May 14, 2012

Made in India

England Test players who were born 4000 miles away
32

Colin Cowdrey
Born in Ootacamund, not far from Bangalore, Cowdrey was given the propitious initials "MCC" by his cricket-loving father, whose first act on seeing the baby was to put him down for membership at Lord's. A batsman with textbook technique, Cowdrey became the first man to appear in 100 Tests - he scored a hundred in his 100th appearance - and made no fewer than six Ashes tours of Australia.

John Jameson
Forming a well-rounded opening partnership with Cowdrey, the hard-hitting Warwickshire batsman "Tubs" Jameson was born in Bombay - and was sounded out about playing for India before he made his Test debut against them, in 1971. He won four caps in all, rather unluckily being run out in three of his eight innings. Jameson later became an umpire, then a genial assistant secretary at Lord's.

Ranji
One of the shining stars of cricket's Golden Age (before the First World War), KS Ranjitsinhji - later the Jam Saheb of Nawanagar - entranced crowds with his stylish play and, well, his sheer style: flicking the ball casually to leg with a dismissive wave of wrists adorned by billowing silk shirtsleeves. The fact that he was a prince added to the mystique too. The first Indian cricketing superstar, he never played first-class cricket at home, although he gave his name to the country's premier domestic trophy.

Nasser Hussain
Born in Madras, but fiercely English on the field, Essex's Hussain played 96 Tests for England, captaining them in 45. He retired in 2004, and made an almost seamless transition to the commentary box, where he soon became one of the most acute observers of what's goin' off out there.

Duleep
Ranji's nephew, and almost as stylish a batsman, KS Duleepsinhji also played for Sussex and England. Persistent illness confined him to eight full seasons of first-class cricket, during which he averaged a whisker under 50 (and 58 in a dozen Tests).

Douglas Jardine
Born in Bombay, where his father taught at the Government Law School, England's most uncompromising captain would probably insist on leading this team too. He might have been an amateur, but he batted like a professional, with great determination and few flourishes: he averaged nearly 47 over a long first-class career, and bettered that in Tests, with 48. And, just in case you've forgotten, Jardine was the man who dreamed up - and successfully implemented - Bodyline.

Mandy Mitchell-Innes
Norman Mitchell-Innes, born in Calcutta, played one Test for England in 1935, after some fine performances for Oxford University... and then pulled out of the next Test, pleading bad hay fever. His hopes of winning another cap receded when, feeling a bit better, he scored a century for Oxford at The Oval while the Test he was supposed to be playing in was going on across the river at Lord's.

Bob Woolmer
A bit low in the order, perhaps, but he'd need to do a lot of bowling! Woolmer, born in Kanpur, modelled his batting on Colin Cowdrey's, and succeeded well enough to score three centuries - all against Australia - in his 19 Tests. Woolmer became a popular and hard-working coach, and the entire cricket world mourned when he died, aged only 58, during the 2007 World Cup.

Dick Young
Our wicketkeeper, the bespectacled amateur Mr RA Young, played two Tests during the 1907-08 Ashes tour. A fine batsman, he once scored 220 for Sussex, and also made 150 for Cambridge in the 1906 Varsity match. Young later ran the cricket at Eton for more than 30 years.

Min Patel
A canny slow left-armer, Patel was a consistent performer for Kent from 1989 to 2007, taking more than 600 first-class wickets. He was probably unlucky not to win more than two Test caps, both against his native India (he was born in Bombay) in 1996.

Robin Jackman
Born in Simla, the Surrey fast-medium bowler Jackman seemed to have missed out on Test cricket before he was called up, at the age of 35, as a replacement for the 1980-81 West Indian tour after a fine domestic season. The long wait wasn't quite over, though, as Jackman had no sooner joined the team than he was deported from Guyana because of his strong connections with South Africa (he had played a lot there, and his wife was South African). The rest of the England team joined him, and the tour resumed only after high-level talks. "Jackers" made the first of his four Test appearances in the next Test, in Bridgetown, starting well by removing the stellar opening pair of Gordon Greenidge and Desmond Haynes. These days Jackman is a jovial TV commentator, based in South Africa.

