Cricket Board case: Mr.Choksy continues his submissions (21 July 1999)
What is the proof that Sri Lanka would lose the ICC membership if we did not attend the International Cricket Council conference
21-Jul-1999
21 July 1999
Cricket Board case: Mr.Choksy continues his submissions
Sarath Malalasekera
What is the proof that Sri Lanka would lose the ICC membership if we
did not attend the International Cricket Council conference. There
was not a single material before court to that effect, submitted
President's Counsel K.N. Choksy, Senior Counsel for the petitioner in
the BCCSL case, when it came up before the Court of Appeal yesterday.
The Bench comprised Justice Hector S. Yapa and Justice P. H. K.
Kulatilleke.
An application by the petitioners in the case seeking an interim
injunction restraining the interim committee functioning in the
office.
The petitioners are Anura Weerasinghe, Shammi Silva, Jayananda
Warnaweera, Kamal Dharmasiri and B.S. Perera, office bearers and
members BCCSL ex-co elected at the Board AGM held on March 28, 1999.
Petitioners cited Minister of Samurdhi, Youth Affairs and Sports S.B.
Dissanayake, Rienzie T. Wijetilleke, chairman of the interim Board,
Michael Tissera, Sidath Wettimuny, Ashantha de Mel, S. Skamdhakumar,
Gehan Siribaddana, Upali Kumarasiri and Dhammika Ranatunga as
respondents.
Mr. Choksy citing several authorities submitted to court that the
interim injunction issued by the District Court was not a suspension
of the Board. A suspension on the Board only could be issued by the
Sports Minister, he said.
Senior Counsel said that under sections 32 and 33 of the Sports Law
the Minister has no power to appoint an interim committee. The only
way to solve the present situation the Sports Minister has, go to
Parliament and amend the law, he added.
That objections filed by the Minister of Sports against the issue of
a Writ to suspend the interim committee has no material to back it.
They are mere assertions of the minister without any material to
support, Mr. Choksey said.
Mr. Choksey empahsised that the President of the Cricket Board is
only a ceremonial president. He is not an Executive President.
Justice Hector Yapa:- If he is only a ceremonial president, why are
they fighting!
The petitioner deny all and singular averments which are inconsistent
with the petition.
Solicitor General K.C. Kamalasabyson PC appeared with State Counsel
Uditha Egalahewa for the first respondent, Sports Minister S.B.
Dissanayake.
President's Counsel K.N. Choksy with Messrs. L.C. Seneviratne PC,
S.L. Gunasekera, Ronald Perera instructed by M/s Paul Ratnayake
Associates appeared for the petitioners.
President's Counsel Ikram Mohamed with Messrs Shammil Perera and
Thisath Wijegunewardena instructed by M/s Julius and Creasy appeared
for the second to sixth respondents.
Mr. Choksy will continue his submissions when the proceedings resume
on July 27.
Source :: The Daily News (https://www.lanka.net/lakehouse/)