Tony Cozier
Tony Cozier Tony CozierRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Veteran writer and commentator on Caribbean cricket

A transitory resurgence?

After a series of crushing defeats, West Indies turned things around impressively in Trinidad. But will the success turn out to be fleeting once again?

Tony Cozier

June 22, 2014

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

Kraigg Brathwaite pulls, West Indies v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Trinidad, 2nd day, June 17, 2014
The youngest member of the West Indies side, Kraigg Braithwaite, was the Man of the Match for his 129 © WICB
Enlarge

We have got to go back 15 years, to the 1999 home series against Australia, to find as unlikely a turnaround for West Indies as that in the second Test against New Zealand at the Queen's Park Oval on Friday.

The circumstances were almost identical, as was the margin of victory.

West Indies cricket has floundered for so long that any straw is eagerly clutched at. Normally, it would be fanciful to base any optimism on nothing more than a solitary victory over tough, resilient but hardly intimidating opponents; in this case, the expectation is that the impact of the latest revival won't be as transitory as that in 1999.

The transformation then was inspired by the unique genius of one man, Brian Lara, the beleaguered captain. The encouraging difference is that this sequel was a true team effort. All 11 could claim a contribution to the outcome.

It was even more significant that five of those to the forefront were in their early or mid-20s. The timeworn cliché can be again be seized on: they do represent the future.

In 1999, Lara had returned from a humiliating 5-0 whitewash on West Indies' first major tour of post-apartheid South Africa to receive a roasting from the West Indies board for "weaknesses in leadership". The board placed him on probation for two Tests. The first, against Australia in Port-of-Spain, brought as crushing a defeat as West Indies had ever suffered - by 312 runs. Their second-innings all-out 51 was then their lowest Test total. Lara's tenure in the position he had long since craved was surely at its end.

What happened next spoke as much of Lara's mental strength as of his exceptional batting skill. It also highlighted how much West Indies relied on him.

Responding to Australia's modest first-innings 256 in the second Test, Lara set out from the familiar despair of 34 for 4. He proceeded to ravage an attack of Glenn McGrath, Jason Gillespie, Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill for 213. The steadfast Jimmy Adams kept him company in a stand of 322. The other nine cobbled together 82 among them.

The Australians, duly stunned, could only muster 177 in their second innings against Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh and Nehemiah Perry, a tall offspinner on debut. West Indies needed three runs to win the Test.

There was more Lara magic in the third Test, in Bridgetown. His unbeaten 153 that carried West Indies to their implausible target of 308 on the final day, with Walsh, the accredited No. 11, as his final partner, left big men weeping and hugging each other, women swooning.

From the debacles of South Africa and Port-of-Spain, West Indies were now unbelievably 2-1 up in a series against Test cricket's most powerful team. In spite of another Lara hundred, the final Test was an anti-climax. Australia won comfortably to share the series.

The resurgence proved transitory. Within a year, Lara had resigned as captain after West Indies' early elimination from the World Cup in England and defeat in both Tests and all five ODIs in New Zealand. It was back to square one.

Fast forward to 2014. The backdrop was no less daunting than that facing Lara and his team. The tally was four losses, three by an innings in three days, in Tests in India and New Zealand five months earlier.

After such thrashings, the captain, Darren Sammy, threw his hands in the air and proclaimed "we cannot continue like this". The WICB responded to his lament, not by censuring him for weak leadership and placing him on probation but by replacing him with Denesh Ramdin.

The outcome of Ramdin's first Test at the helm equated to that of the first Test of 1999. The margin was 186 runs in four day. It would have been greater but for a swashbuckling, nothing-to-lose last-wicket partnership of 82.

Heading to Port-of-Spain, the despair was every bit as acute as it was prior to Lara's stimulus 15 years earlier. The omnipresent football World Cup was a welcome distraction.

The usually ultra-cautious selectors reacted by making three changes. On the irrefutable evidence of form, specifically hundreds against touring Bangladesh A in Barbados, they reinstated Kraigg Brathwaite and introduced Jermaine Blackwood as the first new batsman in the Test team for two years. They recalled Shannon Gabriel to boost the fast bowling.