The rest of the squad
The senior Nawab of Pataudi played three Tests for England - scoring a century in his first, during the Bodyline tour - and three for India as captain in England in 1946. Neville Tufnell (born Simla) kept wicket in one Test in South Africa in 1910-11. Errol Holmes, born in Calcutta, was a fine batsman for Surrey - and the man who replaced Mandy Mitchell-Innes when he dropped out of a Test with hay fever (see above). The Agra-born Gloucestershire batsman George Emmett drew the short straw when, in 1948, he replaced Len Hutton (dropped for a supposed lack of resolve against the fast bowlers) for the third Test against Don Bradman's Invincibles: Emmett was dismissed twice by Ray Lindwall, for 10 and 0, and back came Hutton. Major Teddy Wynyard (born Saharanpur in Uttar Pradesh) was an upright amateur batsman who won three Test caps between 1896 and 1906, but we'd better keep him on the sidelines here, as he was once said not to think much of Ranji.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2012.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • serious-am-i on May 16, 2012, 16:10 GMT

    @CricketPissek - if u read properly kiwirocker talked about origins. I was quoting kiwirocker and replying to his statement. I don't think you could print a T.V interview unless its something cricinfo wanted to publish as an article. Anyways that's out of topic.

  • Nerk on May 15, 2012, 11:34 GMT

    As an Aussie, I don't care where England's players come from, as long as we can beat 'em! I also hope that when a fellow Aussie does take a shot at the English for being so bad at cricket they have to steal them from elsewhere, they only do it in jest, because it really is not that bigger deal.

  • Criketanand on May 15, 2012, 11:22 GMT

    @CricketPissek i was waiting for someone to say that they are waiting for someone to ask why sachin is not in the list . u did so there u go

  • JG2704 on May 14, 2012, 19:56 GMT

    @kalyanbk on (May 14 2012, 16:27 PM GMT) Presume you're joking re Monty

  • Akshaythekaxk on May 14, 2012, 19:12 GMT

    THANKS ROARSTER! I took Vikram Solanki's name coz i missed test cricket part. BTW, i am not a tendulkar fan.

  • CricketPissek on May 14, 2012, 16:46 GMT

    I'm now waiting for someone to ask why Sachin Tendulkar isn't in the list? (perhaps qualifying by playing for Lashings? :P )

  • kalyanbk on May 14, 2012, 16:27 GMT

    The article fails to mention where Dick Young was born. Also who can forget Monty Panesar (Madhusudhan Singh Panesar).

  • SDHM on May 14, 2012, 16:09 GMT

    Peter - for a start, counties are only allowed to field 2 overseas players. The Kolpak ruling you are probably referring to is a result of European law and therefore there's nothing that can be done about it (unless a county wanted to be sued for plenty of money by a European court of law) The ECB has introduced cash incentives for counties to field young English players instead, which is proving successful - just look at what the Lions side has just done to the West Indies, for example. Perhaps Australians, and Australia in general, should look at why there's only one player in the current set-up (Usman Khawaja) that was born overseas, considering foreign-born people make up a much greater proportion of the population of Australia than they do here in the UK?

  • Bramblefly on May 14, 2012, 15:29 GMT

    @Yolk_Eater - Nothing would make me happier than getting past this stuff and actually having conversations exclusively about cricket. Unfortunately, this site has commenters for whom deconstructing origins for their own purpose matters, usually after their team has lost to England. This article contributes a bit to the rich history of cricket and how it has spread around the world but, to these commenters, any writing on English cricket is a red rag to a bull. I wish it weren't so.

  • jmcilhinney on May 14, 2012, 14:36 GMT

    It's always easier to tear others down than to lift yourself up. It's easier for someone like jonesy2 to criticise England for irrelevancies rather than admit the limitations of his own team and just enjoy cricket. As has been said many times, if England weren't #1 at the moment noone would care about the origin of their players other than out of curiosity. People like RandyOZ moan endlessly about foreign-born players in the England team and what a disgrace it is yet he recently crowed about Nathan Lyon's being a Redback (plays for South Australia in the Sheffield Shield) yet Lyon learnt his cricket in NSW and moved to SA as an adult. Why is it OK to represent a state that you had no connection to until adulthood yet shameful to represent a country that you have lived in since childhood and, in most cases, played most, if not all, of your cricket in?

