South Africa in Australia 2012-13 October 29, 2012

Shrewd selectors keep Haddin in the frame

Matthew Wade will go to Brisbane to face South Africa next week, but Brad Haddin may still go to England for the Ashes next year
22

Matthew Wade is now Australia's undisputed No. 1 wicketkeeper, and for the moment Brad Haddin is the undisputed No. 2. Australia's selectors stopped significantly short of ending Haddin's international career in naming the team for the first Test against South Africa in Brisbane. They know there will likely be a time over the next 18 demanding months when he may still be needed, not least during the 2013 Ashes series in England.

Wicketkeeping handovers can be high on emotion and significance since they happen so rarely. When Adam Gilchrist was given the Test gloves ahead of Ian Healy for the 1999 Gabba Test against Pakistan, the senior man was decidedly upset at not being allowed the chance to play a final time at home, and his relationship with the chairman of selectors Trevor Hohns - a team-mate on the storied 1989 Ashes tour - was significantly damaged. Feeling ran high because there was no question whatsoever about Healy coming back in case of injury: Hohns felt his time was up.

Yet the Haddin/Wade duel has been settled without a hint of rancour, and without the whiff of finality about Haddin's chances of returning. This is partly because the decision has been reached over time, with plenty of communication between all parties. At no stage has Haddin seemed uneasy or uninformed about his place in the scheme of things, while at the same time Wade has not appeared perturbed by the prospect of losing his place despite making a pivotal century in his third and most recent Test match.

There is also the fact that Haddin has been reassured that he is far from done as an option for the selectors. As the national selector John Inverarity so frankly stated on Monday, Haddin has been told that he will regain his place should Wade be injured. At 35, Haddin is in this way benefiting from the same thinking that has Ricky Ponting and Michael Hussey not obliged to answer any questions from the selection panel about retirement even as they push ever deeper into their 30s.

"I phoned Brad towards the end of last week, and we had a really good conversation," Inverarity said. "Part of that conversation was that he was still very much in the reckoning, and I gave him the assurance that if Matthew Wade were to be injured in the first Test, he'd be our replacement wicketkeeper coming into the second Test. Nobody knows what the future will bring but he's very much in contention. If there was an injury he could come back very quickly. He's a very fit 35-year-old. He remains strongly in contention."

The future, of course, features four Test matches in India, and the Ashes tour of England beyond them. It is a schedule that will stretch the resources of Australian cricket, most critically in batting and slow bowling. Inverarity's panel are better served for fast bowlers and glovemen, but by keeping Haddin in the frame for the summer they have also given him the Ashes to aim for. As far back as January, the coach and selector Mickey Arthur said he wanted Haddin to be part of the Ashes campaign.

"Behind the stumps, the leadership he gives us is insurmountable and you can't put a price on that," Arthur had said. "I'm comfortable with where Brad's at, yes we'd like more runs from him, but I'm really comfortable that Brad is on the right track. Yes we've got to get performance and nobody is guaranteed their position, but I'm very comfortable that Brad Haddin could potentially go forward to the Ashes series."

Since then, Wade has moved ahead, but Haddin remains a strong chance of going to England as the back-up wicketkeeper and a senior member of the touring squad. His experience of England and personal success on the 2009 tour would be a useful asset to the tourists, especially given some of Wade's struggles while taking the gloves in the 4-0 ODI series defeat Australia suffered in June and July. Wicketkeeping in England requires an awareness of certain subtleties, like the ball's tendency to move in the air after it has passed the bat, and Haddin adapted far better to them on his visits to the other side of the world than Wade did this year. Even if Wade retains the gloves throughout the tour, Haddin's advice and intensity as a training partner would be highly useful.

If there was an injury he could come back very quickly. He's a very fit 35-year-old. He remains strongly in contention.
John Inverarity on Brad Haddin

As captain and selector, Michael Clarke would also benefit from Haddin's presence. By countenancing Wade's retention, Clarke showed he is quite capable of making team-focused selection decisions without being swayed by friendship. Nonetheless, there is little doubt that Haddin's alliance with Clarke remains an important part of Australia's tactical thinking. Their conversations will take place more often over the phone than in the slips cordon this summer.

