Australia v England, 3rd ODI, Sydney January 19, 2014

Australia stroll to series win


Video report: No one knows why England still can't win a game

Australia 3 for 244 (Marsh 71*, Warner 71) beat England 9 for 243 (Morgan 54, Coulter-Nile 3-47) by 7 wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

As Brad Haddin observed the day before this match, winning is a habit and so is losing. On the evidence of an SCG contest that ended with Australia wrapping up their second consecutive ODI series victory over England in the minimum three matches, the hosts' predilection for the former is matched by their visitors' weakness for the latter.

Though less dramatic and perhaps less demoralising than James Faulkner's Gabba heist had been, this defeat underlined England's rut and Australia's peak as well as any of the seven previous matches on the tour. Alastair Cook's side won the toss on a pitch favouring the side batting first and made a swift start, yet found themselves fatally slowed as much by their own lack of conviction as Australia's neat bowling and high class fielding.

Australia's chase was not quite perfect, as no batsman made a hundred and wickets were lost to loose strokes, but the belief surging through the team was demonstrated by the jaunty run rate pursued throughout, and best exemplified by the sight of David Warner swinging a six down the ground the over after Aaron Finch's dismissal playing a similarly full-blooded stroke.

Warner perished when a century beckoned, but Shaun Marsh, Michael Clarke and Haddin had little trouble galloping to victory. They did so with a gaping 10 overs to spare, and could look proudly upon the fact they had done so without having any of Mitchell Johnson, George Bailey or Clint McKay in their XI.

The only moment of unease arrived in late afternoon when Eoin Morgan's lone English rearguard was terminated. His dismissal to a low return catch by Daniel Christian required a replay for confirmation after Morgan stood his ground, provoking an angry response from Clarke.

England's innings was otherwise characterised by a failure to convert starts into substantial scores, due in part to another exceptional fielding exhibition by Clarke's men. Glenn Maxwell took a sharp catch at point to end Cook's fluent 35, while Warner's run out of Ian Bell and Clarke's own catch to remove a becalmed Ben Stokes were truly outstanding.

Xavier Doherty, Nathan Coulter-Nile, and Maxwell all delivered useful spells, though it was more of a struggle for James Pattinson in his first international appearance since last year's Lord's Test. Straining for effect but lacking rhythm, his six overs cost 41.

Australia's pursuit began with a lengthy delay while a sight screen issue was addressed, before Warner avoided being run out without facing a ball when Ravi Bopara's throw missed the stumps while the opener was still well short of his ground, having been called through for a swift single by Finch. This hiccup did not prevent the score from mounting quickly, as Warner in particular found ideal timing for the slowish pitch.

Finch was no less proactive, but his tendency to drive balls at a catchable height was to cost him once more, Bopara claiming the chance at cover. Warner was not perturbed in the slightest by the wicket, crashing Tim Bresnan over long off for six the very next over, and proceeding on his merry way at a pace that quickly shrank the target.

Marsh thus had time to get established, and their stand reaped a swift 78 before Warner shelled to cover while trying to repeat a boundary from the previous ball. Clarke kept the rate ticking at well above the requirement, gliding to a breezy 34 that was ended by perhaps the ball of the night - a Bopara inducker that perforated the captain's attempted drive.

Haddin gained a promotion in the order through the injury-enforced absence of Bailey, and delighted the healthy and hearty crowd of 37,823 by closing in on the target with a series of brazen blows. Marsh, building confidence with every run, applied the final touch with a pleasant flick over midwicket.

Cook had played with hitherto unseen freedom, even striking his first six of the tour, but his dismissal with the total at 50 in the ninth over allowed Clarke to exert greater pressure and limit the flow of runs. The over before his dismissal Cook had been given lbw, playing across a skidder from Doherty, who had been introduced early by Clarke. But his review showed the ball to be skimming over the top of the stumps.

Bell's innings also promised much, but was ended by a stupendous direct hit from Warner, who threw the stumps down square of the wicket and halfway to the boundary. Stokes, promoted to No. 3, struggled in his new position, scratching his way to 15 without a boundary before perishing to a quite superb catch from Clarke, diving low to his right at square leg to intercept a flat and well-struck sweep shot.

Gary Ballance and Bopara also made starts, before each erred slightly in their choice of stroke to be snapped up in the field. Coulter-Nile, who bowled tidily for his three wickets, coaxed Ballance to slice an airy cut shot to deep point, while Faulkner tempted Bopara into edging behind as he tried to glide the ball to third man.

Morgan was left to pick up the pieces, striking a pair of compelling sixes over cover and down the ground before his miscalculation against Christian. When he dived to claim a return catch from a front edge centimetres from the turf Morgan stood his ground, resulting in an angry, finger-pointing confrontation involving Clarke and Jos Buttler.

Umpires Simon Fry and Ranmore Martinesz moved between the pair to end the argument, after which time Morgan was given out upon consultation of replays to confirm Christian's catch. In the opening match of the series Warner had walked for a low catch behind by Buttler, only to be recalled when the third umpire Kumar Dharmasena judged the ball to have bounced.

