16 November 1996
High deeds of the father sit heavily on son`s shoulders
By Giles Smith
Michael Parkinson told me a story this week about a cricket match
he watched at Bradford in which Richard Hutton, the son of the
almighty Len, stoutly built a brave, 30-run innings on a sorry
wicket, only to be met at the pavilion by a spectator saying,
"Well done, lad. But tha`ll never be as good as thee dad." A
better definition of thanklessness one would be hard pressed to
find.
It is a tale that rings poignantly alongside the news that Liam
Botham, the 19-year-old son of Ian, has weighed up his options as
a sportsman and decided to concentrate on rugby rather than
cricket. This is the Liam who, only this August, was making his
county debut for Hampshire against Middlesex and taking five
wickets in an innings, including, rather deliciously, Mike
Gatting`s; the Liam once described by his father as "a cheeky
bugger who reckons he is going to be better than his old man".
Botham timed his retirement so that he would be out of the way
when his son took up the game seriously. But Liam has opted
for rugby. Doubtless many considerations informed his choice,
but in so doing, whether consciously or not, he has nicely
side-stepped a set of footprints laid down by his father and
extending dauntingly to the horizon. Whatever gets said in the
future when Liam comes off the pitch at West Hartlepool,
at least nobody will be able to offer heart-sinking comparisons with his dad.
You couldn`t claim that being the sporting child of a famous
sportsperson was entirely without its advantages. Kick-abouts
in the back garden presumably take on a different dimension
if, like Mark, your father is Tony Hateley. You would grow
up with a pretty clear idea of what it takes. At the same time,
you would have to suffer not just the ceaseless comparisons and
contrasts, but also a kind of low-watt, public resentment (all
those unfair genes), as if a sporting gift were some kind of
private income. Not to mention the psychic burden of seeing your
name forever followed by a parenthesis - "(son of . . . )"
Botham wrote in his autobiography: "I`m sure that it is the hope
of every father who plays professional sport that he will one
day be able to watch his son performing at the same or higher
level." But how often does that happen? How often does a child
crawl out from under and rise to better the achievement of a successful sporting parent? Hard to prove yourself in the eyes of
your father when your father has gone ahead and proved everything
there was to prove.
Don Bradman`s son felt so encumbered by the precedent set by
his father that he changed his name to Bradhouse. One can see
how one would no more wish to take the name Bradman out on to
a cricket square than one would want to carry the name
Biggs into an annual general meeting for train drivers. But
this name change is haunting in a hundred ways, not least because
of the proximity of the pseudonym to the real name. Smith or
Jones would have served Bradman`s son as a more efficient disguise, but clearly some irreducible part of him wished to stay
true to the family line.
Incidentally, Bradhouse is one of the very few sons of famous
cricketers to inspire a song by a former member of a punk rock
group: Captain Sensible, a beret-wearing, bleached blond pogoartist with The Damned in the late 1970s, but always a wellinformed and reflective cricket fan, wrote the poignant Donald`s
Son for a solo album in the mid-1980s. Some small consolation there, perhaps.
Clearly, the traumas attached to parental precedents are felt
elsewhere than sport, but few areas of life provide so obviously
the means for measuring the shortfall. With literature one
can argue about these things. It`s a generation-dividing issue,
for instance, which Amis writes for England. Some point to
Kingsley`s superior record in the Booker Prize; others raise
Martin`s indisputably major influence on an entire intake of
younger players.
In general, though, examples taken from outside sport tend
to confirm one`s impression that brilliance is unlikely to flare
still brighter in the passage from parent to child. In pop
music, the parental shadow seems to spread itself especially
thickly. John Lennon was once asked if he thought Ringo was
the best drummer in the world. He replied, "Ringo isn`t even
the best drummer in the Beatles" - a jibe thrown into relief
when one compares the career achievements of Ringo with his
drumming son, Zak. And would anyone trade their Bob Marley albums for a complete set of albums by Ziggy?
The challenge is to find exceptions to the rule - mothers or
fathers, daughters or sons. Frankie Dettori has out-achieved
his champion father, Gianfranco. Contemporary motor racing seems
to offer two potential upsets: Jacques Villeneuve may yet
prove himself more gifted than Gilles; Damon Hill may yet push
beyond the achievements of Graham (though many would fancy his
chances better if he was still driving a Williams).
Clearly the most satisfying examples will be ones in which the
target set by the parent is vertiginously high. Ideally,
there would be international caps involved for both parties.
If anyone can think of any suitable instances, I would be glad
to compile a list and reproduce it here.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)