Rahul Bhattacharya
Author of Pundits from Pakistan: On Tour with India, 2003-04
Mint Lounge

Here comes the flood

It's set to be a big year for India with Tests in five continents. If only the BCCI and the broadcasters rolled back on the hyper-commercialisation

Rahul Bhattacharya

January 3, 2011

Comments: 31 | Text size: A | A

Sachin Tendulkar on an advertisement, India, February 1, 1996
In 1996 cricket-profiteering was in its infancy © Time & Life Pictures
Related Links
Teams: India

Welcome, Twenty Eleven! This is how Indian cricket is going to fill you up. South Africa tour in progress, the World Cup, the IPL, a tour of the West Indies, one of England, probably a tour by the West Indies too, then a tour of Australia, and the Champions League, and only a fool would bet against the World Twenty20 popping up because that is what it does. In short, a pretty hectic and crucial year across formats, the first time, as far as I can tell, that India will play Test matches on all five continents in the same calendar year, besides participating in the great 50-over and 20-over galas. There's only a couple of syllables between Twenty Eleven and Twenty-four Seven.

As you read this, torn-down stadiums all over India are confidently missing their deadlines, so everything seems to be in order for the tenth cricket World Cup. It will commence as soon as confirmation has come in from the Caribbean that the 2007 edition has indeed concluded. After numerous global summits in the wake of that endless event, the ICC used its collective wits and spreadsheets to compress the competition to... 43 days, or two-and-a-half times the length of the Olympics. And not to worry, India will not crash out in the first round, as they did four years ago. The whole structure has been designed to achieve this purpose.

The format - a long, quasi-warm-up league phase meandering towards quarter-finals - is much like the last subcontinental World Cup, in 1996. So forgiving was that format that teams could forfeit league matches, as Australia and West Indies did to Sri Lanka out of security fears, and still qualify for the knockouts. Following those forfeitures, in a display of Asian solidarity, India and Pakistan fielded a joint team to play an exhibition game in Colombo. The situation today, alas, is far beyond that. And though it is being held in the subcontinent, with Pakistan no longer hosting any part of it, this is not a truly subcontinental World Cup.

One-day cricket itself has come full circle since that tournament. The tidal wave of 50-overs cricket was cresting then, rather than lapping against indifferent feet as it does now. You can see the trend: the World Cup of 2015 is to be pared to 10 teams from 14, the Champions Trophy is to be done away with altogether, and Australia have begun to play their domestic one-day matches over four innings. So it will be interesting to see if one-dayers can show people a big night (or 43) on the town. For what it's worth, I think it will be a flat five weeks and a raucous, rousing last week. One of Bangladesh or West Indies will make the semis.

Not just one-day cricket but the entire landscape has changed since 1996. To leaf through War Minus the Shooting, Mike Marqusee's polemic about cricket's tryst with the global economy in that World Cup, is to be transported to those nascent days of cricket profiteering: Jagmohan Dalmiya and IS Bindra and Mark Mascarenhas, Pepsi and the "Nothing Official About It" campaign at a time when ambush marketing was not a term in any cricket fan's lexicon, the proliferation of VIP enclaves and hospitality boxes in stadiums. Observing it all, the venerable Pakistani critic Omar Kureishi tells the author of his fear that in "coming years private sector interests would organise their own mini World Cups and the ICC and the boards would lose control of their players".

In 2010, Kureishi's fears were partially borne out as a corporate-franchise tournament, cricket's richest, found itself embroiled in a financial scandal. Only partially, because the IPL was not a rebel start-up but an establishment creation, and because almost as dismal as the scandal was the Indian board's ultra-establishment response.

For better or worse, the BCCI had sold franchises for millions of dollars, and having slept at the wheel thereafter, with no respect for due process it decided to terminate two of them without so much as a notice. It was classic BCCI arrogance, founded on vengeance rather than principle. In trying to decimate the monster they'd created, they themselves turned into monsters.

One crore rupees (US$ 223,713 approx) per season was the slightly excessive token to governing council members to rubber-stamp Modi's decisions. So Shashank Manohar and N Srinivasan decided to apply that cutting-edge BCCI fix: they turned the governing council into an honorary committee. The honorary committee acted as honorary committees do. They came up with a tournament format so convoluted that it requires an honorary sub-committee to decode it (the short version: some teams will play each other one time and some teams will play each other two times - no more questions!). They crafted rules for player retention that, one cannot help but suspect, were pushed through by the board president-in-waiting, who by one of those innocent little coincidences also happens to own the team that retained the maximum number of players.

As you read this, torn-down stadiums all over India are confidently missing their deadlines, so everything seems to be in order for the tenth cricket World Cup. It will commence as soon as confirmation has come in from the Caribbean that the 2007 edition has indeed concluded

The fourth IPL is slated to get off the ground some five days after the World Cup. Many things about Modi will not be missed, but his energy and execution skills probably will. It promises to be less of a Page 3 tournament than its predecessors, which will be nice, but with a slew of court cases in progress, I'm not sure if anyone will be able to get it off Page 1.

Otherwise, from his bunker in London, Modi can look back at 2010 with satisfaction. His legacy to cricket coverage was further secured. Not content with turning commentators into hucksters, his last idea - and one of his many dodgy deals under the scanner - was to insert advertisements not just between overs but between deliveries. He had this done by zooming into the giant screen at the stadium, which beamed the commercial. Or so we thought. The truth, it emerges, is far more cunning than that. The commercial only appeared to be coming from the giant screen. In fact, it is simply a television recording played on loop so that we are lulled into thinking of it as ambient advertising.

With such innovations, little wonder that commercial intrusions invaded even Test cricket. Watching, and listening to, television coverage of India's Tests in Sri Lanka on Neo, Suresh Menon mused in a column: "Great car. Stupendous phone. Incredible bike. The IPL-isation of cricket commentary is complete." And a few months later, from the Tests in South Africa on Ten, viewers were subjected to advertisements not between deliveries but during them, in the form of branded patches leaping into view on either side of the batsman as the bowler let go the ball.

Most right-minded fans are all for commercial support for their sport, but only if it leaves it in better shape. In this respect there was one board initiative in 2010 that deserves proper applause: it increased Test-match fees, and by almost threefold, so that Tests are no longer the poor cousin of the limited-overs formats. Its motive was probably the same as it was when it conjured up Test matches out of nowhere in 2010: to keep India at No. 1. Any incentive will help, because 2011 is the year that India's hold on the position will be seriously challenged. Apparently some nefarious souls have been complaining about Test cricket, but with away series in England and Australia, there is much to look forward to. It's going to be a grand rock show year, or an extended dirge, and if nothing else then at some point Sachin Tendulkar will score his 100th international hundred and all will be right with the nation.

Rahul Bhattacharya is the author of the cricket tour book Pundits from Pakistan and the forthcoming novel The Sly Company of People Who Care

RSS Feeds: Rahul Bhattacharya

© Mint

Posted by D.Nagarajan on (January 4, 2011, 11:14 GMT)

Lovely article. Its indeed a pain to watch cricket on channels that are more keen on ads than the cricket itself, any DTH provider will really mint money if he can provide ad free feed. I have been watching the ashes on 9 and its fantastic.

Posted by   on (January 4, 2011, 7:51 GMT)

exceptionally nice article.carry on gud work rahul.

Posted by   on (January 3, 2011, 20:40 GMT)

Reallly naice Article...........

Posted by akshay4india on (January 3, 2011, 20:35 GMT)

There is a logical solution to this. Instead of reducing the bottom-line (profit) for networks, there is a way for them to reduce the amount of ads AND keep the same profit. This is how I see it: During the ad break, show only 1 ad, as opposed to 3 that are being shown right now. Triple the fees charged for showing the ads. Thinks about it, people would be willing to pay more for their ads if their ads is the only one that is shown in the ad break. Doind this would mean that both viewers and networks will be kept happy. It will just be a miracle though, when these networks realise this.

Posted by Sanks555 on (January 3, 2011, 19:52 GMT)

Good article but no mention of domestic cricket. Does international cricket grow out of vacuum. And if number of games are concerned, the current generation probably plays less than previous generations. Jack Hobbs did not hit 199 centuries by sleeping in his home. Malcolm Mashall took 1600-plus wicket and despite being a bowler, scored 10,000 runs in first class.So much for player burnout.

Posted by   on (January 3, 2011, 19:49 GMT)

LOL, the last line pretty much summed up all that is dire and brushed under the carpet in the name of cricket administration in India. Beware of the backlash though, there'll be a few hundred comments alleging a "nobody" taking a shot at "God" ( which basically equates to - if you don't excel in molesting women you should never have the audacity to tear down Charles Sobhraj ).

Posted by 26Shubham02 on (January 3, 2011, 19:42 GMT)

I remember the words of Jesus, "Lord, forgive them, for they do not know, what they are doing". This i would refer to the 20-20 and their manufacturers.Lalit Modi is gone but as said, the disease left a mark on the body of cricket. Instead people would enjoy the test championship more than champions trophy and IPLs and world T-20.... Where are all the stars of IPL ?....Back to dressing room, and having dressing their bruised noses and fingers of bouncers..... it's fascinating to watch good cricket at it's best where 4 out of top 5 teams are competing right now.

Posted by   on (January 3, 2011, 19:21 GMT)

Pathetic coverage by Neo Sports and Ten Sports has made the experience of watching test match cricket a PAINFUL one. I hope authorities stand up and take notice of such attitude of these channels!!

Posted by nikhilpuri on (January 3, 2011, 19:06 GMT)

Rahul - really impressed by your article. One reason why I thoroughly enjoyed reading it was because the content was opinionated, backed up by facts and hit home the point pretty hard. Personally, I despise 90% of the commercialization that the IPL has brought to the game, and as a true fan, would hope that a viewing experience was more about the cricket than the advertising. Anyway, I do hope that the World Cup will be exciting, and with India in with a strong chance this time (I know we've heard that before...but we are at home now and Australia isn't what they were)...I think we will see a competitive World Cup. Keep writing - I am enjoying your opinion.

Posted by Champ2000 on (January 3, 2011, 18:21 GMT)

If nothing else then at some point Sachin Tendulkar will score his 100th international hundred and all will be right with the nation.

How True...

Posted by vilas on (January 3, 2011, 18:17 GMT)

To all those people complaining that this is an attack on tendulkar or indian cricket look again. Our cricket team is doing fine; its just the commercialization around it that's starting to become an eyesore. The IPL has made millionaires of the most useless/overrated people you will see out there; Gavaskar was pissed when the BCCI cut his 'honorary committee' position aka 1 crore cash flow. Watching cricket on these other channels is painful with the advertisements being an eyesore - reminds me of pop up ads when you visit websites. Its annoying, how much more money do you need to make at the risk of sacrificing quality cricket? Thank god for Sky and Channel 9; watching the Ashes has been such a pleasure

Posted by enigma77543 on (January 3, 2011, 18:15 GMT)

I don't know why people feel anyone is taking shots "at" Tendulkar, they are not. But the question is, isn't there something wrong when people celebrate his hundreds while the Indian team suffered an innings defeat? Is he somehow more important than the national team & its performance? I'm sure he himself will find it embarrassing that people were celebrating his hundred while India suffered such an embarrassing loss.

As for IPL & T20-format in general, it's plain & simple, IT SUCKS, it's boring & repetitive & if all I wanted see is a ball getting smacked around for a couple of hours then I'd rather watch baseball but cricket has something else to offer, it's about grace, elegance & a contest between bat & bowl unlike any other but unfortunately, T20 is either going to be killed in a few years due to it's monotonous nature or it'll end up killing the sport of cricket & turn into a bastardized version of baseball which'd be a great pity.

Posted by Shimmykins on (January 3, 2011, 17:56 GMT)

Hahaha here come the oh its anti indian and oh its a cheap shot at sachin. In truth its a great artical showing how every last penny is being squeezed out them by the BCCI

Posted by green_jelly on (January 3, 2011, 17:40 GMT)

If the No.1 team had to beat everyone everywhere all the time, then there would be no need for rankings. If you don't like India's position at #1, then go complain to the ICC ranking system. Some people have this simple minded view that to be #1, a team has to either never ever lose at anything, or be white.

Posted by SSRajan on (January 3, 2011, 16:38 GMT)

Does this guy ever write anything positive?? I don't remember having read any.. If he does not like cricket so much that he finds fault with everything ICC/BCCI does, why is he a cricket journalist/writer/whatever.. Can't he find a different profession? At least we will be speared the ranting..

Posted by srini4 on (January 3, 2011, 12:30 GMT)

I loved this article. Great work Mr. Bhattacharya.

Posted by crick.fan on (January 3, 2011, 12:00 GMT)

I agree totally... the advertisements are getting in the way of the game... its not like other sports don't have sponsors...its just that other sports aren't managed by money hungry beggars who'd sell their own families for some more money (might actually be true :p) Hearing ex cricket stars selling their souls and talking about Karbon Kamaal catches was shameful. We must remember that the game is bigger than the sponsors. If they (the sponsors) really want visibility during India's games, they should PAY MORE. Dont cut down the coverage and don't dumb down the sport. Cricket isn't just about throwing a ball and have the batsman swing his bat real hard at hit. The love of the sport in the country will ensure that the sponsors WILL pay as they cant get a better. Its just sad that the sport has been lost. Just hope that the world cup isn't filled with Maruti straight drives and Veet Fine Legs!!

Posted by arya_underfoot on (January 3, 2011, 11:54 GMT)

great...another nobody taking a cheap shot at sachin.

but seriously, india's no.1 ranking will seriously be tested. if we can win in england, australia and the west indies (and the current series in south africa), then surely no-one can deny the legitimacy of the ranking system. however, if we lose any one of those series and dont win the other three and still remain no.1, then further doubt and scorn will be heaped upon both our cricket team and their ranking.

