December 20, 2009

Sri Lanka in good shape despite injuries

A balanced selection for the second ODI allowed the team to bounce back from the defeat in Rajkot; their debutant bowlers impressed, as did the middle order
  shares 15

No one can complain they were not royally entertained during the first two games of what has the potential to develop into a titanic five-match series. Fears that Sri Lanka might fade after a Test defeat and in the face of Virender Sehwag's explosive pyrotechnics have proved unfounded. Sri Lanka have reacted positively to the challenge, meeting aggression with aggression and showing they are here to fight to the very end.

It is refreshing to see a Sri Lanka team unafraid to make bold decisions. In the past they have often made the mistake of leaning towards the safer options. However, during the past week Kumar Sangakkara has led the team really well. He's looked calm and has been thinking on his feet on the field, trying to counter India's batsmen. Importantly, he's been unafraid to back his young guns in selection. It has been the tonic the team needed.

I felt excited when I heard the team for the second game. Although the strategy nearly worked in the end, I was not in favour of the eight-man batting line-up in Rajkot. The thinking was understandable, with Muttiah Muralitharan and Lasith Malinga both unavailable. On a postcard-sized ground always tipped to produce a run-fest, it was tempting to go with the experience of Sanath Jayasuriya over Ajantha Mendis, and then have extra batting firepower. However, the 21 overs bowled by Jayasuriya, Angelo Mathews, Thilina Kandamby and Tillakaratne Dilshan went for 211 runs. An extra frontline bowler might have made a difference.

So the team for the second game was more balanced, with extra bowling options. This helps because India, especially Sehwag, have been ruthless in their targeting of the weaker links in Sri Lanka's attack. Sehwag tried to take the bowlers out of the game with military intent and that left Sangakkara with serious headaches. So with four frontline bowlers plus Mathews, who was shrewdly given the new ball in Nagpur to try and outmanoeuvre Sehwag, and Dilshan, the attack was stronger.

I also agreed with Thilan Samaraweera's omission from the Nagpur game. He has done really well for Sri Lanka over the past year and is in prime form, but he adds greater value to the team when conditions are more bowler-friendly. On the shirt-front pitches we've seen thus far, you need someone in the middle with greater strike power and Chamara Kapugedera fits the bill nicely. The selection also sharpened up their fielding, which has failed to create pressure for much of the tour, especially in the inner ring.

I was impressed with the two debutants, Suranga Lakmal and Suraj Randiv. Lakmal was raw but bowled with pace and heart. He's got some substance as a quick bowler and will only get better with exposure at this level. Randiv was very impressive. He's matured a lot and grown mentally stronger. He looked calm in the field and held his nerve well, so much so that Sangakkara trusted him with the Powerplay and the final over - a positive decision that paid off. He also look assured with the bat at a critical time, helping ensure Mathews was not forced to take unnecessary risks.

The Sri Lanka batting has obviously been dominated by Dilshan. Sri Lanka have given a free licence to the openers to go after the Indian bowlers. That tactic is paying dividends with Dilshan thriving. The move up the order has let him set the pace of the game. In his older position, in the middle order, his role was dictated by the state of the game but at the top he is freer. Like Jayasuriya for so many years, Dilshan settles after some early boundaries get him on his way.

Both Dilshan and Sehwag have played similar roles, putting their opponents under severe stress, tearing up gameplans and forcing the captains onto the back foot. In Nagpur, Dilshan's brilliant century forced Dhoni to use up the quotas of his best bowlers earlier than he would have liked and left Sri Lanka with the luxury of a Powerplay in the final overs. The main difference between the two Delhi Daredevils team-mates is that Sehwag has greater big-hitting options on the leg-side against the spinners, a limitation that Harbhajan Singh tries to exploit by bowling at Dilshan's pads.

