We want Atherton back on track (18 July 1999)
IT has been a good couple of weeks for me, with the aftermath of the first Test victory being followed by Essex success and positive meetings with England officials
18-Jul-1999
18 July 1999
We want Atherton back on track
Nasser Hussain
IT has been a good couple of weeks for me, with the aftermath of the
first Test victory being followed by Essex success and positive
meetings with England officials. But the best news by far came as I
was driving home from Southend on Wednesday: instead of hearing about
Atherton's back problems, the radio instead told me that Atherton was
back.
Mike Atherton, at that stage, was on 176 for Lancashire against
Glamorgan and, of course, he went on to a career-best 268 not out. It
could not have been a more welcome innings.
I have been desperate for Mike to get back. I have always been very
close to him and there is no doubt that he is still good enough to
play for England. The question is whether his back can continue to
take the strain and I sincerely hope this is the start of a prolonged
spell of fitness and runs from Mike. He has been through some hard
times so he must be chuffed to bits.
Steve Waugh has called Mike 'The Cockroach' because, however many
times people have tried to stamp on him, he always manages to crawl
out from under their shoe, and it is clear to me and everyone in the
England set-up that Mike still has that hunger to succeed,
particularly while his contemporaries remain in the side.
We are going to have to sit down and have a meeting about Atherton -
me, David Graveney, a physio and perhaps Mike himself - between now
and the winter tour to review his case, consider the matter of
internal flights during a tour and see whether we can get him back
where he belongs, playing Test cricket. Remember how good his record
is against South Africa.
In the meantime, I just hope every newspaper and TV commentator
continues to write him off because nothing will give Mike more
satisfaction than proving them all wrong. I think I'll send him any
negative cuttings I can find just to give him that extra push!
That is for the future. For now, the Lord's Test beckons and it is
safe to say that there will not be many changes from the team who
defeated New Zealand at Edgbaston. The big issue, of course, will be
the successful return of Darren Gough for Yorkshire against
Warwickshire, another excellent development. I cannot emphasise
strongly enough that we want Darren back as quickly as possible and,
if he is fit, then we will have the sort of healthy competition for
places that we need.
The first I heard of Darren's comeback was when Graveney rang to tell
me Yorkshire had injury problems and they needed him to play. My
first thought was one of caution and to ask if he was definitely fit.
The feeling was that he would not be sure until he played. He has
come through well and I will be ringing him to see what the situation
is. Then the priority will be to consider the next year - not just
the next match - and make sure Darren really is match-fit when he
returns.
The priority for the team who do take the field is to put the Lord's
hoodoo to rest. I just cannot see why other sides should lift
themselves more than England when they play at 'headquarters' and I
think it's interesting that the Englishmen who have done well at
Lord's are usually the ones who are very, very proud to be English.
People like Graham Gooch and Jack Russell. It's the guys who say:
'This is our home. We love playing here. This is where we belong'.
That's what we've got to instil in everyone. In the dressing room
there is an honours board with the names of players who have taken
five wickets or scored centuries in a Lord's Test. We must all be
aiming to get our names on that board.
Now it is time to let you in on a little secret. Alex Tudor, our hero
at Edgbaston, could easily have missed out on the chance of being
nightwatchman and making history. The identity of the man who wanted
to take his place might surprise you.
Phil Tufnell has been brilliant, both in the first Test and in our
match against Middlesex at Southend. He bowled to me a lot on
Wednesday and Thursday before bowling me for 99 - interesting career
move, Cat - and he was absolutely magnificent without having any
luck. In the past he might have kicked dust and thought the world was
against him but he just kept on going, encouraging others, and he
seems to me like a new Phil Tufnell. The nightwatchman volunteer?
Yes, it was Phil.
On the second night when we were preparing for our second innings, I
had nominated Andrew Caddick to be our nightwatchman. Then someone
else, I can't remember who, said it should be Tudor and I was happy
to go along with that. Then Tufnell rushed up to Graham Gooch and
said: "Let me do it. Tudes and Caddy are batting too well to be
wasted on that job." We all told him we were happy with Tudor, but
his attitude was pleasing.
The same was true of Caddick. He has been said to be difficult but he
was given licence to be his natural self and he responded.
Lord's will be a huge Test for him. He has proved he can fit in and
that he can bowl well when conditions are in his favour. A repeat
performance is the next step.
I will be looking to improve a couple of areas in our performance
when we gather on Tuesday. Firstly, our catching. It was Alec Stewart
who missed a couple last time but it has happened to others,
including me, in the past and we just cannot afford to waste chances
if we are to beat the likes of Australia and South Africa.
Just look at Mark Ramprakash in Melbourne last winter - taking
half-chances can turn matches and the only answer is practice. As I
have already said, I much prefer skills practice to drills.
Secondly, on a personal level, I must look at my running between
wickets. The run-out between me and Mark Butcher at Edgbaston was
down to a lack of communication - he was playing drop it and run,
which was probably right, while I wanted to cut out any unnecessary
risks. But a lot of people have me down as a run-out specialist and I
have been involved in a few, so I must work it out.
I scored a century in last year's Lord's Test but I could not enjoy
it because we were beaten a couple of hours later. A repeat hundred
in a winning team would be perfect and there is no doubt that the
first day is crucial. If we can do well then, when New Zealand will
be looking to hit back at us, we may have broken their spirit.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)