ICC World Twenty20 2010

An opportunity in upheaval

Andrew McGlashan

April 29, 2010

Comments: 42 | Text size: A | A

Eoin Morgan takes a breather during England's training session, South Africa v England, 3rd ODI, Cape Town, November 26, 2009
Eoin Morgan hasn't picked up a bat since March 25 © Getty Images
Enlarge

Love it or hate it you can't get away from it. No sooner has a six-week IPL concluded in Mumbai - amid huge controversy - that another Twenty20 tournament begins on the other side of world in the Caribbean. The events of the last few weeks in India have swept cricket to the sidelines. The game needs a sparkling tournament in West Indies and, most importantly, a clean and controversy-free event.

Although the two tournaments are very different, it is hardly ideal to have so much cricket of one format in the same period, let alone another World Twenty20 less than a year after the last one in England which Pakistan memorably won at Lord's. However, ICC are trying to get their events schedule back on track, so the trophy is up for grabs again less than a year after it was collected by the now-retired (and suspended) Younis Khan. A lot has happened in nine months.

One advantage of Twenty20 rolling into Twenty20 is that many of the players will be attuned to the format. The preparation factor, though, needs to be balanced against the fatigue factor and possible injuries. Already the tournament is missing Virender Sehwag, Wayne Parnell and Brett Lee through injury. The latter's withdrawal is not a huge surprise, but the absence of Sehwag and Parnell robs the event of two matchwinners. They could have been injured without the IPL, but the timing doesn't help.

And not all the players at the IPL who are now here in the West Indies have been active over the last two months. Eoin Morgan and AB de Villiers were two of the notable stars to be benched by their franchises which just goes to show how pre-tournament status can quickly count for nothing. Morgan's situation in particular shows the problems that can occur: he went to the IPL in the form of his life, but hasn't picked up a bat since March 25. Then there are the likes of Yuvraj Singh and Dwayne Bravo; players who had a forgettable IPL but will be crucial to their team's chances in this tournament

The IPL also highlights another dilemma for Twenty20 cricket. It is played so extensively at domestic level, but sparsely on the international scene. New Zealand's seven matches are the most played by a team since the end of last year's World Twenty20. The Associate teams play it as frequently as anyone with both Afghanistan and Ireland having had six matches apiece. At the other, India and South Africa have played just two since June 2009.

It makes it hard to formulate plans and work out tactics when matches are played so infrequently. Some commentators believe Twenty20 should be purely a domestic event, but ICC have committed to spreading it internationally and there is much merit in doing so. The obvious solution would be to trim the number of ODIs to accommodate more T20s (how about three of each on most tours?) but this would need a global commitment and ODI cricket is still favoured by boards.

 
 
The pre-tournament hype has sounded promising - fewer restrictions on what can be brought into grounds and fair pricing top of the list - but as ever the real test will be when the action begins
 

Despite the imbalance, in the short history of international Twenty20 the two events, in South Africa and England, have been a resounding success both from a point of view of the cricket on display and the response from the public. The inaugural tournament in 2007 was the tonic the game needed after an awful 50-over World Cup in the Caribbean which managed to completely forget the roots of the game in the region. Instead of a vibrant, colourful, joyous event we had a sanitised, dull and, ultimately, farcical seven weeks.

For that reason alone this World Twenty20 is vitally important and everyone has their fingers crossed that ICC have learnt from their mistakes of three years ago. The pre-tournament hype has sounded promising - fewer restrictions on what can be brought into grounds and fair pricing top of the list - but as ever the real test will be when the action begins.

The notorious unpredictability of Twenty20 makes it almost futile to suggest a favourite (who would ever have imagined Zimbabwe beating Australia or Netherlands embarrassing England) and that is one of the factors that makes for a compelling event. Coupled with it being played over an 17-day period and it is a perfect formula. It's no surprise that the recent events to come out with most praise have been the World Twenty20 and last year's Champions Trophy in South Africa. Quality not quantity.

There should be some fascinating tales to emerge over the next couple of weeks. Afghanistan's fairytale success has already become the stuff of legend and although it's safe to say this is a tournament they won't win, their passion and pride alone means millions of eyes will be on them against South Africa and India.


Naeem Islam goes airborne to play a slashing cut, Bangladesh v England, 1st ODI, Mirpur, February 28, 2010
Bangladesh are perfectly suited to Twenty20, but can they progress this time? © Getty Images
Enlarge

There's also Bangladesh, for who Twenty20 is perfectly suited to develop on the international stage, and Zimbabwe who can show that they are on the way back up (in cricket terms, at least) having hit rock bottom. Australia have yet to dominate the shortest format as they have all others, but signs are that could change with the emergence of David Warner and maturity of Cameron White.

Don't forget the hosts, either, because any team that includes Chris Gayle, Bravo and Kieron Pollard can be a fearsome Twenty20 outfit. How brilliant it would be for them to perform in front of a home audience.

And then there are the defending champions. What is to be made of Pakistan in the current state? If it was any other team such a chaotic build-up would virtually rule out success, but with Pakistan the case is never so cut and dried. Crucially their bowling resources have remained largely intact which means Mohammad Asif, Mohammad Aamer, Saeed Ajmal and Shahid Afridi can have a major influence on the tournament.