Dilshan's hand-eye coordination has been awesome and he has also been smart, consolidating after getting set. The one criticism of him could be directed at his careless dismissal in the first game, which left Sri Lanka wobbling. Mahela Jayawardene was just new to the crease, Sri Lanka had scored heavily in the Powerplay, and it was Harbhajan's final over. Dilshan did not need to take the risk. However, to his credit, he made amends in Nagpur.

Losing the first game was a real blow. When Sangakkara was dismissed Sri Lanka needed 99 from 80 balls. With the track superb, the boundaries short and outfield fast, it should have been a breeze. Nine times out of 10 you would back yourself to win. However, as the wickets fell, the jitters came, as they often do when you start to see the finish line in a run-chase.

Both Dilshan and Sehwag have played similar roles, putting their opponents under severe stress, tearing up gameplans and forcing the captains onto the back foot. In Nagpur, Dilshan's brilliant century forced MS Dhoni to use up the quotas of his best bowlers earlier than he would have liked

I have no issues with Sri Lanka's decision to take the Powerplay when they did, although it coincided with the fall of wickets. The decision was the right one, with two batsmen well set and the run-rate still high. The problem was the execution. It is crucial in the Powerplays that you get your shot selection right; there is often the temptation to look for too much. You need to know where your hitting zones are and if the ball is not there, you need to make sure you steal a single at least.

There was still a mature stand between Kandamby and Mathews in the middle order, a partnership that shows plenty of promise for the future. They have the temperaments required to finish games, and with more experience they'll start doing that on a regular basis. When you are batting in the middle, you need to be able to hold your nerve because when you start getting near the target it's hard to stop fears creeping in. These two have the heads to cope with this pressure, although in Rajkot it was not to be.

The loss of Mathews for the rest of the series, the latest casualty in a very long list, will be a major blow. He has given the side balance and become a match-winner in the middle order, a trusted go-to man who has been steadily growing in stature. However, Sri Lanka do still have a word-class allrounder in Jayasuriya, who will need to come in for the Cuttack game and make his experience count.

The question will then be how Sri Lanka reorganise their attack without the seam bowling of Mathews. Cuttack might provide something different in terms of pitch conditions, so it will be an interesting selection conundrum. If a three-seamer attack is deemed necessary and an extra seamer is required, Lasith Malinga should be available. Then one of Mendis or Randiv will need to sit out.

Russel Arnold played 44 Tests and 180 ODIs for Sri Lanka between 1997 and 2007

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY DwightR on | December 22, 2009, 17:32 GMT

    SettingSun- Malinga was deemed not fit for tests, because his sling-action style bowling increases the risk of injury and playing tests would reduce the timeline on his playing career significantly..thats why the board has decided to use him only for ODI's and T20's.

  • POSTED BY SettingSun on | December 21, 2009, 19:25 GMT

    Can somebody tell me why Malinga is no longer playing tests? Every series they seem to have a different pace and seam attack.

  • POSTED BY DwightR on | December 21, 2009, 17:13 GMT

    well looks like a vintage SL middle-order collapse after all is said & done. the team selection must be questioned. Jayasuirya not being included hurt, the pitch favoured slow bowlers and his bowling would have helped considering mendis was hammered plus who knows if the collapase would have happened with him anchoring the middle innings. Even Samareweera an excellent batsmen of spin would have been a nice fit to counter the spin friendly conditions. Kapugerdera has not had a good ODI score in...to long to remember and mendis is clearly struggling. Also yes Where is Maharoof? with all the injuries and poor form of the current fast bowlers he deserves another shot in the squad, hell the way the sri lanka pace attack is going i'd even bring back Vaas for a series. this may sound like a rant but watchin this 3rd ODI was extremely frustrating to see SL slip back into old bad habits.

  • POSTED BY Shafi79 on | December 21, 2009, 7:20 GMT

    What really has happened to mahroof? Even before Mathews got injured i was wondering what Suranga Lakmal was doing in the side, surely Mahroof has to be considered better from what i saw of Lakamal, also during the T-20's Kaushalya Weeraratne was in the side, Mahroof is a way better player. I cant help but feel that Mahroof continously being omitted from the side has nothing to do with his on field abilities.

