Jayaditya Gupta
Executive editor of ESPNcricinfo in India

Give Tendulkar the benefit of the doubt

Leadership hasn't been his strength but statesmanship has come almost naturally to him

Jayaditya Gupta

April 28, 2012

Comments: 48 | Text size: A | A

Sachin Tendulkar looks on as Delhi Daredevils run up a big score, Delhi Daredevils v Mumbai Indians, IPL, Delhi, April 27, 2012
Decorous and politically correct, Tendulkar is the ideal member of the House of Elders © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

You know it's the silly season when, with a government battling several political and financial crises and an opposition struggling to get its own act together, public discourse on national television, in newspapers and on Twitter revolves around the nomination of Sachin Tendulkar to the Rajya Sabha, India's upper house of Parliament. Lines have been sharply drawn for and against, and the episode has triggered rare public criticism of Tendulkar.

For those who came in late: Tendulkar's nomination - officially by the President of India, effectively by the federal government - is to one of a dozen Rajya Sabha seats that are reserved for persons "having special knowledge or practical experience in respect of such matters as literature, science, art and social service". Previous occupants of those seats have included the musician Ravi Shankar, the artist MF Husain, and the film director Mrinal Sen. Into that fairly experienced - for want of a better word - company is cast Indian cricket's Peter Pan, still breaking records in his 40th year.

The news came out of the blue on Thursday afternoon, catching even India's on-the-ball TV channels unawares. First came reports of his meetings with the prime minister, and Sonia Gandhi, who heads the ruling coalition; this was followed swiftly by rumours and confirmation of the offer and, within a few hours, a formal announcement from the President's office. From meeting the PM to being named an MP, it was all done in four-odd hours.

That, though, set off the chain of criticism, politicking and potshots. The initial reaction was one of shock; there had been no indication of this and even the most incisive cricket observers were flabbergasted. The criticism followed pretty soon, however, and by Friday evening representatives of various political parties were seeing and denouncing conspiracy theories - chiefly that the ruling Congress was using Tendulkar to deflect attention from the issues at hand.

Much more unusual, though not surprising, has been the criticism levelled at Tendulkar himself for accepting the offer. In cricket circles, the incredulity - expressed by, among others, Tendulkar's one-time team-mate Sanjay Manjrekar - is because Tendulkar has not exhibited as a player any leadership tendencies. "Until now I've seen no sign of that," Manjrekar said. The consensus seems to be that Anil Kumble or Sourav Ganguly would have been more obvious choices; Kumble, as Manjrekar pointed out, led the players' negotiations with the BCCI for regularised contracts and has latterly been elected president of the Karnataka State Cricket Association, while Ganguly revolutionised the captaincy.

Even Rahul Dravid would have been a better choice, given his reputation as a deep-thinking player and his successful delivery of the Bradman Oration last year. Tendulkar, by contrast, is famous for not committing himself on issues; leadership has never been his strongest suit, and he never looked comfortable as India captain. Away from the crease he has always been a back-seat player, happier to follow than to lead.

If leadership didn't become him, though, statesmanship does. Adored in India, he is hugely respected abroad for his ability to live a relatively dignified life - relative especially to first-world sports stars - in the largest of goldfish bowls. His iconic status has, for the better part of two decades, sat lightly on his shoulders. He is a role model for millions of Indian children, and still highly sought for endorsements, because he is so totally non-controversial, so completely safe. His silence really is golden. Decorous and politically correct to a fault, he is the ideal member of the House of Elders.

Another criticism is that Tendulkar the player will not have the time to attend sessions of Parliament. One paper calculated that in 2011 he had spent 216 days on tour (the Indian team spent 292 days). Could the nomination not have waited till his retirement? The counter to this, though, is even more clear. It can safely be said that Tendulkar is in the twilight of his career; simply put, his body has pretty much run the length of its course on the field. That he has lasted so long is itself amazing but the niggles and strains are becoming increasingly frequent. A winding down of his career, where he culls one or two formats from his schedule, is only a matter of time. And in any case the Rajya Sabha seat is for six years and should be seen through that long-term prism. It can even be said, without stretching the imagination too much, that he is closer to retirement than his two fellow nominees named on Thursday - the actress Rekha and the businesswoman Anu Aga - and that both ladies have reasonably hectic schedules themselves.

The legitimate question remains: why did Tendulkar accept? It is hard to second-guess a man whose face is as widely known as his mind is not. One empirical fact, though, is that with the World Cup won and the 100th hundred in his pocket at last, he has few cricketing peaks to conquer. It's possible he needed something outside of the game to challenge him, something new to master. Perhaps, like his only parallel in popular culture, Amitabh Bachchan, he has political ambitions; perhaps he wanted an affirmation of his popularity outside the normal field of play. Nothing wrong with that - it would be a personal choice that he is entitled to. And can you imagine the furore had he turned down the offer?

 
 
The legitimate question remains: why did Tendulkar accept? It is hard to second-guess a man whose face is as widely known as his mind is not
 

What these six years will give him, though, is a chance to exist outside the bubble in which he has lived from his mid-teens. He will meet some of the best minds in Indian public life, who, after their initial thrill at meeting him, will go about their business as usual. One of his colleagues in the Rajya Sabha will be Dilip Tirkey, a highly respected former Indian hockey captain, who was elected to the house from his home state of Orissa. Hockey is a million miles from the rarefied world of cricket; large parts of Orissa, a state with high rates of poverty and malnourishment, are similarly a world away from the millionaire mansions of South Mumbai. There is every possibility an exchange of ideas between the two could inspire Tendulkar's life plans once he does retire from cricket.

The Rajya Sabha stint will also be the first time he has shown a willingness to put his name and reputation on the line, to hold himself up to accountability and scrutiny - to move outside his comfort zone, the cricket ground, where he has always excelled and has rarely been questioned, and into an arena where the script is not in his control. Given the potential for bad PR - and it has already started - the sheer boldness of the move deserves commendation.

Will he make a difference? Perhaps the question is irrelevant because nominated members are not nominated to make a difference, as the elected legislators are. They are there primarily as a reward for being good and famous citizens of India, for being leaders in their fields. Anything that rubs off will be a bonus. It's true Tendulkar doesn't espouse too many causes, much less comment on non-cricketing issues, but Rekha, a hugely popular actress of the 1970s and 1980s, has kept a similar low profile through her career, avoiding the glare outside of the klieg lights. There is no indication that she will bring to the Rajya Sabha the intelligence and wit she brings to her craft. Yet she has been given the benefit of doubt - a benefit that has, in public discourse over the past couple of days, been denied Tendulkar.

And that seems to be the crux of the matter. The debate is only because this is Tendulkar - because the king has become an MP.

Jayaditya Gupta is executive editor of ESPNcricinfo in India

RSS Feeds: Jayaditya Gupta

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by swaroopjammula on (May 1, 2012, 7:30 GMT)

for all the people who say sachin is not a team man, how can you define a team man? i know a lot of innings where sachin played for team. its the mental thought you are talking about right? then i know some innings. when India lifted independence cup against pakisthan sachin scored at a rapid phase and provided a very qucik start where ganguly capitalized and India won that game. had he been selfish or not a team man he can bat slowly. observe 2003 wc final. he kept the score which aus made in view and went after mcgrath right from first over which is no his style. how can anyone call him not a team man. he is a team man. the main problem for him is before 2000 when ganguly started he was the only player who constitued the team.

Posted by deepak_sholapurkar on (May 1, 2012, 3:41 GMT)

Sachin is far better in Rajya Sabha compared to all the politicians. Its good to see a differnt face in Parliment.

And now with the form he is having in Cricket Ground, its definately sachin has choosen better option. Who knows he may be a next chief minister of Maharastra

Posted by Divinetouch on (April 30, 2012, 13:45 GMT)

Sachinji,

You are a true son of BHARATMA and being a patriot you have responded to the call to serve your country.

All those who who are critical of your decision should ask themselves if they are asked to serve their country what would they do.

To serve one's country is a great honour and it is ony bestowed upon those who are deemed eleigible.

Your dignity and humility will ensure you are an outstanding sewak.

BHAGAVAN SATHYA SAI BABA will shower HIS grace on you at all times such that you can excel in the field of civil service as you have done as a cricketer.

Posted by jay57870 on (April 30, 2012, 3:26 GMT)

Look at the great Don Bradman. He rose to national prominence from humble beginnings: a country boy to great cricketer to administrator to businessman to national icon. Even as a reclusive old man, his input was solicited by many. So much so, then Australian PM John Howard called him the "greatest living Australian"! Not surprising, given the great Don's strong belief in "character must surely be one of the greatest assets any nation through its citizens can possess." Bottom line: Leadership is primarily about character, trust & ethics. Talk about "leadership tendencies" like "players' negotiations" or "captaincy" or press conferences or college degrees is secondary. There's surely wisdom in PM Manmohan Singh's bold move in endorsing Tendulkar, while he's still young & energetic! Late Peter Roebuck once proclaimed: "Throughout he has been public property, India's proudest possession." As such, Sachin's life mission is inextricably linked to the nation! He needs "no benefit of doubt"!!

