S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

A winner as batsman and captain

Over an international career spanning 17 years, Ricky Ponting stamped his authority as one of Australia's greatest by scoring runs in almost all conditions and against all opposition

S Rajesh

November 30, 2012

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A

Ricky Ponting clips the ball to the leg side, Australia v India, 4th Test, Adelaide, 2nd day, January 25, 2012
Ricky Ponting is one of only five batsmen to score four centuries in the fourth innings of Tests © Getty Images

Quite simply, Ricky Ponting is the most successful cricketer to ever play the game: over a career spanning 559 international matches (going into his last Test), he was a part - and often the protagonist - of 377 victories. That the next best is only 301 (by Sachin Tendulkar) indicates, more than anything else, the golden era of Australian cricket that he was a part of, but he also shaped much of it with his batting and captaincy. Ponting remains the only player to have played in more than 100 Test wins (he has 108); among active cricketers, Jacques Kallis is next on 75. In ODIs, Australia won 262 of the 375 matches he played; next in line is again Tendulkar with 234. And then there were also the three World Cup wins that he was a part of, two of them as captain.

Through a large number of these wins, Ponting was Australia's mainstay in the batting line-up. In Australia, he is regarded as their best batsman since Don Bradman, and the numbers back up that claim quite emphatically. Only Tendulkar has more runs in Tests and ODIs, and till recently, he had the second-most centuries in both formats too, till Kallis went past him in Tests. Among Australians, Ponting's Test aggregate is easily the highest, though his average has fallen marginally below Greg Chappell's, thanks to his relatively poor recent form; in ODIs, Ponting scored almost 4000 runs more than the next-best Australian.

Perth may not be Australia's most historic ground, but in a way it'll be fitting that Ponting's Test journey will end where it all started 17 years ago: a rough lbw call stopped him four short of a debut century, against Sri Lanka, but since then not much has come in the way of his appetite for runs. Even when he took over as captain, it didn't diminish from Ponting the batsman: he averaged 51.51 in Tests and 42.91 in ODIs over a long captaincy stint.

Ponting's Test career started with 96 against Sri Lanka, and he then also passed 50 in his first Test against West Indies (88 in Brisbane), England (127 at Headingley), New Zealand (73 not out in Brisbane), South Africa (105 in Melbourne) and Pakistan (76 not out in Peshawar). (He also scored 54 in the only Test against ICC World XI in Sydney, making it seven 50-plus scores in his first Test against an opposition.) Despite those strong starts, though, Ponting's Test form was patchy through his first three years.

From 1999 to 2006, though, he was on top of his game as a Test batsman. During this period, he scored more than 8000 runs at a 65-plus average, with 31 centuries in 87 Tests. No other batsman scored 7500 Test runs. From 2007 onwards he wasn't quite as prolific, but he still managed to average almost 41, though his conversion rate of fifties into hundreds dropped drastically.

Ricky Ponting's Test career
Period Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Till Dec 1998 22 1209 36.63 2/ 7
Jan 1999 to Dec 2006 87 8114 65.43 31/ 29
Jan 2007 onwards 58 4043 40.83 8/ 26
Career 167 13,366 52.21 41/ 62

The golden years
During that eight-year period between 1999 and 2006, Ponting averaged 50 or more against all opposition except Sri Lanka, against whom he averaged 47.09 in seven Tests. He was especially unstoppable at home, averaging 73.76 from 47 Tests. He wasn't quite as prolific overseas, but still averaged an outstanding 56.55 in 40 matches. The only blot during that period - as indeed over his entire career - was his record in India: in seven Test innings there, he scored 40 runs at 5.71; over his entire career, he averaged 26.48 in Tests in India, with one century in 25 innings. Harbhajan Singh was his tormentor on most of those occasions, getting him out ten times, the most occasions any bowler dismissed him. He averaged more than 40 in all other countries in which he played more than one Test.

