The Surfer
Farooq Nomani argues in the Dawn that the PCB's recently released 'Registration of Agents Regulations, 2010' – a set of rules intended to oversee the legitimacy of player-agent arrangements - is inadequate
In the aftermath of the spot-fixing scandal, “agent” was the catchword of regulatory hawks because that’s what Mazhar Majeed sold himself as. But what if the next Mazhar Majeed presents himself as a lawyer? An accountant? Or a ‘business manager’? Are such service providers covered by the Agents Regulations? I suppose that depends on how the Agents Regulations define an “agent”? Problem is, they don’t. The Agents Regulations are silent as to what would constitute an “agency activity” and neither does the ICC Players Handbook or the PCB Constitution provide any guidance on the scope of the term.
Wouldn't it have been a help to West Indies' youngsters to have Ramnaresh Sarwan or Shivnarine Chanderpaul meeting them at the crease at some stage to rotate the strike, to deal with Saeed Ajmal and to take some of the pressure off them during the
Skipper Darren Sammy, poor fellow, has not been able to be of such aid [as one of the discarded seniors could have] to his young charges, struggling as he is even more than them with bat and ball. Captain after captain over the last decade has said similar things [after a loss]. But, nowadays, the need to "make things happen" is urgent. Why? Because West Indies cricket is full of greenhorns as the cowboys of the old West would have said: young, undeveloped talent searching for direction but not yet finding it.
The exclusion all at once of the three most senior batsmen, Sarwan, Chanderpaul and Gayle has made an already bad situation worse. Good sense would suggest that such an imbalance be rectified by at least the re-introduction of Sarwan for the ODIs, and he and Chanders for the Tests.
With there being no such thing as a cricket season - unless you’re referring to the period between January 1 and December 31 - cricket is being robbed of it's meaning says Shehan Karunatilaka, writing in Outlook India .
It’s all about context. At a time when commentators were heralding the death of one-day cricket, the World Cup proved that there was still life in the old format. There were plenty of nail-biters, many of which featured England. Each game had a meaning, a subtext and a reason for being. Something which a 7-game series between New Zealand and Zimbabwe may lack. While the World Cup final had most of us riveted, can the same be said for the last 50 Sri Lanka-India games, which probably took place in as many weeks? If we keep repeating the same battles and lowering the stakes, cricket will be shorn of its meaning.
Sandeep Dwivedi, writing in the Indian Express , says Lasith Malinga has merely chosen a format of the game that suits his frail physical condition
Malinga definitely had his reasons to give up the flannels for good. He was fit enough to bowl four hours, that too slit in two-three spells, with a sufficient break between games, but he wasn’t sure if his knee could take the workload of the tough five-day routine of a Test match in England. But despite their long experience of playing the game, the Lankan administrators failed to get this cricketing logic. They took it personally. It was a rejection, they believed.
With Daniel Vettori saying the day when a left-arm spinner will bowl the doosra is not far, S Dinakar, writing in the Hindu , examines the implications of such an innovation.
Murali Kartik, still the finest left-arm spinner in the country [India], revealed he had attempted bowling the doosra — here a left-arm spinner gets the ball to spin into the right-hander — at the nets and managed to pull it off from only 10 yards. “You require hyper-flexible wrist and shoulder to send down this delivery from 22 yards. And I do not believe this is possible without a degree of bending and straightening of the arm.”
A doosra could be a potent weapon against a left-handed batsman who could be forced to hit against the spin. And against a right-hander, the short-leg and the leg-slip could come into play.
The Old Batsman takes a look at a recent IPL game and wonders whether 'playing yourself in' is as important as people once assumed.
At the end of the sixth over in their game against Rajasthan yesterday, Kings XI were 77-1. It would be easy to pass this off as symptomatic of one of the many warping forces T20 is applying in its first era. Yet it hints at something more fundamental. In distilling the game down to an extreme form, conventional wisdoms will be challenged.
Over 400 runs were blasted at the Feroze Shah Kotla in the IPL game between Delhi Daredevils and Kings XI Punjab on Saturday
But how did the usually low-slow Kotla, so frustrating for batsmen, become a belter? It's because Saturday's game was played on a side track and not one of the three centre wickets. The centre strips are bare without a speck of grass and have been low and sluggish ever since they have been re-laid in 2010. "The grass just refuses to grow on the centre wickets. It could be because of the layer of soil underneath or due to wear and tear. Wickets on either side have a healthy coverage of grass," DDCA's grounds and pitches committee chairman Venkat Sundaram said.
Cricket is still to make make big strides in the USA but Peter Della Penna, writing on the website dreamcricket.com observes that visitors have reacted positively to experiencing cricket for the first time at National Baseball Hall of Fame.
“I’d love to go see a full game actually,” said 45-year-old Karen Knights of Raymond, Maine. Knights was with her husband Rodney and 13-year-old daughter Megan on a day out to discover baseball history when they came across the Swinging Away display. The entire family was quite intrigued by the differences between baseball and cricket.
There's a refreshingly youthful look to many of the squads on the English County circuit, writes Barney Ronay in The Observer , and that bodes well for the future of the national team.
Three matches into the current season the County Championship already appears to be undergoing a generational changing of the guard, showcasing not just the much lauded endeavours of Reece Topley – a 17-year-old fast bowler from Essex who is currently the leading wicket-taker in the country – but a thickening posse of young English batsmen with their eye on an early-season Test spot. The present may be racked with financial strife for many counties but the future seems likely to benefit from the breath of regeneration percolating around even the most leathery of dressing rooms.
But it is also irritating that the public in this country are deprived of the excellent spectacle that is a 50-over match on a dry pitch, when the right schedule is so easily attainable: start the season with the championship, go into 20-over cricket in June then 50-over cricket in July, and finish off with the championship, instead of squeezing in CB40 matches at every spare moment.
Sushant Sareen, who works with the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses in New Delhi, writes in Tehelka that Indo-Pak cricket will never be the right vehicle for taking bilateral relations to the next level
That cricket can never be a substitute for quiet, serious diplomacy is borne out by past record. Gen Zia-ul-Haq initiated cricket diplomacy in 1987 by forcing himself on a reluctant Indian government after a near crisis caused by the Operation Brasstacks military exercise had been diffused. Pervez Musharraf’s sojourn in 2005 to watch the match in New Delhi also didn’t lead to any major breakthrough.