Cricket Records in England Women in South Africa T20I Series, 2015/16

Best bowling figures in a match

Player	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Econ	Team	Opposition	Ground	Match Date	Scorecard
A Shrubsole	4.0	-	25	3	6.25	ENG Women	v SA Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
S Ismail	3.0	-	27	3	9.00	SA Women	v ENG Women	Johannesburg	21 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 330
M Daniels	4.0	-	20	2	5.00	SA Women	v ENG Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
D van Niekerk	4.0	-	26	2	6.50	SA Women	v ENG Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
S Luus	4.0	-	26	2	6.50	SA Women	v ENG Women	Cape Town	19 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 329
JL Gunn	4.0	-	28	2	7.00	ENG Women	v SA Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
A Shrubsole	4.0	-	28	2	7.00	ENG Women	v SA Women	Johannesburg	21 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 330
S Luus	2.0	-	12	1	6.00	SA Women	v ENG Women	Johannesburg	21 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 330
GA Elwiss	2.0	-	15	1	7.50	ENG Women	v SA Women	Cape Town	19 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 329
M Klaas	3.0	-	17	1	5.66	SA Women	v ENG Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
D Hazell	4.0	-	18	1	4.50	ENG Women	v SA Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
CL Tryon	2.0	-	19	1	9.50	SA Women	v ENG Women	Johannesburg	21 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 330
S Ismail	4.0	-	20	1	5.00	SA Women	v ENG Women	Cape Town	19 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 329
NE Farrant	4.0	-	21	1	5.25	ENG Women	v SA Women	Johannesburg	21 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 330
CL Tryon	2.0	-	21	1	10.50	SA Women	v ENG Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328
RL Grundy	3.0	-	24	1	8.00	ENG Women	v SA Women	Cape Town	19 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 329
M Daniels	3.0	-	26	1	8.66	SA Women	v ENG Women	Cape Town	19 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 329
D van Niekerk	2.3	-	28	1	11.20	SA Women	v ENG Women	Johannesburg	21 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 330
S Ismail	4.0	-	39	1	9.75	SA Women	v ENG Women	Paarl	18 Feb 2016	Women T20 # 328

Adjust:Most recentPast weekPast MonthPast year4 years10 years25 years

Performances in matches that overlap decades are credited to the year in which they occurred - this results in some unknown data, especially in regard to bowling figures
Performances in matches that overlap years are credited to the year in which they occurred - this results in some unknown data, especially in regard to bowling figures