Brook content to move on quickly from 'shambles of a night'

Harry Brook will not read too much into "a bit of a shambles of a night" in Cardiff as England lost a truncated first T20I against South Africa.

Just 12.5 overs were possible at Sophia Gardens as persistent showers delayed the start by more than two hours. Play eventually began at 8:50pm for a nine-over match. Having won the toss and elected to bowl, Brook watched on as a powerful South Africa batting card smashed 97 for 5 from 7.5 overs before rain curtailed their innings. That downpour subsequently gave England an adjusted chase of 69 in five overs, of which they fell 15 short.

England opted to remove Jofra Archer from their XI announced on Tuesday on safety grounds, after ruling conditions were too risky for their prized fast bowler. Luke Wood was the late replacement, earning his eighth T20I cap, and was the pick of the home attack with 2 for 22.

"It was a bit of a shambles really, wasn't it?" said Brook, whose 0 from four deliveries was his first duck in T20Is. "You can't take much from that. There was so much going on. They got nine overs, we got five overs. You can't take much from it.

"It was a long, long day. I don't think we need to make any excuses up. We probably didn't execute as well as we should have done with bat and ball. It's bloody hard when you only bat for five overs."

Brook stopped short of saying the match should not have gone ahead: "That's not for me to decide, that's for the umpires or the match referee. We just try to do what we can on the field."

However, the decision to park Archer was an admission of the risk involved, particularly given the amount of time and money invested to get the 30-year-old back playing all international formats this summer ahead of the winter's Ashes. Brook even cited Adam Hose's horrific ankle injury sustained during The Hundred as a worse-case scenario had Archer played.

"It would have been stupid to play him with the amount of cricket we've got coming up," said Brook. "If he'd have gone out in the boundary and done what Adam Hose did in The Hundred and broken his leg or whatever, that would have been a shambles.

"As soon as we knew that the game was shortened, we didn't think it was quite necessary for Jof to play. Obviously, the outfield was sodden and he's got a lot of cricket to play in the next few months with a big series coming up. So, yeah, we, we decided to not play him."