CMJ: Morris steers English cricket towards brighter future (24 Aug 1998)
NEVER has a season more clearly demonstrated the value of resilience in cricket, nor the consequences of lacking it
24-Aug-1998
24 August 1998
Morris steers towards brighter future
By Christopher Martin-Jenkins
NEVER has a season more clearly demonstrated the value of
resilience in cricket, nor the consequences of lacking it.
England won the Test series against South Africa only because
they had first saved the Old Trafford Test by batting for more
than 11 hours after following on 369 behind. It was a great
rearguard action of a kind rarely achieved by England or anyone
else. Look what transpired as a result.
By illuminating contrast, Surrey look like winning the
championship mainly because too few of their opponents have been
able to recover once they have hit trouble. There have been 171
four-day championship matches so far, four of which have finished
in two days, 37 in three and a good many more have been affected
by the weather. The games which actually last for four days are a
in a clear minority. It is not at all what the advocates of
four-day cricket had in mind.
This is at the heart of the problem everyone is keen to solve:
the need for a 'competitive' national side. "If you can force
your heart and nerve and sinew, to serve your turn long after
they are gone . . . "
Those working on any possible restructuring of the championship
need to ask why the evidence points to the persistent failure of
counties to recover once one side has got a big score and the
other one has begun to struggle in response.
If pitches are to blame, as up to a point they must be, the
England and Wales Cricket Board will have to reconsider their
guidelines, but time and again this year we have had more than 15
wickets falling on the first day, only for umpires to conclude
that it is bad batting, not bad pitches, which has caused the
collapse. There are only three other possible reasons: superb
bowling which, much as we would love to believe it, is clearly
not very common; bad technique; and mental weakness.
Whatever can be done with the professional structure, work is
already in hand to improve the technical and mental quality of
those who reach the professional level. Since retiring at the end
of last season while still at the peak of his powers as an
opening batsman for Glamorgan, Hugh Morris has completed a review
of national coaching which promises to create a far more
efficient system for coached and coaches alike.
Co-ordinated coaching, allied to the moves already under way to
sharpen up adult recreational cricket, should move the UK nearer
to that Australian virtuous circle wherein the young talent is
spotted, sifted, nurtured and matured, enabling the international
side to be refreshed as necessary with gifted, hardened players
who can be drafted into a strong side without any fear of the
whole experience being too much for them.
It was Micky Stewart who started the process of revamping the
NatWest Development of Excellence and Rover National Coaching
schemes which have already brought more coherence to the business
of encouraging and developing young cricketers.
Nearly 30,000 coaching awards have been made over the last 25
years to those who have sought voluntarily to give something back
to the game by doing some coaching in schools or clubs. Next
year, the former Warwickshire and Worcestershire left-hander,
Gordon Lord, will take over from Bob Carter the essential task of
educating future coaches.
There will be five new levels for coaches. Level one courses
start regionally round the country for volunteers from Sept 1 and
the object is to pass on basic skills designed for stimulating
the interests of beginners in clubs and schools.
At all levels there will be an emphasis on sports science as well
as on technique and coaches will be helped to analyse and to
communicate clearly, with groups as with individuals. From next
year, new level two coaches and those with existing senior and
advanced coaching awards will be invited to county-based sessions
leading to the third level, where coaching will be aimed at
talented youngsters and experienced club cricketers. At levels
four and five the need will be for articulate and well qualified
coaches to work with county cricketers and international players.
Morris sums up the various facets of coaching as "technical,
tactical, physical, mental and lifestyle, by which I mean advice
about drugs, diet, wider education and the need for ambitious
cricketers to become articulate".
All these areas will be examined at a world cricket coaching
conference at the National Exhibition Centre in Birmingham next
June 1 and 2, when anyone who is interested in cricket coaching
can attend. The World Cup will be in full swing and Morris has
already issued invitations to Bob Woolmer, Terry Jenner, Dennis
Lillee, Desmond Haynes and, from further afield, Frank Dick.
Morris is keen to get more former Test cricketers interested in
the art of coaching but says there is "no glass ceiling" to
prevent players of lesser attainment from reaching high levels as
coaches. He points to Arsène Wenger as a classic example.
The ECB's technical director sees less need for change in the
development of excellence schemes which already identifies many
of the best young cricketers from the 1.3 million under 12 and
puts them on a theoretical road to the top via national squads at
under 13, 15, 17 and 19.
Morris will tell the ECB when he makes his report at the end of
this season that the need is less for a finishing academy along
the lines of those in Australia, South Africa and New Zealand
than for a national cricket centre, catering for special training
of many different ages and teams.
The Test against Sri Lanka later this week and the tour of
Australia later this year may or may not put a stop to the
encouraging progress of Alec Stewart and his team. The really
good news is that changes well below the surface are working
towards a production line which should ensure that the current
upturn is more than just a flash in the pan.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)