New Zealand's bogey opposition
Ask any New Zealand cricketer which team he least prefers to play, and the answer will probably be Pakistan
S Rajesh
19-Jun-2009

Daniel Vettori contemplates yet another defeat against Pakistan • AFP
Ask any New Zealand cricketer which team he leasts prefer to play, and the answer will probably be Pakistan. Over the last two decades, Pakistan have been the one team - apart from the all-conquering Australians, of course - that New Zealand have failed to decipher. In individual sports there is often an issue of match-ups, where the strength of a player may be particularly effective against one opponent but not so against the others, but in this case it seems to apply in a team game as well, as New Zealand have collectively failed to come up with the answers against Pakistan's mercurial outfits.
The latest example was in the ICC World Twenty20, when New Zealand considerably ruined their chances of making the last four by not only losing, but being destroyed, by Pakistan in their Super Eights game. It was the second time they had met in the World Twenty20 - they'd played in the semi-final in 2007 - and the second time they came out at the wrong end of the result. (In contrast, New Zealand have played India three times in Twenty20 internationals, and once in a warm-up game, and haven't lost once.)
And it isn't just in the shortest format that New Zealand have struggled to solve the Pakistan mystery. The story has been depressingly familiar in ODIs too: in 59 games against them since 1990, New Zealand have lost 40 and won only 18. Pakistan have been virtually unbeatable at home with 14 wins in 15 games, but even at other venues they've won the most important games. On the five occasions that the teams have met in World Cups, New Zealand have lost each time, including twice each in the 1992 and 1999 editions. Two of those matches - in 1992 and 1999 - were semi-finals, which indicates New Zealand are probably the favourite opponents for Pakistan, especially on the big stage. Even against Australia, New Zealand have done better in World Cup games, winning two out of five.
The table below lists New Zealand's ODI record against each team, and the only side which has a better win-loss ratio against them than Pakistan is Australia. It's against Pakistan, though, that New Zealand's batsmen have struggled the most - the average and the run rate against them is lower than against any other side.
Opposition | Played | Won/ lost | Ratio | Bat ave/ run rate | Bowl ave/ econ rate |
Australia | 78 | 20/ 55 | 0.36 | 26.00/ 4.64 | 37.54/ 5.09 |
Pakistan | 59 | 18/ 40 | 0.45 | 25.25/ 4.54 | 31.98/ 4.73 |
South Africa | 50 | 17/ 29 | 0.58 | 27.72/ 4.60 | 34.73/ 4.84 |
Sri Lanka | 49 | 19/ 26 | 0.73 | 25.45/ 4.37 | 29.78/ 4.67 |
India | 54 | 25/ 24 | 1.04 | 29.01/ 4.80 | 31.96/ 4.90 |
England | 42 | 23/ 16 | 1.43 | 30.22/ 4.67 | 26.57/ 4.53 |
West Indies | 38 | 19/ 13 | 1.46 | 31.32/ 4.83 | 28.82/ 4.62 |
Zimbabwe | 26 | 17/ 7 | 2.42 | 37.38/ 5.22 | 27.14/ 4.64 |
Bangladesh | 14 | 13/ 1 | 13.00 | 37.88/ 5.08 | 18.31/ 3.56 |
The story is similar in Tests as well, though there are a few other sides that New Zealand have struggled against in the long version - they have poorer win-loss ratios against Australia, South Africa and England. However, their batting average against Pakistan - which, by some statistical quirk, is exactly the same in both forms of the game - is the lowest again, suggesting that Pakistan's often deadly mix of reverse swing and spin has troubled New Zealand more than most other bowling attacks.
Historically too, some of the heaviest defeats for New Zealand have come against Pakistan: the loss by an innings and 324 runs in Lahore in 2002 is their worst in Tests (among innings defeats), while the 299-run loss in Auckland a year earlier is the second-largest margin in terms of runs.
The story is similar in the shorter versions too - in Sharjah in 1986, Pakistan beat them by ten wickets with 164 balls to spare, their heaviest defeat batting first. And their defeat in the World Twenty20, with 41 balls remaining, is their worst in terms of balls to spare in the shortest format.
