Windies confirm source of trouble (28 February 1999)
Every time we start to wonder just how West Indies cricket has got itself into its present unholy mess, the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) summons a Press conference and beams it live and direct across the Caribbean to leave us in no doubt about
28-Feb-1999
28 February 1999
Windies confirm source of trouble
Tony Cozier
Every time we start to wonder just how West Indies cricket has got
itself into its present unholy mess, the West Indies Cricket Board
(WICB) summons a Press conference and beams it live and direct across
the Caribbean to leave us in no doubt about the source.
The latest, in Antigua last Monday night, was up to its usual standard
of mind-boggling absurdity.
For half-an-hour or so, WICB president Pat Rousseau castigated
captain, manager and coach for "weaknesses in leadership that
contributed to the poor performance of the team" on the tour of South
Africa and gave a host of reasons why captain Brian Lara should be
removed from the post.
He then promptly announced that, in spite of everything he had just
said, Lara would be retained, if conditionally, and so would manager
Clive Lloyd and coach Malcolm Marshall.
Lara would be on probation for two Tests, during which he would have
to meet "specific performance targets", identified as "an improvement
in his relationship with his players, discipline with specific
emphasis on punctuality, interaction with the coach and manager and
nurturing and development of his team members".
As Prime Minister Owen Arthur has noted, these are things that the
captain of any school team would take for granted - and Lara has been
leading teams at all levels since he was at Fatima College and been
fined by at least two precisely for turning up late.
Now, even as the captain of the West Indies, he was being treated like
an errant schoolboy, scolded in public and told to mend his ways.
Demeaning
It was demeaning stuff and, whatever his many faults, Lara did not
deserve to be so humiliated, especially since he was still the
captain. And, even if their censure was more muted, neither did Lloyd
and Marshall, two esteemed West Indian cricketers. What respect can
they now command in the West Indies' dressing room after the Board
they represent has openly chided them for "weaknesses in leadership"?
The whole thing smacked of one of those trials by public ridicule so
popular with Mao's Red Guards during China's Cultural Revolution.
If the sounds of uncontrollable laughter could be heard from a couple
of miles away, drifting in above the whirr of the cameras and
recorders and the president's nasal tones, it would have been the
Australians heartily gaffawing in their accommodation at the Rex
Halcyon Hotel.
The spectacle of an opponent shooting himself in the foot is always
satisfying and amusing.
In the circumstances, Lara - and Lloyd and Marshall, too - should have
immediately informed Rousseau that their positions had been made
untenable and resigned.
It was abundantly clear at the end of the Press conference that the
Board had no confidence in them although, true to form, it lacked the
conviction to replace them.
Resignations, however, have gone out of fashion in the Caribbean.
If it was still the honourable response to loss of face there would
not be a single member remaining on the WICB following their
capitulation to the players' ultimatum at Heathrow Airport last
November.
That, as you may remember, was preceded by another grand media
conference in Antigua at which Rousseau announced the dismissal of
Lara as captain and Carl Hooper as vice-captain. Within a week, he
was agreeing to their reinstatement and proclaiming that the climb
down was no reason for him, and his discredited Board, to quit.
The options, then as now, were clear-cut. The outcome both times has
been a compromise, a fudge, that did no credit to those in charge of
West Indies cricket. Either Lara was still the man for the job or he
was not.
The argument that there was no one else is simply a red-herring.
There simply has to be an alternative should Lara fail to meet his
"targets" after two Tests or if he suddenly catches chicken-pox or,
indeed, if the chipped bone in his right wrist hasn't healed come
Friday morning.
Once the Board decided Lara was their choice, he should have been
retained for all four Tests without all the embarrassing linen-washing
and, indeed, with the Board's full support.
If the latter, as the overwhelming evidence indicated was the case, he
should have been sacked. Full stop.
It was ludicrous to hear Rousseau pleading at the end of his
dissertation for the public to give its "full support" to the captain
and management after he had just finished itemising the charges
against them and finding them guilty of being mostly responsible for
the debacle in South Africa that so shamed West Indies cricket.
Conflict of interest
After South Africa, and right away running into Australia, it was
always going to be tough on Lara. It will now be doubly so. His
retention, even in Trinidad, has not been universally well
accepted. The Board has openly confirmed his deriliction of duty in
South Africa, a serious indictment that has angered most West Indians.
They would have long since set their own "performance targets" and,
with Hooper and Shivnarine Chanderpaul missing for the first Test,
there will be even greater pressure on Lara to make significant
scores.
Beyond the boundary, West Indian crowds can be unforgiving. On the
field, the Australian sledging will carry an even more acid bite for
there was already no love lost between them and Lara.
Such strain can have contrasting effects. It can overwhelm the
mentally weak but can strengthen the resolve of the mentally tough.
There are who speak fearfully of Australia's "psychological warfare"
in the form of Dennis Lillee's war-cry that "now the West Indies are
on their knees they should be hammered - just as they used to hammer
us". It is an underestimation of the resilience of West Indian.
If they have forgotten the reaction to Tony Greig's similar
braggadocio in 1976 that he would make the West Indies "grovel", Clive
Lloyd can remind them.
No doubt he will also make it a point of reminding those who assemble
in Port-of-Spain on Wednesday - that is, after he has tried to impress
on them that, yes, he, Lara and Marshall are still in charge in spite
of what they heard out of Antigua on Monday night.
Source :: The Barbados Nation (https://www.nationnews.com/)