Highest Test averages between Jan 1999 and Dec 2006 (Qual: 3000 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Ricky Ponting 87 8114 65.43 31/ 29
Jacques Kallis 81 7053 62.41 22/ 35
Rahul Dravid 82 7265 59.54 21/ 31
Mohammad Yousuf 66 5954 58.37 22/ 22
Inzamam-ul-Haq 65 5455 56.23 19/ 24
Matthew Hayden 81 7422 55.80 26/ 27
Sachin Tendulkar 71 5837 55.06 18/ 23
Brian Lara 74 7212 54.63 24/ 23
Steve Waugh 58 3818 52.30 15/ 11
Gary Kirsten 53 4197 51.18 14/ 17

One of the best at No. 3
Through most of the 17 years Ponting played international cricket, he owned the No. 3 spot. In all international cricket, he scored 22,869 runs from that position, which is easily the highest; the second-best is Sangakkara's 16,324. Ponting's 61 international hundreds at that position is 25 more than the next-best.

Breaking up those numbers format-wise, Ponting missed out on 10,000 Test runs at No. 3 by only 96, and though he currently has the most Test hundreds, Sangakkara is only three behind and will probably overhaul that mark pretty soon.

In ODIs, Ponting is easily the most prolific No. 3 batsman with 12,662 runs, almost 5000 more than the next-best (Kallis' 7759). His 29 ODI hundreds at No. 3 is more than twice that of any other batsman at that position (Kallis has 13).

Highest run-getters in Tests at No. 3
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Rahul Dravid 219 10,524 52.88 28/ 50
Ricky Ponting 196 9904 56.27 32/ 43
Kumar Sangakkara 169 9222 59.11 29/ 37
Don Bradman 56 5078 103.63 20/ 10
Hashim Amla 95 4734 55.04 16/ 22
Richie Richardson 107 4711 47.11 14/ 21
Rohan Kanhai 90 4689 52.68 13/ 20
David Boon 111 4412 45.48 13/ 20
Most runs scored at No. 3 in ODIs
Batsman Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Ricky Ponting 330 12,662 42.48 80.73 29/ 74
Jacques Kallis 196 7759 46.74 73.83 13/ 57
Kumar Sangakkara 176 6517 39.98 76.16 7/ 47
Dean Jones 131 5100 43.58 72.07 7/ 39
Brian Lara 106 4447 45.84 85.98 12/ 26

Almost 21% of the Tests that Ponting played were against England, and while he managed eight centuries in those matches, his overall average against them was eight runs lower than his career average. Some of his best runs, though, were scored against England's bowlers, perhaps none better than his effort at Old Trafford in 2005, when he kept a high-quality England attack at bay in scoring a match-saving 156.

Highest Australian run-scorers in the Ashes
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Don Bradman 37 5028 89.78 19/ 12
Allan Border 47 3548 56.31 8/ 21
Steve Waugh 46 3200 58.18 10/ 14
Clem Hill 41 2660 35.46 4/ 16
Greg Chappell 35 2619 45.94 9/ 12
Mark Taylor 33 2496 42.30 6/ 15
Ricky Ponting 35 2476 44.21 8/ 9
Neil Harvey 37 2416 38.34 6/ 12

Finishing with a flourish
In fact, Ponting brought out his best in the last innings of a Test more than once. In Fatullah in 2006, Ponting's unbeaten 118 saved Australia from the embarrassment of a Test defeat against Bangladesh, as they turned around a huge first-innings deficit and chased a fourth-innings target of 307. A couple of months earlier, he had celebrated his 100th Test with centuries in each innings, including 143 not out in a successful fourth-innings run-chase of 288. (That makes him the only batsman to score centuries in each innings of his 100th Test.) During that period, Ponting had scored three fourth-innings centuries in seven innings.

Overall, Ponting is one of five batsmen to score four centuries in the fourth innings of Tests; no batsman has scored more. His overall fourth-innings stats are fantastic too: 1454 runs at 51.92. Only four batsmen have scored more fourth-innings runs than he has.

As well as finishing matches, Ponting was outstanding at setting up games with dominant opening-day performances: in the first innings, he scored 5403 runs at 61.39, with 21 hundreds. No batsman has more first-innings centuries.

Leading by example
As mentioned earlier, Ponting won more international matches than any other player, and in a majority of those he was captain. Of the 377 wins he was a part of, he led the team in 220 of those games. The next-best is Graeme Smith's 154. Smith might catch up with Ponting's 48 wins in Tests (he is only four short), but it's unlikely any captain will catch up with Ponting's 165 ODI wins in a hurry.

With a 30-Test cut-off among Test captains, only Steve Waugh has a higher win percentage (wins as a percentage of Tests captained); in ODIs, with a 60-match cut-off, Ponting is second only to Clive Lloyd.

