Matches (13)
IPL (2)
PSL (1)
BAN-A vs NZ-A (1)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
WCL 2 (1)
Women's One-Day Cup (1)
The Surfer

For the sake of the game

It may appear that the ongoing fourth edition of the IPL lacks the spark and intensity of prior seasons, writes sports attorney Desh Gaurav Chopra Sekhri in the Indian Express , but while it would be unfair to gauge the IPL with the same yardstick

Akhila Ranganna
Akhila Ranganna
25-Feb-2013
It may appear that the ongoing fourth edition of the IPL lacks the spark and intensity of prior seasons, writes sports attorney Desh Gaurav Chopra Sekhri in the Indian Express, but while it would be unfair to gauge the IPL with the same yardstick as one uses for what was a dream World Cup 2011 for every Indian, the past couple of weeks have witnessed developments that are worrying for the IPL’s long-term growth and viability.
Of immediate concern is the choice that cricketers are forced to make with regard to playing for their countries or for their career sustainability. In particular, the situation faced by two impact cricketers — Chris Gayle and his ongoing tussle with the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB), and Lasith Malinga’s retirement from Test and his impending dispute with the Sri Lankan Cricket Board
In the upcoming ICC world cricket schedule for the next seven-eight years, bilateral series are likely to overlap each of the future editions of the IPL. Not only that, in four of the five upcoming seasons, the IPL will follow immediately after an ICC world event — thus leaving the IPL, again, susceptible to saturation and declining viewership/ revenue. What this will lead to is either uncertainty in choosing rosters for teams — IPL or national, or it could lead to warring factions of boards making fair or unfair demands of the ICC, BCCI and, even more unfortunate, the players.

Akhila Ranganna is assistant editor (Audio) at ESPNcricinfo