Michael Owen-Smith, of The Cricketer International, talks to Sri Lanka's prolific off-spinner in the March issue of the magazine
The Sri Lankans are almost universally regarded as the nice guys of world
cricket, although Australian umpires Ross Emerson and Darrell Hair and some
of the other people involved in the triangular series against England and
Australia in 1998/99 might beg to differ. Indeed, they are sometimes
regarded as being too nice for their own good. Do they not lack that hard
edge that characterises South Africa and Australia?

Muttiah Muralitharan Photo © CricInfo
|
If there is any one person who epitomises that "nice" image it has to be
their world-class spin bowler, Muttiah Muralitharan. He is always full of
smiles and laughter and there is a definite hint of mischief in the twinkle
of his eyes. Whatever anybody thinks about his wrist-driven action, you are
always left with the same impression: this man must be good for cricket. He
is a character in a game that too often seems to be robot-controlled.
His passion for cricket is unmistakable and uncontrollable. When he feels he
is about to reel in his opponent, rather like a fisherman toying with a
catch, his eyes seem to come out on stalks - my wife refers to him as 'Mr
Big Eyes'. When he appeals vigorously for a catch or berates one of his
fielders for failing to take a difficult bat/pad or giving away an
unnecessary single, he has a high-pitched shriek which makes it sound as
though somebody is strangling him rather than the reality of his strangling
the batsman.
Yet this passionate person never loses his emotional control which is such
an important part of being a spin bowler. It takes time for him to spin his
web and then entangle his prey. What makes Murali so special is his ability
to keep the balance between focusing on dismissing his opponent and getting
caught in the excitement of the moment.
"I am very competitive. I don't like losing," he explains. "Every time I
play, I want to give 100% and do something special for the team. I am
totally focused on what I am doing. I don't even like to give away a single
run that is not necessary. At the same time you have to realise that cricket
requires you to play a very patient game, particularly when you are a spin
bowler. It happens in a match that you can get frustrated and sometimes you
end up taking it out on a team mate. Afterwards, I will say sorry to the
guy. It is part of the game. You have a drink together and forget about what
happened in the middle."
Murali's biggest test, of course, has not been to take 300 Test wickets but
to handle the disappointment, the mental discomfort and the unhappiness
about having his action called into question, especially as he feels he was
never doing anything wrong or unfair. There is the additional pressure of
being under instructions from his Board to steer well away from controversy
in his dealings with the media.
How then did he cope with being no-balled by Australian umpires Hair and
Emerson? "It didn't affect me much because I thought I was doing a fair
thing. It was his opinion. It was his decision and I cannot overrule that
decision. Sometimes it irritates me but you get harder and harder mentally
when you feel somebody is trying to push you out. It has certainly improved
me mentally when somebody has tried to push me out because it means that
somebody is scared of me. You take it at that point and come harder at him.
I have never changed my action from the way I bowled as a small boy."
Murali is more concerned about maintaining, or improving if possible, that
fantastic rate of wickets-per-Test that has placed him ahead of all other
spinners and second only to Dennis Lillee in the time it took him to reach
300 Test wickets.
"When I first started playing Test cricket in 1992 I was quite successful.
But after about three years - in 1995, I think it was - I realised that I
was still taking wickets but not as quickly as I had been doing previously.
I got to 100 wickets in 27 Test matches and to 150 in 36. I thought I needed
to do something to speed up the process. That is when I started to think
about adding more variety to my armoury. It seemed to work pretty well
because I went from 150 to 200 in only six matches.
"I had been trying the ball that turns away from the batsman in practice for
two years and I knew Saqlain had also started doing it in Pakistan. So I
said to myself why don't I do it in matches? The result was that I got my
second 100 wickets in just 16 matches. My third century came in another 16
matches, so they seem to be keeping on coming."
Are there some opponents he finds easier to rout than others? What about
England? He took 16 wickets last time out against them at The Oval in the
game in which he reached the 200 mark. His innings returns were 7 for 155
and 9 for 65, almost up in the Jim Laker class.