Captains with highest win % in Tests (Qual: 30 Tests)
Captain Tests Won Lost Win % W/L ratio
Steve Waugh 57 41 9 71.93 4.56
Ricky Ponting 77 48 16 62.34 3.00
Mike Brearley 31 18 4 58.06 4.50
Viv Richards 50 27 8 54.00 3.38
Mark Taylor 50 26 13 52.00 2.00
Captains with highest win % in ODIs (Qual: 60 matches)
Captain Matches Won Lost Win % W/L ratio
Clive Lloyd 84 64 18 76.19 3.56
Ricky Ponting 230 165 51 71.74 3.24
Hansie Cronje 138 99 35 71.74 2.83
Viv Richards 105 67 36 63.81 1.86
Steve Waugh 106 67 35 63.21 1.91

Through all the rigours of captaincy, Ponting continued to excel at his primary suit - scoring runs. Only Smith and Allan Border have scored more Test runs as captains, while Ponting is second to none in terms of ODI runs as captain.

World Cup exploits
And after all this there was the small matter of his World Cup stats. In keeping with his winning stats, he also won more World Cup matches than any other player - 38, four more than Glenn McGrath. He's also one of only two players - Glenn McGrath being the other - to play four World Cup finals.

He excelled as a batsman too in these tournaments - only Tendulkar has scored more World Cup runs. Tendulkar's overall World Cup aggregate is 535 more than Ponting's, but the gap narrows to 92 when runs scored against the Test-playing teams are considered. In the biggest match of them all - the World Cup final - he has produced his best, scoring an unbeaten 140 against India 2003, the second-highest score in a final.

Most runs scored in World Cups v non-Associate teams
Batsman Matches Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar 36 1597 46.97 85.03 3/ 12
Ricky Ponting 36 1505 50.16 79.92 4/ 6
Brian Lara 29 1109 42.65 83.88 2/ 6
Javed Miandad 30 1083 43.32 68.02 1/ 8
Sanath Jayasuriya 32 1024 35.31 89.43 3/ 6
Viv Richards 23 1013 63.31 85.05 3/ 5

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Samar_Singh on (December 3, 2012, 7:31 GMT)

Kallis is the best player of his generation. Ponting and Tendulkar then after.

Posted by Zubeir09 on (December 2, 2012, 19:03 GMT)

Well... Peoples who try to compare ' Punter ' with Sachin or Kallis simply dont understand the game of cricket deeply. They all are the great players of same generation. If Kallis hasn't got support like Dravid/Laxman or Hayden/Langer, then don't also forget that he was never under the pressure of captaining a No. 1 ranked team, which ' Punter ' did for most of his career. And when it comes to captaincy, every cricket lover Knows that Sachin denied the opportunity to captain Indian Team. This fact also can't be overseen that none of Sachin or Kallis did lift their respective teams to the great points like ' Punetr ' lifts his team in both formats of the game. Leading his side to so many dominant victories, No. 1 Title for so long period, 2 ODI WC Titles As a Captain, 4 ODI WC Final Appearance, 108 test wins, 262 ODI wins and maintaining his own great form in batting while doing so makes " PUNTER " Great Cricketer of All Times.....Hats Off!

Posted by BoratShah on (December 2, 2012, 4:22 GMT)

Nice compilation of most of Ricky's achievements. He was also one of THE BEST fielders in the world. It is a sign of something lacking in Cricket Statistics that Ponting's fielding cannot be quantified well enough to be included in such a piece.

Posted by blackie on (December 1, 2012, 13:48 GMT)

I'm a bit surprised and disappointed that the discussion has turned so negative. i'm a west Indian but i recognise Ponting as one of the greats. his record speaks volumes though his 'win ratio' must be attributed to the greatness of the team. To be fair to him though it must be recognised that he did win more than one match for Australia. That is one sign of a great player. I hated when he played against Windies simply because he was so good. Cricket will miss the Punter. One of the modern greats!!!

Posted by   on (December 1, 2012, 10:53 GMT)

On current form and considering who he plays with Clark may usurp Ricky's number two spot. If Clark was not playing in this series it may have been a no contest. He must have scored close to 40% of Ausies runs this series.

