May 21, 2010

Where are Australia's spin discards?

They hoped to fill the void left by Warne and MacGill, but Casson, McGain, Cullen and Krejza are out of the picture now, though they will take heart from Hauritz's comeback
  shares 24

The uncertainty over Australia's spin situation has eased with the significant improvement of Nathan Hauritz and the emergence of Steven Smith, but the path for those who have been discarded remains unclear. Before Hauritz secured a spot in the Test side and the legspinner Smith arrived as the country's most exciting all-round prospect, the slow-bowling slot was a place for a flicker of excitement followed by wilderness misadventure.

Beau Casson and Bryce McGain received only one Test opportunity each, Jason Krejza got two, and Cameron White was employed for a series against India before leaving the trade and transforming into a valuable limited-overs batsman. White was the lucky one. He still plays for Australia, even though he doesn't even rate as a part-time twirler now.

The rest of that group would be ecstatic to complete a full season with their states. Throw in Dan Cullen, who played against Bangladesh in 2006, and the former specialist spin hopes are in various stages of physical and mental rehabilitation. It has been an unconventional method of grooming players who were previously rated so highly.

Offspinner Krejza is recovering from hip surgery that followed a summer in which he was dropped from Tasmania's Sheffield Shield team. Cullen has just lost his contract at South Australia and is wondering what to do next. Casson played only one first-class game before the rise of Smith and a debilitating bout of chronic fatigue ended his season.

Surprisingly, the one who did the worst in Tests has done the best at coming back, although the scale is relative. McGain, who traded places with Jon Holland in Victoria, finished 11th on the Shield wicket list with 26 at 32.50, including six in the final victory. But he won't play for Australia again, and not just for his figures of 0 for 149 against South Africa in Cape Town in March.

At 38, McGain is a season-by-season prospect with the Bushrangers, who have Holland as their youth policy. Holland, a left-arm orthodox, also suffered after being picked in Australia's one-day squad for the India tour late last year. He didn't play a game on that trip and ended the domestic season by having shoulder surgery.

The story of these men is similar to the path of Hauritz, who experienced a dramatic slide when he went from Test debutant to club player in the 2004-05 season. It led to him leaving Queensland for New South Wales and eventually winning his national spot back, a journey that is providing hope and inspiration to those who were cut so ruthlessly.

"It's a great story," Casson says of Hauritz's career. "He played his Test match quite young, went away and had some lean years, then has done very well. It's amazing how quickly things can change both ways. It's something every cricketer is holding on to, especially me as a spinner."

Hauritz was going to be 12th man for a New South Wales game Casson was playing in when he was called to replace the then-injured Krejza against New Zealand. After Krejza was ineffective on the final day in Perth a couple of weeks later, Hauritz came back and has become increasingly assured. He has taken 43 wickets in 11 Tests since the start of the Ashes.

All the rejected spinners of the past six years have sad stories, but Casson's is still moving two years later. Casson, a left-arm wrist spinner, was effectively sent on work experience under the watch of Stuart MacGill for the West Indies tour of 2008. He had finished the season strongly with New South Wales, capturing four wickets in New South Wales' final success, and wasn't expected to play a Test.

That all changed when MacGill retired mid-series, giving Casson a chance in the final match of the series, in Barbados. At the presentation of his baggy green he was teary, and when thinking back to that week he still feels chills and goosebumps. With the ball, he recovered after giving up 43 in seven first-innings overs to gain a composed 3 for 86 in the second.

After Warne and MacGill, spin bowling has returned to more traditional methods in Australia, but the leaders still expect wickets and find it hard to tolerate boundaries. The situation leaves the man with the ball unsure whether to defend or attack

Everyone outside the selection panel believed it was a performance that would earn his passage to India for a four-Test series. McGain, Krejza and White all went instead. Back home, things were becoming even harder as he struggled with New South Wales and then Hauritz catapulted into the Test team. Casson tumbled from Australia's No. 1 spinner to at least No. 5, and was soon struggling with his control so badly that in one game he was ordered out of the attack for high full-tosses. Last winter was spent in the outpost of Darwin club cricket to regain some form.