While Tim Bresnan lifted the total at the finish, helping himself to a pair of sixes in Christian's final over, 243 looked inadequate. Like so much that England have produced on this tour, it would prove to be nowhere near enough.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Hamid on January 22, 2014, 13:28 GMT

    After whitewash in tests, it's looking like a whitewash in ODI's as well....

    what about the T20's ?

  • Paulo on January 20, 2014, 17:24 GMT

    @JG as I said in my previous comment "I'd like a look at Briggs". That's why i'd play him. Also Tredwell was poor at home, but I admit he came back nicely yesterday. As I all said the nature of the squad means that I'd pick Bopara to bowl. I agree perhaps I'm being harsh on Bresnan, but I just don't rate him- since his injury he has become an innocuous bowler, and although he batted well, I've always felt his batting has been overrated. Perhaps picking Stokes over Bresnan is just me picking favourites (and the same with Briggs over Tredwell)

  • James on January 20, 2014, 12:27 GMT

    Marsh/Warner is clearly the best opening partnership in ODI's for Australia. Fire power and stability and surprisingly, consistency.

  • Xiong on January 20, 2014, 11:59 GMT

    @SLslider Clearly you lack knowledge. Australia's batsmen play best when on fast, bouncy tracks where the ball comes onto the bat. Hence the failure in England on the slow turners they produced for us, and our general failure in the sub continent, but unlike your lot we go just fine in SA. You might want to check the history of Australia in SA, even with the terrible team we were fielding a couple of years back we went well in SA. Australia are not SL or India, we don't fail miserably just because the bowling is quick and the wickets are loaded with pace and bounce and the ball nips a little bit off the pitch. It's late swing and quality spin that we suck against, and SA only has half of that equation in Steyn.

    I'm not saying Australia are going to win the series over there, but if you think a whitewash is the only result possible you are absolutely mistaken. SA do well in Aus, and Aus do well in SA, we prepare the same kinds of wickets and both teams play well in either country.

  • Roo on January 20, 2014, 10:54 GMT

    @jb633 - glad you have settled down a bit now after the Gabba :)

    You are clearly missing KP, Anderson & out of form Finn + Swanny - I know Swann retired, but by his comms (re: bowling 30/40 overs) he could have continued playing ODI's as he is a good bowler & outstanding fielder & handy batter. Trott is also absent & with his average @51 would make a welcomed return to the squad - hear he is coming along nicely atm so hopefully ready for your summer...

    PS: xtrafalgarx isn't an Aussie, just follows my team for some reason?...

  • Andrew on January 20, 2014, 10:23 GMT

    @Jono Makim - I am really happy that Finch was selected - his form warranted it. Averaging 30 is not bad, but often in averaging 30 - you get 4 poor scores before a good one. Yes the good one will probably win you a match - but what about the other innings? He has an ave of 33 after 21 games with a S/R of over 90, Haddin's ave as an opener is the same, with a S/R of 82. I think it is Faulkner v Finch, I want to see my top 4 averaging around 40, unless they are an allrounder - which effectively Haddin is. Bear in mind - I am excited about watching Finch tee-off, & would like him to succeed. @PrasPunter on (January 20, 2014, 8:15 GMT) - yeah, I wonder what he would be like against a Kemar Roach or Dale Steyn? There must be a reason why his FC average blows. @Shaggy076 on (January 20, 2014, 9:20 GMT) - I was with you until you said Warner & Marsh - ANYBODY but Marsh!!!!!!! If Marsh was the other option - Finch is a no-brainer in my books - I have ZERO confidence in Marsh!

  • Kushal on January 20, 2014, 9:41 GMT

    It's funny how AUS fans are talking so much after winning just one series at their home. LOL. They have lost all their matches away from AUS in last 1 year or so and will also get whitewashed in SA. Nor do they have a single classy batsman like Sanga and Mahela, neither they have a spinner with the quality of Herath. If AUS can draw a single test match in SA it will be an achievement for them. Steyn,Phil and Morkel will have AUS overrate batsmen for breakfast. LOL. Some less than 50 scores coming up people.

  • Graham on January 20, 2014, 9:20 GMT

    Merry; I agree with you not completely sold. I know there will be games Finch wins. But to think we could be undefeated in a world cup going into a quarter final and both Finch and Warner fail in that game and you lose. Finch can and will win games but something inside me tellsvme we would be safer and have a higher winning percentage with Warner and Marsh opening.

  • Dummy4 on January 20, 2014, 8:46 GMT

    @Meety, I disagree on Finch, I don't care if he only averages 30, it's all about the strike rate. He and Davey throw the opposition bowlers into disarray every innings. Just where do you bowl at them? Finch has also shown over the last two or three years that he goes on with it in domestic 50 over cricket and he's carried that on into the international arena, if he bats through the better part of the innings the opposition is more than likely out of the game. Yes, he can look absolutely woeful but he gets the job done admirably. I have a sneaking suspicion our old mate Hammond is now frequenting these pages as Plumridge!

  • Prasanna on January 20, 2014, 8:15 GMT

    @Meety, exactly my point as well - Finch is hardly convincing. Looks like he might get out any ball. Not tight on his off-stump.

  • No featured comments at the moment.