February 12, 2016

Dissecting Suresh Raina's ODI stats

His stats by point of entry show that he struggles when he comes in before the 20th over, but he has been hugely successful in the middle overs

Among batsmen who have scored 2000-plus runs at Nos. 5 and 6 since 2005, only Andrew Symonds has a better strike rate than Suresh Raina © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Suresh Raina's international career has been a curious one. He made his debut in July 2005, and a few years later established himself as one of the core members of India's limited-overs side. There were always question-marks about his technique - against fast bowling in general and the short ball in particular - but in shorter formats that wasn't a deficiency that could be exploited fully by fielding teams. His Test match forays haven't been as successful - despite a century on debut - but that wasn't such a surprise. In the last few months, though, his ODI career has stuttered too: he was dropped for the series in Australia, even as he returned to the team for the T20I series and played a key role in the 3-0 victory.

It's clear that Raina remains an asset in T20Is - he became only the second Indian to play 50 matches in that format - but what do his ODI stats say about the kind of batsman he has been? Has he done enough to deserve a longer run, or do India need to look at others for the No. 5/6 slot? Here's what the numbers say about him.

What stands out about Raina's overall numbers in both ODIs and T20Is is his consistency across the years. Since the middle of 2008, when he became a regular member of India's ODI side - he has missed only 27 of India's 214 ODIs since June 2008 - Raina has consistently averaged in the mid-30s, with a strike rate in the mid-90s. He has had his problems in the bouncier conditions of Australia and South Africa, averaging only 25.83 in 25 innings in those two countries, but he has done much better in England and New Zealand, averaging more than 46 at a strike rate of 115 from 19 innings. (Click here for his ODI career summary.)

Suresh Raina's ODI career
Period Inngs Runs Ave SR 100s/ 50s
 Before 2008  28  612  26.60  72.68  0/ 3
 2008 to 2012  104  3130  38.17  97.96  3/ 21
 2013 onwards  60  1826  35.11  96.05  2/ 12
 Career  192  5568  35.46  93.76  5/ 36

The issues about his technique that have been highlighted in the past are reflected again in the tables below, which split up his batting stats at Nos. 5 and 6 by the period of the innings when he has come in to bat. His overall average at No. 5 is 35.32, but when he has come in with India three down for 60 or fewer runs, he has averaged 26 in 19 innings. That improves to almost 33 when he has come in with 61 to 100 runs on the board, but his average and strike rate both improve dramatically when he has come in with more than 100 runs on the board; in 25 such innings, he has topped 50 ten times. When he comes in after 200, the average drops as he obviously needs to take more risks with fewer overs remaining.

The story is similar at No. 6: a sub-30 average with a strike rate in the early 70s when he comes in at 80 or fewer runs at four down, but the numbers get much healthier when he comes in with more runs on the board.

Suresh Raina at No. 5 in ODIs, by point-of-entry scores
Entry score Inngs Runs Ave SR 50+ scores
 60 or less  19  501  26.37  72.71  3
 61 to 100  24  719  32.68  85.49  5
 101 to 200  25  1006  50.30  116.98  10
 201 and above  13  176  25.14  123.94  0
Suresh Raina at No. 6 in ODIs, by point-of-entry scores
Entry score Inngs Runs Ave SR 50+ scores
 80 or less  17  428  28.53  71.69  2
 81 to 175  25  809  40.45  93.85  5
 176 and above  19  469  36.08  125.74  3

The graphic below combines those two tables, and groups his performances by the stage of the innings when he has come in to bat, at Nos. 5 and 6. In the 36 innings when he has come in to bat within the first 15 overs, Raina has passed 50 just four times, while his average drops to less than 25. When coming in between the 16th and 20th overs, his average goes up, but it's still less than 30. Clearly, he has hasn't relished the opportunity to come in early against a new-ish ball and bail his team out after the loss of early wickets.

Raina's comfort zone is batting against a slightly older ball in the middle overs, and the stats reflect that: when he comes in to bat between the 21st and the 35th overs, his average skyrockets to 53.43, while the strike rate goes up to 105. He has 19 fifty-plus scores in 59 innings during this period, compared to eight in 56 innings when he has come in within the first 20 overs.

Raina has averaged less than 25 in ODIs when he has come in by the 15th over at Nos. 5 and 6, but when he comes in between the 21st and 35th overs, his stats are much better © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

And then there's Raina's career numbers in ODIs against pace and spin: though he has a better strike rate against pace, his average against them is almost 18 points lower. Among the four bowlers who have dismissed him most often in ODIs are Mitchell Johnson, Steven Finn, and Jerome Taylor; he averages less than 20 against all of them.

Raina against pace and spin in ODIs
Bowling type Dismissals Average Strike rate
 Pace  107  33.29  99.17
 Spin  39  51.15  85.33
Bowlers who have dismissed Raina most often in ODIs
Bowler Runs Balls Dismissals Average SR
 Steven Finn  93  101  5  18.60  92.08
 Mitchell Johnson  52  51  5  10.40  101.96
 Nuwan Kulasekara  121  120  5  24.20  100.83
 Jerome Taylor  41  55  5  8.20  74.55
 Angelo Mathews  78  96  4  19.50  81.25
 Morne Morkel  41  44  4  10.25  93.18

Raina has his problems against pace, and against the new ball, but it's also apparent that his overall stats at Nos. 5 and 6 remain impressive: his strike rate of 94.13 is second only to Andrew Symonds among batsmen who have scored at 2000 runs at those positions since the beginning of 2005. Raina also hits a four or a six every 9.92 balls - among the 14 batsmen in this 2000-plus run list, only Yuvraj Singh has a better rate (9.90). Clearly, when he comes after the 20th over, his ability to score big and score briskly is an asset. Even in a more recent period, he has done well in this aspect: since 2014, he averages 43 at a strike rate of 104 when he comes in between the 20th and the 35th; since 2013, the average is 46 and the average 102. And then there is his ability in the field, and his offspin.

For the selectors and the team management, the debate would be whether his strengths are good enough to gloss over his obvious weakness when he comes in early. The argument in favour of his selection is that a lot of ODI pitches these days are flat tracks, and India's top three have been so good recently that it isn't often that they are three or four down within 20 overs. Manish Pandey's century in the Sydney ODI, though, has given the selectors another option for the middle-order slots. The onus is on Raina to lift his game and prove once again that he deserves that No. 5/6 slot ahead of anyone else.

Best SR in ODIs at Nos. 5 & 6 since Jan 2005 (Min 2000 runs)
Player Inns Runs Ave SR balls/bound
 Andrew Symonds  73  2631  44.59  94.57  10.04
 Suresh Raina  142  4108  35.41  94.13  9.92
 Eoin Morgan  103  3027  35.19  88.35  10.98
 Michael Hussey  105  3486  42.00  86.78  14.14
 MS Dhoni  169  5873  48.13  85.93  12.20
 Yuvraj Singh  68  2447  46.16  85.85  9.90
 Angelo Mathews  111  3327  41.58  85.61  11.99
 Umar Akmal  87  2695  36.41  85.50  11.50

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  •   Subhash Gattupalli on February 17, 2016, 1:36 GMT

    I would always prefer Yuvraj Singh, if he is in the playing XI, ahead of Suresh Raina. Yuvi has the skills to play pace/spin and has a better boundary scoring rate and can bat for long. He has done well many times even when top-order has failed.

  • India on February 14, 2016, 0:41 GMT

    Absolutely zero doubt that Raina is a huge asset to the team. This guy performs when it is needed to perform. Not sure about tests, but he should be a permanent fixture in ODI/T20s. Yuvraj Singh's days are over- He performed magnificently in the 2011 WC but age has caught up and it is time to say goodbyes. Same with Dhoni - He has given a lot to Indian cricket but it is time for the next generation.

  • Raj on February 13, 2016, 18:11 GMT

    Raina is easily in top three players of the top three ODI and the top three T20 teams in the world since 2008. So we do know where he stands, do recognize his contributions, and know what he is capable of. He would have won India 2014 T20 WC finals had he battted ahead of Yuvraj. He was in terrific form and has always been treat to watch from ball one in short form is of the game. However his game fell short in one area that is how to play bounce and the preoccupation with it. Wish he had taken few body blows in earlier days (easier said than done) to figure out himself that it is part of the game and not that big a deal. He could have taken the second approach of ducking under the bouncers effectively. But the half measure approach undermined his true potential as a world class batsman.

  • BIKIRAN on February 13, 2016, 15:17 GMT

    The best favour Raina can do himself in order to play ODIs(& hopefully tests one day) is to practice the square cut and pull stroke.There is a great video in the YouTube in which former Australian great Ian Chappell shows how and why the pull should be played.And all this comes from someone who played without wearing a helmet.Right now his back & across movement seems dangerous and may land him in trouble if the bowler decides to bowl full or if the shot is mistimed.Against quick bowlers and on bouncy wickets the ability to play the square cut and the pull can solve a lot of problems for a batsman.One can see how Virat Kohli profited from starting to play the square cut.

  • Subhadeep on February 13, 2016, 6:11 GMT

    Raina should be a permanent ODI player other than in Australia and South Africa.

  • amit on February 13, 2016, 6:09 GMT

    I have always maintained that Raina is NOT a good no. 5, but he is a very good no.6. It worked well, when Yuvi was in form at no.5, as Yuvi was a reliable player who could stay at the wicket and accelerate any time. But, with Yuvi out and no quality no.5 as yet, Raina has not been able to fulfill his role at no.5. A no.5 can't afford to fail if top order collapses. Raina doesn't fit the bill in ODIs to play to hold innings and score a century from 5. Only exception was in WC against Zimbabwe, but not many teams are zim to allow Raina.

  • Johnathon on February 13, 2016, 5:39 GMT

    It seems pretty obvious from these stats. If India is at 100+ score when a wicket falls, send Raina in ahead of Dhoni. If less than 100 or 200+ and all the top batsman are gone, send in Dhoni instead of Raina.

  • Tanmay on February 13, 2016, 3:51 GMT

    His stats in Aus-SA-NZ & Eng should also be considered. Playing for almost 11 years now, Raina has failed to deliver in above countries. He has only 1 hundred v Eng in Eng to show against his name. I know coming at 5 & 6, he cant score 100s but he has failed to make impact coming at 6 in crucial games. Yuvraj was more solid & far more superior player even in Aus & SA. In Tri series in Australia in 2012 as well as last year, Raina failed miserably culminating in his dismissal v Australia in WC semi final last year. Although he is an asset in India, Manish Pandey is an ideal choice to be no.5 after the Sydney ODI in next ODI series India play. Also with Champions Trophy to be held next year in England, as defending Champions India should continue with Rohit-Dhawan-Virat-Rahane-Dhoni-Pandey batting line-up.

  • Jo on February 12, 2016, 20:31 GMT

    Raina fills in old Jadeja as a team player. Both create dynamism on field. That's needed to shake things up frequently when things not going well in match situation. We really have less of those players and they deserve to be present on field, even if they done contribute on their main task. Even Sachin was bad at it, and Warne extremely good at it, the main reason for Aussies were seen as mighties in 90s-2000s era.

  • Sanjeeth on February 12, 2016, 16:24 GMT

    The Indian team can go with better young talents rather than thinking raina will play great inning some day in future. The raina have given lots of chances. now its time to move on and give chances to new players. what ever IDI stats Raina has.... Raina days are over.

  • No featured comments at the moment.