Posted by   on (December 1, 2012, 10:47 GMT)

Mmm 44.00 Against the England he faced for most of his career? Not very flattering. He hasn't been a top notch performer since 2006 according to these stats. only 40.o If that was at the beginning of his career he would not have played more than 20 matches for Australia. Especially considering the talent who did not get to play for Aus in this period. Like I always thought Ricky's game was lifted by those around him. When they left his real talent level was exposed. a different game coming out when Hayden and Langer had put up a 100 plus partnership. Kallis has played with this pressure. It is only now that he gets to walk in after Hash had put a dent in the bowlers confidence.

Posted by JimBobBirnie on (December 1, 2012, 3:22 GMT)

And in between the 3 defeats he led Australia to the unforgettable whitewash in 2007. I still have nightmares about the Adelaide match.

Posted by JimBobBirnie on (December 1, 2012, 3:17 GMT)

Ponting is an all time great. The author failed to mention that he also holds the record for most Ashes series lost as captain.

Posted by RogerC on (December 1, 2012, 0:23 GMT)

If number of wins is an indicator of a player's greatness, then Justin Langer is a greater player than Vivian Richards. Ponting's higher number of wins are due to a great team and he benefited from it. After the great team dissipated, he became a less effective player. One should actually look at Ponting's performance after 2005 and compare those with Lara or Tendulkar's performance over their career.

Posted by Soso_killer on (November 30, 2012, 23:41 GMT)

This shows how great Kallis has been, during 99-06 SA had an unstable middle order, yet Kallis managed to average 60+.

It was only after 06 that the likes of AB & Amla came of age. Kallis has since then upped his strike rate, and his 100 conversion rate has improved.

Kallis never had (Gangully, Dravid, Laxman etc) or (Hayden, Langer, Martyn etc), so he was never going to score quickly, he had to drop anchor and occupy the crease which is not easy, i am sure Ponting will agree. As he has struggled in that regard with an unstable batting line up.

I hope those who dont understand the game will now realise that Kallis is the best player of his generation.

Posted by Emancipator007 on (November 30, 2012, 20:50 GMT)

The best part about Punt was that despite his miserable time in India, he was cussed enuf to keep coming back and fight to be competitive (just like Warne, another failure in India) which he was in past 2 tours (3 50s/1 100).This is unlike "Ashes" specialists Greg C and Lillee who just refused to tour most countries for most of their career. Punt's greatest legacy is his ODI triumphs/trophies-Champions Trophies/World Cups/Tri-series/bilateral series where it was REALLY difficult to beat his teams. Unlike Tests where India was the ONLY country to push OZ to the hilt both home & away after the 1999 whitewash in OZ (7-6 uptill 2008 in India favor). The surprising stat is that Tendu still has 301 wins despite having one of most non-penetrative, least incisive attacks to back his scores during '90s/even now, LOL (at least Lara had Ambrose/Walsh till 2000).Punt also hated losing & would die trying not to lose & did not care about records-just Baggy Green wins.

Posted by dewansharie on (November 30, 2012, 14:12 GMT)

well this needs to be printed out and placed in every ground and shown to every person says Punter wasn't the best of Cricket. this is a hell of a record which Punter can point at any time and say here is what i have given to cricket.

Posted by CricketIsnotlife on (November 30, 2012, 12:48 GMT)

Please don't belittle Indian cricket stating India was weak and Tendulkar was the only reliable player. Since Sachin's debut, India had Vengsarkar, Azharuddin, Siddhu, Dravid, Laxman, Sehwag, Dhoni, Zaheer Khan, Kumble, Srinath, Harbhajan. So they had a very strong batting line-up and bowlers right through his career. In fact, if any one Indian cricketer played a lone hand in India winning, it has to be Kumble and not Sachin. As far as Ponting is concerned, he is indeed the greatest cricketer ever since he contributed not just with the bat like Sachin but was a tiger in the field effecting many run outs and also was a captain of his country through 2 World Cups, 2 Champions Trophy, 190+ test catches and 48 tests. So no comparison there. The closest or I would say better is Kallis since he is also a frontline bowlers and super slip catcher.