At 21, Brathwaite was the youngest player on either team, not that long out of Combermere School in Barbados, alma mater of two cricket knights, Frank Worrell and Wes Hall - and, without even a fleeting relevance to cricket, pop superstar Rihanna as well.

Brathwaite was Man of the Match for his archetypical opener's 129, around which the dashers carried out the game plan to be more assertive than they were in Kingston. Together, they built the formidable first-innings lead.

Darren Bravo, 25, was once described by Steve Waugh as "the next batting superstar, no doubt". He hasn't lived up to such hype since. Now he shook off the effects of the "personal problems" that led to his premature exit from the New Zealand tour in January with his first hundred in the Caribbean.

Fittingly, it was at the Queen's Park Oval where he plays for club and country. His uninhibited celebrations were a sure sign that in three and a quarter hours he had shaken off the gremlins.

Blackwood, 22, brought with him three hundreds and a 94 in his previous three first-class matches. The leading scorer in the 2014 first-class season, he immediately took to Test cricket with refreshing panache.

Kemar Roach and Gabriel are both 26. Roach was the bowling spearhead until a shoulder operation kept him away from cricket of any sort since last October. Gabriel was in his seventh Test.

Jerome Taylor and Sulieman Benn, each returning after more than three years in Test exile, bore the brunt in a numerically limited attack. Benn, the beanpole left-arm spinner, sent down 86.4 overs in the match for his five wickets. His fielders let him down more than he deserved.

Roach's recovery, like Gabriel's increasing self-belief, was evident in each spell.

Not everything was ideal for West Indies.

In Dwayne Bravo's continued absence through injury, they are glaringly short of a competent allrounder. In the field, they missed eight chances all told and were overcome by an abrupt lethargy, typified by strangely defensive tactics during the frustrating ninth-wicket partnership of 99 between BJ Watling and Mark Craig in New Zealand's second innings that stretched the contest into the final day.

A seemingly trifling winning goal of 93 has often proved nerve-jangling; Chris Gayle put it in perspective with a no-nonsense T20 assault. His unbeaten 80 off 46 balls, with six sixes and seven fours, scotched concern, at least for the time being, that he is a spent force.

The third Test starts at Kensington Oval on Thursday. It presents an engaging finale between two evenly matched teams. It is as important for New Zealand's mission to prove that their strength extends beyond their home shores as for West Indies' in building for the future.

Tony Cozier has written about and commentated on cricket in the Caribbean for 50 years

RSS Feeds: Tony Cozier

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by JAH123 on (June 26, 2014, 4:30 GMT)

Hmmm, I'm not sure how much of a comparison you can make between this win and Lara's win against Australia. With no disrespect to NZ, they are hardly the Australian side of 1999.

Posted by   on (June 25, 2014, 19:49 GMT)

@ Sal Husain, u saw him in the Ipl - so what? that's hit and giggle cricket. anybody can look ordinary playing t20. holder deserves a chance to play test cricket cause Gabriel is just what we in Jamaica call a runs cart. when u batting whistle, 'runs cart runs cart carry the runs come gimme.

Posted by simonviller on (June 25, 2014, 19:33 GMT)

It's nice to see WI win sometimes ,but the rebuilding must continue for sometime until suitable all-rounders are found and selected in the team .WI cannot continue with four bowlers, if they are to make progress up the rankings table .WI would do well with three pacers and two front line spinners with a batsman as a part-timer bowler ,but with the present batting line it's not possible .

Posted by   on (June 25, 2014, 16:04 GMT)

Narine should never be picked before Benn or Shilly, for a test match EVER! Gabriel needs to make room for Holder.

Posted by SapperP5799 on (June 25, 2014, 14:46 GMT)

It is amazing that some of us actual believe that we are more informed and more knowledgeable than those we see and work with all of the players daily. Only time will tell if Narine becomes a great test bowler, but currently his stats for tests, 1 day and T20 are 40.52, 26.97 and 17.44 does it really mean anything,

Posted by   on (June 25, 2014, 2:04 GMT)

My take on all this talk about who's the best spinner in test,all i will say is Spinners don't take 5 wicket hauls in test matches without putting in the overs,check out the great Muli's stats,see how many overs he's bowled each time to get a 5 wicket haul, on average it's about 35 overs....so it's strange that someone's just played 13 first class games with 6 test matches included is rated as a great test Spinner....