  • POSTED BY GemsBond on | December 21, 2009, 5:58 GMT

    Its not fare to compare these new guys with the likes of Sanath and Arvinda.If there would have been guts and temper than Sl would not have lost the rajkot game.Though the young guns are pretty good but not well enough to handle pressure except Mathews at some extent.They will take some time to be mature.If Sl wants to use Sanath they can better do by opting him as an opener in batting powerplay when ball is changed.

  • POSTED BY mysay on | December 21, 2009, 5:04 GMT

    Russels articles are a treat to read. It is sad to lose Mathews, but I believe the only real gun to replace him has to be Maharoof. Mendis should be cut out for the fact that Indians have played him far too often. Malinga has to be brought in and he should work on firing in his 140km yorkers in the power plays to stem the flow of runs. It is also good to see Sangakkara's positive batting approach. India is a tough team, but I'm proud to see Sri Lanka fighting tooth & nail. I only wish the pitches are more bowler friendly.

  • POSTED BY Alexk400 on | December 20, 2009, 20:07 GMT

    The reason SLA won because India lacks in batting in ODI. I do not trust kohli , raina or jadeja to score more than 50. So they can be bundled out so cheaply with line and length bowling. SLA can win at best 4-1 or worst win by 3-2.

    That does not mean SLA is good. I do not think SLA odi team is good. it is just that Indian bowling is horrible at present and batting without yuvi in middle , every one get exposed if sehwag do not score.

    Russ has unique cricketing mind. Voice need make over though. hahaha.

  • POSTED BY Nampally on | December 20, 2009, 18:52 GMT

    When you trade Dhoni for Mathews, SL is in better shape than India for the third ODI. After 2 very closely contested matches, it has been reduced to best of 3 . Sehwag Vs. Dilshan is the key match up. If either of these 2 men give their sides the start they deserve, then that side seems to win. The games so far have been totally dominated by the batsmen. The second ODI would have been much closer than it ended up as. Zaheer left a 4 thru' his legs and failed to make a possible catch of Mendis, giving 2 more runs. These 6 runs turned the tables in favour of SL. The Indian fielding and bowling left much to be desired. If India improves in these 2 departments then it will be tough for SL to win. The Indian pace bowlers & Harbhajan need to produce. On the SL side, the newcomer Randiv did well in his debut. If Dilshan fails in the next game, then SL will find it tough to win although Sanga & Jaya are batting well. So the next 3 games are well poised. The team holding its nerve will win.

  • POSTED BY Afta on | December 20, 2009, 15:14 GMT

    Absolutely spot on. I am so impressed with Russell Arnold's surgeon-like analysis. Barring all politics (which I doubt) he should be our future team manager, coach and a selector. Sri Lanka could look forward to a bright future. Well thought-out, brilliant.

  • POSTED BY dr_sachinfan_chennai on | December 20, 2009, 10:31 GMT

    Truly this Lankan O.D.I setup is wonderful. Dilshan is in his form of life. If Tharanga can consolidate his second coming, their middle order is best today along with S.As with veterans Sanga n Mahela and Kandamby n Kapu followed by Mathews. Bowling too is nice with Malinga, Murali n one of the other seamer or spinner as per demand. They ld be Team to beat in WC 11.

  • POSTED BY DwightR on | December 22, 2009, 17:32 GMT

    SettingSun- Malinga was deemed not fit for tests, because his sling-action style bowling increases the risk of injury and playing tests would reduce the timeline on his playing career significantly..thats why the board has decided to use him only for ODI's and T20's.

  • POSTED BY SettingSun on | December 21, 2009, 19:25 GMT

    Can somebody tell me why Malinga is no longer playing tests? Every series they seem to have a different pace and seam attack.

