Sambit Bal
Sambit Bal Sambit BalRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Editor, ESPNcricinfo

Saving the next Amir

The ICC's punishment may be hard on three talented cricketers but it was necessary to save the next one from falling into the same trap

Sambit Bal

February 6, 2011

Text size: A | A

Mohammad Amir, Salman Butt and Mohammad Asif look on, Lord's, August 27, 2010
In the long run cricket will benefit from the ICC's judgement © Getty Images

For anyone who cherishes cricket's ultimate gift, the joust between bat and ball, it is impossible not to feel a certain sadness about the fate of the two Mohammads, Asif and Amir. Between them they brought craft and cunning, raw skills and bowling intelligence, swing and seam, and the possibility of a bowling partnership to rival the very best in history.

But the game must be ruthless with those attempting to compromise it, and there is no more base deed for a sportsperson than to betray the trust and emotions invested in him. Those three no-balls might seem a trifle compared to some of the misdemeanours of the past, but the fact that cricket has been weak, indecisive, and insincere in the past in dealing with its most malignant scourge is no reason for it to let up now. Five years for a couple of no-balls - plenty of which have been bowled deliberately down the years - might seem excessive, but with some transgressions, merely crossing the line is the severest of acts.

Fixing of any kind corrodes the game at the very root and it cannot be treated by merely shaking off a few leaves. In the past, allowing individual boards to deal independently with their lot meant inconsistencies in investigations and punishments. This was a landmark case because the ICC took upon itself the responsibility of conducting the trial and bringing the culprits to book and there has been a lot to commend in the way the trial has been conducted.

Right from the start there was no prevarication or attempt at fudging. The Pakistan Cricket Board reflected the mood of the nation, which swung between shock, anger, outrage, both at the players, and in some quarters at perceived conspirators out to malign the players. The ICC responded swiftly, banning the players provisionally and instituting a tribunal to try them.

Barring the possibility the tapes were masterfully cooked up - and their authenticity has never been challenged - the case had seemed pretty clear. The no-balls had been delivered precisely as had been predicted, and the sight of Salman Butt's gaze fixed on Amir's overstretched front foot, when they should have been on the batsman while fielding at mid-off, will remain the enduring image of the spot-fixing scandal.

In the past, allowing individual boards to deal independently with their lot meant inconsistencies in investigations and punishments. This was a landmark case because the ICC took upon itself the responsibility of conducting the trial and bringing the culprits to book and there was a lot to commend in the way the trial has been conducted

Of course the no-balls had no bearing on the result; Amir bowled sensationally in the Test and no evidence has surfaced so far that the no-balls were linked to betting. Prima facie, it was a case of Mazhar Majeed trying to display his hold over the players. But it was also a case of players being compromised. You can't be only a little guilty when it comes to fixing of any kind, and spot-fixing is even more virulent that full-blown match-fixing. It is far easier to organise and far tougher to detect. Butt, Asif and Amir can consider themselves unfortunate they have been the subjects of a sting but it was a clear case of cricket getting lucky. Who knows how many such instances play out in front of our unsuspecting eyes?

Once it came to light, though, there was no option for cricket but to deal with it in the toughest manner possible. Pakistan cricket has been guilty in the past of half-measures, of not trying to make a clean break. It is a tragedy, no doubt, to lose three players who would have been part of the long-term plan. In Butt they seemed to have found a calm, urbane and improving captain, and in the Mohammads a match-winning new-ball pair.

But in the long run Pakistan cricket, and cricket everywhere else, will benefit from this. It is naïve to believe that match-fixing or spot-fixing can be eradicated completely. Corruption exists, in varying degrees, in all societies, and weakness in the face of the lure of wealth is among the earliest human foibles. But the reward for sporting success goes far beyond the financial. It brings glory, adoration and honour. Artists, writers and scientists are admired and respected, movie heroes acquire stardom. Sportspersons gain all these and something more: they corner a special place in our hearts. We can feel their joy, their glory and their pain like they are our own. It's the highest of gifts. That's why the betrayal of one's sport is among the lowest of moral crimes.

The heart weeps at the sight of Amir. For a boy so full of skills and so full of life to be banished from the game for an indiscretion the scale of which he might not have been able to comprehend at the time is the biggest shame. But the punishment is necessary to ensure the next Amir doesn't go the same way. Cricket needs the toughest of deterrents to protect itself from corruption. No preventive measures are ever going to be enough; the cost of getting caught must be the heaviest imaginable.

Sambit Bal is the editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sambit Bal

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Email Feedback Print
Sambit BalClose
Sambit Bal Editor-in-chief Sambit Bal took to journalism at the age of 19 after realising that he wasn't fit for anything else, and to cricket journalism 14 years later when it dawned on him that it provided the perfect excuse to watch cricket in the office. Among other things he has bowled legspin, occasionally landing the ball in front of the batsman; laid out the comics page of a newspaper; covered crime, urban development and politics; and edited Gentleman, a monthly features magazine. He joined Wisden in 2001 and edited Wisden Asia Cricket and Cricinfo Magazine. He still spends his spare time watching cricket.

    'A test of Kohli's mental strength'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoffrey Boycott on Kohli's recent form, and Cook's captaincy

    Kallis: a standard-bearer for a nation

Mark Nicholas: He made South Africans proud and he made the rest of the world stand up and take notice

    'Like a ballet dancer'

My XI: Martin Crowe on Mark Waugh's lazy elegance and batsmanship that was easy on eye

    Sea, sun, scandal

Diary: Our correspondent takes in the sights and sounds of Galle and Colombo, and reports on a tampering controversy

Remembering Ashok Mankad

V Ramnarayan: The late 'Kaka' was a terrific batsman, a shrewd captain, and a wonderful raconteur. But most of all he was a genuine friend

News | Features Last 7 days

Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

Ugly runs but still they swoon

Alastair Cook did not bat like a leading man but the crowd applauded him for simply not failing

Time to pension off the seniors?

If England are going to win nothing, history suggests it might be worth their while to win nothing with kids

Boycott floored by an Indian trundler

When Eknath Solkar got under the skin of Geoff Boycott, leading to a three-year self-imposed exile from Test cricket

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!