Mark Nicholas
Mark Nicholas Mark NicholasRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Hampshire batsman; host of Channel Nine's cricket coverage

England v India, 5th Investec Test, The Oval, 3rd day

One-day barrier to Indian Test progress

With too great an emphasis on limited-overs cricket, MS Dhoni's side have a set of skills and a level of concentration that are not commensurate with the necessities of Tests

Mark Nicholas at The Oval

August 17, 2014

Comments: 56 | Text size: A | A

MS Dhoni's captaincy is uncertain in Test cricket © Getty Images

How does a professional team crumble in the way India have done this last month? What are the elements that combine to turn distinguished cricketers into fodder for their opponent? England have some fine players but their impact should not have been as powerful as this. The Indians had both Alastair Cook and his team in the palm of their hand and somehow, inconceivably, contrived to let them go. Rarely, in the history of the game, has there been such a dramatic reversal of fortune and results. The overriding impression is that India have only themselves to blame.

Out of that great land comes the accusation that players are spoilt by the fame they acquire and the money they earn. These riches come relatively easily and can, perhaps for the first time in their cricket history, be made without reference to basic skills or a willingness to apply themselves to the long haul that is Test cricket. Unless you spend time in India, it is hard to understand the favour that is heaped upon gifted cricketers. It is a charmed life.

Certainly, the Indian players have not relished the battle as it has become more intense. This manifests itself in various ways. The batsmen have not put a high price on their wicket. It is surely the duty of any Test cricketer to preserve their wicket and the Indians have failed in that duty. The bowlers have shown heart and courage but neither the consistency nor discipline that are key attributes at this level of the game. The fielders look unaware of the possibilities in each ball bowled, almost as if they do not expect it to come to them, or worse, do not want it too. The slips are poorly positioned and therefore cover less ground than they should and do not instinctively go for catches because they are packed so close.

My feeling is that the Indian players have either lost, or in some cases never knew, the rhythm and pattern of Test match cricket. India has spawned an affectation for the short-form of the game which allows for a set of skills and a level of concentration that are not commensurate with the necessities of Tests.

One-day cricket is much simpler. It dictates to the players, which makes it less interesting. In the longer form of the game the player has choices to make and his career and the match depend on these choices. In the limited-overs form, the player mainly follows the natural path of the game to its conclusion, which he may or may not be able to influence.

MS Dhoni is a good one-day tactician because he can orchestrate his bowlers and finesse his own batting within the confines of a 50- or 20-over period. Stretch him out and he becomes uncertain. He has tendency to lean upon excesses - too many slips for example - or falls foul of his own stubbornness - no third man for example.

He does amazing things and when they come off he is hailed as the sort of lateral thinker that Test cricket needs. Think of his wicketkeeping position to Ravindra Jadeja at Lord's or the sudden switch to a bouncer barrage that England fell for. Then he does other inexplicable things and the critics chase him.

Dhoni is a marvellous cricketer and still the natural leader of a country so dependent on the game. His measure and intelligence is an invaluable asset to those around him. His cool exterior is both a plus and a minus. The young players surely need clearer evidence of his passion for the job and for the game. At times, he seems indifferent and therefore cannot expect the emotionally charged responses from his team that turn a match. He has become oddly reluctant to defend. Or perhaps, he has not mastered defensive tactics when the pitch has pace or bounce. At Trent Bridge he set sensible fields that were able to dry up England but the pitch was slow and low in bounce, much like those in India where he has learnt the game. On the recent faster pitches, he has let England race away. The same conclusion can be levelled at India's batting, which has a greater sense of permanence on slow pitches.

After the game, the captain would not criticise his batsmen other than to say that they were learning about technique and the process would take time. But he must have watched from the other end at both Old Trafford and The Oval and thought "If I can do it why can't you?" Dhoni himself is proof that technique must not be confused with desire. He applies his unorthodox methods quite brilliantly. Test cricket takes the soul of a man. Only those prepared to commit absolutely can survive its examination.

The Indian bowlers are used to the short spells required in the short formats and to the cover provided by boundary riders. Their concentration can be switched on and off while their physical strength is only tested for a few hours at a time. The five match series has sucked the oxygen out of Bhuvneshwar Kumar and preyed on the mind of Ajinkya Rahane, two talented cricketers who are not remotely used to the demands of a tour such as this.

With tiredness comes the loss of focus and the bypassing of detail. The fielding had promise and urgency early in the tour but descended into something close to farce on the third morning at The Oval. Aching bowlers were suddenly overstepping the front line often enough to be sure that a wicket would be taken from a no-ball. The batsmen began to subside into the kind of crass errors associated with collapses and losing teams.

Picking a specific turning point is difficult. Probably there were two. The first day at the Ageas Bowl when England won the toss and batted well in beautiful conditions gave Cook and his men an unlikely lightness of being. They benefited from outrageous luck - witness the toss itself, Jadeja dropping Cook on 15 and Pankaj Singh failing to win a plumb lbw shout against Ian Bell on 0. Or was it luck? The toss is a fifty/fifty thing, so yes. The dropped catch is bad cricket. The lbw would have been overturned if India were not so stubborn about the DRS. After all that, England made 569 which proved to be a slam-dunk of a show. But, but, but, should India have allowed Moeen Ali to knock them over in the fourth innings? Saeed Ajmal maybe, but Moeen? Would a truly resilient team have saved that game?

The other major moment was the toss in Manchester on a damp morning. Both captains wanted to bat first. Both were wrong. Dhoni won the toss. An hour later India were 8 for 4 and James Anderson was rejoicing in his week of great fortune - acquitted at trial, unplayable on his home pitch.

Increasingly, the Indians have looked dispirited. There should be joy in a cricketer's heart but none has been evident. Winning may not be everything but losing with pride, perspective and character is important.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

RSS Feeds: Mark Nicholas

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by fguy on (August 19, 2014, 20:36 GMT)

until test cricket has a tournament the 50 over World Cup is & will be the pinnacle of the game. bilateral series of any format doesnt have 1/10th of the pressure that WC's have. in a bilateral series you lose a moment or even a game more often than not you can come back; in Wc's there is no comebacks after the first round, one mistake & you're gone. how difficult & TESTING it is is proven by the fact that SA who always have a very strong side have never won a knockout match ever. Englnd - the pioneers of every format - have never won a title. if limited overs cricket was so easy/simple/kids play/hit n giggle then why is that the case?? the 80 odd that MSD made in WC final would have been his greatest examination & TEST that he may have faced as a cricketer. so for now supreme form of the game is ODI bcoz that leads to the greatest prize in cricket - the World Cup.

Posted by fguy on (August 19, 2014, 20:34 GMT)

dont buy this supremacy of test cricket talk. why is leaving the ball a superior skill than scoring at 10 an over for say 5 overs? ask say a cook to do the latter & he wouldnt be able to do it however good form he is in even if his life depended on it. both are different skill sets but none have superiority over the other.

Posted by ODI_BestFormOfCricket on (August 18, 2014, 18:58 GMT)

@testcric we Indians liberated from conservative thinking like winning test cricket is everything, conservative people like you are unwilling to accept change! clearly from your comments you are damn jealous about IPL. we love IPL, CLT t20, odi , t20. winning test match is bonus. if you don't like IPL, just leave don't even talk about that. eng or aus free to play as many as test they want atleast 20 per year and at least 10 between them.

Posted by kahvas on (August 18, 2014, 17:47 GMT)

Many experts says this Indian team is a better ODI team. However, I do not remember the last time India won an ODI overseas. Anyways, lil bit of bounce and/or swing, and Indians will fold in double digits, be it test odi or t20's. In order to clear this mess, the president or someone way up has to call the shots and must in the interest of India and not MS Dhoni or his buddies.

Posted by whirlaway on (August 18, 2014, 17:15 GMT)

Keep in mind that India has not won a single ODI match on their last two overseas tours. So, fans should not expect India to do any better in the ODIs either.

Posted by sonofstan on (August 18, 2014, 14:31 GMT)

Test match cricket has everything in abundance - the ultimate cricketing challenge. Wickets ( 8 for 4 anyone ), fast runs ( 100 in an hour on Sunday ), application ( all of those last wicket stands ), highs and lows ( Lords and the Oval...) it tests all of a cricketer's skills ODIs and T20 do not. IPL is as cricket for Americans with their short attention spans.

Posted by IPL_is_Fixed on (August 18, 2014, 13:29 GMT)

No uncertainty. No Barrier. Its clear Team IPL should not play any more Test Cricket. A separate Team India should be evolved to play Test Cricket with vigour, respect, judicious, humility, dexterity...

This Team IPL which is always aimed at losing Test Series should be disbanded from playing Test Cricket and dispatch it to play that funny IPL

Posted by baghels.a on (August 18, 2014, 13:26 GMT)

Continuing from my last post : We Indian fans at least majority of us love our shorter formats but we want to see our team excelling at test level...same is the case for the Indian players, they all learn from there seniors the importance of test cricket and doing well in it,lot of flak is thrown towards BCCI that they don't care much about tests but then how come they had arranged for a 5 test match series v/s England ?? or numerous other 5 or 4 test match series they have scheduled in the future...

itsthewayuplay , now in IPL there are no more any ridiculous rules for uncapped players as everybody is put under the auction, the incentive these uncapped players get is that after getting a lucrative IPL contract they can concentrate on the next step and look to break into Indian team....I am not trying to make excuses but under these conditions with currently the best bowler in these conditions Jimmy Anderson leading the attack many other batting sides will struggle against England.

Posted by   on (August 18, 2014, 13:02 GMT)

Excellent article from the best player not to play for England. I don't think Mark is belittling ODI. He is merely pointing out that quite often ODI follows the same format. First ten overs belt the ball all over the park. Next 30 overs pick ones and twos. Last ten overs belt the ball out of the park. Reach about 300 and let the other team have a go. I am an Englishman living in Australia, and in that time have watched Australia dominate the world at all levels of the game. In all that time I couldn't have cared less if England won the world cup or not. I just wanted to England to beat Australia at test cricket.

Posted by glen1 on (August 18, 2014, 12:57 GMT)

Test cricket requires patience, a steady base where the basic necessities are met, and a encouraging environment from the near and dear for the delayed fruits, if any. There is a major tectonic shift in India where the pace of life has changed dramatically, and it is a luxury to while away and let the world go by. What emerges from this is excellent one-day cricket.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Mark NicholasClose
Mark Nicholas A prolific and stylish middle-order batsman for Hampshire, Mark Nicholas was unlucky never to have played for England, but after captaining his county to four major trophies he made his reputation as a presenter, commentator and columnist. Named the UK Sports Presenter of the Year in 2001 and 2005 by the Royal Television Society, he has commentated all over the world, from the World Cup in the West Indies to the Indian Premier League. He now hosts the cricket coverage for Channel Nine in Australia and Channel 5 in England.

    It's not the plan, stupid

Ed Smith: Good performances make all plans look good. The better team on the day always wins, irrespective of what was strategised in the dressing room

    Original hits

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

The charm of the Boxing Day Test

Jonathan Wilson: It's special not just for the cricket, but also because it satisfies one of the tenets of Christmas - bringing people together

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

Vijay 144, Ganguly 144

Stats highlights from the first day of the second Test between Australia and India in Brisbane

News | Features Last 7 days