Posted by Starvybz on (June 24, 2014, 18:27 GMT)

i really dont understand why persons say narine "is not a test bowler" so dont repeat what you hear something west indians are very popular for.

Posted by   on (June 24, 2014, 9:13 GMT)

Narine is not on;ly a test bowler but the spinner in the west indies and the world , how can anyone say otherwise is beyond me. Benn bowled fifty overs for two wickets , Narine will probably bowled lees overs with more wickets , he is a class act. Gabriel did well in the test he played and should remain in the side , i saw holder in the IPL and he looked ordinary but everyone has their prejudice. i predict the selectors will go with the same eleven.

Posted by   on (June 24, 2014, 4:55 GMT)

narine isnt a test bowler, but in 3 test matches vs New Zealand he has taken 18 wickets at a strike rate of 60 & average of 24 with 2 five fors 1 at home & 1 on tour. in 3 tests vs NZ a bowler of benn's caliber has 10 wickets at 119 & 44. Narine has the doosra which Benn does not have & Shillingford is not allowed to bowl. The kiwis dont like facing the doosra & have not seen it in this series as yet. If he plays & after the test his doosra is declaired suspect @ least he would have had the chance to win us the series already. maybe its jus me but considering that Kensington Oval is not a ground that has a history of being helpful to spinners i would rather play the non test cricket bowler who takes Test wickets twice as fast for half the amount of runs as Benn vs the Kiwis in a test which will decide who wins the series. if still in doubt maybe we should ask the Kiwi's which bowler they wood rather face & see who we should pick

Posted by   on (June 24, 2014, 4:25 GMT)

@ augustus williams , narine is not a test bowler, but in 3 test matches vs New Zealand he has taken 18 wickets at a strike rate of 60 & average of 24 with 2 five fors 1 at home & 1 on tour. in 3 tests a bowler of benn's caliber has taken 10 wickets at a strike rate of 119 & an average of 44 with no five fors against the same opposition. Narine has the doosra which Benn does not have & Shillingford is not allowed to bowl. maybe its jus me but considering that Kensington Oval is not a ground that has a history of being helpful to spinners i would rather play the non test cricket bowler twice as fast for half the amount of runs as Benn vs the Kiwis in a test which will decide who wins the series. if still in doubt maybe we should ask the Kiwi's which bowler they wood rather face & see who we should pick.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tony CozierClose

    Every innings is an act of courage

Simon Barnes: Phillip Hughes' death was desperately unlucky, and it came in the courageous pursuit of sporting excellence

The country kid who moved a nation

It was a matter of time before Phillip Hughes cemented his spot in the Australian Test team. Then, improbably and inconsolably, his time ran out. By Daniel Brettig

Inzamam had a lot of time to play his shots

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Inzy's technique

    'If I'd stayed captain, Bangladesh would have done better'

Habibul Bashar talks about the team's early days, landmark wins, and the current squad

A song called Younis

Ahmer Naqvi: For a country torn by internal strife, he offers hope with his magnanimity, humility and cheerful disposition

News | Features Last 7 days

Phillip Hughes: Gone too soon

The cricket world reacts to the passing away of Phillip Hughes

Phillip Hughes: Country kid who moved a nation

Likeable, hard-working and skilful, it was a matter of time before Phillip Hughes cemented his spot in the Australian Test team. Then, improbably and inconsolably, his time ran out

Hope for Hughes, feel for Abbott

It is impossible to imagine how Sean Abbott must feel after sending down that bouncer to Phillip Hughes. While the cricket world hopes for Hughes' recovery, it should also ensure Abbott is supported

November games need November prices

An early start to the international season, coupled with costly tickets, have kept the Australian public away from the cricket

Phillip Hughes

News | Features Last 7 days