"That time in the West Indies is a time I'll never forget, the greatest moment in my cricketing career," Casson says. "Then the year after that definitely wasn't as planned. Coming back I wanted to try to do everything straight away and I wasn't patient. My form was probably a reflection of that." Earlier this year chronic fatigue kept Casson in bed for a couple of months and walking the three flights of stairs to his unit left him "pretty cooked". He is wishing for better next season, when his best chance is as a replacement if Smith stays in the Australian set-up. New South Wales have looked after Casson, but there are no guarantees.

"Naturally, I need performance. If there's performance on the board my opportunity will come," he says. "If I'm going well I will be a very good proposition with the side and I can help them win games." Similar thoughts bubble in the minds of Cullen, McGain, Holland and Cullen Bailey, South Australia's former Cricket Australia-contract holder.

The attack v defence dilemma
Shane Warne attended Cricket Australia's spin summit in Brisbane last week to talk mental and tactical aspects with the Centre of Excellence slow-bowling intake as well as other promising operators. Warne, the greatest modern spinner, has indirectly been one of the biggest problems for those following him.

Captains struggle to use slow men who don't have Warne's big turn and control. After Warne and MacGill, spin bowling has returned to more traditional methods in Australia, but the leaders still expect wickets and find it hard to tolerate boundaries. The situation leaves the man with the ball unsure whether to defend or attack.

Krejza has suffered from the dilemma after playing his Tests as an aggressive offie who gave the ball air and spun it hard. That worked in Nagpur, where he collected 12 wickets on debut, but not in Perth, where he gave away 4.25 an over as South Africa chased 414 for victory.

Hauritz was preferred because he was capable of greater control. At first he provided safety and balance to the attack, but has become more aggressive as he has gained belief. "Everyone needs to be able to perform both roles," John Davison, the Centre of Excellence spin coach, says. "Jason Krejza is really working with that now, finding out when he needs to be bowling his attacking lines and giving the ball plenty of air, versus when the team needs him to perform a holding-type role."

Over the past two years Davison has analysed Australia's talented spinners - he thinks Smith and Holland are the ones with the most potential - but he is also involved in the job of rehabilitating some of those who have already been tried. Cullen drifted by focusing on variations such as the doosra, which in turn ruined the strength of his offspinner. He asked Davison if he could attend the spin clinic last week, and heard Saqlain Mushtaq, the former Pakistan offspinner, say he had more success earlier in his career, when he was relying on his stock ball instead of the doosra he invented.

"Dan's been very technically focused, so we're trying to get him away from that a bit and back to the good old days when he first hit the scene," Davison says. "He was highly competitive, fiery, had a good offspinner and set good fields. We're trying to get him away from breaking down his action and being too critical of himself."

The message to spinners now is that you don't have to turn the ball in every direction, but you do need to be able to beat the bat on both sides. "If you can drift the ball in the air and get some to slide through and some to spin, which Graeme Swann does, you can still be effective," Davison says. "If you're only beating one side you're probably going to struggle."

The 2010 Academy intake includes specialist spinners in leggies Adam Zampa and Nathan Brain, Luke Doran, a left-arm orthodox, and Glenn Maxwell, an offspinning allrounder. Jason Floros and Nic Maddinson are batsmen who deliver turn on the side. Smith is also a part-time scholar but his life has quickly become crammed with overseas assignments and his appearances in Brisbane will be limited.

Smith, who is only 20, finished equal second on the World Twenty20 wicket list with 11, and for most of the rest of the winter will either be with Worcestershire or Australia's teams on their England trip. As well as being the new spin flavour, Smith has the added advantage of his quality batting skills, which make him an exciting and sensible all-round package. Modern Australian spinners have learned how important it is to have a solid back-up plan.

Peter English is the Australasia editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY ToMegaTherion1986 on | May 24, 2010, 0:35 GMT

    Spin bowling is real art form, because not only do you need to be able to produce something special, but you also need be completely on top of your control and flight. It is a really tough profession and one that can take many years to truely master.

    Becoming increasingly important in modern spin bowling though is the ability to 1: Control the accuracy and flight 2: And probably the most important, is to do the simple things well. Because on a day where the Doosra or Wrongun or whatever you want to bowl isn't working, you need that fall back option that won't conceed 6 runs an over. It is along with keeping the toughest career path for any young cricketer, but definately worth while.

    In reference to Australia's spin bowling options, selectors need to make the tough decisions to decide on who is good enough for international cricket. Simply Krejza was not ready, incredibly talented and i'm sure he will play again. But Hauritz and Smith are definitely the best we have right now.