  • POSTED BY DwightR on | December 21, 2009, 17:13 GMT

    well looks like a vintage SL middle-order collapse after all is said & done. the team selection must be questioned. Jayasuirya not being included hurt, the pitch favoured slow bowlers and his bowling would have helped considering mendis was hammered plus who knows if the collapase would have happened with him anchoring the middle innings. Even Samareweera an excellent batsmen of spin would have been a nice fit to counter the spin friendly conditions. Kapugerdera has not had a good ODI score in...to long to remember and mendis is clearly struggling. Also yes Where is Maharoof? with all the injuries and poor form of the current fast bowlers he deserves another shot in the squad, hell the way the sri lanka pace attack is going i'd even bring back Vaas for a series. this may sound like a rant but watchin this 3rd ODI was extremely frustrating to see SL slip back into old bad habits.

  • POSTED BY Shafi79 on | December 21, 2009, 7:20 GMT

    What really has happened to mahroof? Even before Mathews got injured i was wondering what Suranga Lakmal was doing in the side, surely Mahroof has to be considered better from what i saw of Lakamal, also during the T-20's Kaushalya Weeraratne was in the side, Mahroof is a way better player. I cant help but feel that Mahroof continously being omitted from the side has nothing to do with his on field abilities.

  • POSTED BY GemsBond on | December 21, 2009, 5:58 GMT

    Its not fare to compare these new guys with the likes of Sanath and Arvinda.If there would have been guts and temper than Sl would not have lost the rajkot game.Though the young guns are pretty good but not well enough to handle pressure except Mathews at some extent.They will take some time to be mature.If Sl wants to use Sanath they can better do by opting him as an opener in batting powerplay when ball is changed.

  • POSTED BY mysay on | December 21, 2009, 5:04 GMT

    Russels articles are a treat to read. It is sad to lose Mathews, but I believe the only real gun to replace him has to be Maharoof. Mendis should be cut out for the fact that Indians have played him far too often. Malinga has to be brought in and he should work on firing in his 140km yorkers in the power plays to stem the flow of runs. It is also good to see Sangakkara's positive batting approach. India is a tough team, but I'm proud to see Sri Lanka fighting tooth & nail. I only wish the pitches are more bowler friendly.

  • POSTED BY Alexk400 on | December 20, 2009, 20:07 GMT

    The reason SLA won because India lacks in batting in ODI. I do not trust kohli , raina or jadeja to score more than 50. So they can be bundled out so cheaply with line and length bowling. SLA can win at best 4-1 or worst win by 3-2.

    That does not mean SLA is good. I do not think SLA odi team is good. it is just that Indian bowling is horrible at present and batting without yuvi in middle , every one get exposed if sehwag do not score.

    Russ has unique cricketing mind. Voice need make over though. hahaha.

  • POSTED BY Nampally on | December 20, 2009, 18:52 GMT

    When you trade Dhoni for Mathews, SL is in better shape than India for the third ODI. After 2 very closely contested matches, it has been reduced to best of 3 . Sehwag Vs. Dilshan is the key match up. If either of these 2 men give their sides the start they deserve, then that side seems to win. The games so far have been totally dominated by the batsmen. The second ODI would have been much closer than it ended up as. Zaheer left a 4 thru' his legs and failed to make a possible catch of Mendis, giving 2 more runs. These 6 runs turned the tables in favour of SL. The Indian fielding and bowling left much to be desired. If India improves in these 2 departments then it will be tough for SL to win. The Indian pace bowlers & Harbhajan need to produce. On the SL side, the newcomer Randiv did well in his debut. If Dilshan fails in the next game, then SL will find it tough to win although Sanga & Jaya are batting well. So the next 3 games are well poised. The team holding its nerve will win.

