August 16, 2012

This was surely the longest cricketing day

Kenny Shovel

Goodbye to the emotional ups and downs. An end to countless hours sat in front of a screen transfixed by a once in a lifetime sporting opportunity. It’s over at last. No, not London 2012, I’ve finally finished the ECB county cricket fans' research survey.

A couple of points. Was I the only one who had a ‘Dear God, this is taking longer to get through than The Lord of the Rings’ moment? There really should be a warning to monitor blood sugar levels before you commit someone to spend that amount of time without sustenance.

And I’m not sure the length of that survey is helpful to collecting the views of domestic cricket supporters. Exactly how many Twenty20 fans will have the patience to complete it?

And I know age was one of the questions asked but the ECB must already have enough of a grasp on the demographics of the average county member to understand that time is becoming increasingly precious to them. I’m not sure everyone who starts that survey will make it to the other side. Or rather, perhaps they will, in a different sense.

It might have helped if the section where you picked your most and least favoured scheduling options hadn’t been as repetitive as Groundhog Day. A lot of people will have given up by that point.

Let's face it, a lot of people won’t have been interested in picking between Championship games ending at nine at night and CB40 games played on Whit Monday. They’ll just want to press a button marked ‘Leave the Championship alone’ or ‘I can only attend at weekends’. Instead you had to navigate through a series of sometimes odd, unpalatable options until you got to the final screen where you could leave a comment.

I’m sure Populus have designed the survey to extract exactly the information the ECB are interested in. But is it the information supporters are interested in giving? I was certainly left wondering if I’d managed to convey my exact feelings about the domestic game or if they’d been lost in a series of loaded questions.

Take this one:

Choose the statement which would most encourage you to attend a county match.

- Two fewer four day cricket matches a season (from 16 to 14), with matches played on regular days of the week and some teams only playing each other once rather than home and away - Retaining the current number of four day cricket matches (16), with matches played on irregular days of the week and each team playing all other teams home and away

Are 16 games played on regular days of the week not an option then? How annoying is it that you can’t vote for that directly? It’s that frustration that already has the internet supporter boards awash with cynicism towards the structure of the questionnaire.

That’s a shame, as this is a rare opportunity to have our voices heard. It’s certainly an opportunity I’d encourage people to take. But part of the problem is that, as far as supporters are concerned, the ECB has form when it comes to canvassing their views.

The Morgan Review was supposed to include supporter input, but that must have been from a fairly small focus group as I’ve never met or heard of anyone who was asked. Although perhaps contributing towards an ECB domestic structure review is on a par with having an STD or owning a Marillion album and it just isn’t something you admit too?

A few seasons before that a questionnaire about Twenty20 was handed out, but only at Twenty20 matches. Many county members felt they were being denied an opportunity to express their preference for championship cricket. It was as if only people in the butchers' queue were being asked if they were vegetarian.

It’s that kind of suspicion that breeds cynicism and leads to the long-held distrust of the ECB felt by many supporters. A distrust that in some ways is unfair.

There are many roads through life that will have led people to work for the ECB but I’d wager that most will have involved a stint working for a county and virtually all will include childhood summers being taken to see cricket at their local ground. So county cricket will have friends within the ECB, it’s just that to supporters it sometimes feels like there aren’t any.

Finding a viable structure for domestic cricket is a major issue facing the ECB. But so is the current disconnect between supporters and administrators.

The feeling that the ECB are on an opposing side to the county game with fans sidelined and ignored. One of the most positive outcomes from this current survey would be recognition at the top of the game that their relationship to the paying public is just as much in need of repair as the domestic schedule.

Kenny Shovel has never sat in a press box or charged a match programme to expenses

RSS Feeds: Dave Hawksworth

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by John Noton on (August 18, 2012, 17:13 GMT)

The current Test series is proving every bit as exciting as we expected, but what a classic it could have been had it been played over five games. Clearly the same mindset affects those who organise the international schedule as the organisers of county cricket: any aspect of the game that appeals to traditional cricket-lovers must be out of date and has to be changed!

Posted by Dave Morton on (August 17, 2012, 18:05 GMT)

And yet (contradicting myself somewhat from the earlier statement), the current Yorks v Derbys LVCC match was very well attended on sunny day 2, with many, many teenaged kids there - watching the cricket, and not messing around, too.

There is a deep love for the game....everywhere except in the offices of the ECB, it seems.

Posted by durhamfootman on (August 17, 2012, 17:53 GMT)

Cramming CC cricket into the extreme margins of the county season has led, this year, to the first half of the CC being largely wiped out. Worse, it has forced counties to take drastic action early in the season. Forfeitures and ludicrous run chases (Worcs/Mid), buffet bowling that allowed Leics to rack up 158 runs in 7 overs (yes, 7 overs) in order to try (unsuccessfully I think) to force a result. Matches unaffected by rain have often struggled to last 2 days because the pitches have been ruined, and the batsmen have had no middle time. This season has quite possibly provided the lowest standard of cricket and the worst value for money in my memory. Will this affect the scheduling for next year, given that global warming is going to get worse, not better? Probably not! Will I risk investing more money in a season ticket next year under these conditions? Probably not!

Posted by Dave Morton on (August 17, 2012, 16:20 GMT)

I have today received the questionnaire e-mail, not from my own county but from Kent CCC, from whom I purchased an e-ticket for the Yorkshire game back in April/May/whenever.

This uneven distribution would itself affect the results of the survey, as much as the reader-fatigue mentioned above.

Having answered that I had attended 28 LVCC matches in the last 2 years, and that I intended to go to 16 next season, the endless questions about what they had to do to persuade me to attend came as a surprise. I could only answer N/A or 'No Difference' to all of them.

This was better designed than the one earlier this season (George Dobell was involved, though he was hamstrung regarding some of the questions), but it still comes across as a sop. The fate of County Cricket has already been sealed, I fear.

The beer-swilling morons will have their T20 way; cricket lovers will grow even older, and die. Like the game.

Posted by Talbot Of Ochre on (August 17, 2012, 11:55 GMT)

Due to beginning to lose the will to live I'm sure I ended up hastily contradicting myself on answering several of the options!

I wonder how many people gave up half way through.

Posted by StoneRose on (August 17, 2012, 11:31 GMT)

I agree with all comments, I hope they do focus groups held at at least every county ground as the real issues did not seem to be there (e.g. QF stage for CB40). I wanted to give feedback on the poor survey design but instead had the use the characters-limited space at the final 'any other comments' question to give my real views.

Posted by englandsno1 on (August 17, 2012, 8:49 GMT)

Having ploughed through all that I'm just beginning to have more understanding for KP.

Posted by Mark on (August 16, 2012, 19:17 GMT)

Yes I too completed the survey in approximately the same time it took Joe Sayers to reach double figures. Heavily loaded and biased questions with more repetitions than you get in a whole series of Just A Minute. No doubt it will be entered in to some spreadsheet so that it concludes you have contradicted yourself several times over so your answers default to the T20 rules the world option and only one CC match per season starting at midnight is your abiding preference.

Why the cost of entry is relevant I have no idea as most completing will be county members.

Posted by Alex Proffitt on (August 16, 2012, 17:16 GMT)

I too plodded through that awful survey. The most depressing page was the one that said, after about 40 mins, congratulations - you are half way through! Groan. It was like torture.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dave Hawksworth
Dave Hawksworth has been in a relationship with cricket for over 30 years. During that time he's seen Ken Rutherford score 300 before tea, Geoff Boycott hit the first ball of the day for a boundary, and drunk a lot of beer. He's never sat in a press box or charged a match programme to expenses.

All articles by this writer