Mathew Fleming: The changing character of County Cricket (22 Aug 1998)
TALKING to the old and bold on the circuit, there are many inevitable differences of opinion
22-Aug-1998
22 August 1998
The changing character of County Cricket
Matthew Fleming
TALKING to the old and bold on the circuit, there are many
inevitable differences of opinion. Some say that the current
generation of cricketers have it too easy, pointing to the
much-publicised wage increases, rows of sponsored cars, the
plethora of coaches, sports psychologists, dieticians and the
like. Others think there are too many players playing too much
cricket. Quantity not quality.
To change or not to change is the question. Conferences or
divisions, 50 overs or 40, covered wickets or uncovered, one, two
or even no overseas professional. There seems to be only one
thing on which everyone agrees and that is that the character of
the sport is changing.
I am not merely referring to the question of walking or not
walking, or the issue that really isn't - sledging - because in
every era there are those who have successfully and
unsuccessfully walked the tightrope between angel and villain.
Just as important to the change of cricket's character has been
the arrival of 'professionalism' and the increasingly nomadic
nature of our sport.
It is apparent that there used to be a far greater sense of
camaraderie between the counties. The ever-increasing desire,
indeed requirement, for success seems to be driving invisible
wedges between teams.
In years gone by, opposing players would always meet for a pint
to discuss the day's play, gossip, techniques and whatever else
tickled their fancy, and a good deal did.
Whether new-age fathers are rushing home for children's bath-time
at the close of play, or the drink-driving laws have put people
off, I do not know. For one reason or another this seems to be
happening less and less.
Having a 40-something-year-old former county professional, and a
New Zealander to boot, as a coach has made me even more aware of
the increasingly anti-social nature of the game.
The statistics of John Wright's career tell a very different
story, but to listen to him one could be forgiven for thinking
that he spends more time at the bar having a yarn with his
colleagues and friends than he did in the middle.
He and his contemporaries seem to have a never-ending supply of
anecdotes - the bowler with size 10 feet who wore a size 14 left
boot during a John Player League game to try to cure his no-ball
problem; Ray East pretending to drop dead during his run-up when
a car passing the ground backfired; a batsman having been
dismissed last ball before tea, changing helmets and coming out
to bat again after tea (and getting away with it for a couple of
balls).
I am quite convinced there is a generous degree of exaggeration,
but unless the occasions arise where these stories can be told
frequently then they can't be really satisfactorily exaggerated.
Despite what he claims, I am quite sure that John Wright did not
have a colleague who was so tight he could take out of his pocket
a cigarette that was already alight, but I am sad that the
opportunity for me to outrageously embellish this story may be
limited.
This week at Canterbury our 12th man, who was acting under
intense pressure from his team-mates, took the refreshments out
at the drinks break in a car. We thought it was amusing, it
injected a degree of humour into the morning session, and set the
Worcestershire 12th man, Phil Newport, a delicate poser. Sadly,
the weather forecast doesn't look good enough for him to
commandeer the ice-cream van.
It was this light-hearted moment that set several of us thinking
about when something like this had last happened and the changing
nature of the game.
We are all in favour of increased professionalism as it will
undoubtedly help our game at all levels. Cricket, however, must
be enjoyed to be played well and therefore give pleasure to the
paying public, who, after all, are expecting to be entertained in
one form or another.
I WAS extremely flattered to discover that I had recently been
the subject of a conversation involving Fred Trueman. He
apparently took a friend of his aside at a cricketing event last
spring and said confidentially to him: "Fleming, bowling for
England. If you were a batsman you wouldn't sleep at night would
you?"
I am told that there wasn't a hint of sarcasm in his voice,
which, not unnaturally, surprised this someone, who said: "Why's
that Fred?"
Fred replied: "In case you overslept." If only we all had the
chance to play when cricket really was cricket.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)