  • POSTED BY Afta on | December 20, 2009, 15:14 GMT

    Absolutely spot on. I am so impressed with Russell Arnold's surgeon-like analysis. Barring all politics (which I doubt) he should be our future team manager, coach and a selector. Sri Lanka could look forward to a bright future. Well thought-out, brilliant.

  • POSTED BY dr_sachinfan_chennai on | December 20, 2009, 10:31 GMT

    Truly this Lankan O.D.I setup is wonderful. Dilshan is in his form of life. If Tharanga can consolidate his second coming, their middle order is best today along with S.As with veterans Sanga n Mahela and Kandamby n Kapu followed by Mathews. Bowling too is nice with Malinga, Murali n one of the other seamer or spinner as per demand. They ld be Team to beat in WC 11.

  • POSTED BY dr_sachinfan_chennai on | December 20, 2009, 10:27 GMT

    Truly this Lankan O.D.I setup is wonderful. Dilshan is in his form of life. If Tharanga can consolidate his second coming, their middle order is best today along with S.As with Sanga n Mahela two stalwarts and Kandamby n Kapu followed by Mathews. Angelo will be most missed player for next 3 matches surely. Bowling too is nice with Malinga, Murali n one of the other seamer or spinner as per demand. They ld be Team to beat in WC 11.

  • POSTED BY mankya on | December 20, 2009, 10:15 GMT

    Yes!! Srilanka is in good shape despite injuries to their top players. Everyone talk about India for their win but I wonder why they dont talk about this inexperienced young Srilankan side. Chasing 400+ in the first ODI and getting close to it was superb. Cheers Srilanka!!!!

  • POSTED BY hsengiv86 on | December 20, 2009, 9:35 GMT

    what happened to maharoof as a replacement for mattews?

  • POSTED BY SLfan on | December 20, 2009, 9:06 GMT

    I think, the newcomer Thissara Perera should be given an opportunity in the next game, instead of Jayasuriya. Since Suraj Randiv & Ajantha Mendis are giving spin options for Sanga, we can play another 'Mathews type' player who can also bat down the order.

  • POSTED BY 9ST9 on | December 20, 2009, 8:07 GMT

    Regardless of the result of the ongoing series , it is very pleasing to see that Sri Lankas future looks bright. Matthews ( sadly out with an injury) has a great cricketing mind, and for a 22 year old displays immense maturity. Kandamby is showing what he promised so many years ago. This young side has lot of character. A SL side of the past would have gone down if 400+ was scored against them. But this unit fought it out really well. The current SL side is young and even if they lose, administrators shouldn't be too bothered. This team needs to be given more and more experience. Mendis needs to be given more opportunity. As soon as he concedes a few runs the think-tank get rid of him-which is unwise to do. The absence of murali has given the chance to try out some young blood.The only real concern is Kapugedara who at times doesn't put enough value on his wicket. Also Kulasekara is not altogether formidable in the flat indian decks.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY 9ST9 on | December 20, 2009, 8:07 GMT

    Regardless of the result of the ongoing series , it is very pleasing to see that Sri Lankas future looks bright. Matthews ( sadly out with an injury) has a great cricketing mind, and for a 22 year old displays immense maturity. Kandamby is showing what he promised so many years ago. This young side has lot of character. A SL side of the past would have gone down if 400+ was scored against them. But this unit fought it out really well. The current SL side is young and even if they lose, administrators shouldn't be too bothered. This team needs to be given more and more experience. Mendis needs to be given more opportunity. As soon as he concedes a few runs the think-tank get rid of him-which is unwise to do. The absence of murali has given the chance to try out some young blood.The only real concern is Kapugedara who at times doesn't put enough value on his wicket. Also Kulasekara is not altogether formidable in the flat indian decks.

  • POSTED BY SLfan on | December 20, 2009, 9:06 GMT

    I think, the newcomer Thissara Perera should be given an opportunity in the next game, instead of Jayasuriya. Since Suraj Randiv & Ajantha Mendis are giving spin options for Sanga, we can play another 'Mathews type' player who can also bat down the order.

