Getty Images
Related Links
News : To walk or not to walk?
Players/Officials: Adam Gilchrist
Series/Tournaments: ICC World Cup
Teams: Australia
Other links: 50 Magic Moments

Port Elizabeth, 18 March 2003

Australians only walk when their car has run out of petrol. But in the 2003 World Cup, Adam Gilchrist disproved that theory with an act of sportsmanship that generated almost universal approval along cricket supporters, and general bemusement, not to say disquiet, in the Australian dressing room.

It was the semi-final, and Gilchrist attempted to sweep the offspin of Aravinda de Silva, got a thin edge onto his pad and was caught behind. Rudi Koertzen, the umpire, did not respond to Sri Lanka's appeals but Gilchrist did. He paused, waited for the umpire's decision - or non-decision - then turned and headed for the pavilion.

It was an astonishing moment, partly because it was an Australian, partly because it was such an important game, and partly because the nature of that type of dismissal is rarely clear-cut.

Gilchrist's decision had no bearing on the result - Australia won comfortably - but it seemed to be a symbol of a more enlightened, free-spirited approach in the post-Waugh era. Of course, under duress these good intentions can go out of the window; there weren't many Australians walking in the 2005 Ashes.

There were some dissenting voices about Gilchrist's action. Some, like Angus Fraser, objected to him being canonised simply for not cheating. Others thought that he walked almost by accident; that having played his shot he overbalanced in the direction of the pavilion and simply carried on going. Both are harsh judgments. It was a remarkable occurrence, and one that should be held as an example to all cricketers.

John Stern is editor of the Wisden Cricketer. This article was first published in the print version of Cricinfo Magazine

RSS Feeds: John Stern

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Somerset-Richard on (September 22, 2009, 15:34 GMT)

Apart from Gilly's obvious ability to score test match runs at a very fast rate, and being a genuine all-round wicketkeeper-batsman, the reputation for being one of only a few "walkers" is why he is one of the most admired Aussie cricketers amongst us Poms.

Posted by sandeepberry on (September 21, 2009, 22:49 GMT)

What can you say? Gillly is a giant amongst men. This is a trait which sets him apart from other cricketers. he embodies what the sport is all about. Good on yer

Posted by smitu on (September 21, 2009, 18:01 GMT)

I think so one shouldn't walk, until the decision given is pathetic. Because no bowler will give you a second chance if you're given out incorrectly-which happens quite often. In most cases, the correct decisions and the wrong decisions even out over a span of few years. The other point is that, no batsmen is going to walk when he needs his wicket the most. Would Gilchrist have walked in an innings where he desperately needed to score runs to keep a place in the team....???

Posted by number-09 on (September 21, 2009, 12:42 GMT)

And Brian walked irrespective of the nature of the game. Any credit for that.

Posted by number-09 on (September 21, 2009, 12:39 GMT)

Geez, Gilchrist walking is a revelation? Viv Richards walked as soon as he nicked a ball. Lara was known for disappearing from the crease a soon as he nicked the ball, and before the umpire knew what was happening. And it was a frequent occurrence and one we thought nothing of.

Posted by bingohaley on (September 21, 2009, 11:51 GMT)

Yes definitely the most sporting gesture was that of Vishy to recall Taylor. Vishy was probably among the last gentlemen who played the sport!

Posted by BiSONN on (September 21, 2009, 11:07 GMT)

Loving this feature! Great to remember such memorable moments in cricket, and yes, this truly was one of them!

Keep up the great work. Looking forward to the next magic moment :)

Posted by Dalxy on (September 21, 2009, 4:23 GMT)

There is no mention of "walking" in Spirit of Cricket (the preamble to the Laws of Cricket). However "to appeal knowing that the batsman is not out" is against the spirit of the game, and I believe (I may be wrong) that Gilchrist did this more times than he walked. I'm not saying he is a bad bloke, but it is worth a thought.

Posted by Timu on (September 21, 2009, 3:04 GMT)

I thinks its unfair to look down on batsman who choose not to walk. I find that those sort of comments usually come from people who haven't played the game very much. The reality of batting is that you get a lot of calls that go against you, and alot that also go with you. Ive been out caught off my pads and off bump balls, LBW of inside edges, even LBW dancing down the wicket! Conversely Ive also been not out when Ive nicked the ball through to the keeper, and Im sure Ive been lucky with LBWs more then my fair share as well. In the end, your luck tends to even out, both as a batter and a bowler. As long as your happy to accept the umpires mistakes, whether it be for you or against you, then I don't see it as bad sportsmanship. I think its the least complicated way for everyone, umpires and players.

Posted by SoftwareStar on (September 20, 2009, 22:46 GMT)

happy that he walked.. it is a very hard thing to do.. but is this such a big issue to be written about as a magic moment? i remember 2 other people who always walked; Gundappa Vishwanath and Brian Lara and they never seem to get any credit for it. i think GRV's golden jubilee test's gesture was a much more magical moment than this.. why are the cricinfo authors so short-sighted..?

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
John SternClose
John Stern John Stern is editor of the Wisden Cricketer, the world's largest selling cricket magazine. Having cut his journalistic teeth at the legendary Reg Hayter's sports-writing academy in Fleet Street, he spent four years on the county treadmill for the London Times. He joined Wisden in 2001 and was deputy editor of Wisden Cricket Monthly at the time of its merger with the Cricketer in 2003 to form TWC.

    How to construct an ODI chase

Michael Bevan: Focus on targets smaller than winning the match, and back your tailenders to deliver for you

Ten things different at this World Cup

And one that will be the same. A look at what has changed since 2011. By Alan Gardner

    You're not so big now, brother

ESPNcricinfo XI: When unfavoured teams trounced stronger ones at the World Cup

    Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

Ian Chappell: India's batting is going the way of their bowling, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

Who is the BBL aimed at?

Michael Jeh: There's nothing wrong with the quality of the cricket on offer, but the bells and whistles surrounding it are intrusive and overwhelming

News | Features Last 7 days

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

44 balls, 16 sixes, 149 runs

Stats highlights from an incredible day in Johannesburg, where AB de Villiers smashed the record for the fastest ODI ton

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

India's batting is going the way of their bowling in Australia, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

Why cricket needs yellow and red cards

David Warner's repeated transgressions tell us that the game has a discipline problem that has got out of hand

News | Features Last 7 days