  • serious-am-i on May 16, 2012, 16:10 GMT

    @CricketPissek - if u read properly kiwirocker talked about origins. I was quoting kiwirocker and replying to his statement. I don't think you could print a T.V interview unless its something cricinfo wanted to publish as an article. Anyways that's out of topic.

  • Nerk on May 15, 2012, 11:34 GMT

    As an Aussie, I don't care where England's players come from, as long as we can beat 'em! I also hope that when a fellow Aussie does take a shot at the English for being so bad at cricket they have to steal them from elsewhere, they only do it in jest, because it really is not that bigger deal.

  • Criketanand on May 15, 2012, 11:22 GMT

    @CricketPissek i was waiting for someone to say that they are waiting for someone to ask why sachin is not in the list . u did so there u go

  • JG2704 on May 14, 2012, 19:56 GMT

    @kalyanbk on (May 14 2012, 16:27 PM GMT) Presume you're joking re Monty

  • Akshaythekaxk on May 14, 2012, 19:12 GMT

    THANKS ROARSTER! I took Vikram Solanki's name coz i missed test cricket part. BTW, i am not a tendulkar fan.

  • CricketPissek on May 14, 2012, 16:46 GMT

    I'm now waiting for someone to ask why Sachin Tendulkar isn't in the list? (perhaps qualifying by playing for Lashings? :P )

  • kalyanbk on May 14, 2012, 16:27 GMT

    The article fails to mention where Dick Young was born. Also who can forget Monty Panesar (Madhusudhan Singh Panesar).

  • SDHM on May 14, 2012, 16:09 GMT

    Peter - for a start, counties are only allowed to field 2 overseas players. The Kolpak ruling you are probably referring to is a result of European law and therefore there's nothing that can be done about it (unless a county wanted to be sued for plenty of money by a European court of law) The ECB has introduced cash incentives for counties to field young English players instead, which is proving successful - just look at what the Lions side has just done to the West Indies, for example. Perhaps Australians, and Australia in general, should look at why there's only one player in the current set-up (Usman Khawaja) that was born overseas, considering foreign-born people make up a much greater proportion of the population of Australia than they do here in the UK?

  • Bramblefly on May 14, 2012, 15:29 GMT

    @Yolk_Eater - Nothing would make me happier than getting past this stuff and actually having conversations exclusively about cricket. Unfortunately, this site has commenters for whom deconstructing origins for their own purpose matters, usually after their team has lost to England. This article contributes a bit to the rich history of cricket and how it has spread around the world but, to these commenters, any writing on English cricket is a red rag to a bull. I wish it weren't so.

  • jmcilhinney on May 14, 2012, 14:36 GMT

    It's always easier to tear others down than to lift yourself up. It's easier for someone like jonesy2 to criticise England for irrelevancies rather than admit the limitations of his own team and just enjoy cricket. As has been said many times, if England weren't #1 at the moment noone would care about the origin of their players other than out of curiosity. People like RandyOZ moan endlessly about foreign-born players in the England team and what a disgrace it is yet he recently crowed about Nathan Lyon's being a Redback (plays for South Australia in the Sheffield Shield) yet Lyon learnt his cricket in NSW and moved to SA as an adult. Why is it OK to represent a state that you had no connection to until adulthood yet shameful to represent a country that you have lived in since childhood and, in most cases, played most, if not all, of your cricket in?

  • bumsonseats on May 14, 2012, 14:14 GMT

    cricket seems to be the only sport that seem to have problems regarding over seas guys moving from 1 country to another. it happens in the sports that I follow rugby league/rugby union. the number of south sea islanders playing for Australia and New Zealand and the home nations of the UK, playing for both codes is unbelievable. these guys seem to be able to play after a couple of years of living there or living over a certain amount of days per year. on the rugby forums i never read that NZ or England or Australia won a world cup with players born in another country. England in cricket in the 80s 90s 20s played more guys with less right to play for England than these days. the difference been in those days England did not win. SA / NZ play guys now who has less credentials than any of the present england test squad. its hard to read on here certain guys saying the same old thing on every similar stories.then calling for a guy to be picked for his team, using the same circumstances

  • CricketPissek on May 14, 2012, 14:01 GMT

    @serious-am-i - who said anything about origin as far as ethnicity is concerned? The headline says MADE IN INDIA! Owais Shah was born in Karachi, Pakistan. Him identifying himself as being ethnically Indian (in the interview you allegedly read) is neither here nor there.