  • POSTED BY hsengiv86 on | December 20, 2009, 9:35 GMT

    what happened to maharoof as a replacement for mattews?

  • POSTED BY mankya on | December 20, 2009, 10:15 GMT

    Yes!! Srilanka is in good shape despite injuries to their top players. Everyone talk about India for their win but I wonder why they dont talk about this inexperienced young Srilankan side. Chasing 400+ in the first ODI and getting close to it was superb. Cheers Srilanka!!!!

  • POSTED BY dr_sachinfan_chennai on | December 20, 2009, 10:27 GMT

    Truly this Lankan O.D.I setup is wonderful. Dilshan is in his form of life. If Tharanga can consolidate his second coming, their middle order is best today along with S.As with Sanga n Mahela two stalwarts and Kandamby n Kapu followed by Mathews. Angelo will be most missed player for next 3 matches surely. Bowling too is nice with Malinga, Murali n one of the other seamer or spinner as per demand. They ld be Team to beat in WC 11.

  • POSTED BY dr_sachinfan_chennai on | December 20, 2009, 10:31 GMT

    Truly this Lankan O.D.I setup is wonderful. Dilshan is in his form of life. If Tharanga can consolidate his second coming, their middle order is best today along with S.As with veterans Sanga n Mahela and Kandamby n Kapu followed by Mathews. Bowling too is nice with Malinga, Murali n one of the other seamer or spinner as per demand. They ld be Team to beat in WC 11.

  • POSTED BY Afta on | December 20, 2009, 15:14 GMT

    Absolutely spot on. I am so impressed with Russell Arnold's surgeon-like analysis. Barring all politics (which I doubt) he should be our future team manager, coach and a selector. Sri Lanka could look forward to a bright future. Well thought-out, brilliant.

  • POSTED BY Nampally on | December 20, 2009, 18:52 GMT

    When you trade Dhoni for Mathews, SL is in better shape than India for the third ODI. After 2 very closely contested matches, it has been reduced to best of 3 . Sehwag Vs. Dilshan is the key match up. If either of these 2 men give their sides the start they deserve, then that side seems to win. The games so far have been totally dominated by the batsmen. The second ODI would have been much closer than it ended up as. Zaheer left a 4 thru' his legs and failed to make a possible catch of Mendis, giving 2 more runs. These 6 runs turned the tables in favour of SL. The Indian fielding and bowling left much to be desired. If India improves in these 2 departments then it will be tough for SL to win. The Indian pace bowlers & Harbhajan need to produce. On the SL side, the newcomer Randiv did well in his debut. If Dilshan fails in the next game, then SL will find it tough to win although Sanga & Jaya are batting well. So the next 3 games are well poised. The team holding its nerve will win.

  • POSTED BY Alexk400 on | December 20, 2009, 20:07 GMT

    The reason SLA won because India lacks in batting in ODI. I do not trust kohli , raina or jadeja to score more than 50. So they can be bundled out so cheaply with line and length bowling. SLA can win at best 4-1 or worst win by 3-2.

    That does not mean SLA is good. I do not think SLA odi team is good. it is just that Indian bowling is horrible at present and batting without yuvi in middle , every one get exposed if sehwag do not score.

    Russ has unique cricketing mind. Voice need make over though. hahaha.

  • POSTED BY mysay on | December 21, 2009, 5:04 GMT

    Russels articles are a treat to read. It is sad to lose Mathews, but I believe the only real gun to replace him has to be Maharoof. Mendis should be cut out for the fact that Indians have played him far too often. Malinga has to be brought in and he should work on firing in his 140km yorkers in the power plays to stem the flow of runs. It is also good to see Sangakkara's positive batting approach. India is a tough team, but I'm proud to see Sri Lanka fighting tooth & nail. I only wish the pitches are more bowler friendly.