South Africa v Australia, 3rd Test, Cape Town, 3rd day March 3, 2014

Du Plessis' telling off, and Johnson's bouncer

There were some fiery moments on the third day's play which revealed just how big the stakes were in the Cape Town Test
17

#politeenquiries: Is Warner brave or stupid?

South Africa have never beaten Australia in a series at home since readmission. Australia are looking to test their progress away from their own backyard. The stakes involved in the Cape Town Test were never more clear than on the third day.

The look in one's eyes when they are trying to coerce a reaction out of an opponent. The way that person bristles as they try not to give them that satisfaction. The gestures and words that have nothing to do with the score but everything to with the atmosphere. The way one team gets under another's skin and wears them down.

That is what today was all about.

Handling the ball, almost

Faf du Plessis had survived being cut in half by Ryan Harris off the first ball he faced, which he does not think he nicked despite Australia's half-appeal and the small smudge on Hotspot. He was beaten by the same bowler and edged one which didn't reach the cordon and then it happened. It was the 34th over, Mitchell Johnson bowled a short one, which hit du Plessis on the pad and rolled toward the stumps. Du Plessis dared to pick up the ball and though Australia did not appeal, they did snarl.

"They were pretty aggressive about it," du Plessis said. "I thought I was being a nice guy by passing it back but they are like a pack of dogs when you get near that ball. Whatever. That's the way they play their cricket and I can see they don't like it."

Du Plessis admitted he was not 100% sure of the laws of touching the ball and when he was informed he could be putting himself in danger, took it to heart. "I won't do it again," he said.

Which is exactly what Australia want. Although Johnson would not reveal exactly what he said, because he couldn't remember, he admitted du Plessis was given a talking to. "A lot of the boys just said it's not time for him to be fielding," Johnson said. "I was going to let the ball hit me but he didn't throw it straight. Hads is a big believer in that he always wants to pick the ball up. That's our job, we're there to field. We should be doing it."

What they may really have been about was maintaining the ball themselves in order to achieve reverse swing which introduces the next layer of the day's competition.

Who's better at reverse swing?

Australia had the ball reversing shortly after the first hour and du Plessis admitted to being pretty surprised. "I was really surprised to see the ball reverse from their side. It was 20 overs old and with the damp conditions... let's just leave it at that," he said.

After David Warner suggested South Africa may have used dubious methods to achieve the same in Port Elizabeth, du Plessis made sure to tread carefully but left it out there anyway. Johnson was more pragmatic about Australia's art and explained how he thought they achieved it. "It was our plan coming here to get the ball to reverse and bowling second helped," he said. "The wicket was abrasive enough to bowl cross seam and I usually hit the same so I could hit it nice and rough and we can get that shine off the ball. We're not surprised that it went."

Reverse swing is going to be important for Australia because the more they get, the less time they will feel they need to bowl South Africa out.

Time versus runs

This is the trickiest balance to achieve and it will be up to Michael Clarke to see if he can get it right this time. Memories of Adelaide 2012 will be fresh in his mind. South Africa's target was 430 and he gave himself four sessions to bowl them out. South Africa survived and du Plessis, who was their hero then, has reason to believe they can do it again.

"It's always tricky with third innings. You don't know what's a good total to set. If you bat for too long, you take time out of the game and if you don't bat enough, the opposition could chase it down," he said. "We've been good in fourth innings recently, whether chasing it down and getting close. At the moment a draw, we will look good but you never know."

Johnson did not play in that match but he knows exactly what du Plessis is talking about. "We want to get a few more runs on the board. That wicket is starting to play a few tricks; going up and down. It's an Adelaide-type wicket," he said. "We've played there, they've played there and they did a good job keeping us out last time. Maybe five sessions would be nice. But it depends how many runs we get."

In their attempts to win this match, Australia will turn on the aggression and South Africa will expect more of what they saw from Johnson today when he felled Steyn to set off some ...

Fast-bowlers' fireworks.

Steyn, perhaps unknowingly, lit the flare when he issued the challenge, walked out to bat despite his hamstring strain and galloped down the stairs at a fair clip. He was asking for trouble when he cut and drove Shane Watson for two boundaries and meted out the same treatment to Harris. After he got away with an edge off Johnson, the Australian quick had to respond. He dished up a bouncer which Steyn could not avoid and struck him flush on the badge.

"I know that I am going to get it back," Johnson admitted. "He is a fierce competitor. He just smiled straight away."

