Saad Shafqat
Saad Shafqat Saad ShafqatRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Writer based in Karachi

Pakistan's mediocrity raises questions

Does Mohammad Hafeez deserve to be in the Test side? Who after Misbah? What is Whatmore doing? Does the board have a plan to safeguard the future?

Saad Shafqat

September 14, 2013

Comments: 86 | Text size: A | A

Mohammad Hafeez trudges back to the pavilion after a low score, Zimbabwe v Pakistan, 1st Test, Harare, 1st day, September 3, 2013
Mohammad Hafeez averages 20.8 with the bat outside Asia © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

Zimbabwe have just given Pakistan an enormous surprise. This is great news for Zimbabwe, but terrible news for Pakistan. On their previous trip there, precisely two years ago - things had been far more one-sided, with Pakistan making short work of the opposition in all three ODIs and both T20s, and pocketing the one-off Test by a comfortable seven wickets.

This time Pakistan got their nose bloodied when they lost the opening ODI, and now comes the shock defeat in the second Test - the equivalent of a kick in the most sensitive parts, leaving Pakistan's cricket edifice doubled over.

Undoubtedly Zimbabwe have improved tremendously. For over a decade, they have looked terribly out of sorts, but today they have a penetrative seam attack, a nettlesome offspinner, and solid upper-order batsmen.

Meanwhile for Pakistan, several disturbing questions arise. Defeat in a limited-overs encounter can always be written off as a slip on a banana peel to which anyone can occasionally succumb. But a Test match is a far more comprehensive and probing examination. It measures your true cricketing worth far more accurately than any ODI or T20. When you have lost a Test, there are few excuses left.

In fact, the 1-1 tally for the Test series does not do justice to Zimbabwe, who nearly outplayed Pakistan in the opening Test as well. Pakistan's eventual winning margin of 221 runs may be massive, but it was almost entirely accounted for by a solitary performance in the form of Younis Khan's 200 not out in the second innings. In the first innings Pakistan's total remained modest and they conceded a lead of 78. Even during his otherwise magnificent double-hundred, Younis had a few close calls, including a convincing lbw appeal when he was on 10. Had he failed in the second innings, Zimbabwe would have been celebrating a Test whitewash.

Batting was Pakistan's most obvious failure, but the bowling proved disappointing too. On the opening day of the second Test, Pakistan reduced Zimbabwe to 187 for 6, but their bowlers failed to close the deal as the last four Zimbabwean wickets took the total to almost 300, including a tenth-wicket stand of 46. With Pakistan having to bat last, everything thereafter depended on securing a sizeable first-innings lead, but Pakistan's batting line-up more or less crumbled, and the Test turned. On the final morning Pakistan came out needing 106 runs with five wickets left and Misbah-ul-Haq still at the crease. It was a decade, almost to the day, from the memorable Multan Test against Bangladesh, when Pakistan needed 113 with four left and Inzamam-ul-Haq not out on 53. But Misbah, despite his valiant rearguard, is no Inzi, and this Zimbabwe team are a cut above that Bangladesh side of 2003.

A good bit of Pakistan's mediocrity can perhaps be explained by improper selection, of which there is no more apt an example than Mohammad Hafeez. His batting average in 14 Tests outside Asia is only 20.80, which is in the tailender range, yet he has played each of those matches as an opener. He has managed to extend his Test life by offering a competitive bowling option and by creating the posture of a captain-in-waiting, but by now his batting abilities have been thoroughly exposed and he doesn't merit Test selection on the basis of his bowling alone.

Another Pakistan batsman who appears horribly exposed is Azhar Ali, whose Test average is in steady decline since it peaked at 45 last year. The talented and technically competent Asad Shafiq has also looked sadly adrift. These players are experiencing a rough patch but they have shown enough mettle in the past to still be considered the nucleus of Pakistan's future middle order. In the case of Hafeez, however, the excuses have simply run out; interesting alternative options - Haris Sohail, Fawad Alam, and perhaps even Umar Amin or Umar Akmal - are available to replace him.

A captaincy crisis is also looming. Misbah is nearly 40 and, with Hafeez undeserving of a Test spot, there is no longer any successor in sight. Hafeez is still a sound option for limited-overs, but the Test captaincy has suddenly been flung open. After Misbah's retirement the authorities will inevitably turn to Younis, but that can't be a long-term appointment. Plus, he has refused the honour before, so there's no guarantee that he will accept. From the younger crop, Azhar projects an air of leadership potential, but he first needs to prove his value as a batsman.

The spectacle out in the middle - mistimed strokes, suicidal shot selection, wickets gifted away - is what everyone naturally focuses on, but there is scant evidence to suggest the elaborate support infrastructure is doing its job properly. What, for example, is coach Dav Whatmore's contribution to this Pakistan effort beyond relaxing in the pavilion, appearing in silly soda ads, and collecting a fat paycheck? What is being done to sort out the uncertain status of the selection committee, whose chair appointment remains in legal limbo following a court challenge? And what is the PCB doing to identify and nurture batting talent in the country? Najam Sethi, the interim PCB chief hastily appointed by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, has so far done little to inspire confidence among fans that their beloved game is being tended to.

