Trust Karachi to produce a winner
Whatever talk there always is of the Karachi pitch, it manages to be overshadowed eventually by producing a winner
The Verdict by Osman Samiuddin at Karachi
01-Dec-2006
![]() |
![]()
|
Finally, some much-needed PR for Karachi and the National Stadium: including this
Test, ten of the last eleven matches here have produced results. Whatever
talk there always is of the pitch, it manages to be overshadowed
eventually by producing a winner. And provided you have the
bowlers, it has always been a ground given to reverse swing, an art that
always makes for an entertaining spectacle.
Old balls have regularly been made to do remarkable things amidst the
concrete surrounds of the National Stadium. India were safe at 108 for two
in 1982-83 here, before Imran Khan skittled them for 197 after tea; only
one of his eight victims wasn't bowled or leg-before and if Wasim Bari,
'keeper that day, is to be believed, were there corners to be navigated on
the pitch, Imran would have done so.
Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis didn't much mind Karachi either, especially
during the 1990-91 season. New Zealand would have felt secure at 167 for
three on the first day, though by its end and the next morning, the Ws had
made sure their total didn't go past 196. West Indies too disintegrated
twice suddenly in their Test here later that season, both bowlers sharing
15 of the 20 wickets to fall.
And Karachiites still recall Waqar's five-wicket haul in the ODI against
the West Indies from the same tour: chasing 212 from 40 overs, Desmond
Haynes and Richie Richardson had a handle on the situation with a 138-run
partnership for the second wicket. The return of Waqar, after a spanking
in his first spell, brought a swift, spectacular end, 139 for one ending
205 for seven.
There have been more, but why does battered leather take to Karachi so
much? For such a little-understood phenomenon, answers are understandably
vague. But ex-cricketers, Wasim and Waqar among them, point first to the
sea breeze that filters in from the coast roughly15km south. Drier
conditions and traditionally rough outfields have always helped, ensuring
that reverse swing is always a factor at the ground.
Waqar, now bowling coach, worked especially with Umar Gul and Shahid Nazir
before the match, with a scuffed up ball, knowing it would play a part. In
hindsight, it was a handy session, for at various junctures through the
Test, the old ball told. Not as extravagantly as it has been known to, but
enough. On the second day, Gul winked out three top-order batsmen in 11
balls, Brian Lara and Ramnaresh Sarwan castled by deliveries that swung
big and late. In essence, if the Test wasn't decided during that period,
it was set up.
And for stretches of the last day, it appeared as if only some old ball
magic would sweep aside what periodically threatened to be stout
resistance, especially as clouds gathered and the light faded. It didn't
work out that way entirely thanks to Danish Kaneria - leg-spin being
another of the ground's old, enjoyable weaknesses - but Gul fracturing a
well-set Sarwan's foot in the morning was a moment as important as it was
unfortunate. In tandem with Nazir and Abdul Razzaq, all others were
troubled if not dismissed.
It wasn't hurled at the pace it has been known to be delivered at and
neither was the parabola it cut as much a banana as it can be. And
ultimately the old ball really had only Razzaq's time-honoured tail-end
removal to show at the death. But swing it always did and the atmosphere
was forever pregnant with its threat. Lara acknowledged later that this particular
ability was especially handy. "Gul, Nazir and even Razzaq all swung the
ball late. On such dry pitches and in such conditions, it is an added
advantage to be able to do it."
Reverse swing, leg-spin, a cool sea breeze, permanently bright weather and
now 21 Pakistan wins out of 38: as advertising goes, selling points for
venues don't get much better than that.
Osman Samiuddin is Pakistan editor of Cricinfo