Lord's set for fresh vote on women (6 May 1998)
ANOTHER vote on whether women should be admitted as members of MCC could take place as early as the autumn of this year
06-May-1998
6 May 1998
Lord's set for fresh vote on women
Christopher Martin-Jenkins
ANOTHER vote on whether women should be admitted as members of
MCC could take place as early as the autumn of this year. A
ballot in September or October seems both a likely and a sensible
outcome of what is sure to be a stormy annual meeting at Lord's
this afternoon.
The agenda also includes discussion of the decision to charge
members for tickets to World Cup matches at Lord's next year. A
vote of no confidence in the committee has been threatened, but
no notice of one given.
There is indignation from some about the unprecedented decision
to charge members £45 for a ticket to the matches between England
and Sri Lanka and a 'Super Six' second-round match, and £75 for a
reserved seat at the final on June 24.
These are, however, subsidised prices and it would have cost the
club £1.4 million to recompense the World Cup organisers and
allow members in free. Members of MCC, and also of county clubs,
have priority in booking tickets until next Thursday, May 14,
when the general public are allowed to apply for entry to the 42
matches.
A further ballot of the club's 17,800 members on the question of
women's membership was not expected until next year at the
earliest after the special meeting at Lord's in February in which
the majority voting in favour of female admission - 6,969 to
5,538 - was less than two thirds and therefore insufficient to
make the rule change required.
The MCC president, Colin Ingleby-Mackenzie, has already said that
he would be in favour of another special meeting before the end
of this year and his successor, who will be named today, is
likely to accept the committee's consensus that, in view of the
club's public role, it is no longer tenable to have an all-male
membership.
Although some lawyers have suggested that the change could be
viewed as a regulation, which would require only a simple
majority, three distinguished lawyers on the committee have
advised that it is, strictly, a rule and that 66 per cent will
therefore need to vote in favour.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)