| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
England, India, Sri Lanka, South Africa and Australia are looking good
February 13, 2011
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Audio/Video:
What lies in store in the 2011 World Cup?
Series/Tournaments:
ICC Cricket World Cup
|
|||
The 2011 World Cup is potentially the most open since the inaugural tournament in 1975. As many as five teams have a realistic chance of winning the coveted trophy.
Unlike the 2007 tournament where it was simply a matter of: "Who'll meet Australia in the final?" this time the defending champions are not favourites.
If any team is entitled to outright favouritism, it's joint host India. They have an unbelievably strong batting line-up, with the likes of Sachin Tendulkar and Virender Sehwag. If youngsters Virat Kohli and Suresh Raina also play to their potential, that's a whole lot of firepower, and it's anchored by the cool captain, MS Dhoni. India are perfectly equipped to set huge targets as well as chase them down. They're also well stocked with spinners, both frontline and part-time. The emergence of R Ashwin takes some of the load off Harbhajan SIngh, and while Yuvraj Singh's batting has waned lately, his bowling has prospered.
The big impediments to India winning the trophy for the first time since 1983 are their inconsistent pace attack, which relies heavily on the fragile Zaheer Khan, and the massive weight of fan expectation. No team has ever won the trophy playing in a home final but India have a great chance of breaking that sequence.
The Australian selectors have gambled by basing their attack around aggressive fast bowlers. They continued in this vein by choosing an attacking offspinner, Jason Krezja, to replace the injured Nathan Hauritz. How far Australia progress will depend to a degree on how well Ricky Ponting succeeds in adapting his captaincy to constantly seek wickets as the ultimate mode of containment. Australia will also have to bat well, especially when the spin bowlers are operating, and this is where they'll miss the versatility of Michael Hussey. A meeting with England in the quarter-finals is the most likely outcome, and following their recent comprehensive triumph in the seven-ODI series, Australia should be confident of that match-up.
For once South Africa have a balanced attack rather than one heavily reliant upon seamers. They also have a strong batting line-up - not quite as powerful as India's but close. They have the team to win, but do they have the temperament? As skipper, Graeme Smith has to utilise his varied attack and also find a way to keep his team from tensing up in the big matches. History is not on his side.
The last time the tournament was played on the subcontinent, in 1996, Sri Lanka won the trophy. They'd love to repeat that performance in order to give their champion, Muttiah Muralitharan, the perfect send-off. Sri Lanka have a steady attack - strong in spin bowling but one good pace bowler short of dominant. The batting, headed by Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene, is solid but lacks a genuine middle-order power threat. If Tillakaratne Dilshan fires at the top, that won't be such a problem.
Whichever team finishes top in Group A will meet either West Indies or Bangladesh in the quarter-finals. This is a major incentive, and it means the Australia v Sri Lanka contest is crucial.
This year looked like England's big chance to win their first World Cup, but their batsmen played spin bowling poorly in Australia. That's not likely to improve on the subcontinent, and with Eoin Morgan injured, the England batting relies even more on the erratic Kevin Pietersen. Strategically, Andrew Strauss needs to be more aggressive as a captain, and he should demote Matt Prior to the middle order. Ian Bell plays both pace and spin well and can make big scores; he's a better alternative as an opener.
Of those five teams, England are the most likely to miss the semi-finals.
Strength versus subtlety in both encounters is an enticing and competitive mix. Hopefully this will lead to an absorbing final, which would be a vast improvement on the 2007 schemozzle in the Caribbean that masqueraded as the pinnacle of the one-day game.
Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian
Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even
though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

Anti-corruption efforts need to be proactive
Ian Chappell: Rather than relying on the police or media to uncover rot in the game, cricket has to get tough with its own
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by. By Ajay Shankar
Jayaditya Gupta: Gauging from the official broadcast of the IPL you'd be hard-pressed to guess there has been a spot-fixing scandal over the past few days
Go Figure: S Rajesh and Andy Zaltzman explore the hidden secrets behind 222
Krishna Kumar: There's no one better to sing the praises of the abdomen guard than someone who grew up playing without one, or wearing one with an infernal buckle
As we go into the last week of the league games of IPL 2013, seven teams have a mathematical chance of making the last four. Here's what each of those teams needs to do
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Unfortunate Sunrisers let match slip away
For 36 overs, Sunrisers painstakingly built a position of strength only for one terrible over to spoil it for them
Kartik wins in Royal Challengers' loss
It is hazardous to go by bowlers' figures in T20, but his figures of 4-0-17-1 in defence of just 115 were possibly an accurate reflection of how well he bowled
Unfortunate Sunrisers let match slip away (73)
For 36 overs, Sunrisers painstakingly built a position of strength only for one terrible over to spoil it for them
As we go into the last week of the league games of IPL 2013, seven teams have a mathematical chance of making the last four. Here's what each of those teams needs to do
Dravid and the art of T20 captaincy (56)
Despite a small squad bereft of big names, Rajasthan Royals' captain has churned out win after win
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry (43)
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
'I have decided to return to my natural game' (39)
Misbah-ul-Haq talks about his approach to the captaincy, the criticism he has copped for his defensive style, and the lessons from the drubbing in South Africa
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
england in top five WHAT HAVE DONE IN ASIA
Posted by UKFIX on (February 16, 2011, 13:00 GMT)According to Mr. Chappell, there are 4 potential WC winners, India, Australia, South Africa and England. I do not know, man like Chapplle has no idea that we are playing in sub-continent. I totally disagree with Mr. Chappell, In my opinion, these are semi finalist. India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and (Australia, South Africa). No one is talking about Pakistan, same as it was during T20 WC in England and Pakistan got the trophy. Australia, England and South Africa has no chance to win WC. India, because they are very good at home has the best chance to win but again home crowed pressure is a negative point for them and the other team is Sri Lanka. Because I am Pakistani, so I have firm believe that Pakistan will win the WC and Mr. Chappell it is just a start.
Posted byI still predict a Aussie v/s Pakistan final. Pakistan because they are peaking at the right time & they argubly have the most versatile bowling attack in which they can restrict teams to less than 270 any time and then the exp of Younis & Misbah to guide them there & Aussies always find a way to lift themselves like they did against England in one day series !!!
Posted byPrediction for the World Cup.... Pool A Qualifiers.. 1. Australia 2. Pakistan 3. Sri Lanka 4. New Zealand Pool B Qualifiers 1. South Africa 2. India 3. England 4. Bangladesh First Quarter final...Australia vs Bangladesh...Aus will win. 2nd Quarter final....Pakistan vs England.......Pak will win. 3rd Quarter final....Lanka vs India.........India will win. 4th Quarter final....New Zealand vs South Africa...South Africa will win. First Semi Final....Aus vs India......India will win. 2nd Semi Final....Pak vs South Africa.....Pak will win. FINAL....Pak vs India......Pakistan will win the world cup.
Posted byPakistan is not one of the favorites, thats exactly why they stand a chance! :P And, no we are not getting all worked up about it!!
Posted by mustufa on (February 15, 2011, 17:41 GMT)Its better for them to be not ranked, they have nothing to prove and all to gain.
Posted by holier-than-thou on (February 15, 2011, 13:17 GMT)Bangladesh will win the WC
Posted by Saulat on (February 15, 2011, 10:41 GMT)@ cric_fanatics .. Who is Ian ??? Just Wait n Watch Boi ..
Posted by Petti on (February 15, 2011, 8:56 GMT)in my View 1. India 2. Sri Lanka 3.England/South Africa. there is no chance to win the world cup to South Africa or England even they will go to semis.Hope Sri lanka Vs India will go to finals.We all know when india comes to final they dont perform well.Sri lanka has balance team than India.but india has powerful batting lineup.when we compare with sri lankan they have best bowling and fielding line up.plyers like sanga,mehela. dilshan and also Mathews can chance the match. Sachin+Dhoni= Sanga+Mahela Sehwag=Dilshan Murali+ Malinga+Mendis=???? so.. sri lanka has more chance to win world cup 2011
Posted byI strongly disagree with your predictions. India does have a strong batting lineup on paper, but in reality none of them is "big match" player. Secondly, India have an ordinary pace attack, though they have got spinning options but its ordinary against rest Asian fellow teams. India won't make it to last four. Real threats in order are 1. Aus 2 Pak 3 SL 4 SA. It is very little left in WC by now and you have every right to butter India.