Not quite in Warne's footsteps

Eleven Australian spinners who struggled to stand in the shadow of the Great One

Steven Lynch

December 13, 2010

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

Steven Smith prepares to delivery, Derbyshire v Australians, Tour match, Derby, 2nd day, July 9, 2010
Steve Smith: a Warne replica minus the bowling © Getty Images
Enlarge

Stuart MacGill
Probably the unluckiest of the lot: MacGill could have been an all-time great if his career hadn't collided with Warne's. He still took 208 Test wickets at less than 30 apiece, and often outperformed the great man when they played together. When Warne retired early in 2007, MacGill looked set for a few years in the side without looking over his shoulder - but he was already 36, and injuries got the better of him: he retired abruptly in the middle of a Test in the West Indies the following June.

Michael Beer
The selection of Michael Beer in the squad for the third Ashes Test at Perth was Australia's biggest selectorial bolt from the blue since legspinner John Watkins was whistled up in 1972-73 - he'd also previously played only five first-class matches and didn't have a five-for to his name. Slow left-armer Beer, 26, moved from Victoria to Western Australia this season, and has so far taken just 16 first-class wickets at 39.93. Of those, 11 have come in three matches at the WACA at 42.45 - hardly compelling evidence to choose him ahead of the spurned Nathan Hauritz, who has played more matches in Perth, and taken more wickets at a better average (15 at 33.80 in five games, with a best of 5 for 39).

Xavier Doherty
A bowling average of 48 in a first-class career spanning nearly ten years didn't seem to suggest that Xavier Doherty was a world-beater ... and his performances in the first two Tests of the 2010-11 Ashes series lived down to that reputation. He took three wickets for 306, and was promptly dropped: not many are placing bets on a recall. Doherty may have been included because of Kevin Pietersen's recent failings against slow left-armers, and it's true that he did get KP out in Adelaide ... after he'd made 227.

Jason Krejza
Seemed definitely to be one to watch when he took 8 for 215 - and 12 wickets in the match - on his debut, against India in Nagpur in November 2008 ... but he didn't play in Australia's next Test, and has won only one cap since. "Krazy" Krejza is still wheeling down his offspinners for Tasmania, but still proving costly: in 2009-10 his 18 first-class wickets cost more than 50 runs apiece.

Bryce McGain
The affable McGain was almost 37 when, early in 2009, he became Australia's oldest Test debutant for 24 years - since another legspinner, Bob Holland. But McGain's Test career was short, and not very sweet: targeted from the start by the South Africans - Ashwell Prince hit his second ball for six, and seven more flew over the ropes later on - McGain finished with none for 149 from 18 ragged overs in Cape Town. Australia lost by an innings, and poor McGain hasn't looked like adding to his baggy-green collection since. He's still playing, though, and in 2010 briefly turned out for Essex.

Nathan Hauritz
Hauritz made a surprise debut in India in 2004 when Warne broke a finger on the eve of the Mumbai Test - and that seemed to be it, as later he drifted out of the Queensland side then, after a move to Sydney, the NSW team too. But he got a surprise Test recall at the end of 2008, despite not being a Shield regular, and did better than many expected in the following year's Ashes series. Successive five-fors against Pakistan in Melbourne and Sydney seemed to answer criticism that he didn't take enough wickets - but then a mauling in India put the selectors off, and Hauritz was rudely dumped for the start of the Ashes series despite his domestic form (14 wickets at 26 in the ongoing Shield season) being better than most of his rivals.

Steve Smith
He's a blond legspinner ... but the Warne comparisons stop there, for the moment at least. Smith is more of a roller - if less roly-poly - than Warnie, and he may well end up being a better batsman than bowler: his first two Tests, against Pakistan in England in 2010, produced just three wickets, and a fine innings of 77. But he's still only 21, and in March 2010 took 7 for 64 for NSW against South Australia. His time may come... soon.

Brad Hogg
International cricket's favourite ex-postman - he used to run through his postal rounds to get fit - chinaman bowler Hogg was another who might have benefited from Warne's retirement. Hogg had played one Test in India in 1996, as Warne recovered from finger surgery - legend has it he'd waited half his life to hear Ian Healy growl "Bowled, Hoggy" from behind the stumps, then bowled so badly that it never happened - then later became a one-day regular, especially useful at World Cups (he took 13 wickets in 2003, and 21 in the West Indies in 2007). But he never quite nailed down a Test place, and little over a year after Warne bowed out Hogg announced his retirement too, after three disappointing Tests at home against India in 2007-08. He's now trying his hand at delivering TV commentary.


Jon Holland in his delivery stride
Jon Holland: Anyone remember the man who played no match? © Garry Sparke
Enlarge
Jon Holland
Slow left-armer Holland was only 22, with only four Shield games for Victoria under his belt, when he was chosen for Australia's one-day squad for a tour of India late in 2009. Stuart MacGill said he looked a "naturally gifted bowler" and ought to be given a game: the selectors, not for the first time, didn't agree with MacGill. Holland didn't play an international match on the tour ... and still hasn't. So far in 2010-11 he's taken six first-class wickets - the same as he managed in the whole of last season.

Cameron White
White was another initially viewed as a Warne clone - he's blond, solid, and comes from Victoria. But he was never in the same class as a spinner, as he himself admitted, and doesn't bowl much at all these days - last season he took just two first-class wickets, and has none at all so far this term. The late David Hookes, during his time as Victoria's coach, thought White was more likely to gain a Test spot as a batsman, but although he has cemented a spot in Australia's limited-overs teams, White has so far been restricted to four Tests, all in India in 2008-09, when he took five wickets and failed to reach 50. His captaincy has its admirers, though.

Beau Casson
Test cricket's only Beau had a seemingly ideal start to his Test career - slow left-arm chinaman bowler Casson took three wickets on his debut, in Bridgetown in 2008, as West Indies were beaten to clinch the series (he made the side after MacGill's sudden retirement in the middle of the previous Test). But since then it's been a depressingly familiar tale, as Casson - who has a heart problem that is checked regularly - has struggled for impact at state level. He took 29 first-class wickets in 2007-08 - but managed only seven (at 91) the following year, and has played only once since.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Cricinfo Guide to International Cricket 2011. And Ask Steven is now on Facebook

RSS Feeds: Steven Lynch

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by The_Lethal_1 on (December 15, 2010, 22:18 GMT)

I am still gobsmacked that Hauritz isn't in the side. I feel for the bloke. He has done a pretty good job for Australia in the last two years and because of one bad tour against India in India he is discarded like a piece of rubbish. He has a great record in Australia, has proven that he troubles Cook and Strauss and pretty economical for an off spinner. I just feel that Hauritz hasn't helped himself as much as he could have. Before the start of the last Australian summer there was talk that he was working on his doosra but I have never seen him bowl it yet. Still, Beer will prove to be another addition to this list no doubt and once Hilditch is sacked, hopefull Hauritz will get another go.

Posted by   on (December 14, 2010, 11:35 GMT)

i agree with nuxxy. this whole thing that seems like a never ending mess for australia, could be solved by having a couple of guys in charge of the team. but guys that make it simple for everyone. some people just have this knack of putting everything in perspective. and then onwards you think it was so simple.

AB did it before. bob simpson. they do have guys like that. wht is hard to understand is this fixation with technology, countless coaches. experts.

of course. i suppose its too much to expect them to ask warne to be with the team as a mentor.

Posted by   on (December 14, 2010, 11:35 GMT)

i agree with nuxxy. this whole thing that seems like a never ending mess for australia, could be solved by having a couple of guys in charge of the team. but guys that make it simple for everyone. some people just have this knack of putting everything in perspective. and then onwards you think it was so simple.

AB did it before. bob simpson. they do have guys like that. wht is hard to understand is this fixation with technology, countless coaches. experts.

of. i suppose its too much to expect them to ask warne to be with the team as a mentor.

Posted by   on (December 14, 2010, 11:23 GMT)

I can't get over this world-wide misguide opinion that Warne is the 'greatest bowler ever'. Are there that many people in the world who don't undertsand the game of cricket? Sure Warne was a great bowler but did he really win more test matches for Australia than Glenn McGrath, Steve Waugh, Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist ? You need to take 20 wickets to win a test - there's plenty of teams who have done that and still lost - but cricket is won by the team that scores the most runs. It is obvious that Australia had a great team in the Warne era in which the batsmen made enough runs to put scoreboard pressure on opponents - allowing the bowlers enough time and space to do their work. Plus they had the great McGrath who dominated Lara and Tendulkar and basically the best player in every team like Warne never did. McGrath made the greats look average. Warne made the average look mediocre. As Mr. Lynch alludes, did anyone ever Notice Warne missing when Macgill played for Australia ? No !

Posted by   on (December 14, 2010, 11:21 GMT)

i agree with nuxxy. this whole thing that seems like a never ending mess for australia, could be solved by having a couple of guys in charge of the team. but guys that make it simple for everyone. some people just have this knack of putting everything in perspective. and then onwards you think it was so simple.

AB did it before. bob simpson. they do have guys like that. wht is hard to understand is this fixation with technology, countless coaches. experts.

of. i suppose its too much to expect them to ask warne to be with the team as a mentor.

Posted by   on (December 14, 2010, 7:45 GMT)

Australian selector's room is resembling like a slaughter house these days. Hauritz is my pick and stick to him till someone else shows better solid credentials and selectors must leave hopeless optimism behind and be realistic.

Posted by tikna on (December 14, 2010, 5:29 GMT)

One of the common theme that runs almost through is that most bowlers either retired or were made to look worse then their talent deserves against India.

May be Aus should not consider a spinners performance against India and then judge the guy

Posted by pejapla on (December 14, 2010, 0:14 GMT)

Warnie had in incredible self belief that frightened batsmen and set a protocol for current cricketers who now understand that spinners need to be attacked.

Posted by Meety on (December 13, 2010, 21:06 GMT)

@george204 -true. @Nadeem1976, mate please read up names listed by George204, you show a fair bit of ignorance. Don't forget a great Leggie like MacGill was playing at the same time as Warne! @nuxxy - IF they had any sense!!!!! @c5nv2838a47i- ditto! @Khawaja Ikram Ul Haq - I had the highest regard for MacGill but are you saying he was a better spinner or just that MacGill spun the ball further? MacGill had a better "wrong un" & did spin the ball further then Warne, but did not have the "in-swinging drift" or range of turn. Still - wish he was not injured & retired. @Dave Bremner - I assume you mean that we won't great spinners because of the way the first class structure is in Oz? To that end I think that either the ACT or NT be added to our first class structure. I prefer NT - as the Darwin ground seems to be somewhat sub-continental & therefor more spin friendly - it would also be a good base for Indian tours.

Posted by dsig3 on (December 13, 2010, 18:31 GMT)

@chaithan: Brian Lara said it best about Warne. He was easier to face than Murali but was a better bowler. If measuring a legspinners ability by the amount of turn and variations then McGill wins every time. Unfortunately its not a about that. If I wanted someone to bowl for my life in a pressure situation with a batsmen on 200, I'd pick warne every day of the week. Alot of Indian fans on here are belittling warne at every opportunity. I really dont understand why I could belittle SRT because he plays on featherbeds 90% of the time.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Steven LynchClose
Steven Lynch Steven Lynch won the Wisden Cricket Monthly Christmas Quiz three years running before the then-editor said "I can't let you win it again, but would you like a job?" That lasted for 15 years, before he moved across to the Wisden website when that was set up in 2000. Following the merger of the two sites early in 2003 he was appointed as the global editor of Wisden Cricinfo. In June 2005 he became the deputy editor of Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. He continues to contribute the popular weekly "Ask Steven" question-and-answer column on ESPNcricinfo, and edits the Wisden Guide to International Cricket.

'Gilchrist always looked to take on the spinners'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Adam Gilchrist's adaptability

    'It's up to the WICB to win the players over'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoffrey Boycott talks about the troubles in West Indian cricket, Steven Smith's recent catch against Pakistan, and fast bowling in India

    No time for India and West Indies to squabble

Mark Nicholas: Why the BCCI should use a carrot, not a stick, in its approach to the WICB

    'When I became an umpire, I didn't realise how complicated this game was'

Peter Willey on suiting up against '80s West Indies, and umpiring in England

All hail the Phantom

Bill Lawry was a technically correct opener who took on some of the best fast bowlers with distinction over a ten-year career. By Stuart Wark

News | Features Last 7 days

How India weeds out its suspect actions

The BCCI set up a three-man committee to tackle the problem of chucking at age-group and domestic cricket, and it has produced significant results in five years

A rock, a hard place and the WICB

The board's latest standoff with its players has had embarrassing consequences internationally, so any resolution now needs to be approached thoughtfully

Twin Asian challenges await Australia

What Australia have not done since returning a fractured unit from India is head back to Asia to play an Asian team. Two of their major weaknesses - handling spin and reverse swing - will be tested in the UAE by Pakistan

Kohli back to old habits

Stats highlights from the fourth ODI between India and West Indies in Dharamsala

West Indies go AWOL

West Indies may have formally played the fourth ODI in Dharamsala but their fielding suggested their minds were already on the flight back home

News | Features Last 7 days