Some of those grins will be in jest and some of them will have a little more needle behind them. None of them will be recorded on the scorecards and only a few will make it on to highlights. They're the moments that make memories and that's where we'll keep them.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Shaggy076 on March 4, 2014, 10:50 GMT

    DuPlessis deliberately implied there could possibly be foul play yet no outrage on what he has said. Its interesting peoples take on this compared to the Warner incident. Also Faf you surely know the handling the ball rule you picked it up to get under the Aussies skin and then whinge when they gave you a deserved serve. Australians have done some big talking and relentlessly attacked for it by the South African fans, now DuPlessis joins Smith in getting away with similar. Its funny that Aussie supporters are called wingers.

  • Shaggy076 on March 4, 2014, 10:27 GMT

    Orangatan; id take a serious victory over South Africa any day they are actually good. WHo cares what happened in India right now. By the way we have never lost in Sri Lanka cant see why we would fear that series.

  • stonk on March 4, 2014, 10:21 GMT

    Well the Australians have a long memory. Morne Morkels treatment of Michael Clarke was bordering on the Brutal, some would say inhuman. Morkel had better have his lanky, thick, Boer hide on when he next visits Australia.

  • orangtan on March 4, 2014, 9:59 GMT

    @all the Aussies who are beside themselves with ecstasy, remember it was just a year ago that you were whitewashed in India, when are you coming again to India, Sri Lanka or Pakistan ?

  • Protears on March 4, 2014, 6:06 GMT

    This series exposed questions needing answering. the first was what is the void left by Kallis, clearly its like trying to replace a Sobers which is impossible. The next is Smith reached the impass where his heart could not rule his head any longer, a point where the game of cricket is not what it used to be for him, he will go out a legend per se with a fantastic career Biffy. The next is Morne is not the way forward, one dimensional and for his proportions he doesn't get the bounce or aggression needed, we need a change there. JP Duminy, exposed by spin, exposed by bounce very little fight to go with the talent. Alviro is he a stop gap or do we really believe in him as an opener?

    We have a number of spots up for grabs and a number of hands being put up. Harmer, Hendricks, De Lange, Bavuma, Miller, De Kock, Roussouw, Ingram, Cook, Viljoen, Parnell, Abbott, Van Zyl. Time to move on.

  • on March 4, 2014, 5:52 GMT

    One interesting thing in the picture is to see the non-striker not at all taking a start! I guess, he didn't fancy facing Johnson. Definitely not after witnessing Steyn get hit...

  • milepost on March 4, 2014, 5:50 GMT

    I have to confess I though Australia would win the series 3-0 (based on form, not ICC rankings or perceptio) so was disappointed with the last test. The Aussies are on track here to deliver a heavy defeat to SA and rightly take the actual number one team tag. In saying that, when the top 2 teams play tests as they are right now, it would be great to see 4 or even 5 match series.

  • Tumbarumbar on March 4, 2014, 4:46 GMT

    What a weird and wonderful test series. Who would have believed that dry, lifeless pitches would have been prepared for two out of three tests given the pace attack possessed by South Africa? Surely that meant that the toss became the deciding factor in those two tests.

  • Henry_Crun on March 4, 2014, 2:19 GMT

    The reason that Steyn could see the funny side of the ball that sconned him was that he knew it was his own fault. Had he not ducked into it, it is doubtful that the ball was much above waist height. Sure, it was short, but on a track with variable bounce, it says a lot for actually watching the ball. That being said, it's not that easy when the thing is travelling at 150k.

  • challagalla on March 4, 2014, 1:20 GMT

    wonderful competitive cricket played hard with all the usual edginess when Australia is there. What a series . Great to see fast aggressive bowling and I only wish Steyn was not injured. Takes something away without him . Sledge all cricketers . I am an Indian and see nothing objectionable in sledging even if it is against my Indian cricketers.

  • Shaggy076 on March 4, 2014, 10:50 GMT

    DuPlessis deliberately implied there could possibly be foul play yet no outrage on what he has said. Its interesting peoples take on this compared to the Warner incident. Also Faf you surely know the handling the ball rule you picked it up to get under the Aussies skin and then whinge when they gave you a deserved serve. Australians have done some big talking and relentlessly attacked for it by the South African fans, now DuPlessis joins Smith in getting away with similar. Its funny that Aussie supporters are called wingers.

  • Shaggy076 on March 4, 2014, 10:27 GMT

    Orangatan; id take a serious victory over South Africa any day they are actually good. WHo cares what happened in India right now. By the way we have never lost in Sri Lanka cant see why we would fear that series.