  • POSTED BY popcorn on | May 22, 2010, 7:20 GMT

    I think Jason Krejza has been treated unfairly. He had a fantastic debut in India - a land of spin. To expect him to turn the ball on ANY pitch in Australia except the SCG is asking too much of him, or for that matter, any spinner in Australia.To groom spinners, Cricket Australia should send these spinners out to the subcontinent to hone their art.

  • POSTED BY s.sreekant on | May 22, 2010, 3:53 GMT

    i dont think smith should come in as a batsman who can bowl,if he does then he will become like white and will start thinking about his batting alone,will have a negative impact if he does not bowl in a match,he will start thinking that i am a batsman i dont need to bowl,i can stay in the even if dont bowl and bat well,he should come in as a bowler who can bat and moreover australia need a good backup spinner and smith should grab this opportunity and work hard!!!!!!!

  • POSTED BY D.V.C. on | May 22, 2010, 3:23 GMT

    @Nadisha Jayasinghe: Totally. What I always found weird was that McGain's limited overs stats are better than his 1st class stats, but he was never even considered for ODIs or T20. The selectors have this thing about the shorter the format, the younger you need to be. Whereas the opposite appears to be true, you only need to look at all of the 'retired' players in the IPL. @Minus Zero: McGain 90 wkts from 30 matches at avg: 35.63, econ: 3.35, S/R: 63.8.

  • POSTED BY long_handle9 on | May 21, 2010, 23:35 GMT

    interesting article, I remember Cricinfo used to come up with a lot of these when it wasn't owned by ESPN

  • POSTED BY Coxwaffle on | May 21, 2010, 22:42 GMT

    I think what a lot of you are forgetting is that Swann is 31 and hasn't exactly 'burst onto the scene' - he's done hard yards on unresponsive wickets at Trent Bridge in early season conditions. My point is, that he learnt his craft and honed what he can and can't do - rather than spinning a ball really hard (which is all he did at Northants), or bowling a doosra, he's developed drift, flight and thinking (or laughing!) a batsman out. Steven Smith may, or may not, be the real deal - but he needs time to develop. Krejza, Casson, Cullen et al will come again if they follow Swann's example - they work hard and take success as the product of faliure, and let's be honest, time is well on their side. Ironic though, that the heir-apparant to the Aussie spinning birth has been born out of performances in T20. Proof, surely, that the game is in reasonable health!

  • POSTED BY Itchy on | May 21, 2010, 22:26 GMT

    @Minus Zero: You are comparing Warne and MacGills career stats with Steve Smith stats based on one season! Factor in the other spinners who are in line for the job and I would be surprised if they fare any better. I have never been a Hauritz fan although he has performed well recently.

    I agree with gzawilliam who believes Smith should come in as a specialist batsman who can also bowl. Selectors need to be upfront though and state what their intentions/expectations are with respect to performance.

  • POSTED BY Puppster23 on | May 21, 2010, 16:44 GMT

    Think this whole ''Oz don't have any spinners'' thing is slightly overrated. Australia is probably the worst place to bowl spin in the world, the greatest spinners have also kind of struggled here. In the FC scene in OZ, things are even worse, as pitches are taylor-made for the quicks, which leaves budding spinners with not much to work with...

  • POSTED BY santhoshkudva on | May 21, 2010, 16:00 GMT

    anybody under that NSW blues cap is made to look great. dont have too high an opinion about that steve smith. overrated. wait till he is taken to the cleaners.

  • POSTED BY boris6491 on | May 21, 2010, 15:19 GMT

    I thought the treatment of Krejza was poor. I am certainly not a Hauritz advocate. I would like to see a good old attacking spinner in the test lineup who is truly capable of taking wickets rather than bowling consistently enough to have a batsman give their wicket to you, a la Hauritz. Krejza would be Australia's equivalent to Graeme Swann, an attacking offie who is not afraid of throwing the ball up and a useful batsman. Steve Smith is also a good prospect as is Holland. I don't think McGain will get another opportunity due to his age while Casson and Cullen in particular have featured very little for their state sides, the latter being released which harms his chances significantly. If I really had to choose between all these spinners to play in tests (as to me this represents the best spinner that Australia has), I would select Krejza. Hauritz may be a reasonable performer in ODIs, but he is not and will never be a suitable test spinner.

  • POSTED BY ToMegaTherion1986 on | May 24, 2010, 0:35 GMT

    Spin bowling is real art form, because not only do you need to be able to produce something special, but you also need be completely on top of your control and flight. It is a really tough profession and one that can take many years to truely master.

    Becoming increasingly important in modern spin bowling though is the ability to 1: Control the accuracy and flight 2: And probably the most important, is to do the simple things well. Because on a day where the Doosra or Wrongun or whatever you want to bowl isn't working, you need that fall back option that won't conceed 6 runs an over. It is along with keeping the toughest career path for any young cricketer, but definately worth while.

    In reference to Australia's spin bowling options, selectors need to make the tough decisions to decide on who is good enough for international cricket. Simply Krejza was not ready, incredibly talented and i'm sure he will play again. But Hauritz and Smith are definitely the best we have right now.

  • POSTED BY popcorn on | May 22, 2010, 7:20 GMT

    I think Jason Krejza has been treated unfairly. He had a fantastic debut in India - a land of spin. To expect him to turn the ball on ANY pitch in Australia except the SCG is asking too much of him, or for that matter, any spinner in Australia.To groom spinners, Cricket Australia should send these spinners out to the subcontinent to hone their art.

  • POSTED BY s.sreekant on | May 22, 2010, 3:53 GMT

    i dont think smith should come in as a batsman who can bowl,if he does then he will become like white and will start thinking about his batting alone,will have a negative impact if he does not bowl in a match,he will start thinking that i am a batsman i dont need to bowl,i can stay in the even if dont bowl and bat well,he should come in as a bowler who can bat and moreover australia need a good backup spinner and smith should grab this opportunity and work hard!!!!!!!

  • POSTED BY D.V.C. on | May 22, 2010, 3:23 GMT

    @Nadisha Jayasinghe: Totally. What I always found weird was that McGain's limited overs stats are better than his 1st class stats, but he was never even considered for ODIs or T20. The selectors have this thing about the shorter the format, the younger you need to be. Whereas the opposite appears to be true, you only need to look at all of the 'retired' players in the IPL. @Minus Zero: McGain 90 wkts from 30 matches at avg: 35.63, econ: 3.35, S/R: 63.8.

  • POSTED BY long_handle9 on | May 21, 2010, 23:35 GMT

    interesting article, I remember Cricinfo used to come up with a lot of these when it wasn't owned by ESPN

  • POSTED BY Coxwaffle on | May 21, 2010, 22:42 GMT

    I think what a lot of you are forgetting is that Swann is 31 and hasn't exactly 'burst onto the scene' - he's done hard yards on unresponsive wickets at Trent Bridge in early season conditions. My point is, that he learnt his craft and honed what he can and can't do - rather than spinning a ball really hard (which is all he did at Northants), or bowling a doosra, he's developed drift, flight and thinking (or laughing!) a batsman out. Steven Smith may, or may not, be the real deal - but he needs time to develop. Krejza, Casson, Cullen et al will come again if they follow Swann's example - they work hard and take success as the product of faliure, and let's be honest, time is well on their side. Ironic though, that the heir-apparant to the Aussie spinning birth has been born out of performances in T20. Proof, surely, that the game is in reasonable health!

  • POSTED BY Itchy on | May 21, 2010, 22:26 GMT

    @Minus Zero: You are comparing Warne and MacGills career stats with Steve Smith stats based on one season! Factor in the other spinners who are in line for the job and I would be surprised if they fare any better. I have never been a Hauritz fan although he has performed well recently.

    I agree with gzawilliam who believes Smith should come in as a specialist batsman who can also bowl. Selectors need to be upfront though and state what their intentions/expectations are with respect to performance.

  • POSTED BY Puppster23 on | May 21, 2010, 16:44 GMT

    Think this whole ''Oz don't have any spinners'' thing is slightly overrated. Australia is probably the worst place to bowl spin in the world, the greatest spinners have also kind of struggled here. In the FC scene in OZ, things are even worse, as pitches are taylor-made for the quicks, which leaves budding spinners with not much to work with...

  • POSTED BY santhoshkudva on | May 21, 2010, 16:00 GMT

    anybody under that NSW blues cap is made to look great. dont have too high an opinion about that steve smith. overrated. wait till he is taken to the cleaners.

