Boldest book on the block
The 2007 Almanack says Fletcher should go, Warne was cricketing perfection and Pietersen should keep his tattoos covered up
David Nobbs
11-May-2007
The 2007 Almanack says Fletcher
should go, Warne was cricketing
perfection and Pietersen should
keep his tattoos covered up
![]() |
![]()
|
It's also a wonderfully
professional and efficient
enterprise. I got my review copy on
March 17, yet it includes reports on
every one of England's matches in
their winter tour of Australia, the
last game of which - a victory too
(unless you're Australian) - took
place on February 11. Not bad going.
All the usual records and
features are there, and by now you
all know who the five cricketers
of the year are (unless you're
Australian - unusually, there
isn't one among them). This year
they comprise three batsmen, one
bowler and one dancer.
There are articles on all sorts
of subjects - from sinking hopes
(unless you're Australian - I
must stop saying that) to sinking
pitches - there's a splendid piece
by Marcus Berkmann about heroic
attempts to play the great game on
sandbanks, presumably financed
by the Dogger Bank.
Another fascinating article,
by that great radio lady
Gillian Reynolds,
praises the splendid
but permanently
endangered
institution, Test
Match Special, set
on an insecure
sandbank created by the BBC. There's talk of it being
modernised, dumbed down. I
tremble. I was also particularly
interested in an analysis by
Kamran Abbasi of why there are so
many more injuries in the modern
game. I don't know what's going
off out there.
And, yes, there is an obituary
of the great Fred Trueman, plus
a splendid tribute from Michael
Parkinson. My favourite quote
in the whole book comes from
that. It's Fred on why he gave
instructions that there was to
be no memorial service for him.
"When I'm gone I don't want any
of these two-faced bastards who
I didn't get on with standing up
and saying nice things about me."
Remarks like that are the reason
why I live in Yorkshire.
There's nothing faint-hearted
about Wisden. The editor Matthew
Engel tackles whether the urn, the
Elgin Marbles of cricket, should
go to Australia when they win
it; England's preparations and
failings; whether Duncan Fletcher
should survive; the modern Test
match schedule; tampering with
the ball; washing that Darrell right
out of my Hair; the so-called Kolpak
players; small boundaries; large
benefits; unreadable scoreboards,
and much else. His views are clear,
passionate and well-argued.
![]() |
![]()
|
Much of the book, of course,
consists of facts and figures, but
even facts and figures tell stories.
Wisden has quite recently compiled
a list of 'The Leading Cricketer in
the World' for every year, except
war years, between 1900 and
2006. It tells a fascinating story.
Between 1900 and 1948, all the
leading cricketers were English
or Australian, except for two
South Africans. Since 1949, there
have been 20 West Indians, three
Sri Lankans, and two each from
India, New Zealand and Pakistan.
The great game has spread.
Let it continue, till we have
Bangladeshi and Kenyan
winners of that trophy.
Nothing in cricket makes
my blood boil more than the decision to remove Holland
from our Friends Provident
Trophy. What sort of idiot wants to
discourage the spread of the game
into continental Europe?
I stated that there was a hero
and villain in this year's edition.
It's time to reveal them.
The hero is Shane Warne;
how could it not be? Matthew
Engel lists the nine grounds
on which he will be playing for
Hampshire this summer. "If you
have grandchildren, take them. If
you don't, go anyway - so you can
tell them." Mike Atherton praises
him as "The Mighty Craftsman".
"We will never see anything closer
to perfection." And he tells how
Warne was the only one of the
victorious Australians to manage
the moment of victory with
dignity, breaking off from the
celebrating pack to acknowledge
the vanquished. Engel again
on the Adelaide Test - be brave,
read it. "Shane Warne conjured
up perhaps the most astounding
victory of even his career."
And the villain? Kevin
Pietersen, I'm afraid. He's criticised
by Engel, along with Flintoff, the
fallen hero of 2005, for covering
himself with tattoos and showing
them off, which he thinks socially
irresponsible in a man who's a role
model. In that Adelaide Test, Engel
quotes Pietersen's claim, after his
first innings, that he had Warne
beaten. Of the second innings he
writes, "Pietersen swept Warne
and was bowled round his legs.
Mastery, eh?" Of his fielding he
states, "A wild Pietersen throw
turned a last-ball three into a
seven, and then for England there
was only deflation."
And Peter Oborne, reviewing
Pietersen's "premature
autobiography", states "This book
is a study in narcissism, and
should be avoided at all costs by
people who care about the game of
cricket". Ouch.
This year's Wisden should be
sought out by anyone who cares
about the game of cricket - except,
perhaps, Kevin Pietersen.
This article was first published in the May 2007 issue of The Wisden Cricketer