    @JG2704 - Why are Bopara and Samit Patel not in the list? Maybe because London and Leicester aren't in India :P

  • AdrianVanDenStael on May 14, 2012, 13:59 GMT

    @Bramblefly and Hogg_1989: you are quite right to mention the historical context, although there are clearly some posters that don't want to remember last week, let alone a century ago. One could go further and mention the fact that almost the entire cricket-playing population of Australia, New Zealand, West Indies, and much of that in South Africa is of non-indigenous origin anyway. Almost every modern Australian test cricketer is of European descent. It's an oddity of sport that people get so worked up about where people were born and "foreigners" anyway; in almost any other line of work you'd just employ the best person for the job. If you refused to employ that person on the grounds that you thought they "weren't really English" you would not only get into trouble with the authorities, but be shooting yourself in the foot by making your organisation less efficient than it could be.

  • Yolk_Eater on May 14, 2012, 13:07 GMT

    guys, why are you all taking it as some problem, its just facts. thats it. be cool

  • howardroark_fh on May 14, 2012, 12:59 GMT

    @ roarster i guess thekaxk brought up vikram solanki's name may b becoz he missed the Test batsman part in the title. solanki was a handy batsman who promised much at one time. on the other hand it's people like u who brings up SRT's name in every irrelevant article

  • Bramblefly on May 14, 2012, 12:43 GMT

    @ Peter Apostolopoulos - Maybe a bit of history is required here for context. India was (rightly or wrongly) part of the British empire until 1947. Hence, there were a lot of English expats lving there. Just like English people at home, the expats have families. There were huge numbers of returning expats in '47 and the years following. There was also the start of a post-colonial wave of Indian and Pakistani immigration because of those links that has lasted to this day. The English test players of this origin such as Cowdrey, Jackman and Hussain are, well, English. It doesn't matter where they were born. It's a similar story re South Africa as well. None of this impacts on the opportunities for English players in the county system. Overseas player quota are suitably restricted as well. Take a look at the currrent England Lions set up; it's hardly a discouraging picture for England's international future.

  • JG2704 on May 14, 2012, 12:28 GMT

    Interesting article but might have been a little better if it said when each player moved to England etc. I'm actually surprised no one (so far) has managed to question why Bopara and Patel aren't there.

  • serious-am-i on May 14, 2012, 12:18 GMT

    @kiwirocker: Owais Shah isn't a pakistani origin, may be you missed his interview, he claimed himself to be of Indian origin. In current English squad there is Bopara, Samit Patel of Indian origin as well but not born in India. Mark Ramprakash is some one who I guess no English County fan would forget about.

  • CaravanShaker on May 14, 2012, 12:00 GMT

    "Posted by thekaxk on (May 14 2012, 08:14 AM GMT)

    Why is Vikram Solanki not here?"

    Presumably because he hasn't played test cricket.

  • Nervewrecker on May 14, 2012, 11:52 GMT

    How about an ESPNcricinfo XI: England Test Cricketers who made their debut after 2000 and were born in England ? It will be a really difficult task to find a decent XI !

  • Venkatb on May 14, 2012, 11:31 GMT

    Mitchell-Innes over Pataudi Sr.? no way - Pat Sr. had an Ashes century on debut and a significantly better first-class record.

  • on May 14, 2012, 11:29 GMT

    @Hoggy_1989: Very few Australian Test cricketers have been born overseas in comparison to English Test cricketers, both in quantity and as a percentage of overall Test cricketers to represent each country. And what about the number of foreigners participating in English county cricket, which reduces the opportunities for English-born cricketers to develop, let alone be selected, for England?