Posted by jay57870 on (April 30, 2012, 3:04 GMT)

Jayaditya - The real question is not "why did Tendulkar accept?" but rather "can you imagine the furore had he turned down the offer?" Just think: Had he declined, the collateral damage would have been disastrous. People would have called it high treason. Far from it, Sachin has always considered it a huge honour to play for country above everything else. His quiet leadership style is, foremost, deeply rooted in trust and ethics. Sachin's character, integrity and values - on and off the field - are impeccable. He is a universal role model and global ambassador of sportsmansip. TIME Magazine proclaimed him one of "The 100 Most Influential People In The World" in 2010! Its tribute: "Sports heroes such as Tendulkar stand for national dignity in a way that perhaps only a postcolonial nation can understand. And feel grateful for"! Yes, it's national dignity that the nation needs so desperately these days. India should indeed be grateful for Tendulkar accepting the Rajya Sabha post! (TBC)

Posted by   on (April 29, 2012, 20:10 GMT)

Nicely written, putting into perspective both the sides. Got many people to think more on the subject..

Posted by Brambletonian on (April 29, 2012, 15:47 GMT)

Sachin was never a team man and never will be ..and imagine this guy as Rajya sabha MP..What a joke..God bless India

Posted by   on (April 29, 2012, 8:27 GMT)

Think of it from Sachin's point of view. Right from childhood, he has been looked upon in awe. As he grew older, he must have thought to himself, "If people love me so much, maybe I can make a difference to this country." If I was him (assuming I was as talented, as humble and, what else am I missing? Oh yeah, a hundred hundreds), I would think that I have been given a great opportunity in this life. Very few people get as lucky as I did. I should not throw it away. I have entertained a billion lives for 20 years. Maybe I can help change their lives too.

Posted by rajnish.sinha on (April 29, 2012, 6:43 GMT)

sachin's stature is bigger than that of PM in this country. yet he chooses to take up the post. when a person takes up something where he has nothing to gain and everything to loose, it should be praised and not condemned. yes he has kept himself away from issues. because all this while he was a cricketer. its easy to comment on issues without committing to them. examples mahesh bhatt, aamir khan, javed akhtar etc., but then when sachin realised that he will have time now on his side, he has committed to public life by taking up the offer. kudos to the master. i think guys like sanjay manjrekar must be having sachin's idol in their homes at the place of worship. they live off making commments on him.

Posted by   on (April 29, 2012, 6:31 GMT)

Yes Sachin's career has run its course...and frankly he needed options...media is not his forte and gaps in academic qualifications, like gaps in batting techniques, will hurt in most other vocations. The man himself is very much aware of that. The incumbent Government, themselves shorn of ideas, had to come up with something to keep afloat their sinking stakes in the country's democracy, and as now appears, in the demographic interest's as well in which surely sports and films rank the highest . Its an opportunity, as indeed the associated honour, which Sachin the retired sportsman will accept and serve with dignity. How much it will improve the stock of the sporting fraternity will however remain a conjecture.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jayaditya GuptaClose
Jayaditya Gupta Executive editor, India A football lover and a veteran of the print media, Jayaditya sold out on both to join the crazy gang at ESPNcricinfo. It's a decision that often left him wondering whether he'd stumbled into the wrong room by mistake, till he realised that many of his colleagues switch the TV channel from cricket to football when they think nobody's watching. He does have cricketing heroes: Viv Richards and Steve Waugh share space with Steve Coppell (the player and manager) and Bryan Robson (the player!). Having covered two world cups (the football version) and a Champions League final, he can now set his sights on fulfilling other ambitions - including the launch of "Footinfo". Watch this space for more details...

Late highs fail to mask wretched year

2014 in review: Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, 2014 was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh

    Enough with the on-field chatter

Ian Chappell: One of these days there's going to be an ugly altercation between players on the field

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Could McCullum win the Nobel Peace Prize?

The Beige Brigade salivate over B Mac's incredible feats and sixes, and the deliciousness that is Hagley Park

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Rudderless Shami proves too costly

Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days