|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
The only question in West Indies' Test team against Bangladesh surrounds the elevation of Veerasammy Permaul
October 28, 2012
Some have been more contentious than others but the selection of no West Indies team, home or abroad, has ever met with the unanimous approval of media and fans. The latest, for the two imminent Tests in Bangladesh, comes under the category of "others". Even popularity-seeking prime ministers and narrow-minded board members who so eagerly take up the cause of their countrymen deemed to be unjustly omitted have been silent on the chosen fifteen.
Even so, in a region where insularity is rife in every area, it is hardly surprising that the one endeavour supposedly binding together its dozen separate entities should also be open to it.
In an attempt to counter the inevitable misconceptions, Clyde Butts, the current chief selector, took to occasionally calling a media conference to explain his panel's decisions. If it rarely satisfied the skeptics, the question-and-answer sessions at least revealed the reasoning behind the choices. Butts summoned no such forum this time. Perhaps the euphoric hangover of last month's World T20 triumph and the general satisfaction in the composition of this squad persuaded him that it wasn't necessary.
What adverse comment there has been mainly surrounds offspinner Shane Shillingford's absence. Enlightenment on that score alone would be helpful. Tom Lafond, Shillingford's fellow Dominican and former Windward Islands team manager, was quoted as saying he was "really flabbergasted", calling the preference for the uncapped left-arm spinner Veerasammy Permaul "a travesty" before going on to the ironic non-sequitur that the recall of Barbados batsman Kirk Edwards led to his concern that "we are going back to the days of insularity".
As predictable as that was, and without Butts' account, we can only speculate on how he and his colleagues, Courtney Browne and Robert Haynes, came to replace a spinner with 29 wickets in eight Tests (albeit at 44.79 each) who claimed ten wickets in a Test against Australia as recently as April, with one whose reputation has been made against India A in the Caribbean in July and on the Sagicor High Performance Centre's tour of Bangladesh in September.
A logical deduction would be that, in the unlikely scenario that two spinners are required, the other should turn in the opposite direction to Sunil Narine, a certainty in the starting XI who, for all his mysteries, is basically an offspinner. As it is, Marlon Samuels and Narsingh Deonarine, two accredited batsmen, have also proved themselves as handy offspinners.
In other words, to add Shillingford, although a fine bowler whose spirit is evident in overcoming the trauma of adjusting his flawed action, would be overkill; without Narine, he would be an automatic pick. Unless Narine is injured, overcome by the bowling yips or commits himself fully to global T20 franchises, such a scenario won't change.
The dilemma, of course, is what happens should some misfortune indeed eliminate Narine from a Test (or both) in Bangladesh. It would place a heavy responsibility on Permaul but, quite apart from his bowling, his elevation to the A team captaincy against India A had already flagged the selectors' confidence in him.
On experience alone, left-arm spinners Sulieman Benn and Nikita Miller, have claims stronger than Permaul. The evidence is that neither seems to fit into the present scheme of things, perhaps, but not solely, as they are both past 30 while, at 23, the Guyanese Permaul has more of a future.
It is a year since the West Indies were last in Bangladesh for a couple of Tests, one T20 and three ODIs (the upcoming tour is in the first year of a renewed ICC Future Tours Programme). A lot has happened since in the 11 Tests, 17 ODIs and five T20s against India and England away and Australia and New Zealand at home, quite apart from the World T20 triumph in Sri Lanka.
|To add Shillingford, although a fine bowler whose spirit is evident in overcoming the trauma of adjusting his flawed action, would be overkill|
For the return to Bangladesh for the Tests, Shillingford (who was there but did not play a single match in Bangladesh and India last year) is not the only one replaced. So too are Fidel Edwards, Lendl Simmons, Adrian Barath, Devendra Bishoo and Kraigg Brathwaite.
Edwards set up the second Test victory last year with a typically explosive new-ball burst of the first five wickets that left the first innings in ruins at 59 for 5. It was his eleventh haul of five wickets or more in an innings but he has somehow lost much of his venom in the interim as well as being deserted by the luck all bowlers need.
He hasn't reproduced such devastation in his last 11 Test innings. The upshot is that he has been supplanted by Kemar Roach (who was his understudy last year) and Ravi Rampaul with the new ball.
Edwards' exclusion was not unexpected but, if only for the feel of touring, his place might have gone to one of the up-and-comers like Delorn Johnson, Shannon Gabriel, Sheldon Cotterell rather than Tino Best. Still fast, fit and eager, he is in the twilight of his best years at 30 and, in the conditions, unlikely to feature in the first eleven.
The major disappointment is that Bishoo, Barath and Brathwaite remain at home.
Bishoo, the tough little legspinner, was the ICC's Emerging Cricketer of the Year 2011. His prospects could hardly have been rosier. Now he is back in the A team, attempting to rediscover the magic of his most difficult art. The young guns, Barath (22), Brathwaite (19) and Kieran Powell (22) shared the post left vacant at the top of the order during the protracted absence of Chris Gayle.
Barath, the dashing right-hander with the advantage of a debut hundred against Australia, seemed to be in pole position to keep his place on Gayle's return. He hasn't. Whenever he appeared well set in his last eight consecutive Tests, untimely impetuosity led to his dismissals - and now his exclusion.
Brathwaite's remarkable powers of concentration that brought him a truckload of hundreds at junior level were confirmed in his nine Tests but so were his technical blemishes. There is ample time for him to correct them. By process of elimination, the stylish left-hander Powell got the spot on Gayle's return and immediately secured it with his 134 and partnership of 254 with the returning Jamaican against New Zealand.
What Butts might point out is the several encouraging options open to the selectors. Like Permaul, others have stepped forward from the A team and the High Performance Centre's trip to Bangladesh. Their performances add more than usual significance to next season's first-class tournament.
Tony Cozier has written about and commentated on cricket in the Caribbean for nearly 50 yearsFeeds: Tony Cozier
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
Ask Steven: Also, most keeping dismissals on debut, seven-for at HQ, and youngest ODI centurions
Diary: Our correspondent walks and buses the streets of the English capital, and then heads for the coast
My Favourite Cricket Story: Brett Lee remembers how Australia nearly lost the Old Trafford Test in the 2005 Ashes
Ed Smith: Success, failure, innovation - they are all about our willingness to take risks and how we judge them
The Cricket Couch: Australian physio Alex Kountouris talks about player health management
The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him
Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England
They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity
Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th
In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia
India's wretched run away from home began at Lord's in 2011. A young team full of self-belief may have brought it to an end with their victory at the same venue three years later
What's wrong with their cricket? Well, what isn't?
Alastair Cook did not bat like a leading man but the crowd applauded him for simply not failing
If England are going to win nothing, history suggests it might be worth their while to win nothing with kids
Why not you? Read and learn how!