  • stonk on March 4, 2014, 10:21 GMT

    Well the Australians have a long memory. Morne Morkels treatment of Michael Clarke was bordering on the Brutal, some would say inhuman. Morkel had better have his lanky, thick, Boer hide on when he next visits Australia.

  • orangtan on March 4, 2014, 9:59 GMT

    @all the Aussies who are beside themselves with ecstasy, remember it was just a year ago that you were whitewashed in India, when are you coming again to India, Sri Lanka or Pakistan ?

  • Protears on March 4, 2014, 6:06 GMT

    This series exposed questions needing answering. the first was what is the void left by Kallis, clearly its like trying to replace a Sobers which is impossible. The next is Smith reached the impass where his heart could not rule his head any longer, a point where the game of cricket is not what it used to be for him, he will go out a legend per se with a fantastic career Biffy. The next is Morne is not the way forward, one dimensional and for his proportions he doesn't get the bounce or aggression needed, we need a change there. JP Duminy, exposed by spin, exposed by bounce very little fight to go with the talent. Alviro is he a stop gap or do we really believe in him as an opener?

    We have a number of spots up for grabs and a number of hands being put up. Harmer, Hendricks, De Lange, Bavuma, Miller, De Kock, Roussouw, Ingram, Cook, Viljoen, Parnell, Abbott, Van Zyl. Time to move on.

  • on March 4, 2014, 5:52 GMT

    One interesting thing in the picture is to see the non-striker not at all taking a start! I guess, he didn't fancy facing Johnson. Definitely not after witnessing Steyn get hit...

  • milepost on March 4, 2014, 5:50 GMT

    I have to confess I though Australia would win the series 3-0 (based on form, not ICC rankings or perceptio) so was disappointed with the last test. The Aussies are on track here to deliver a heavy defeat to SA and rightly take the actual number one team tag. In saying that, when the top 2 teams play tests as they are right now, it would be great to see 4 or even 5 match series.

  • Tumbarumbar on March 4, 2014, 4:46 GMT

    What a weird and wonderful test series. Who would have believed that dry, lifeless pitches would have been prepared for two out of three tests given the pace attack possessed by South Africa? Surely that meant that the toss became the deciding factor in those two tests.

  • Henry_Crun on March 4, 2014, 2:19 GMT

    The reason that Steyn could see the funny side of the ball that sconned him was that he knew it was his own fault. Had he not ducked into it, it is doubtful that the ball was much above waist height. Sure, it was short, but on a track with variable bounce, it says a lot for actually watching the ball. That being said, it's not that easy when the thing is travelling at 150k.

  • challagalla on March 4, 2014, 1:20 GMT

    wonderful competitive cricket played hard with all the usual edginess when Australia is there. What a series . Great to see fast aggressive bowling and I only wish Steyn was not injured. Takes something away without him . Sledge all cricketers . I am an Indian and see nothing objectionable in sledging even if it is against my Indian cricketers.

  • ShutTheGate on March 3, 2014, 23:31 GMT

    So to the SA fans critical of Warners comments and criticising Ryan Harris, calling him a mediocre bowler - can I assume that your going to flame Du Plesis for his comments and that you're going to call Morkel an average bowler for failing to take a wicket?

    Otherwise you'd be hypocritical.

  • Rowayton on March 3, 2014, 22:43 GMT

    Not the first time I've said it, Anthony Marshall, but the consistent refrain that there is something dodgy about Steve Smith's technique is a complete myth. Smith's technique is fine - when he hits the ball his feet are in good position and he presents the full face of the bat. In my mind, the ones who talk about his 'dodgy' technique are ones who thought he was no good and cannot admit they were wrong.

  • on March 3, 2014, 22:14 GMT

    Quote from Faf du Plesis "I was really surprised to see the ball reverse from their side. It was 20 overs old and with the damp conditions... let's just leave it at that," Now let's see if Warner got off lightly like everyone seems to think. I bet du Plesis gets no punishment at all, not even 15% of his match payments for suggesting this.

  • on March 3, 2014, 21:36 GMT

    Du plessis wouldn't be hinting at something untoward would he? A bit too soon after the zipper incident I would have thought. It's good hard cricket at the moment, Clarke will give himself plenty of time so still all three results on the table I think. "Smiths dodgy technique?" Looks pretty good I think. He certainly scoring some good runs.

  • on March 3, 2014, 19:44 GMT

    I have to confess that I really thought that Australia would struggle over in South Africa even without Kallis playing because South Africa is a class side. However, with Smith's captaincy (and batting) being somewhat erratic and Steyn not being at his best (except for 2nd Test), it has opened a door. It is unlikely that Australia can lose the series from here, but regardless of the result, they have shown the world that the are a side to be reckoned with. Smith is a find at number five despite his dodgy technique, Johnson is just sensational when he is on song and Harris has the balls of a lion bowling with that amount of damage to his knee. Let's see if Lyon can clean up in their second innings.