Opposition | Played | Won/ lost | Ratio | Bat ave | Bowl ave |
Australia | 23 | 2/ 14 | 0.14 | 26.55 | 43.82 |
South Africa | 18 | 2/ 11 | 0.18 | 28.16 | 41.65 |
England | 28 | 4/ 15 | 0.26 | 28.29 | 35.05 |
Pakistan | 16 | 3/ 11 | 0.27 | 25.25 | 34.71 |
Sri Lanka | 18 | 5/ 5 | 1.00 | 32.38 | 31.50 |
India | 19 | 4/ 3 | 1.33 | 35.69 | 38.74 |
West Indies | 13 | 5/ 2 | 2.50 | 33.63 | 33.32 |
Zimbabwe | 13 | 7/ 0 | - | 42.91 | 26.72 |
Bangladesh | 8 | 7/ 0 | - | 43.03 | 17.77 |
The problem area for New Zealand against Pakistan has clearly been with the bat, so here's a look at how their batsmen have fared against them since 1990, and their overall stats during this period.
A couple of names on top of this table have fine stats against Pakistan - both Stephen Fleming and Craig McMillan have better stats against Pakistan than against other sides - but for most of the batsmen, Pakistan haven't been a happy opposition to play against. Nathan Astle, Roger Twose, Mark Greatbatch, Jacob Oram and Brendon McCullum have all done poorly against Pakistan during this period, while the current captain's batting record is quite embarrassing - 35 runs at an average of 5.83.
Batsman | ODIs | Runs | Average/ Strike rate | Ave/ SR v all teams since 1990 |
Stephen Fleming | 35 | 1090 | 34.06/ 69.29 | 32.41/ 71.40 |
Craig McMillan | 20 | 744 | 49.60/ 82.20 | 28.18/ 75.94 |
Chris Cairns | 33 | 697 | 26.80/ 87.34 | 29.22/ 83.76 |
Nathan Astle | 25 | 662 | 27.58/ 79.95 | 34.92/ 72.64 |
Scott Styris | 15 | 435 | 43.50/ 72.86 | 32.58/ 78.89 |
Roger Twose | 14 | 417 | 29.78/ 73.15 | 38.81/ 75.40 |
Martin Crowe | 10 | 402 | 50.25/ 74.16 | 44.98/ 70.59 |
Bryan Young | 18 | 358 | 19.88/ 60.16 | 24.52/ 61.03 |
Ken Rutherford | 16 | 354 | 22.12/ 54.12 | 31.63/ 67.44 |
Mark Greatbatch | 16 | 246 | 16.40/ 58.99 | 27.30/ 69.74 |
Jacob Oram | 20 | 231 | 15.40/ 78.83 | 24.65/ 83.41 |
Lou Vincent | 14 | 225 | 20.45/ 53.06 | 27.11/ 69.88 |
Andrew Jones | 11 | 172 | 15.63/ 40.18 | 28.79/ 55.23 |
Brendon McCullum | 14 | 125 | 17.85/ 80.12 | 28.44/ 89.08 |
Daniel Vettori | 18 | 35 | 5.83/ 87.50 | 15.05/ 79.30 |
The story is somewhat similar in the Tests too, though there are more batsmen who've done well. Fleming has impressive numbers again, as does Mark Richardson, the former opener. Another batsman who has outstanding numbers in both forms of the game is Martin Crowe, arguably New Zealand's best-ever Test batsman. Waqar Younis had famously called him the best batsman he'd bowled to, and a look at his stats against Pakistan indicates why he said so.
For some of the other batsmen, though, it's been one huge struggle. Check out the stats for Nathan Astle - in five Tests against Pakistan, he's managed a grand total of 22 runs, at a miserable average of 3.14.
Batsman | Tests | Runs | Average | Ave v all teams since 1990 |
Stephen Fleming | 9 | 665 | 47.50 | 40.06 |
Mark Richardson | 6 | 507 | 50.70 | 44.77 |
Mark Greatbatch | 9 | 375 | 20.83 | 23.29 |
Bryan Young | 6 | 369 | 30.75 | 31.78 |
Ken Rutherford | 7 | 332 | 23.71 | 31.29 |
Mathew Sinclair | 3 | 325 | 108.33 | 32.55 |
Andrew Jones | 4 | 319 | 39.87 | 45.22 |
Chris Cairns | 5 | 249 | 24.90 | 33.92 |
Matthew Bell | 3 | 248 | 49.60 | 24.30 |
Martin Crowe | 3 | 244 | 61.00 | 45.43 |
Craig McMillan | 6 | 242 | 26.88 | 38.46 |
Daniel Vettori | 3 | 213 | 42.60 | 28.42 |
Lou Vincent | 3 | 94 | 15.67 | 34.15 |
Scott Styris | 2 | 89 | 22.25 | 36.04 |
Nathan Astle | 5 | 22 | 3.14 | 37.02 |
S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo