Martin WilliamsonRSS FeedFeeds

1912

The original damp squib

Martin Williamson

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

A waterlogged Lord's during the 1912 England v Australia Test, June 25, 1912
The story of the summer... a waterlogged Lord's during the England-Australia Test © Wisden Cricket Monthly
Enlarge

The triangular tournament of 1912 was years ahead of its time. The idea was sound - a competition involving the only three Test-playing countries of the time meeting each other three times - and when first mooted by South Africa's Sir Abe Bailey in 1909 was warmly welcomed. That it failed was due to circumstances almost entirely beyond the control of the organisers.

The scheme was hatched at the inaugural meeting of the Imperial Cricket Council, the new world governing body, at Lord's in July 1909. At that gathering, such topics as eligibility of players to represent countries other than that of their birth and a programme for Test series were discussed - plus ca change. High on the agenda, and quickly agreed to, was a triangular contest, to be held in England in 1912 and thereafter every four years. The reservations of the counties, that this would result in too much cricket, were quelled by a deal whereby they would all be guaranteed lucrative tour matches against both visiting sides.

In 1909 the plan was most attractive. England and Australia were evenly matched, and South Africa were growing in strength and had won their most recent home series against England (in 1905-06) 4-1 - they were to win the 1909-10 series 3-2 - and had performed well in England in 1907 thanks to their phalanx of legspinners.

But in the February of 1912, a simmering dispute between several leading Australian players and the recently formed Australian Cricket Board spilled over into open warfare. At a meeting of the selectors ahead of the fourth Test, in Sydney, Clem Hill, Australia's captain, came to blows with a colleague, Peter McAllister. Underlying the animosity was the question of who should have the right to appoint the tour manager for the 1912 trip. The players, nominal amateurs for whom the trip was a real money-spinner, thought they should, while the board, realising that there was cash to be made, stated it should. The end result was that the board won through and six leading players - Hill, Warwick Armstrong, Victor Trumper, Tibby Cotter, Hanson Carter and Vernon Ransford - refused to tour.

The South Africans had problems of their own. Their earlier success had come largely thanks to their battery of legspinners and googly bowlers, who on the matting wickets then used in South Africa were lethal. But batsmen were becoming more used to playing the relatively new googlies, and on English turf wickets the spinners' effectiveness was even further reduced.

The third crucial factor was the weather. A soggy spring in 1912 was followed by one of the wettest summers since records began in 1766. In June, July and August, rainfall was more than double the annual average, and to add to the misery, August also went into the record books as the coldest, dullest and wettest month of the 20th century.

When the scheme was announced, the Times warned it could "furnish a surfeit of healthy excitement, which would defeat the purpose of wholesome cricket among those who have its best interests at heart". It need not have worried. Healthy excitement was not a phrase used by many to describe the events of the summer.

If Australia's lack of depth on the field was a worry, the squad's off-field antics were even more remarkable. The post-tour report by George Crouch, the board-appointed manager, spoke of bad language, poor manners and heavy drinking. Even the usually conservative Wisden was taken to observe that "some of the players were not satisfied with Crouch as manager", while adding he claimed some of the team had behaved so badly that the side was "socially ostracised". It was hardly surprising that the Australians' income from the tour was 40% down on their previous trip in 1909.

Even England had problems, with CB Fry's idiosyncratic captaincy openly criticised in the media. But the weakness of the opposition, allied to the strength in depth of the side and familiarity with the conditions, meant the tournament was a fairly one-sided affair.


The three captains pose ahead of the ill-fated 1912 Triangular Tournament.  Frank Mitchell (South Africa, left), CB Fry (England, middle) and Syd Gregory (Australia, right)
The three captains pose ahead of the ill-fated 1912 Triangular Tournament © The Cricketer International
Enlarge

Australia started well, with a crushing innings victory over South Africa in the tournament opener at Old Trafford, notable for Victoria's legspinner Jimmy Matthews uniquely taking a hat-trick in each innings (on the same day). England then eased to an equally comprehensive innings win over the South Africans at Lord's.

Then the weather closed in. Only four hours' play was possible on the first two days of the first Test between England and Australia at Lord's, and as all the matches were over three days, that ruled out any meaningful contest. The second meeting of the two sides, at Old Trafford, was even worse hit, and although there was some play, Fry complained that the pitch was "pure mud".

England eased to a second win over South Africa in Manchester; and in front of desultory crowds at Lord's, Australia beat them as well by 10 wickets. One of the few who attended that match was King George V, the first time a reigning monarch had seen Test cricket.

The final round of matches was just as uncompetitive. At The Oval, England polished off South Africa before lunch on the second day, with SF Barnes grabbing 8 for 29 inside 90 minutes. In the only match at Trent Bridge, appalling weather enabled South Africa to avoid a tournament whitewash in their final match against Aussies.

The series decider came at The Oval, where it was agreed that the match would be played to a finish - the organisers had overlooked the need for a tiebreaker in the event of two sides finishing with the same number of wins, and so a definite result had to be achieved. A meeting had been held days before the match to consider an additional fourth Test should it be needed - the 10th of the summer - but there was little appetite for the suggestion.

The first day was sunny, but a wet outfield meant that Fry was unwilling to start promptly and play didn't get underway until midway through the afternoon. The crowd vented their feelings by booing Fry all the way to the middle when he came out to bat.

Less than 90 minutes' play was possible on both the second and third days, but on the third Australia lost eight wickets for 21 runs on a "pitch better suited to water polo". They never recovered, and England won the match, the tournament and the Ashes.

It was fairly apparent that the experiment had not been a success, with the weather and public antipathy the crucial factors. "Nine Tests provide a surfeit of cricket," observed the Daily Telegraph, "and contests between Australia and South Africa are not a great attraction to the British public."

The Australian board had already reached that conclusion, sending a telegram in which it said there was "no point in continuing the triangular tours … [as] neither Australia or South Africa could finance two visiting teams in one season".

Wisden concluded that "the experiment is not likely to be repeated for many years to come - perhaps not in this generation". Although the idea was not officially shelved, it never resurfaced after the First World War. It was to be another 63 years before a multi-national tournament was held again and that - the 1975 World Cup - was an altogether more successful affair, helped by one of the hottest summers of the century.

Is there an incident from the past you would like to know more about? Email us with your comments and suggestions.

Martin Williamson is executive editor of Cricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

RSS Feeds: Martin Williamson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Umair_umair on (July 3, 2010, 19:15 GMT)

Apologies for mistake in the previous comment. Asian Test championship did have a second edition in 2001-2002 season (without India). But was abandoned for good after that (perhaps because of Indo-Pak political tensions).

Posted by Umair_umair on (July 3, 2010, 19:08 GMT)

It is surprising that Martin mentions 1975 ODI Worldcup as the next multinational tournament but ignores the "1998-99 Asian Test Championship". I think Asian Test Champion would have been a more relevant reference because he was writing about multinational Test competitions. It is more relevant since it was only the second time a multinational test competition was held and more interestingly, like the one discussed in this article, Asian test championship was also abandoned after the inaugural competition. Informative piece overall.

Posted by Umair_umair on (July 3, 2010, 18:47 GMT)

I wish there were some intelligent, innovative administrators here and what an occasion it would have been to have a test and T20/ ODI Triangular series with PAK, ENG and AUS. Atleast t20 and ODIs (If not test because of Ashes).

That would have been interesting.

Posted by   on (July 3, 2010, 10:28 GMT)

I guess lot of cricket fans like me would be happy to see a triangular test tournament in our days. That would bring new life to almost dyeing test cricket and more and more fans would be attracted towards test matches.

Posted by vinnigefanie on (July 3, 2010, 7:37 GMT)

Interesting with a few minor errors. At the time 1909 it was the Imperial Cricket Conference - the term international replaced imperial in 1965 and conference was replaced bu council in 1989. Sir Abe Bailey, known what in those years as a Randlord, or mining magnet (diamonds) was former fast-medium bowler who played for Transvaal and later became a politician. He first floated the idea of an international style cricket forum in 1907 and initially the triangular tournament at the same time.

Posted by   on (July 3, 2010, 4:00 GMT)

Three test-playing countries come together, and people were afraid that there would be "too much cricket". God help us all.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Martin WilliamsonClose

Late highs fail to mask wretched year

2014 in review: Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, 2014 was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh

    Enough with the on-field chatter

Ian Chappell: One of these days there's going to be an ugly altercation between players on the field

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Could McCullum win the Nobel Peace Prize?

The Beige Brigade salivate over B Mac's incredible feats and sixes, and the deliciousness that is Hagley Park

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Rudderless Shami proves too costly

Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days