Enchanted as an eight-year-old by Hutton's heroes (28 April 1999)
Cricket lovers are often asked why they love cricket
28-Apr-1999
28 April 1999
Enchanted as an eight-year-old by Hutton's heroes
Tim Rice
Cricket lovers are often asked why they love cricket. This is not
always a question posed in a manner implying that the lover of the
great game is off his trolley, though it generally is, for anyone
having to ask that question has clearly not been even momentarily
captivated by cricket's beauty, subtlety, excitement, delicacy, brute
force, speed, leisurely pace and personalities, to name but a few of
its delights.
The answer to the question is not easy - why does anyone like
anything? Over to the philosophers. But the people who play cricket
are surely one of the main attractions, or should be - we all need
heroes more than we need to be called Sabres or Phoenix, even more
than we need floodlights or two divisions.
I cast no aspersions upon the current members of our national side,
but I reckon I was particularly lucky to be a nipper when Len Hutton
was at the helm. The first England side I was fully aware of
consisted of 11 players who not only would waltz into any country's
squad today, but who could all be considered serious candidates for
any all-time England XI.
Sad to say, only five of these great men are still with us, and the
Grim Reaper has been particularly hard on the top of the batting
line-up, but their deeds and characters still reverberate around
cricket's hallowed halls as if they were still going strong.
The future Sir Leonard himself batted at No 1 throughout the 1953
Ashes series, which I only discovered when, after four drawn Tests,
it was coming to an end at Kennington Oval. But what an end. Since
the war England had been all but humiliated in three consecutive
series, with just one Test victory under Freddie Brown, in 1950-51,
to put against four defeats in that same season and numerous
drubbings home and away under a declining Wally Hammond in 1946-47
and a noble Norman Yardley in 1948. Bradman, of course, had a lot to
do with our problems in the Forties.
But in 1953 it was Hutton who could lay as good a claim as any to be
the world's best batsman. And as England's first professional
captain, appointed (and by no means with universal support) the year
before against India, his undemonstrative steely leadership served
England as well as his masterly batsmanship. Pressure existed in
1953, only it wasn't mentioned in polite circles.
Hutton coped and did not buckle. He scored more runs than anyone else
in Tests that summer and perhaps his worst mistake was to get run out
in England's second innings at the Oval when the Ashes were all but
won. Today he might also have got into trouble for being photographed
having a quiet fag on the balcony as he acknowledged the crowd's
victory appreciation.
His opening partner was Bill Edrich. Few began their Test careers
with less success than W J Edrich in 1938, but his immortality had
been long assured by 1953. This was largely because of his phenomenal
exploits with his lifelong Middlesex friend Denis Compton in 1947,
when Compton (D) broke every batting record, in the book and Bill
would have but for Denis. There had been many other triumphs for
county and country for the Middlesex duo, but none was sweeter than
their unbroken partnership which sealed the Ashes win that August.
The supreme entertainer, Compton thus renewed his lease as the
nation's most famous and loved sportsman.
Peter May, still by general consent the best English batsman to have
emerged since the Second World War, batted at three between the
Middlesex pair. He played two important innings at the Oval. In 1953
he had not quite secured an automatic right to a place in the side,
but few doubted he would soon do so and he was already being thought
of as Hutton's obvious successor. Tom Graveney was at five, already
the most graceful of players, not yet as consistently commanding as
he was to be in later years. Has England produced a finer
professional batsman since 1945? Only Ken Barrington, a very
different stylist, challenges.
Then we come to the all-rounder, Trevor Bailey. Suffice it to say
that if it hadn't been for Ian Botham, we would still be wondering
why we couldn't find another Bailey. T E Bailey was good enough to
play for England as either a batsman or a bowler - surely the only
definition of a true all-rounder. In 1953 he saved one of the Tests
with the bat, and another with the ball.
Actually there were two all-rounders. Godfrey Evans batted at seven
and very often scored crucial runs, either at breakneck speed or with
unyielding stubbornness, as requested. But Godders was also the
world's best wicketkeeper. In this fifth Test he kept to a
staggering, indisputably great quartet of England bowlers: Laker,
Lock, Trueman and Bedser.
Jim Laker's crazily brilliant summer against Australia (19 for 90 and
all that) was still three years away, but he gave an advance warning
of it in this match. He and his long-time Surrey colleague, Tony
Lock, spun Australia to defeat in their second innings, leaving
England not much over a hundred to win. A good deal of the damage in
Australia's first innings had been inflicted by young 'Fiery Fred'
Trueman and the man who for so many years had been England's attack
all on his own, Alec Bedser. The all-time world list of better fast
and medium-fast bowlers than these two is short. The future Sir Alec
took 39 Australian wickets in 1953.
What a team! Not one was just passing through. All hold their own in
the greatest of company. No wonder an eight-year-old got hooked.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)