"The one thing I've said to the players since taking over the captaincy and becoming a selector is that no selection I have any impact on will be personal," Clarke said. "It's all about what's best for the team, and I've spoken to Brad and he knows this won't affect our relationship. We've been great friends for a long time, I think I played my first game with Brad when I was 17. Things won't change there, he's been a great player for a long time and this certainly isn't the end of his career in my opinion."

Others watched the decision between Wade and Haddin with plenty of interest, also. For Peter Nevill, Haddin's No. 2 in New South Wales, he now looks likely to play out the summer as a top order batsman and outfielder for the Blues, resigned to pressing his case for further honours with runs alone. Tim Paine, set to take the gloves for Australia A against South Africa this week, is reminded that the selectors would like him to play a full season without succumbing to finger trouble, and to add to his solitary first-class century.

Paine's place in team planning has another level of intrigue to it, for in 2010 he batted and kept wicket with outstanding reliability in India, commonly considered the most vexing of assignments for a wicketkeeper. He did so well as to cast Haddin's 2008 tour of the subcontinent in harsh light, and there is the chance that should Wade slip up or fall prey to injury in India, the selectors might be tempted to replace him with Paine.

The remainder of the domestic summer will be fascinating for how Paine and Haddin fare in competition with one another, and for whether Haddin is sufficiently motivated by the prospect of a back-up spot on the plane to England. Either way, the choice of Wade over Haddin for Brisbane was a sound one, and the reluctance of the selectors to cast Haddin entirely out of contention reflected their collective shrewdness.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • zenboomerang on October 31, 2012, 4:24 GMT

    @azzaman333... Agree & pretty much have said similar things about Wade / Paine... It was Wades maturity at such a young age (19y.o.) that first took my attention in 2007 when he scored on debuted in Shield - 83 & 5 n.o. + 6 catches... He's got the experience & the runs behind him to prove his endurance while still at a young age...

  • zenboomerang on October 31, 2012, 4:20 GMT

    @Macca_mat... I guess Haddin is still on the radar mainly as a injury replacement; Paine hasn't had much FC cricket since missing 2 summers of cricket & I'd much prefer Paine gets some cricket into him before being risked as a Wade Test replacement... Agree that Haddin isn't a Test batsman alone, there are better prospects in SS that need to be given a chance...

  • on October 31, 2012, 4:19 GMT

    Haddin is a lot more popular with Cricinfo writers than with most Australian supporters. I had hoped being dropped from the side would have been the end of articles lauding his decidedly mediocre skills as something great, but alas it was not to be. The whole story here is basically "Haddin would play if Wade goes under a bus". Did anyone think that wouldn't be the case?

  • Meety on October 30, 2012, 20:17 GMT

    @Moppa on (October 29 2012, 10:49 AM GMT) - was at the Gabba when he hit that ton, & felt that he got on the top of Anderson. Sitting in the stands - it seemed that Anderson had dropped his bundle & wasn't enjoying life, & I thought at the time this was the moment the England attack was broken - unfortunately - oops!

  • azzaman333 on October 30, 2012, 11:39 GMT

    Wade is clearly a better batsman than Paine. Both have played roughly 50 first class games, Wade has an average of 40 with 5 centuries, Paine an average of 30 with 1 century. Paine was probably a better keeper than Wade 2 seasons ago, but with all the injuries Paine has had, and the constant improvement from Wade, I'm not sure that's still the case. Wade is also 3 years younger than Paine. There's practically nothing in favour of Paine over Wade. So can the muppets calling for Paine's inclusion at the expense of Wade give it up please? Wade is better in every respect, deal with it.

  • zenboomerang on October 30, 2012, 6:38 GMT

    @Daniel Brettig :- "Haddin [may] still go to England"... Sure & the sun [may] rise in the west... "mays" & "ifs" are not much of a story... "If" Wade does well this summer, then this story will be meaningless - CA will want to bring its future no.2 which surely would be Paine at this point of time & then there are a number of good young keepers coming through SS atm... That would be a more interesting story... Considering CA sent very compromised squads to the WI's due to budget constraints, why would CA send Haddin to Eng if he wasn't part of our future needs?... Lets see how Hadds handles SS this seaon before we get ahead of ourselves...

  • Mary_786 on October 30, 2012, 5:48 GMT

    Haddin should not be at the ashes, Wade is our best keeper and Haddin is not good enough to be in the team as batsman alone.

  • getaclue on October 30, 2012, 5:01 GMT

    Finally, someone makes mention that Paine only has one first class tonne...same goes with Tom Cooper who bloggers repeatedly pumped up last summer.

  • on October 30, 2012, 4:10 GMT

    I can't see Haddin doing well in England with his technique

  • Meety on October 29, 2012, 23:25 GMT

    @ RyanHarrisGreatCricketer on (October 29 2012, 14:52 PM GMT) - good theory, although they often went with Daniel Smith as keeper in List A games, so that wouldn't be a sure thing either.

  • zenboomerang on October 31, 2012, 4:24 GMT

    @azzaman333... Agree & pretty much have said similar things about Wade / Paine... It was Wades maturity at such a young age (19y.o.) that first took my attention in 2007 when he scored on debuted in Shield - 83 & 5 n.o. + 6 catches... He's got the experience & the runs behind him to prove his endurance while still at a young age...

  • zenboomerang on October 31, 2012, 4:20 GMT

    @Macca_mat... I guess Haddin is still on the radar mainly as a injury replacement; Paine hasn't had much FC cricket since missing 2 summers of cricket & I'd much prefer Paine gets some cricket into him before being risked as a Wade Test replacement... Agree that Haddin isn't a Test batsman alone, there are better prospects in SS that need to be given a chance...

  • on October 31, 2012, 4:19 GMT

    Haddin is a lot more popular with Cricinfo writers than with most Australian supporters. I had hoped being dropped from the side would have been the end of articles lauding his decidedly mediocre skills as something great, but alas it was not to be. The whole story here is basically "Haddin would play if Wade goes under a bus". Did anyone think that wouldn't be the case?

  • Meety on October 30, 2012, 20:17 GMT

    @Moppa on (October 29 2012, 10:49 AM GMT) - was at the Gabba when he hit that ton, & felt that he got on the top of Anderson. Sitting in the stands - it seemed that Anderson had dropped his bundle & wasn't enjoying life, & I thought at the time this was the moment the England attack was broken - unfortunately - oops!

  • azzaman333 on October 30, 2012, 11:39 GMT

    Wade is clearly a better batsman than Paine. Both have played roughly 50 first class games, Wade has an average of 40 with 5 centuries, Paine an average of 30 with 1 century. Paine was probably a better keeper than Wade 2 seasons ago, but with all the injuries Paine has had, and the constant improvement from Wade, I'm not sure that's still the case. Wade is also 3 years younger than Paine. There's practically nothing in favour of Paine over Wade. So can the muppets calling for Paine's inclusion at the expense of Wade give it up please? Wade is better in every respect, deal with it.

  • zenboomerang on October 30, 2012, 6:38 GMT

    @Daniel Brettig :- "Haddin [may] still go to England"... Sure & the sun [may] rise in the west... "mays" & "ifs" are not much of a story... "If" Wade does well this summer, then this story will be meaningless - CA will want to bring its future no.2 which surely would be Paine at this point of time & then there are a number of good young keepers coming through SS atm... That would be a more interesting story... Considering CA sent very compromised squads to the WI's due to budget constraints, why would CA send Haddin to Eng if he wasn't part of our future needs?... Lets see how Hadds handles SS this seaon before we get ahead of ourselves...

  • Mary_786 on October 30, 2012, 5:48 GMT

    Haddin should not be at the ashes, Wade is our best keeper and Haddin is not good enough to be in the team as batsman alone.

  • getaclue on October 30, 2012, 5:01 GMT

    Finally, someone makes mention that Paine only has one first class tonne...same goes with Tom Cooper who bloggers repeatedly pumped up last summer.

  • on October 30, 2012, 4:10 GMT

    I can't see Haddin doing well in England with his technique

  • Meety on October 29, 2012, 23:25 GMT

    @ RyanHarrisGreatCricketer on (October 29 2012, 14:52 PM GMT) - good theory, although they often went with Daniel Smith as keeper in List A games, so that wouldn't be a sure thing either.

  • wix99 on October 29, 2012, 20:34 GMT

    Tim Paine and Peter Nevill are the real challengers to Matthew Wade's keeping position. Hopefully NSW will rotate keeping duties between Haddin and Nevill. Both are capable batsmen and can still play with wearing the gloves.

  • landl47 on October 29, 2012, 14:54 GMT

    Haddin is the MacGill of wicketkeepers- someone who would have had a great career if only he hadn't had a legend playing at the same time. I was impressed by him in the Champions League, but that's T20 and doesn't really translate to test cricket. Personally, I think Tim Paine is a better W/K than either of them and a gritty batsman in the lower order, but this really isn't Aus's problem. All 3 are decent keepers and viable #7s. Whether Haddin goes to England next year probably depends on his form in the Aus summer; if he does, with Ponting and Hussey, Aus won't lack for experience.

  • RyanHarrisGreatCricketer on October 29, 2012, 14:52 GMT

    The tree diagram is like this. fitness permitting, wade will definitely play the entire summer with haddin and paine competing with each other in domestic cricket. big problems for peter neville. the blues need to consider selecting haddin only for shield games so that neville still gets keeping workout in the ryobi cup games

  • RandyOZ on October 29, 2012, 11:31 GMT

    Is this a joke? Haddin at the Ashes? I thought we actually wanted to win them back.

  • on October 29, 2012, 11:25 GMT

    As an RSA supporter, I was never a fan of Haddin. He could turn a match. Likely he will not play again for AUS. May as well keep Wade/Paine around and get them used to test match conditions around the world. Brad's had his time. Thanks mate.

  • on October 29, 2012, 11:23 GMT

    I honestly can't see what all the drama is about. Haddin voluntarily surrendered his position to Wade. Wade took his chance and his last outing was incredibly successful. We OUGHT to be discussin how close the Aussie selectors were (or weren't) to dropping someone who'd had a great deal of success. If it was England's decision to make...........?

  • Meety on October 29, 2012, 10:59 GMT

    @Gilly4ever on (October 29 2012, 08:20 AM GMT) - suggest you look at Haddin's Shield record over the 5 years leading up to his Baggy Green. Pretty sure there was 5 consecutive Shield seasons averaging nearly 60. Technically he was a better batsmen than Gilchrest & at one point in time his average in Tests was 43. What you said about Hartley maybe true, but it is no different to saying that selecting Gilchrest meant that the best keeper in the country - Wade Seccombe, went uncapped! (Not saying for one second I would of selected him over Gilly, but it is the same thing).

  • Moppa on October 29, 2012, 10:49 GMT

    My gut feeling is that Haddin will struggle to retain motivation after losing his Test spot and will retire around the end of this first class season. So unless Wade gets injured pretty soon, I think this is just a show of respect from the selectors without much real meaning. Having said that, I would like to echo @Meety and posts to other articles giving kudos to Haddin for a tough gig: following Adam Gilchrist as Australia's wicketkeeper. To me his highlights were his leg-side take against Pakistan at Sydney in 2010 (one of the best keeper catches I've ever seen) and his ton against England in Brisbane in the last Ashes. I also rate that innings v Sth Africa at Perth highly, @Muneeb_Dawood. 20 years ago, any Test team would have killed for a keeper that averaged 36 - Haddin has been harshly judged by many. But it's time for a younger man and Haddin's keeping declined pretty badly last season, so I think its best he doesn't struggle on in the spotlight of a big Test series.

  • AB_DeVilliers on October 29, 2012, 8:38 GMT

    As a Saffer, i'm very glad to see Haddin out and Wade in. Haddin can take a game away from you, and quickly. He almost did that in Perth 2008.

  • Ozcricketwriter on October 29, 2012, 8:20 GMT

    Brad Haddin, like Wayne Phillips before him, was the result of the selectors wanting something that didn't exist - in this case wanting another Gilchrist. Haddin's keeping was never close to Gilchrist's, nor was his batting, and in selecting Haddin they let the best keeper in the country by a mile, Chris Hartley, go uncapped. Luckily a new keeper has sprung up since, in Matthew Wade, and his batting has been good enough to get the nod in spite of these foolish selection decisions. Haddin at best would be good for ODIs and T20s, where poor keeping skills don't matter quite as much; but for tests he never should have been considered. Thank God we've got Wade now. Let us never go down that dark path again.

  • Meety on October 29, 2012, 7:22 GMT

    I think any doubts about the leadership that Haddin brought to the Oz set up can be cast aside with his performance as captain of the Sixers, (apart from the fact he was a fairly successful Shield captain for NSW when they regularly were under-strength). All for the Wade-era to begin as of now, but I hope history looks kindly on what Haddin has done post-Gilly.

  • Fareen on October 29, 2012, 7:18 GMT

    Haddin is a good option to have, though I think Tim Paine is more talented than both haddin & wade. I do think Paine should play for Australia in ODI's and t-20's. He can bat lower down the order unlike wade and can also open if he needs to.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Fareen on October 29, 2012, 7:18 GMT

    Haddin is a good option to have, though I think Tim Paine is more talented than both haddin & wade. I do think Paine should play for Australia in ODI's and t-20's. He can bat lower down the order unlike wade and can also open if he needs to.

  • Meety on October 29, 2012, 7:22 GMT

    I think any doubts about the leadership that Haddin brought to the Oz set up can be cast aside with his performance as captain of the Sixers, (apart from the fact he was a fairly successful Shield captain for NSW when they regularly were under-strength). All for the Wade-era to begin as of now, but I hope history looks kindly on what Haddin has done post-Gilly.

  • Ozcricketwriter on October 29, 2012, 8:20 GMT

    Brad Haddin, like Wayne Phillips before him, was the result of the selectors wanting something that didn't exist - in this case wanting another Gilchrist. Haddin's keeping was never close to Gilchrist's, nor was his batting, and in selecting Haddin they let the best keeper in the country by a mile, Chris Hartley, go uncapped. Luckily a new keeper has sprung up since, in Matthew Wade, and his batting has been good enough to get the nod in spite of these foolish selection decisions. Haddin at best would be good for ODIs and T20s, where poor keeping skills don't matter quite as much; but for tests he never should have been considered. Thank God we've got Wade now. Let us never go down that dark path again.

  • AB_DeVilliers on October 29, 2012, 8:38 GMT

    As a Saffer, i'm very glad to see Haddin out and Wade in. Haddin can take a game away from you, and quickly. He almost did that in Perth 2008.

  • Moppa on October 29, 2012, 10:49 GMT

    My gut feeling is that Haddin will struggle to retain motivation after losing his Test spot and will retire around the end of this first class season. So unless Wade gets injured pretty soon, I think this is just a show of respect from the selectors without much real meaning. Having said that, I would like to echo @Meety and posts to other articles giving kudos to Haddin for a tough gig: following Adam Gilchrist as Australia's wicketkeeper. To me his highlights were his leg-side take against Pakistan at Sydney in 2010 (one of the best keeper catches I've ever seen) and his ton against England in Brisbane in the last Ashes. I also rate that innings v Sth Africa at Perth highly, @Muneeb_Dawood. 20 years ago, any Test team would have killed for a keeper that averaged 36 - Haddin has been harshly judged by many. But it's time for a younger man and Haddin's keeping declined pretty badly last season, so I think its best he doesn't struggle on in the spotlight of a big Test series.

  • Meety on October 29, 2012, 10:59 GMT

    @Gilly4ever on (October 29 2012, 08:20 AM GMT) - suggest you look at Haddin's Shield record over the 5 years leading up to his Baggy Green. Pretty sure there was 5 consecutive Shield seasons averaging nearly 60. Technically he was a better batsmen than Gilchrest & at one point in time his average in Tests was 43. What you said about Hartley maybe true, but it is no different to saying that selecting Gilchrest meant that the best keeper in the country - Wade Seccombe, went uncapped! (Not saying for one second I would of selected him over Gilly, but it is the same thing).

  • on October 29, 2012, 11:23 GMT

    I honestly can't see what all the drama is about. Haddin voluntarily surrendered his position to Wade. Wade took his chance and his last outing was incredibly successful. We OUGHT to be discussin how close the Aussie selectors were (or weren't) to dropping someone who'd had a great deal of success. If it was England's decision to make...........?

  • on October 29, 2012, 11:25 GMT

    As an RSA supporter, I was never a fan of Haddin. He could turn a match. Likely he will not play again for AUS. May as well keep Wade/Paine around and get them used to test match conditions around the world. Brad's had his time. Thanks mate.

  • RandyOZ on October 29, 2012, 11:31 GMT

    Is this a joke? Haddin at the Ashes? I thought we actually wanted to win them back.

  • RyanHarrisGreatCricketer on October 29, 2012, 14:52 GMT

    The tree diagram is like this. fitness permitting, wade will definitely play the entire summer with haddin and paine competing with each other in domestic cricket. big problems for peter neville. the blues need to consider selecting haddin only for shield games so that neville still gets keeping workout in the ryobi cup games