  • SouthPaw on May 14, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    @roarster: ROTFL !!! Couldn't have done better than this!

  • roarster on May 14, 2012, 9:32 GMT

    thekaxk - here's the key for Vikram's exclusion: "England Test players". I'm sure this won't preclude a flurry of "Why has Sachin been ?" as it does regardless of category (Nobel Prize for Physics winners - what no SRT?)

  • Bramblefly on May 14, 2012, 9:30 GMT

    Hoggy - It's not a problem at all; England's or anyone's. I'm not sure why an inoffensive and interesting list article attracts the partisans. Briitain is a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society with citizens from many different origins. If the purists don't like that then it's too bad. We know they'll never stop hungering for their teams to play against England. That's the true stamp of legitimacy for English cricket.

  • Akshaythekaxk on May 14, 2012, 8:14 GMT

    Why is Vikram Solanki not here?

  • soumyas on May 14, 2012, 7:17 GMT

    hmm...nice article...i didn't know abt Robin Jackman. he is a nice commentator.

  • northumbriannomad on May 14, 2012, 7:16 GMT

    Jonesy, it's an article about England players who were born in India. Hope that explains your problem.

  • S.h.a.d.a.b on May 14, 2012, 7:08 GMT

    Very good one. would be more interesting if you can share, how many others played for England.

  • Hoggy_1989 on May 14, 2012, 5:37 GMT

    @ jonesy2...what about the Australian Test players born in another country? Symonds, Khawaja, Kepler Wessels in recent years to name a few, and the many from pre-WWI days that emigrated here to play against England? This isn't exclusively an England problem you know...

  • KiwiRocker- on May 14, 2012, 5:00 GMT

    Interesting article. Although the current lot of English players seems to have more of Pakistani origin players rather than Indians...Owais Shah, Usman Afzal, and so on. Actually, currently Australia has a Pakistani origin player ( Usman Khawajah), South Africa has one ( Imran Tahir), England has/has several and so does many assiciate teams...

  • jonesy2 on May 14, 2012, 4:47 GMT

    what about all the south africans and aussies and pakistanis and what not

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • jonesy2 on May 14, 2012, 4:47 GMT

    what about all the south africans and aussies and pakistanis and what not

  • KiwiRocker- on May 14, 2012, 5:00 GMT

    Interesting article. Although the current lot of English players seems to have more of Pakistani origin players rather than Indians...Owais Shah, Usman Afzal, and so on. Actually, currently Australia has a Pakistani origin player ( Usman Khawajah), South Africa has one ( Imran Tahir), England has/has several and so does many assiciate teams...

  • Hoggy_1989 on May 14, 2012, 5:37 GMT

    @ jonesy2...what about the Australian Test players born in another country? Symonds, Khawaja, Kepler Wessels in recent years to name a few, and the many from pre-WWI days that emigrated here to play against England? This isn't exclusively an England problem you know...

  • S.h.a.d.a.b on May 14, 2012, 7:08 GMT

    Very good one. would be more interesting if you can share, how many others played for England.

  • northumbriannomad on May 14, 2012, 7:16 GMT

    Jonesy, it's an article about England players who were born in India. Hope that explains your problem.

  • soumyas on May 14, 2012, 7:17 GMT

    hmm...nice article...i didn't know abt Robin Jackman. he is a nice commentator.

  • Akshaythekaxk on May 14, 2012, 8:14 GMT

    Why is Vikram Solanki not here?

  • Bramblefly on May 14, 2012, 9:30 GMT

    Hoggy - It's not a problem at all; England's or anyone's. I'm not sure why an inoffensive and interesting list article attracts the partisans. Briitain is a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society with citizens from many different origins. If the purists don't like that then it's too bad. We know they'll never stop hungering for their teams to play against England. That's the true stamp of legitimacy for English cricket.

  • roarster on May 14, 2012, 9:32 GMT

    thekaxk - here's the key for Vikram's exclusion: "England Test players". I'm sure this won't preclude a flurry of "Why has Sachin been ?" as it does regardless of category (Nobel Prize for Physics winners - what no SRT?)

  • SouthPaw on May 14, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    @roarster: ROTFL !!! Couldn't have done better than this!