  • POSTED BY boris6491 on | May 21, 2010, 15:19 GMT

    I thought the treatment of Krejza was poor. I am certainly not a Hauritz advocate. I would like to see a good old attacking spinner in the test lineup who is truly capable of taking wickets rather than bowling consistently enough to have a batsman give their wicket to you, a la Hauritz. Krejza would be Australia's equivalent to Graeme Swann, an attacking offie who is not afraid of throwing the ball up and a useful batsman. Steve Smith is also a good prospect as is Holland. I don't think McGain will get another opportunity due to his age while Casson and Cullen in particular have featured very little for their state sides, the latter being released which harms his chances significantly. If I really had to choose between all these spinners to play in tests (as to me this represents the best spinner that Australia has), I would select Krejza. Hauritz may be a reasonable performer in ODIs, but he is not and will never be a suitable test spinner.

  • POSTED BY on | May 21, 2010, 13:28 GMT

    I've actually been a fan of Kreiza ever since he made his debut for NSW, and then still when he made the switch to Tasmania. I wonder how many people know he actually started out as a batsman and a part time off-spinner at first class level (this may account for the illusion his stats provide about his ability)? Then he turned into a bowling all-rounder, and now he more or less plays as a bowler who can bat. He amazed me as an off-spinner especially on his debut because he turns the ball an incredible amount, moreso than what I've seen of any of the prospects listed. Its a shame he is injured and has suffered a dip of form lately as he is a great prospect and should play more games for Australia.Also, D.V.C I agree with you, I don't believe Mcgain's chances are gone, I'll only believe when he says it himself. He is a great bowler and has defied critics and has shown age is no barrier. He will continue to do so, and hopefully gets more games, (I'd like to see him in ODIs).

  • POSTED BY LesGrossman on | May 21, 2010, 12:31 GMT

    The problem for these guys was they got coached badly at the so called "Centre of Excellence" and started bowling pies. Yes, Terry Jenner was Warne's coach, but he failed to fully understand what Warne did well technically. He shared his "knowledge" at coaching courses (I've attended numerous) around Australia and his technical points were imparted by coaches everywhere on talented spinners. I've worked in junior development for a state association for a number of years and seen Jenner's technical methods destroy countless number of brilliant young spinners. Jenner was in charge of the next generation of spinners and ruined them all. Good luck to Jon Davidson on turning it around. Hauritz has often said he just went back to how he used to bowl when he was a kid, that's why he has come back to be a quality test spinner. Casson, the two Cullen's and Krezja need to go back what made them successful when they were younger and forget the flawed coaching that has seen their careers plummet.

  • POSTED BY Luckyboy13 on | May 21, 2010, 12:12 GMT

    Smith is a very talented batsman and fielder. As a leg spinner he is developing but he has huge potential. People seem to always forget that Shane Warne was not by any means the complete spin bowling package when he arrived in Test cricket. Warne was also several years older than Smith when he did arrive in Test cricket. Warne's record in First Class cricket was not good when he made his Test debut - and, unlike Smith, Warne had not taken a First Class 7for or made 4 First Class 100s before his 21st birthday. Only time will tell if Smith is as good a bowler as Warne, or if he is more of a batsman than a bowler. People should be patient with Smith.

  • POSTED BY NeilCameron on | May 21, 2010, 11:42 GMT

    One interesting prospect is Steve O'Keefe from NSW. Like Steve Smith he's a spinning all rounder and he scored a few good runs last Sheffield Shield season, as well as taking some important wickets. He's going for less than 3 runs per over which is pretty good these days. Steve Smith was always going to have his critics with his first class average, but he did take 7/64 against South Australia in his last f/c match. He still has a long way to go though.

  • POSTED BY wix99 on | May 21, 2010, 9:42 GMT

    Steve Smith is an exciting prospect. Shane Watson's bowling means Australia can afford to pick him in the Test team as the second spinner alongside Hauritz. The real question is whether he will find his place in the Test team as a batsman or bowler. Unfortunately Cameron White was forced to take on a role he was not suited for. White may still get back into the Test team as a batsman though. Hopefully the selectors will avoid making this mistake with Smith.