Posted by   on (January 3, 2011, 11:23 GMT)

Superbly written article "Ipl-isation of cricket" has really been a sore and a pain to the spectator. If only the administrators draw a line on commercial-isation of the game the game will be indebted to them. But this needs farsighted administrator not a narrow/money minded one...

Posted by RealPablo on (January 3, 2011, 11:16 GMT)

Congratulations Rahul - a thoughtful and necessary article on the nuts and bolts of the game. I am sure I do not need to tell you this, but do ignore the neanderthals for whom the IPL is the face of 'shining India' and who have no ability to see the damage it has already done and will continue to do to the fabric of cricket.

Posted by CricFin on (January 3, 2011, 11:01 GMT)

There are too many ads in cric info web page ,could you please reduce it ?

Posted by   on (January 3, 2011, 10:59 GMT)

I hate those branded pitches and ads during the time of deliveries its so irritating. Watching the ashes coverage quality makes the tens sports and neo coverage look pathetic

Posted by mogan707 on (January 3, 2011, 8:35 GMT)

A totally anti-Indian article;( Most of Cricinfo editors are most often doing this).Look at the positive aspects of Indian team. 1) 2011 will see the Indian team have many options of having a pool of 30 players playing for the country all over the world.And in the process we can find the replacements for Dravid,Sachin and Laxman. 2)Dhoni may also get a rest and we may find a new captain for twenty 20 and ODIs (Gambhir tipped as Captain) and 3)the lucrative IPL has finally been turning slowly and steadily into talent searching and talent recognising rather than just a commercial gain for BCCI. And 4)not to forget Anil Kumble who is both Karnataka Board President as well as NCA co-ordinator,who gives 100% performance to his job Are they not postives? Don't highlight negatives only ;An article is complete only when it has pros and cons.

Posted by ashoksagabillakurthi on (January 3, 2011, 8:27 GMT)

eagerly wating for world cup,to watch india vs pakistan final match in wankhedi stadium.......

Posted by vatsap on (January 3, 2011, 7:55 GMT)

The best WC format was 1992, each play each other once, then you cut to the semis. Even the format prior to that was good enough, round robin 2 groups and then semis. With due respect to encourage the ICC confederates, it elongates the WC to six weeks and there is enough useless cricket. Top 8 teams play, full stop and no fancy super sixes pls. Get the WC done in a shorter time or have more exciting matches (atleast plan it on paper)

Posted by evenflow_1990 on (January 3, 2011, 7:40 GMT)

asian solidarity in 1996. those were the days. (of course i'd say that; i'm lankan and we won that world cup hahaha)

Posted by ganeshram78 on (January 3, 2011, 7:04 GMT)

like your cynical style of journalism!

Posted by Aussasinator on (January 3, 2011, 6:15 GMT)

Right. Sachin's 100th century is the moment that would swamp every other event in the country and introduce the joy to demolish all problems.

Posted by The11thMan on (January 3, 2011, 4:58 GMT)

Wow .. seems like every tom, dick and harry wants to take a dig at Tendulkar's 50th and celebrations it caused (appropriate or not).

Posted by   on (January 3, 2011, 3:55 GMT)

2011 will determine d new ODI world champions.....serious contenders r INDIA & SOUTH AFRICA.....Will india b able 2 repeat dere 1983 fairytale on dere home pitches.....time will tell.....tour in WI,ENG & AUS will test d numero uno status of INDIA in test cricket.....ENG tour will d toughest of all & a gud chance for india 2 win a test series on Australian soil against a weak & depleted side.....WI shudn't b much of a problem for MSD's men!!

Posted by maverick_ind on (January 3, 2011, 3:46 GMT)

its so nice watching sangeetha(what is that :p) and haywards written across the field while the bowler bowls. also i am so glad the tv is converted into a 21" from a 29" in between balls like clockwork so we have to test our eyesights while we try watching a splendid square cut, with mannapuram gold security provided. the ad break ensues 2 secs after the last ball is bowled so that we wait till the next over to see the last shot played. i love test cricket... but t20 shall rule... how i miss the karbonn kamal catch and shaan meri jaan clean bowled uttered during the dlf ipl, also the mrf hindenburg balloon. dravid you will not be missed once you retire.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Rahul BhattacharyaClose
Rahul Bhattacharya Author of Pundits from Pakistan: On Tour with India, 2003-04

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

Going for glory and falling just short

Anantha Narayanan: An anecdotal account of close finishes similar to the recent Adelaide Test

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Gilchrist's conscientious moment

In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days