West Indies in England 2012 June 2, 2012

Anderson rested for third Test


England have omitted James Anderson from their squad for the third Test against West Indies, which starts on Thursday. Anderson suffered a minor quad problem during England's nine-wicket victory at Trent Bridge and, with the series already won, the selectors have decided to rest the bowling attack's leader in order to keep him fresh for the rest of the summer. Anderson's new-ball partner, Stuart Broad, has been included in an otherwise unchanged 12-man squad.

Broad could also be told to put his feet up, with Steven Finn and Graham Onions available to step in as seam-bowling cover. Broad, who is England's T20I captain, missed the second Test against Sri Lanka in April, as well as a planned stint in the IPL, with a calf injury and a decision on his involvement is expected nearer the start of the Edgbaston Test. Both Anderson and Broad have bowled more than 100 overs in the series so far.

Geoff Miller, the national selector, said: "We have been made to work hard for our two victories so far and are delighted to have secured the series, however we know that we will need to continue to play some good cricket if we want a third win against the West Indies this week.

"James Anderson will miss this Test as we look to manage his workload ahead of a busy period of cricket this summer and beyond, a decision which is in the best interests of the team and James himself."

England are due to play West Indies in three ODIs and a T20 international after the Tests, followed by a five-match ODI series against Australia, starting at the end of June. That will be followed by three Tests against South Africa, which will decide the No. 1 Test ranking, then five more one-day internationals and a three-match T20I series finishing on September 12. Nine days later, England will begin their defence of the World Twenty20 in Sri Lanka.

Although Anderson has not played for England's T20 team since 2009, he has previously expressed a desire to break back into the side. His value in Tests, where he is ranked No. 3 in the world, is undisputed, however, and writing in his Mail on Sunday column he said it would be "extremely disappointing" to miss out against West Indies.

"It would be different if I felt fatigued or was struggling with an injury," he said. "But I believe I am fit to play - and while I am fit to play I want to play in every England game I can. Resting players is going to happen more and more often as the schedule gets busier and the ECB has been excellent at monitoring players to keep them fit and ready."

England are 2-0 up in the three-Test series against West Indies and had been widely expected to rest at least one member of the pace attack. Finn stood in for Broad in Sri Lanka in April, taking three wickets as England squared the series, and also replaced Anderson against the same opposition at Lord's last year. A side strain ruled Anderson out of that match - the only Test he has missed since being rested for the 2010 tour of Bangladesh.

Finn became the youngest Englishman to take 50 Test wickets in the same Test but was unable to retain his place and then slipped behind Tim Bresnan in a lengthy fast-bowling queue when injuries struck down Chris Tremlett. Finn has, however, become a key component of the one-day side and was the leading wicket-taker as England whitewashed Pakistan 4-0 in the UAE.

Onions, who last played international cricket more than two years ago before suffering a career-threatening back injury, is also included and, if England decide to rest Broad as well, may get to resume a Test career that left off with two memorable rearguard batting actions during the drawn series in South Africa in 2010. Onions claimed career-best first-class figures on Saturday, with an 11-wicket haul in Durham's defeat by Lancashire, and only Andre Adams has more than his 34 Championship scalps so far this season.

The continuity in England's selection policy means Jonny Bairstow is likely to get another chance to further his claims on the No. 6 spot, unless Andy Flower and Andrew Strauss decide to change the balance of the side and play five bowlers. Bairstow scored 16 and 0 not out on his debut at Lord's, before being worked over by a series of short deliveries from Kemar Roach in making 4 during the second Test, but England will almost certainly want to have a further look at him before the arrival of South Africa next month.

England squad Andrew Strauss (capt), Alastair Cook, Jonathan Trott, Kevin Pietersen, Ian Bell, Jonny Bairstow, Matt Prior (wk), Tim Bresnan, Stuart Broad, Graeme Swann, Steven Finn, Graham Onions

Alan Gardner is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • John on June 5, 2012, 20:23 GMT

    @RandyOZ on (June 05 2012, 09:44 AM GMT) Ahh - getting you now. GM made a prediction just before the 2005 series in England and then mischieviously said he didn't put a timescale on it (the WW prediction) after they achieved it in 2006/7 in Aus. By and large though most of the big talkers either disappear or come back with stats from yesteryear. We had some ourselves pre Pak and they disappeared during the series and then came back when we started winning the ODIs/T20s

  • Anupam on June 5, 2012, 15:47 GMT

    believe it or not i'm not supporting any country i don't support my country, i only support the game cricket. no doubt best pace attack in the world is SA. best spinner ajmal, swann.

  • John on June 5, 2012, 13:51 GMT

    @RandyOZ on (June 05 2012, 09:44 AM GMT), which is a perfect example of why such predictions should be taken with a truckload of salt when coming from a partial source. I expect the upcoming series to be fairly even. In the unlikely event of a whitewash, I reckon it will be because one team is consistently marginally better. There was talk before the Australia/WI series about one bad session being costly and that was consistently the case for WI, who still seem unable to last five days without at least one such lapse. England and SA are both more able to sustain intensity for an entire match so it could be that a single bad session from either team could be the difference in the whole series, never mind just one game. Both teams are capable of that too. England were dominant against India but were bailed out by Stuart Broad in one first innings and SA were bundled out at home for 96 by Australia. With two good bowling attacks, all batsmen will have to be at their best.

  • John on June 5, 2012, 11:56 GMT

    @Randyoz - I have absolutely no diea what you're on about in your response.

  • Randolph on June 5, 2012, 9:44 GMT

    @JG2704 - re not sticking around after whitewashes, that is unless of course your name is Glenn McGrath :)

  • John on June 5, 2012, 8:28 GMT

    @subbass on (June 04 2012, 23:35 PM GMT) Fully agree. I have given a multitude of reasons before for the 5 man attack and that was one of them. You can try and win a game by scoring more runs or by reducing the other team's total by a greater amount. A 5 man attack should reduce their workloads meaning a constant greater intensity and freshness and hopefully less physical strain so less chance of injury. I believe some sides are less suited to it , but Eng seem to be craving for that number 6 batsman when Prior is decent enough and has done better than whoever was at 6 anyway.They don't even seem to be thinking about it though - like it's some kind of sordid thing

  • John on June 5, 2012, 8:19 GMT

    @Giovaughn Wilson on (June 05 2012, 03:57 AM GMT) I'm not against Eng using anyone they are seriously considering for the SA series - so Onions and Finn would be a good idea IMO. Don't see the point in playing those who are not in their immediate plans

  • John on June 5, 2012, 8:16 GMT

    I don't understand why people are predicting whitewashes here - either for England or for SA. SA don't get whitewashed by anyone and they are a very tough nut to crack and are as decent away as they are at home , and Eng are unlikely to get whitewashed by anyone at home and SA are struggling to win series , let alone by whitewash. I wonder if those predicting whitewashes will still be posting if their team loses the series. In my short time on here I have noticed that by and large those who make these bold predictions don't hang around long if/when it goes wrong

  • John on June 5, 2012, 8:10 GMT

    @AKS286 on (June 04 2012, 14:00 PM GMT) Not at all. I am quoting these bowling stats only to state that we are not inferior to SA like some of the SA's are on here saying (in this instance a particular person who intimated that the Pak batsmen found English bowling much easier than SA bowling) but even though England's bowling stats vs Pak were better , I'm stressing that I'm not saying one attack is significantly better than the other. Also I have never said that Sachin is a selfish player , only scores vs weaker countries etc etc..

  • Mathew on June 5, 2012, 6:18 GMT

    One series at a time. We still have to beat a WI team that has impressed me, people seem to forget the ages of these players. SA up next, Eng to win 3-0 mark my words unless rain plays too much of a role. Eng the better team, and at home = victory. If this happens it would be the end of most threads on this site, no wait they can say SA v SA or 'home lions'. Eng still no.1 lol.

  • No featured comments at the moment.