Any of the top eight nations can win the tournament - even perennial nearly-men New Zealand or regular under-achievers England if things go their way - but what has been shown in Twenty20 is that there is nothing gained from taking a backward step. A moment of indecision or negativity can prove costly. Whoever comes out on top on May 16, let's hope that it's on the field exploits that have dominated and that the Caribbean has staged a true carnival.

Andrew McGlashan is assistant editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by NikhilPapad3 on (May 1, 2010, 2:01 GMT)

i have a feeling new zealand is gonna take it out this year

Posted by greeny69 on (May 1, 2010, 1:41 GMT)

forget ipl this is the real deal nothing beats international cricket the ipl is to long and boeing for me

Posted by ironmurph on (April 30, 2010, 22:51 GMT)

Funny though, Pakistan may have come off a pretty average season and India is missing a full line up of bowlers so I don't rate either them currently against the stronger teams of South Africa, Australia, Sri Lanka and New Zealand especially in this format on these pitches

Posted by   on (April 30, 2010, 4:18 GMT)

Inshallah India will win. Pakistan zindabad.

Posted by cricdick on (April 30, 2010, 0:53 GMT)

It is a shame that some instead of talking abt.T20 world cup in real sportsman spirit, are spewing hatrade. Forget IPL, it is another matter, a successful event,which i as an outsider regularly watch. I dont know much about why Pakistanis were left out, but I think becoz they misbehave and that big terror attack people of India did not likie them. Otherwise they were also playing well and making fun iand money in India. So let us forget that. Let us focuss on T20 worldbup carribian style. By the way, mark my word, Pakistan players are more than eager to play in India's IPL.Inspite of corruption, IPL is the biggest service to INTERNATIONAL CRICKET.

Posted by h339 on (April 30, 2010, 0:40 GMT)

"The notorious unpredictability of Twenty20 makes it almost futile to suggest a favourite and that is one of the factors that makes for a compelling event."

Flipping a coin is also notoriously unpredictable. Do you find that compelling too?

Posted by Bengali-Tiger007 on (April 29, 2010, 22:59 GMT)

Lets not forget that Bangladesh is due for a performance and the players that they have who the likes of Tamim Iqbal, Shakib, etc all owes all of us Bangladeshis a show of their lives. One thing I know so far is that BD is unpredictable, but if they click on the day, then they will beat any team willy-nilly! Pakistan and India looks good, they are well known for having all the big hitters no matter what this Mcglashan bloke says. England should progress to atleast the semis according to the way that they have been performing lately and they are very good. All the best to every team.

Posted by svrfremont on (April 29, 2010, 19:50 GMT)

There is no use cribbing about IPL. IPL is all about local market. IPL would not have been *as* successful outside of India. The potenial of 1.5 billion consumers is the one that drives things like IPL. So anybody out there cribbing just shut up. As far as this article goes I dont think anybody should worry about those not present. This is a short slam bang format ; people come and people go. The entertainment value is what drives this game. Let us enjoy the game in the next couple of weeks. That's it.

Posted by DrAtharAbbas on (April 29, 2010, 18:49 GMT)

One has to analyze one more point raised in the article. "The notorious unpredictability of the Twenty20..." I think that a team named "Pakistan" was in the final of the first worldcup only to lose on the penultimate ball. The same team was again in the final and won it comprehensively in the next one. Doesn't it show who is strong and wins. It cannot be termed as random It is obvios who wins. If England loses to Holland or Australia loses to Zimbabwe, one should accept that these two teams are not so good in T20 format.Conversely if Pakistan once lost to Ireland in an ODI world cup or Australia lost to Zimbabwe, ODI may be random too. Contrary to ODI or test match, T20 cannot be won by the heroics of one bowler. He has only 24 deliveries. 5 very fast bowlers can similary be no good in this format. One has to keep eyes open and see 5 absolutely different bowlers, each a match winner, bowling for Pakistan. Abundance of allrounders, strong hitters is unmatched. So obvious who wins

Posted by knowledge_eater on (April 29, 2010, 17:51 GMT)

Sorry Andrew McGlashan, T20 and IPL will continue to suffer in outside the ground talk ergo Genius Journalism in Australia and England. So, I hope no subcontinent team wins the tournament this time, otherwise T20 will continue to suffer in Cricket Talks. Am I right or right Mr. Andrew :wink ? So, for the love of Cricket and cricket progress, I hope Poms or Oz win the cup otherwise no matter what ICC will do, it will continue to suffer in Cricket Talks. And I also must say that ODI talks behind the doors will also continue to suffer, if Poms don't win 2011 ODI world cup in subcontinent. Am I right or not right Mr. Andrew? So, GO Poms and GO Oz give something to talk about to "Genius Journalists".

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tournament Results
Australia v England at Bridgetown - May 16, 2010
England won by 7 wickets (with 18 balls remaining)
Australia v Pakistan at Gros Islet - May 14, 2010
Australia won by 3 wickets (with 1 ball remaining)
England v Sri Lanka at Gros Islet - May 13, 2010
England won by 7 wickets (with 24 balls remaining)
West Indies v Australia at Gros Islet - May 11, 2010
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 22 balls remaining)
India v Sri Lanka at Gros Islet - May 11, 2010
Sri Lanka won by 5 wickets (with 0 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days