  • TheCricketEmpireStrikesBack on March 3, 2014, 19:12 GMT

    Agree with the thoughts and sentiments expressed in the article above. Some fierce competitors in both of these sides and the stakes are high and it's producing some of the greatest and most memorable cricket in a long. long time.

  • Beertjie on March 3, 2014, 18:46 GMT

    Well with a lead of 234 and nominally 196 overs to bowl I guess 5 sessions (150 overs, normally) might be reasonable. Batting for an hour after lunch might see 48 overs used to score around 200 more runs. Very similar stats to Adelaide 2012 (not 2011, Firdose!) but a little more time. Unless someone breaks down there can be only one possible result.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Beertjie on March 3, 2014, 18:46 GMT

    Well with a lead of 234 and nominally 196 overs to bowl I guess 5 sessions (150 overs, normally) might be reasonable. Batting for an hour after lunch might see 48 overs used to score around 200 more runs. Very similar stats to Adelaide 2012 (not 2011, Firdose!) but a little more time. Unless someone breaks down there can be only one possible result.

  • TheCricketEmpireStrikesBack on March 3, 2014, 19:12 GMT

    Agree with the thoughts and sentiments expressed in the article above. Some fierce competitors in both of these sides and the stakes are high and it's producing some of the greatest and most memorable cricket in a long. long time.

  • on March 3, 2014, 19:44 GMT

    I have to confess that I really thought that Australia would struggle over in South Africa even without Kallis playing because South Africa is a class side. However, with Smith's captaincy (and batting) being somewhat erratic and Steyn not being at his best (except for 2nd Test), it has opened a door. It is unlikely that Australia can lose the series from here, but regardless of the result, they have shown the world that the are a side to be reckoned with. Smith is a find at number five despite his dodgy technique, Johnson is just sensational when he is on song and Harris has the balls of a lion bowling with that amount of damage to his knee. Let's see if Lyon can clean up in their second innings.

  • on March 3, 2014, 21:36 GMT

    Du plessis wouldn't be hinting at something untoward would he? A bit too soon after the zipper incident I would have thought. It's good hard cricket at the moment, Clarke will give himself plenty of time so still all three results on the table I think. "Smiths dodgy technique?" Looks pretty good I think. He certainly scoring some good runs.

  • on March 3, 2014, 22:14 GMT

    Quote from Faf du Plesis "I was really surprised to see the ball reverse from their side. It was 20 overs old and with the damp conditions... let's just leave it at that," Now let's see if Warner got off lightly like everyone seems to think. I bet du Plesis gets no punishment at all, not even 15% of his match payments for suggesting this.

  • Rowayton on March 3, 2014, 22:43 GMT

    Not the first time I've said it, Anthony Marshall, but the consistent refrain that there is something dodgy about Steve Smith's technique is a complete myth. Smith's technique is fine - when he hits the ball his feet are in good position and he presents the full face of the bat. In my mind, the ones who talk about his 'dodgy' technique are ones who thought he was no good and cannot admit they were wrong.

  • ShutTheGate on March 3, 2014, 23:31 GMT

    So to the SA fans critical of Warners comments and criticising Ryan Harris, calling him a mediocre bowler - can I assume that your going to flame Du Plesis for his comments and that you're going to call Morkel an average bowler for failing to take a wicket?

    Otherwise you'd be hypocritical.

  • challagalla on March 4, 2014, 1:20 GMT

    wonderful competitive cricket played hard with all the usual edginess when Australia is there. What a series . Great to see fast aggressive bowling and I only wish Steyn was not injured. Takes something away without him . Sledge all cricketers . I am an Indian and see nothing objectionable in sledging even if it is against my Indian cricketers.

  • Henry_Crun on March 4, 2014, 2:19 GMT

    The reason that Steyn could see the funny side of the ball that sconned him was that he knew it was his own fault. Had he not ducked into it, it is doubtful that the ball was much above waist height. Sure, it was short, but on a track with variable bounce, it says a lot for actually watching the ball. That being said, it's not that easy when the thing is travelling at 150k.

  • Tumbarumbar on March 4, 2014, 4:46 GMT

    What a weird and wonderful test series. Who would have believed that dry, lifeless pitches would have been prepared for two out of three tests given the pace attack possessed by South Africa? Surely that meant that the toss became the deciding factor in those two tests.