England v India, 4th Investec Test, Old Trafford August 6, 2014

Unsettled India bank on batsmen


Match facts

August 7-11, 2014
Start time 1100 local (1000 GMT)

Play 05:07
Video preview - Teams brace for pacy Old Trafford pitch

Big Picture

If India have worked as hard on their game as they have to get James Anderson punished in the previous week, they will almost certainly win at least a session at Old Trafford. They could not manage that in the third Test. The visitors had a nightmare in Southampton: their lead bowler was passed unfit before the toss and the rest of the cast was flat, they dropped catches and mis-fielded, and their batsmen got out soon after they got in. MS Dhoni's glass was certainly half-full when he said of his batsmen, "getting starts is more difficult that converting starts."

India had 13 double-figure scores at Ageas Bowl but Ajinkya Rahane's 54 was the highest. They had 11 partnerships over 20 but only three over 50 and none more than 74. A first-innings score of 330 is respectable, but it won't win Tests unless the opposition collapses, and England had amassed 569. The batting problems, however, seem more fixable than the bowling worries. Apart from Anderson and Stuart Broad, England's back-up seamers did not trouble the Indian batsmen in Southampton, and the visitors should back themselves to negotiate Moeen Ali's offbreaks better than they have done in previous Tests.

The challenge for Alastair Cook's team will be to replicate their flawless efforts at Ageas Bowl. England's out-of-form batsmen made runs, two out of the three new players they brought in were successes, and their spinner proved he was no part-timer. A second performance of such magnitude would be proof that the first one - which ended a winless run of 10 Tests - was not merely happenstance. England have not won successive Tests or a series since the summer of 2013, and this is their last opportunity to score a victory until after the 2015 World Cup.

Form guide

(last five matches, most recent first)

England WLDLD

In the spotlight

Sam Robson has not yet done enough this summer to suggest he has succeeded where Nick Compton, Joe Root and Michael Carberry failed, in making the opening slot vacated by Andrew Strauss their own. Robson had one century and three low scores in two Tests against Sri Lanka, and after a half-century against India on a lifeless Trent Bridge track, he has not passed 30 in his next four innings. With England taking a hiatus from Test cricket at the end of this series until April 2015, Robson potentially has four innings to ensure he isn't forgotten. Moeen Ali is faring marginally worse than Robson with the bat in this series, but all anyone is talking about is his 15 wickets.

Can any combination of Indian bowlers take 20 wickets in a Test? No one was asking that question after Lord's, but it has almost become rhetorical after Southampton. With Ishant Sharma injured, Bhuvneshwar Kumar tiring, Mohammed Shami averaging 73.20 for five wickets, Pankaj Singh luckless, and Ravindra Jadeja being outbowled by Moeen Ali, the lack of depth on India's creaking bench has been exposed, as many thought it would be over five Tests. There is talk of offspinner R Ashwin and fast bowler Varun Aaron bolstering the attack, but Ashwin averages nearly 75 in away Tests and Aaron hasn't played since his debut in 2011.

Team news

England played the near-perfect Test in Southampton, but Chris Jordan's performance - his lithe slip catching apart - had plenty of room for improvement. He did not bat, and when he bowled he posed almost no threat and went wicketless. If the Old Trafford pitch is fast, England could give Steve Finn a comeback, but they will probably stick with their successful XI.

England (probable) 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Sam Robson, 3 Gary Ballance, 4 Ian Bell, 5 Joe Root, 6 Moeen Ali, 7 Jos Buttler (wk), 8 Chris Woakes, 9 Chris Jordan/Steve Finn, 10 Stuart Broad, 11 James Anderson.

India are likely to bring in Ashwin and Aaron for Rohit Sharma and Pankaj. Shikhar Dhawan could miss out too, but if India decide not to play Gautam Gambhir, they could retain Rohit and push everyone one slot higher.

India (probable) 1 M Vijay, 2 Shikhar Dhawan/Gautam Gambhir, 3 Cheteshwar Pujara, 4 Virat Kohli, 5 Ajinkya Rahane, 6 MS Dhoni (capt & wk), 7 Ravindra Jadeja, 8 R Ashwin, 9 Bhuvneshwar Kumar, 10 Mohammed Shami, 11 Varun Aaron/Pankaj Singh.

Pitch and conditions

The pitch at Trent Bridge made for dreary cricket; the Lord's surface resembled a budding lawn but its bark was worse than its bite; and Ageas Bowl rewarded only the bowlers who had the skills to exploit its strip. Old Trafford is tipped to have the quickest pitch - although not grassy - of the series so far, but the lead-up to the Test has been wet.

The forecast for the first day is fair, but it is worse on Friday and progressively so over the weekend. The temperature is expected to be between 18C and 20C, so it is certainly sweater weather, for the Indians at least.

Stats and trivia

  • India last played a Test at Old Trafford in 1990, when Sachin Tendulkar made a match-saving maiden century; they have drawn five and lost three matches at the venue. England have won six and drawn two of their last eight Tests in Manchester; their last defeat there was against Pakistan in May 2001.

  • Anderson had taken 12 wickets at 35.33 apiece in four Tests at Old Trafford, his home ground. His new-ball partner Stuart Broad has only two wickets in two Tests at the venue, at an average of 108.50.

  • Ian Bell averages 78.57 in six Tests in Manchester. He has 550 runs in ten innings there, with two hundreds. Cook has scored 431 runs at an average of 53.87 at the venue.


"We put a lot of wear and tear into the Indian bowlers in that game [third Test], that's how you win Test-match series. We put a lot of miles in their legs like they did to us at Trent Bridge, which affected us at Lord's. At the start of this game it's nil-all and you've got to earn the right to put miles in their legs again."
Alastair Cook on how England are approaching the Test

"The match will tell us how fresh they really are, but at the same time the best we could have managed is to work on fitness and manage their workloads, and we have done that really well. So we will turn up on the field and see if they will be fresh and raring to go."
MS Dhoni on India's fast bowlers

George Binoy is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Sajith on August 7, 2014, 11:17 GMT

    @Rajesh_india_1990, Now I cant stop laughing man...

  • Nicholas on August 7, 2014, 10:51 GMT

    @Patchmaster (post on August 6, 2014, 22:17 GMT): Yet another 100 in an ODI that is. Attacking openers like Warner have not done well in tests here in U.K. (Warner averages a mere 24 outside of Australia and South Africa) - so yes, maybe for series in Australia and South Africa, Hales should be considered; but anywhere else where there's swing/seam, Robson is the safer option.

  • Shyam on August 7, 2014, 10:36 GMT

    @OnePleaeUmpire: Agreed. But both of the batsmen dont seem to be out of form

  • Android on August 7, 2014, 10:21 GMT

    This should have been the combination for Indian team for previous test. but I guess management was worried about bringing two new fast bowlers in the team. anyways better late than never. Good chance for Gambhir. He will have two test matches to prove his worth for Australia tour. At the same time good break for Dhawan to look back at his game and iron out the flaws. Ashwin for Rohit is a no brainer. Bhuvi, Ashwin and Jadeja make sure that the extra batsman is not missed, giving India 5 bowlers at same time. plus 5 specialist batsmen would mean more responsibility on Pujara and Kohli, which might work in their favour. Good luck to both teams.

  • Yogarajan on August 7, 2014, 10:18 GMT

    Wow Super changes, I was afraid Aron would replace Pankaj, thankgod, Shami is replaced by Aron. Nice complexion. Now I believe Dhawan(only 187) and Shami( only against Weak WI that too in India) will not take their places or granted. Though Varun Aron don't do much with the ball(swing). THe pace he has got can shatter English batsmen. If Aron doesn't use this opportunity then he should forget about test matches. India now really have a good pace attack.

  • Android on August 7, 2014, 10:14 GMT

    That's it folks, Dhoni has come out with a team that whole of India and whole world wanted to see.. Gauti, Aaron and Ashwin in... And I said before here at cricinfo that Cook will not change the winning squad and he didn't.. Finn may be tall but he wasn't part of the winning team at Southampton.. Cook is pretty much similar to Dhoni when it comes to test captaincy.. Keep the winning team nomatter what.. Dhoni is showing his aggressive nature by rigging these necessary changes ... He's determined to give a fitting reply to England for their off and in-field behaviour.. Beware England, Only rain can save you now! And guess what, India's batting first.. Cook almost looked deflated when he saw the coin turning in favour of India, He knew India's gonna bat first(A no-brainer).. He himself would've batted first(A no-brainer again) ...

  • Android on August 7, 2014, 10:06 GMT

    my team:- Dhoni,virat,pujara,rahane,vijay,gambhir,ashwin,jadeja,bhuvi,shami.

  • Android on August 7, 2014, 9:58 GMT

    my team:- Dhoni,virat,pujara,rahane,vijay,gambhir,ashwin,jadeja,bhuvi,shami.

  • Android on August 7, 2014, 9:46 GMT

    @Shane_oh 1) The last test was a rare performance by Moeen Ali. Expecting him to come up with fifers every match is expecting him to do what even Swann couldn't. 2)Cook does have runs against the best bowlers, but he's not an aggressive opener like Warner, Sehwag, Srikkanth, he might get a 50, but he'd take 100+balls to get there. I'm not faulting his technique, since I know that's perfect test batting. However, even Sehwag, Gilly, Warner and others made tons against some of the best bowlers, and they often got 50s in 70,80 balls. England, barring Bell and Butler, don't have batsmen who can play that way. Don't state Cook's runs in second innings against India came quick, I agree, but it was against a worn out Indian attack. 3) I meant that the likes of Jordan, Woakes were not as threatening as Anderson & Broad were. If Ali hadn't gotten 6 wickets, that match would've gone for a draw, since Jimmy looked a bit tired on Day 5. Missing Broad would weaken the attack.

  • Ed on August 7, 2014, 9:44 GMT

    Alex Hales should have been picked instead of Robson. ALL other top teams have one aggressive opener - ENG have none.