Problem players only cause trouble for New Zealand (5 July 1999)
The success of the World Cup issued Test cricket with a 'follow that' challenge
05-Jul-1999
5 July 1999
Problem players only cause trouble for New Zealand
David Lloyd
The success of the World Cup issued Test cricket with a 'follow that'
challenge. England versus New Zealand was seen by some as
unattractive, but the circumstances - a new England captain, a game
in crisis, young bucks making debuts and 'bad boys' returning - made
it compelling viewing.
Since the dismal exit from the World Cup, I have buried myself in my
new career with Sky Sports. I was involved in the latter stages of
the competition and had then travelled the country covering domestic
matches. I never gave a thought as to how I would feel in the week
building up to the Test. It was on the Tuesday that it finally hit me.
Tuesday is reporting day. Players and staff come together at midday.
I would ensure that all the video information on the opposition was
available, the format for the day's practice would be put in place,
the medical staff would check on the minor injuries and general
well-being of the team and there would be the usual banter. Allan
Mullally's recent batting performances would get an airing with the
big lad telling everyone that he was 'on fire' and back in the runs.
New boys and returning boys would be taken care of, the team meetings
would be organised, countless press interviews undertaken. And the
process would be repeated on Wednesday.
I missed the boys, I missed the smell of the changing-room, I missed
the buzz. But that was all. I kept well out of the way, not my place,
not my show. As it was, on the Tuesday, Sky Sports covered
Leicestershire's day-night game against Yorkshire and I arrived in
Birmingham at about midnight. Next morning, I was due to do a
publicity shot at Edgbaston with Nasser Hussain. I actually arrived
at the ground but got cold feet and did an about-turn. It just did
not seem right. Many, many people have stopped me or written to say
how relaxed I look now. It is funny, you know, I genuinely thought
that I was always relaxed but I will bow to their better judgment -
the evidence seems to be overwhelming!
England won. Hussain was mightily impressive and his team played for
him. Important that, because there was talk about the 'selfishness'
and 'self-centredness' of the new captain. I did not hear it from the
players, though, and they are the ones that matter.
"Should have been captain 18 months ago," has been the call. No, his
time is now. Have you seen his eyes? There is fire in there and it
will get stoked up. There were a couple of clues in the game as to
what we can expect. I detected Mullally 'having a word' in the middle
and so did Mark Butcher. England under Hussain will fight fire with
fire and although he admired the captaincy and diplomacy of
Australia's Mark Taylor, Hussain will know that the orchestra was led
by Steve Waugh and if you play against him you certainly know about
it - ask South Africa, ask Hansie Cronje.
It is never a bad thing to lose the toss at Edgbaston. A sample plug
was taken out of the pitch and there was dampness all the way through
it. There was cloud cover and a tinge of green in the pitch. Stephen
Fleming and New Zealand would know all about the indifferent bounce
as the game progressed and he would feel that he had no alternative
but to bat first, and to bat well.
England included a spinner. Many thought it should have been four
quicks. Me included. If it was Hussain's decision, it was a good one.
Phil Tufnell twinkled and teased, and he took five wickets in the
game. Problem child? Says who? I have been on two tours with him and
he is fine, and damn good company. He can be a bit odd at times, but
what is wrong with that? Aren't we all? Let he who is without sin etc.
Andy Caddick also returned. "Doesn't fit in - not liked." Says who?
Yes, he is different but he will do anything for anyone. 'Handy Andy'
will fetch it, lend it or mend it. He went out of the team because he
bowled like a drain at times when it really mattered in the West
Indies. Ask him. He was told to 'keep working', 'get it back', 'take
some wickets', 'force yourself back into the team'. He had done all
that and looked the business once again.
Everyone probably agreed that England's bowling performance was just
OK on that first day. About six out of ten. Too wide at times and a
touch short. New Zealand showed us the length on day two and we were
bundled out. England, being England, came back strongly in New
Zealand's second innings. Caddick and Mullally demolished them with
swing and seam in ideal, sultry conditions. They were well supported
in the field and especially behind the stumps. Chris Read is special.
A little, fresh-faced lad who is here to stay. I am sure he will
bring out more from the more established players. They will treat him
as their kid brother and I thought it was marvellous as he and the
towering Alex Tudor walked off with their arms round each other at
the end of New Zealand's second innings. The selectors did well and
gave us two smiling lads. I hope the smiles will become infectious.
What can one say about Alex Tudor? Well done again, Nasser, you chose
well in having him as nightwatchman. It could have been Caddick, it
could have been 'Big Al'.
Hussain, after the game, made a point of saying what his team thought
of Tudor. I can tell you, too. He is a very, very impressive young
man who works tirelessly at his cricket. Mark Ramprakash - yes, Mark
Ramprakash, another 'problem' - has shown him the way. They are at
the nets together before anyone else, just working at their batting,
at Ramprakash's instigation. It is so pleasing when all the hard work
pays off.
There will be the predictable 'it is only New Zealand' comments from
predictable people, but England are striving to win games and series
and this is as good a time as any to start.
Edgbaston provided a reminder of Test cricket's standing. New Zealand
lost and got little from the game. England had heroes who finished
with a fantastic feeling.
Spare a thought for Alec Stewart and Roger Twose. Twose was 'coming
home'. He came and went twice in a flash. Stewart did likewise and
missed catches. Both will need to dig deep. They know that the game
itself is about tragedy, despair, elation and success. Above all, it
is about character. They will come again.
Source :: The Electronic Telegraph