Lateef Jafri: Why this vacillation by the PCB Council? (20 Jul 1998)
Why this vacillation by the PCB Council
20-Jul-1998
20 July 1998
Why this vacillation by the PCB Council?
By Lateef Jafri
In what was billed as a meeting with a heavy agenda the Council of the
Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), the higher tier of the organisation,
deferred some important items to its next month's sitting while it put
an end to the guessing game by nominating a three-member selection
committee.
Under the constitution only the Council has the mandatory power to
name the selectors, the captain and the coach.
It is still not known why the decision on the coach was held back for
the news was floating for more than a month that former captain and
star batsman Javed Miandad was a strong candidate for the post now
that his Brunei contract has run its course. He had earlier reportedly
had a detailed one-to-one meeting with the PCB Chief Executive, Majid
Khan, and sports scribes had noted that there was hardly any
divergence of opinion on any issue relating to the former's
reappearance on the cricket scene. As one of the most skillful and
hard-hitting batsmen that Pakistan has produced there is little doubt
that there may have been any difference of views in the Council. The
veterans and cricket observers too have been backing his appointment
for he knows the game from A to Z, had been a quick and agile fielder
and had made his mark as a batsman of the vintage class in the English
counties. A more suitable person can hardly be picked for such an
onerous assignment now that he is prepared to serve the country's
cricket.
It is possible some other name may have surfaced at the Council caucus
at the eleventh hour and so the deferment. But considering the tight
programme during the coming cricket season, the Indo-Pakistan tussles
in Canada and India itself, the mini World Cup in Dhaka and next
year's World Cup in England; the PCB officialdom should try its level
best to convince the Council members -now slated to assemble next
month - to make the right and the best possible choice, not a person
like the previous appointee who failed to handle the players, provide
guidance to the team and deliver the goods.
Presumably there may have been many opinions on the appointment of the
captain for the mainstream team. There may have been several
candidates for the slot of the skipper, apart from Aamir Sohail, who
was tipped by the media to take over the leadership. Since the board
panel is still busy going through the process of questioning a large
number of former and present Test cricketers on betting and
match-fixing charges it is possible the Council was not in a position
to come to a decision, which may have been called hasty. Though Wasim
had recently expressed his desire to keep himself away from captaincy
it is possible many may be pleading his case. As a senior cricketer
Salim Malik's claims cannot be flung to the winds. However, both will
have to wait for the report of the inquiry committee to get a verdict
in their favour. In any case the evidence will have to be iron-cast
otherwise many eye-brows may be raised on the nature of the
investigation and the followers of the game may call for benefit of
doubt to be given to them.
A fit captain to set an example of quality performance before his
team-mates is necessary if the end-result is to be positive and
satisfying. This is not to be taken as a stricture on any particular
player. Like the experienced cricket manager, whose guidance helps the
conglomerate, the captain's advice on the field and his own laudable
show as a player lift the morale of each member of the playing lineup.
He should also be popular with the full entourage, the party treating
itself as one homogeneous unit. The captain's choice is a ticklish
one, considering that the names day by day have been short-listed.
Still a wrong selection may prove counterproductive and harm the
cause of the national team and the country's cricket. Since the
selectorial panel will have no part in showing its preference toward a
player the Councillors have a difficult issue on hand at their August
get-together.
The important decision taken by the Council, and keenly awaited by the
followers of the game, was the appointment of a new selection
committee. Under the constitution its term is to last for three
years. Though no clarification has been made on the subject, the board
officials have given the impression that performances of the committee
will be reviewed after a season and their tenure will be extended as
of necessity. This means the selected team has to put up an impressive
show and there is no criticism of any undue favouritism to players.
The names of the selectors may have caused some ripples in the cricket
circles for media reports had tipped Zaheer Abbas's elevation to the
post of chief of the panel. Anyway as a person of disarming nature
cricket circles and city organisations would welcome the nomination of
Wasim Bari as head of the selection committee. Nobody can question
his cricket credentials, being one of the leading wicket-keepers
during his playing days. He came to the rescue of the team and the
board setup when Packer's recruitment drive had depleted the strength
of the side and took over the helmsmanship of the national outfit
twice in the late seventies. He had been a successful batsman as well
and had set up the 10th wicket record of 133 with Wasim Raja for
Pakistan against the West Indies. He was an alert and acrobatic
wicket-keeper, having many creditable marks to his credit.
The selectorial assignment is his second one and this time as head of
the committee for just four years back he was an associate of Javed
Burki in his committee.
Salahuddin's re-emergence as a selector will considerably help the
country's cricket for in the choice of a national team he always lays
stress on merit and merit alone. He will scour all the venues of the
country to see for himself the form and fitness of the probables. Only
the cricketers giving the best possible performances can expect to be
recommended by him. He has the courage of his convictions to give his
viewpoint on the selection and collection of the best possible
resources in the country, the most talented hands to measure strength
with the cricket-playing countries.
One hopes there is no interference from the Board side to make the
pack imbalanced and Shafiq Papa, who has retained his position, does
not follow a policy of striking a discordant note during the panel
meetings.
Source:: Dawn (https://dawn.com/)