Posted by natasrik on (November 30, 2012, 10:52 GMT)

I am not sure what people are talking about the team, If Australia had Warne, McGrath, Hayden, Langer, Adam, Hussey, etc when Ponting took the leadership, then when Sachin was playing India had so many players from 90's till date, Kapil, Azhar, Sanjay, Ravi Shastri, Anil Kumble, Harbhajan, Viru, Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Srinath, Prasad, Gambhir, Dhoni, Yuvraj and many more. So one cannot dilute the achievements just like that, what matters is the way they played the game and results speaks the facts. If one has to choose top 10 batsman from the era then I would include sachin in the list but top 5 goes like this not necessarily in order, Lara, Ponting, Kallis, Dravid, Waugh. Dravid outscore Sachin and Laxman purely on the basis of results plus his additional quality contribution for the team as a keeper, opener, etc.

Posted by ravikb on (November 30, 2012, 10:47 GMT)

@harshthakor, Lara had a very good bowlers, likes of Ambrose, Walsh, Bishop, etc, in his team in the first part of his career. Only in the last 6 years he played in very weak team. Whereas Sachin played in a very weak team for almost first 11 years but still his record was expectional compared to the second 11 years of his career.

Posted by harshthakor on (November 30, 2012, 9:22 GMT)

Ricky Ponting is the greatest Australian batsman after Don Bradman and Greg Chappell and certainly amongst the top 5 batsman at one down position of all time.At his best probably,the best batsman in the world.In his peak period he statistically overshadowed both Lara and Tendulkar when he averaged over 65 runs and scored an aggregate of above 8000 runs.The best batsman of pure pace in his time and one of the greatest match-winning batsman of all.At one time looked the most likely candidate to overhaul Tendulkar but did not mantain his tempo.His match performance ratings are even above Tendulkar .Overall Lara and Sachin rate ahead of Ponting as they played for weaker teams and in more difficult circumstances.

Posted by natasrik on (November 30, 2012, 8:45 GMT)

Salute to the legend. The author missed out two more important accomplishments, first two champions trophy under his leadership and the most important one he was declared "player of the decade".

Posted by Emancipator007 on (November 30, 2012, 5:58 GMT)

Ponting was a more accomplished & supreme caliber ODI player than a Test;though he is just in the 2nd tier along with Kallis,Dravid,Sanga after the super league of Lara & Tendulkar. In ODIs, where there is a greater chance for a batsman to be decisive in wins (bowling need not win you in ODIs unlike Tests),Punt was exceptional despite presence of Gilly/Haydos/Martyn/Bevan/Huss/Lehmann. Whereas in Tests, the moment the stalwarts (both batting/bowling) retired, he could not carry the team singlehandedly on his shoulders/nor create impossible wins.Basically, he failed under extreme pressure in Tests (v. India/SA/Eng) when OZ became a middling team just like India/WI were during mid-late 90s & when SRT/Lara excelled. But in Tests, he was possibly the best player on the pacy decks of OZ & SA of this era. Why is everybody surprised at Punt's 100 plus Tests win-all stars of that OZ domination era had 70 plus wins in pro-rated Tests.

Posted by   on (November 30, 2012, 3:33 GMT)

Really is a legend of the game, Ponting. Love You and miss you too.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    The return of Bob Simpson

Rewind: When the 41-year-old former captain came out of retirement to lead Australia against India

    Ranji in Ireland, Hazare in Mumbai

Subash Jayaraman's cricket world tour takes in Dublin, Mumbai, Pune, Bangalore and Chennai

    Benn shows up in body and spirit

Tony Cozier: The spinner has brought in a sense of discipline into his bowling and behaviour on the field since his Test comeback

    A year of triumph and disaster

Martin Crowe: Misbah, McCullum, and the ICC's efforts against chucking were the positive highlights in a year that ended with the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death

Why Steven Smith's here to stay

Russell Jackson: He has experienced captaincy at every level. Most admirably, he has managed to reinvent his game to succeed at the highest level

News | Features Last 7 days

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Kohli attains batting nirvana

Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

News | Features Last 7 days

    BCCI's argument against DRS not 100% (164)

    Turning your back on a system that the whole cricketing world wants a discussion on, refusing to discuss it because it is not 100%, is not good enough

    Karn struggles to stay afloat (114)

    The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

    Kohli attains batting nirvana (110)

    Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

    When defeat isn't depressing (57)

    After a long time we have seen an Indian team and captain enjoy the challenge of trying to overcome stronger opposition in an overseas Test

    What ails Rohit and Watson? (53)

    Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena