South Africa v England, 4th Test, Johannesburg, 1st day

A collapse that had long been on the cards

The way England played suggested they'd read - and believed - quite a lot of the hype about the pitch

Andrew McGlashan in Johannesburg

January 14, 2010

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

Stuart Broad started positively, but was soon dismissed as England slid to 180 all out, South Africa v England, 4th Test, Johannesburg, South Africa, January 14, 2010
Looking back in anger: England were made to regret an unfocussed batting display © Getty Images
Enlarge

With a slightly longer-than-usual six-day break since the Cape Town Test there has been time for plenty to be written and said about the Wanderers pitch. The way England played on the opening day suggested they'd read - and believed - quite a lot of the hype. It was an open secret that South Africa had asked the groundsman for a helping hand, but they were also offered some kind assistance by the visiting batsmen.

In truth this was the batting collapse that England have threatened throughout this tour. Only in the first innings at Durban, when they piled up 574 for 9, has the order given the impression of complete solidity. On every other occasion they have flirted with perilous positions.

At Centurion, Graeme Swann hauled the first innings out of a hole before Graham Onions' popped up second-time around to produce his first piece of last-gasp defiance. At Cape Town, Matt Prior just about kept England on level terms before the match-saving heroics of Paul Collingwood, Ian Bell and that man Onions - who was surprisingly left out here in favour of Ryan Sidebotton. England's refusal to give up on any of those occasions was admirable, but there is only so much hanging on a team can do - even this one.

There was also a different mindset at play on this occasion. It was the first time England had batted first in the series. Twice Andrew Strauss had won the toss and put South Africa in, and at Durban Graeme Smith batted first, and soon regretted it. How Strauss must now wish he hadn't had the choice at 10am this morning. When a pitch is prepared for a result it suggests conditions won't get any better, so batting first is the way to go, but there was certainly plenty of help for the quick bowlers. Smith said he would have batted as well, but he didn't need to say anything else.

"I don't quite know yet what a par score is on that wicket," Collingwood said. "But it certainly has a lot in it, good carry and the ball seems to be swinging all the time - and it's certainly seaming a bit."

England had to set their tone for the match with the bat, in conditions that were never going to be easy even if they did make them appear extra difficult. Whatever cricket England play they always appear more comfortable reacting to situations rather than dictating them.

On this occasion they didn't seem to know how to play the situation that was presented to them, and moved away from their stoical gameplan of the series. You can't factor for a Strauss-type dismissal - expect to say South Africa had clearly done their planning - but the loss of their calming captain sent the England line-up into a state of confusion reminiscent of their headless chickens act at Headingley last summer.

"There were some good balls out there that got batsmen out, some good catches - but also some guys who will be disappointed with their shots," Collingwood said. "But that's the kind of thing wickets like this bring around. It can be tough to play on them."

Jonathan Trott had probably just sat down to absorb the atmosphere when Strauss fell - and he walked out to produce his most skittish Test innings to date - but a No. 3 really has to have the mindset of an opener. Trott didn't middle a single ball and his wipe across the line at Morne Morkel was an awful dismissal.

So could Kevin Pietersen respond to the challenge? He had done it before with England on 4 for 2 in Napier (which became 4 for 3) after a run of 10 innings without a hundred, but facing Chris Martin, Tim Southee and Grant Elliott was a bit different to Morkel and Dale Steyn. Pietersen is not batting well at the moment. There are technical issues, but how much the mental side is playing is difficult to judge from the outside.

As all batsmen know, the only thing that matters is runs. And Pietersen isn't making many. An elegant flick through midwicket was a false dawn and when his eyes lit up at a short ball all he could do was pick out mid-on. Regardless of whether the ball was hittable, it was surely the wrong shot at the wrong time. Strauss had said at the toss that he expected early help for the bowlers and the batsmen would have to battle, but introspection was a quality that England severely lacked. Collingwood, however, still believed it was better for Pietersen to go down swinging.

"In many ways, I'm quite pleased that he was going after it, attacking," he said. "I'd rather him get out like that than nicking off' to a length ball. His best way of playing is being an attacking batsman. It didn't come off this time, but I like his approach.

"All of us have got to understand what our strengths are, what our scoring opportunities are on wickets like that - and be committed," he added. "Today, we weren't quite good enough."

Taking the game to the opposition is all well and good, but it is also about picking the moment. Sometimes you have to 'give' a session to the bowlers and this was certainly one of those occasions. As if to emphasise England's misplaced tactics, life was easier when Morkel and Steyn ended their spells, but the damage had already been done. It would be wrong to rule England out of this contest just yet - they often prefer to do things the hard way - but after two Tests where the batting has come to the rescue, now it is down to bowlers.

Andrew McGlashan is assistant editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by popcorn on (January 15, 2010, 11:30 GMT)

TWICE on this Tour of South Africa, and ONCE at Cardiff, England escaped certain defeat.It was sickening to see Andrew Staruss clenching his fist, and smiling, as if in victory when Graham Onions saved the last game. England have saved ALL THREE GAMES ONLY by their tailenders. And at Cardiff, an unwanted pair of gloves and an unwanted physio to waste precious time. Where is their famed batting line -up? At last, England have been exposed. Remember the Fable, " The Emperor wore no clothes?" That's England for you.

Posted by ZAPPA_SAN on (January 15, 2010, 10:52 GMT)

I just hope SA won't regret not having a spinner. Swann was turning it nicely during the morning session of day 2...

Posted by BellCurve on (January 15, 2010, 8:13 GMT)

For the first time this series SA has picked a winning bowling line-up. Four-and-a-half pace men and one part-time spinner is the perfect bowling combination for these conditions. The batting prowess of this line-up is also awesome. Parnell is probably the worst batsmen in the side and he averages 22.08 in First-class cricket. Who knows, he may even mature into the new Hadlee.

Posted by TheDoctor394 on (January 15, 2010, 5:31 GMT)

This article is a reason why I prefer CricInfo to some newspapers that do the rounds. The writing is critical, but it's also fair, intelligent and respectful; it doesn't resort to cheap put-downs or tacky word play (word play is fine - just not the tacky type). Even for an English fan like me, who is smarting after the first day of this current Test, it was a pleasure to read.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
South Africa v England at Johannesburg - Jan 14-17, 2010
South Africa won by an innings and 74 runs
South Africa v England at Cape Town - Jan 3-7, 2010
Match drawn
South Africa v England at Durban - Dec 26-30, 2009
England won by an innings and 98 runs
South Africa v England at Centurion - Dec 16-20, 2009
Match drawn
SAf Invit XI v England XI at East London - Dec 11-12, 2009
Match drawn
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days