There is an important silver lining here too, and we must not lose sight of it: Test cricket is in great health, and its pleasures are infinite. This series produced ten days of a highly absorbing contest, with all the twists, surprises and drama that the most evolved form of the game is known for. What a shame that the organisers lacked the foresight to schedule a third Test, and the sponsors and broadcasters lacked the gumption to support it. We really have to stop depriving audiences of Test cricket's delightful possibilities.

Saad Shafqat is a writer based in Karachi. His latest book is Breath of Death, a medical thriller

RSS Feeds: Saad Shafqat

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (September 20, 2013, 21:30 GMT)

Also why aren't we playing more home matches in Dubai/Sharjah/Abu-Dhabi or even Canada or USA.

Posted by   on (September 20, 2013, 21:27 GMT)

We need to give Ahmed Shezad , Nasir Jamshed , Umar Akmal , and Fawad Alam all talented and gifted batsmen a chance together in one team . If Misbah , Coach and Management cannot handle the exuberance of a younger mind then they either need to learn or move quickly as it is causing our cricketing pride and joy a huge loss. Is it so hard to understand ??

Posted by merchantcricket on (September 17, 2013, 9:00 GMT)

The biggest issue is selection on merit. I just find it difficult to accept the idea that you can't find better test players than Asad and Hafeez (even Azhar, although his average better). Another issue, is captaincy, Misbah is good as a player but not as a captain, we need to have gutsy captain. Misbah's conservative approach is a bigger problem for the moral of the team. Pakistan selection committee need to adopt some sort strategy to remove/add batmans and I think one indicator could be that if a player (after five matches/innings) has an average of less than 40% they will out. Similarly approach of minimum average could be adopt for the ODI.

Posted by fkhawaja on (September 17, 2013, 7:01 GMT)

i think everyone agrees that it was apoor performance and we need changes, 1st coach. whatmore has failed and needs to go. infact he should resign. he has taken the team which defeated england 3 nil to loss against zimbabwe. 2nd captain.. needs a change but unfortunately no clear choice. azhar ali is not even sure of his position. younis is temperamentally not suited and also his age. only person I can see is Umar Gul. he has the experience and is the bowling spearhead. we have had successful bowling captains like wasim . if he is fit he should lead the test and ODI. 3rd batsmen. hafeez has to go from tests. asad shafiq and azhar are in a bad slump.we can bring taufiq umar or ahmed shahzad for hafeez and umar akmal for shafiq. 4th. bowlers. umar gul junaid irfan 2 spinners and keeper.

Posted by   on (September 17, 2013, 3:59 GMT)

A simple solution is to give a serious thought to the test cricket and getting a better scheduling for tests in any given year. Where are the allrounders and the 140 k + bowlers? Its mentally incapacitated to keep Hafeez in the test squad and please get international teams back in Pakistan. These departmental owned teams are producing nothing and we should bring city or region based teams sponsored by the departments so the locals show interest in backing their respective city's team. Who in the hell wants to take side in PIA vs Sui gas match?

Posted by Desihungama on (September 16, 2013, 19:02 GMT)

@Arrow011- Most sensible comment. A bowler should always be a captain, at least for Team Pakistan. Bowlers mind is innovative and always tinkering with unknowns. And when you have a gem in Ajmal why waste time? Weren't we on top when Kardar, Intakhab, Imran, Wasim and Waqar lead?

Posted by applethief on (September 16, 2013, 12:18 GMT)

@Rohit Sen Sammy is a bad point of comparison for Misbah. Sammy is not a good enough player to make it into his team as a batsman or a bowler. He's essentially a specialist captain. Misbah deservers his spot on batting alone, and he is a good fielder to boot. His captaincy, in my opinion, is very good, considering what he has to work with.

Posted by applethief on (September 16, 2013, 11:54 GMT)

Really glad to see someone calling Whatmore to account. It's impossible to see what he's actually done for the team. Selection has not improved or shown any signs of strategy. Neither has technique in batting or fielding. He just seems to keep quiet and in the shadows, not obviously doing anything. Both Waqar and Mohsin were clearly more pro-active and had a clear strategy. Waqar wanted to leave, but it's a real tragedy that Mohsin was treated so badly, like a temp rather than being appreciated for his test successes. He even said as much, that he didn't want to be taken for granted. It's no coincidence that players like Azhar and Asad performed best under him.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Saad ShafqatClose

    Worst keepers, and honours at Lord's

Ask Steven: Also, most keeping dismissals on debut, seven-for at HQ, and youngest ODI centurions

    From swinging London to Maco country

Diary: Our correspondent walks and buses the streets of the English capital, and then heads for the coast

    When Pidge strayed

My Favourite Cricket Story: Brett Lee remembers how Australia nearly lost the Old Trafford Test in the 2005 Ashes

    How we misunderstand risk in sport

Ed Smith: Success, failure, innovation - they are all about our willingness to take risks and how we judge them

When Jesse went pongo

Beige Brigade: The boys discuss the throbbing excitement of the World Cup, spot slow Bodyline in England, and attack the TV coverage's technology

News | Features Last 7 days

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!