  • POSTED BY bestbuddy on | May 21, 2010, 8:49 GMT

    @Minus Zero, give smith some time, he has had just 1 full first class season, and your comparison to warne is flawed - in warnes first 5 test's he average 41.91with a strikerate of 76, and I believe he took 1 for 151 in his first innings. He took time to adapt to both first class and test level - all players do, no matter what type of bowler they are. Reserve judgement until he had played a few seasons and a few tests

  • POSTED BY s.sreekant on | May 21, 2010, 8:45 GMT

    i feel sorry for krejza he was a good spinner,considering his 1st match against india,which is always tough 2 bowl as a spinner,still he performed and kept flighting the ball and i dont see that CA is not showing much interest in spinners and should tell the county sides to give spinners good chance,i don't see any good spinner in the domestic sides,only 1 r 2 are there,i hope in coming years at least they will produce some good interest!!!!!!!!!

  • POSTED BY stuartk319 on | May 21, 2010, 8:16 GMT

    I'm a bit tired of hearing how Steve Smith is going to be a great leg-spinner. Sure; pick him in the Ashes - but for his batting; he has the width of Australia to go before he can play for his bowling alone. The young guys, as well as the 25+ yo's in this article still have heaps of time; and now have good solid role models like Hauritz and Swann. Neither will be legends like Warne, but they compete like he did, bowl to simple plans and read matches beautifully. No trick balls needed.

  • POSTED BY on | May 21, 2010, 8:06 GMT

    Steven Smith is a good prospect. What makes him to be chosen ahead of Hauritz is his batting ability. But I would like to see some discards like Beau Cassen fighting back for their spots in the Australian playing XI

  • POSTED BY SettingSun on | May 21, 2010, 7:49 GMT

    I was surprised that Australia showed so little patience with these spinners because all except McGain had some semblance of success when they were called up. It does cheer me up that Australia are having such problems in the spin bowling department though, especially as there is now a really burgeoning spin bowling scene in England.

  • POSTED BY Nuxxy on | May 21, 2010, 7:16 GMT

    One big problem spinners have is that they need the captain's backing. Defensive spin is pointless...you won't take wickets if you don't have fielders supporting you and creating pressure. Even Warne struggled at first.

  • POSTED BY gzawilliam on | May 21, 2010, 7:13 GMT

    Unfortunately for the older crop of spinners their time is nearly over. The influx from the 2010 academy have good prospects in floros , luke doran and Zampa.

    Smith though is such an impressive package. One of the best fielders in the world already(his catching is par excellence) and with destructive quality batting i think he needs to be given a chance to develop in the test team. Marcus North seems to be the holder of that spot for now. But we have seen his failings. When in form he's great. But when he's out he hardly seems to be noticed on the field.

    I think we need the brash skill of smith for the ashes. An Unknown batting wise and learning quickly with the ball. I think thats better than North in that he has quality but very inconsistent batting and mediocrity with the ball. There is nothing north can do better than smith right now. So i think his time is up.. But hauritz is fantastic. To come back so strong after his downs. I''m so proud he's come good.

  • POSTED BY D.V.C. on | May 21, 2010, 7:03 GMT

    "[McGain] won't play for Australia again, and not just for his figures of 0 for 149 against South Africa in Cape Town in March. [...] At 38, McGain is a season-by-season prospect with the Bushrangers, who have Holland as their youth policy."

    This type of thing really gets to me. If you're the best available then you're good enough, I don't care how old you are. People were saying McGain was too old at 35. How stupid are they going to look if he is still at the top of the 1st class spinner list when he is 42?

  • POSTED BY MinusZero on | May 21, 2010, 5:58 GMT

    Steve Smith certainly is an exciting prospect for the Australian team but if he is thinking of playing tests as a spinner he has a long way to go. While he may have been effective in T20, his first class record is poor, very poor. 26 wickets at 48 with an economy of 4 is not good. His batting is his saving grace, but as far as being the next Warne or MacGill, he has a long way to go. As a comparison, Warne took first class wickets at 26.11 and 2.76 economy and MacGill 30 ave and 3.4 economy. The telling stat though is the strike rate. MacGill 53.5, Warne 56.7 and Smith 73.0!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY MinusZero on | May 21, 2010, 5:58 GMT

    Steve Smith certainly is an exciting prospect for the Australian team but if he is thinking of playing tests as a spinner he has a long way to go. While he may have been effective in T20, his first class record is poor, very poor. 26 wickets at 48 with an economy of 4 is not good. His batting is his saving grace, but as far as being the next Warne or MacGill, he has a long way to go. As a comparison, Warne took first class wickets at 26.11 and 2.76 economy and MacGill 30 ave and 3.4 economy. The telling stat though is the strike rate. MacGill 53.5, Warne 56.7 and Smith 73.0!

  • POSTED BY D.V.C. on | May 21, 2010, 7:03 GMT

    "[McGain] won't play for Australia again, and not just for his figures of 0 for 149 against South Africa in Cape Town in March. [...] At 38, McGain is a season-by-season prospect with the Bushrangers, who have Holland as their youth policy."

    This type of thing really gets to me. If you're the best available then you're good enough, I don't care how old you are. People were saying McGain was too old at 35. How stupid are they going to look if he is still at the top of the 1st class spinner list when he is 42?

  • POSTED BY gzawilliam on | May 21, 2010, 7:13 GMT

    Unfortunately for the older crop of spinners their time is nearly over. The influx from the 2010 academy have good prospects in floros , luke doran and Zampa.

    Smith though is such an impressive package. One of the best fielders in the world already(his catching is par excellence) and with destructive quality batting i think he needs to be given a chance to develop in the test team. Marcus North seems to be the holder of that spot for now. But we have seen his failings. When in form he's great. But when he's out he hardly seems to be noticed on the field.

    I think we need the brash skill of smith for the ashes. An Unknown batting wise and learning quickly with the ball. I think thats better than North in that he has quality but very inconsistent batting and mediocrity with the ball. There is nothing north can do better than smith right now. So i think his time is up.. But hauritz is fantastic. To come back so strong after his downs. I''m so proud he's come good.

  • POSTED BY Nuxxy on | May 21, 2010, 7:16 GMT

    One big problem spinners have is that they need the captain's backing. Defensive spin is pointless...you won't take wickets if you don't have fielders supporting you and creating pressure. Even Warne struggled at first.

  • POSTED BY SettingSun on | May 21, 2010, 7:49 GMT

    I was surprised that Australia showed so little patience with these spinners because all except McGain had some semblance of success when they were called up. It does cheer me up that Australia are having such problems in the spin bowling department though, especially as there is now a really burgeoning spin bowling scene in England.

  • POSTED BY on | May 21, 2010, 8:06 GMT

    Steven Smith is a good prospect. What makes him to be chosen ahead of Hauritz is his batting ability. But I would like to see some discards like Beau Cassen fighting back for their spots in the Australian playing XI

  • POSTED BY stuartk319 on | May 21, 2010, 8:16 GMT

    I'm a bit tired of hearing how Steve Smith is going to be a great leg-spinner. Sure; pick him in the Ashes - but for his batting; he has the width of Australia to go before he can play for his bowling alone. The young guys, as well as the 25+ yo's in this article still have heaps of time; and now have good solid role models like Hauritz and Swann. Neither will be legends like Warne, but they compete like he did, bowl to simple plans and read matches beautifully. No trick balls needed.

  • POSTED BY s.sreekant on | May 21, 2010, 8:45 GMT

    i feel sorry for krejza he was a good spinner,considering his 1st match against india,which is always tough 2 bowl as a spinner,still he performed and kept flighting the ball and i dont see that CA is not showing much interest in spinners and should tell the county sides to give spinners good chance,i don't see any good spinner in the domestic sides,only 1 r 2 are there,i hope in coming years at least they will produce some good interest!!!!!!!!!

  • POSTED BY bestbuddy on | May 21, 2010, 8:49 GMT

    @Minus Zero, give smith some time, he has had just 1 full first class season, and your comparison to warne is flawed - in warnes first 5 test's he average 41.91with a strikerate of 76, and I believe he took 1 for 151 in his first innings. He took time to adapt to both first class and test level - all players do, no matter what type of bowler they are. Reserve judgement until he had played a few seasons and a few tests

  • POSTED BY wix99 on | May 21, 2010, 9:42 GMT

    Steve Smith is an exciting prospect. Shane Watson's bowling means Australia can afford to pick him in the Test team as the second spinner alongside Hauritz. The real question is whether he will find his place in the Test team as a batsman or bowler. Unfortunately Cameron White was forced to take on a role he was not suited for. White may still get back into the Test team as a batsman though. Hopefully the selectors will avoid making this mistake with Smith.