"You can't say England play spin badly. I bowled really well in the 1998
game at The Oval. They got 450 in the first innings, then the pitch helped
me a lot on the fourth and fifth days and I am very difficult to play under
such circumstances. They are not bad players. They are okay players. I think
they proved that in Pakistan. I will have to bowl very well when they come
to Sri Lanka.
"I respect every batsman I play against. I respect everyone. You may think
that one player is better than the next but people are there to learn. That
is what cricket is about. With the technology that is available now, the
batsmen can study the bowlers. It does take time but you can get there. Take
South Africa as an example. They have now become good players of spin and I
think that is one aspect of the Test game where virtually every country has
improved. The Indians play spin particularly well and the same applies to
Pakistan and Sri Lanka when they are playing under their own conditions."
Does he get frustrated when a team consciously tries to block him out at one
end and attack the lesser bowlers at the other? "Sometimes they defend
against me and other times they try to attack me. It depends how we bowl as
a team on any particular day. If we bowl well, then nobody can stop you. The
trouble is that we are a very young side. Over the years I am sure that we
will prove ourselves, but there is a lot of work to be done now that some of
the older players have gone. We did very well in the era of Arjuna Ranatunga
and Roshan Mahanama but those players have gone now. That era is past and a
new team has to learn the game. I think we will learn quickly. We have done
very well for the past year and a half, winning nearly all our series, and I
don't think it will take us long to bounce back again."
One of the questions that immediately springs to mind is just how many
wickets he will take if he continues to have a largely injury-free career.
He will not admit it because he has too much respect for the county game
from his time with Lancashire but he would undoubtedly be looking to take
150 wickets in an England summer, rather than 100, which is the target of
most people, were he to play a full season. He took 66 wickets in just seven
matches for Lancashire last time out.

Photo © AFP
|
"I am just 28, so there are at least five or six years left on my clock.
Spinners only start to mature at my current age. If we continue to play
Tests at the present rate, I don't think it is unrealistic for me to look at
a target of 400 or 500 wickets. I have been lucky that I have missed only a
few Test matches through injury. That happened when I had an operation to my
shoulder. It got dislocated when I dived in the field and fell on it. The
operation was very successful and I have not had any problems with it since
then.
"The key to bowling is to realise that you control the game, not the
batsman. Where I pitch the ball, they have to play. All the tricks are in my
hand. They have got to play according to the length, the line, the type of
delivery that I choose. The bowler sets the plan and the batsman tries to
react to that as best he can. Thereafter, it depends on who is performing
better on the day. Even Sachin Tendulkar has his days when he plays a couple
of idiotic shots and gets out. You have to make sure that you keep applying
the pressure when that happens.
"It has been a great compliment to me to be the second quickest to take 300
Test wickets. It is very difficult to get 300 wickets in Test cricket. It is
a long way to travel. It has taken nearly 10 years for me to play 58 Test
matches. It is a great achievement for me. More importantly, it is a great
achievement for my country to have a bowler who has taken 300 wickets. You
have to play for your country first and foremost."
Does Murali have the problems bowling to left-handers that many critics have
maintained? Should he bowl more round the wicket and would he have better
control from that angle? "I do bowl a fair amount round the wicket to
left-handers. I am learning all the time. The main problem I have with
left-handers is that they leave a lot of balls alone, so they have a chance
of avoiding playing the ball. In future, I will do something for them. I
still have a few tricks up my sleeve for them. I am working on curving the
ball in to them through the air and then spinning it back the other way."
Somehow I cannot see Murali having too many problems when he comes up
against the likes of Marcus Trescothick and Graham Thorpe in his next home
series. He is so comfortable within his own mental zone. He gave this
interview a day before the Newlands Test match started when most players are
way off limits and leave the talking to their captains. He was just as
prepared to talk to the media after Sri Lanka had suffered the worst Test
match defeat in their history.
It seemed almost pointless to enquire whether he had difficulty being a
Tamil member of the side, bearing in mind the political problems his country
is experiencing at the moment. "It isn't an issue," said team manager Ajit
Jayasekera, "and it never has been. All the players get on very well
together in the team. They virtually all speak both Sinhalese and English.
Murali is as popular as any member of the side."