Aakash Chopra
Aakash Chopra Aakash ChopraRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former India opener; author of Beyond the Blues, an account of the 2007-08 Ranji Trophy season

Educating players is the first step in tackling corruption

Also important: monitoring player agents and putting fair salary rules into place

Aakash Chopra

May 17, 2012

Comments: 7 | Text size: A | A

Ravindra Jadeja celebrates his five-for, Chargers v Super Kings, IPL 2012, Visakhapatnam, April 7, 2012
Ravindra Jadeja was banned for a year for trying to negotiate a better contract than the IPL salary cap entitled him to © AFP

This isn't the first time that corruption in cricket has been exposed. Sadly it won't be the last either. Blame me for being a cynic, but such are the times.

India TV's uncovering of the sleaze that has found its way into the country's cricket may have left romantics like me dismayed, but we're perhaps the last of a generation for whom cricket wasn't all about money. I'm compelled to believe that these days greed isn't a vice anymore, just a handy marketing tool. It is, after all, a dog-eat-dog world. The era in which the game was played solely for the love of the sport is long gone.

In fact, some might even want to believe that such an era never existed because real love can only be tested by temptation (read money). There was no money to be made from cricket till a few years ago, but now the average first-class cricketer stands to earn as much, or more, than well-placed working professionals in most fields. Why resort to deceit when one can make money playing clean?

There are other questions that an exposé like the India TV one raises, and they are often obscured by the sensationalism that is created.

The issue of black money transactions, for instance. In past years Ravindra Jadeja and Manish Pandey were suspended for one season and four matches respectively for attempting to negotiate better deals than they were entitled to. The rule clearly stated that the salary cap of an uncapped player (one who hasn't represented India) was set by the IPL governing council and was non-negotiable. Since both Jadeja and Pandey were not just regulars in their franchise teams but also key performers, the negotiation with another franchise could only have been about making an extra buck: you don't move jobs for the same pay packet and benefits. Somebody raised a stink and both were found guilty of flouting IPL rules.

The question is, they were negotiating with real customers, so why did that party go scot-free? Shouldn't franchises be penalised for indulging in such malpractices and luring cricketers? Allowing rich franchises to twist the rules will only encourage rule-breaking. They must be penalised equally for dangling the carrot.

Also: what is making cricketers negotiate? Did they get the rough end of the stick initially? In most jobs, the wage is governed by the quality of work, and the demand for and supply of talent. In a rather contentious move, the IPL governing council set the pay rates for uncapped players on the basis of their experience in first-class cricket, which had nothing to do with their skills in the T20 format. For some reason there has been no such rule for overseas players, all of whom were included in the auctions. Are unreasonable rules encouraging players to break them?

While domestic players from other countries, such as Daniel Christian and Mitchell Marsh, raked in the moolah, equally talented Indian domestic cricketers, like Ambati Rayudu and Pandey, were resigned to earning a pittance in comparison. Even so, things would have remained under control had the franchises adhered to the rules. If none of the teams was willing to pay more, players would have had no option but to like it or lump it. Clearly that hasn't been the case. The only way to deal with this menace of black money exchanging hands is to put these uncapped players on the auction list and allow them to earn what they deserve, officially.

Then there has been the problem of unregistered player agents. Before the advent of the IPL, there were only a handful of agents in India. Now the proliferation of talented players has resulted in many dubious agents coming to the fore, who target lesser-known domestic cricketers with the promise of IPL deals and more.

I speak from experience. A young player in Rajasthan was promised a minimum of Rs 1 crore a year, guaranteed, by an agent if he was allowed to manage the player's career. When the player told me about it, I thought I'd do a background check. It turned out the agent was new to the profession and had no track record of managing sporting talent. Since the money he offered was not in sync with the existing market value of a rookie, I advised caution, and thankfully the player paid heed. It's plain to see that the sports management businesses of such agents can only be a front for murky dealings. As a deterrent, the BCCI must ensure that every player agent is registered with the board, and that their backgrounds are checked and their businesses monitored.

The most important aspect is to educate players. While the sting operation supposedly showed five cricketers shaking hands with shady characters, it also showed that three cricketers refused to be bought. It was the same when Pakistan players were caught indulging in spot-fixing in 2010: only three cricketers out of a squad of 15 were involved in unlawful activities. Corruption works at an individual level, and it will always only be a few individuals who fall prey to temptation. Ideally we would like to eradicate the menace completely, but practically it is impossible. We can monitor, impose stringent rules, and hand out severe punishments, but unfortunately all that may still not be enough. Of course, that shouldn't stop us from constantly trying to set things right. The first step is to educate and mentor cricketers.

After the first edition of the IPL, the governing council announced a programme would be introduced to nurture young cricketers, which would include lessons on how to handle money, media, fame and so on. Five years down the line, that promise is yet to be fulfilled. There's an urgent need to teach players the dos and don'ts, and the repercussions of falling out of line. It may also be advisable to make it mandatory for cricketers to declare their assets.

When news of match-fixing first broke in a big way, in 2000, Pakistan, not too long after, reinstated some of those found guilty of selling the country and tarnishing the image of the game. When heinous acts like those go unpunished, the younger generation fails to understand the repercussions involved. Zero tolerance must mean that the nature of the punishment should serve as a deterrent for the next generation.

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. He is contracted to Rajasthan Royals in the IPL. His website is here and his Twitter feed here

RSS Feeds: Aakash Chopra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by OnlyKaps on (May 19, 2012, 12:59 GMT)

Hats off Akash for being so transparent and open about these matters, I thoroughly agree with you that the age of the sport being played for the love of it is past and we are in a mercenary era. To monitor agents is a good idea but needs honest cops in the Board. Cant send a thief to catch a thief!

Posted by vj3478 on (May 18, 2012, 13:01 GMT)

Agree, local players do neet mentoring. But what about match officials and franchise owners?

Posted by cricket4every on (May 18, 2012, 6:56 GMT)

Akash,well written, but let me tell u,al the 5cricketers ,who are involved has played at u-19india cricket.but cd nt make it to senior level.bcoz they were nt deserving to play indiau19.nw tell me,hw many people kw the names of u19 cricketer,nor media gives much emphasis on junior cricketer, selection at junior level can be managed.R smarth, HG Vihari, CG Khurana, SS Ranjane, AR Patel, S samson are not in squad of india u19. Same had happened to Surya Yadav, Avi Barot. Junior selection can be managed.bcoz no1 takes note of it.can sm1 ask, inspite of doing gd in in domestic season, pls check their records. they are not in squad. those some of who dont deserve are in squad. in cmg years sm of them reach to hieghst level. those who dnt deserve today nd are in team will get into wrong practices. bcoz there counter parts stats earning more nd they dnt...pls take care of seeds, saplings....they will fatch u gd fruits.if u can.analyse urself with their records.

Posted by rvenkat on (May 18, 2012, 4:19 GMT)

Nice article Aakash. You put things in perspective by saying "The era in which the game was played solely for the love of the sport is long gone" which is 200% true. That sums it up all.

Posted by   on (May 17, 2012, 14:34 GMT)

Players to be educated about laws, rules and regulations. I feel it is a career for some lawyers to work as consultant. The whole episode gives me a doubtful role TV channel. There should be a frame work like ICC ACB, any players involved need to treated with disdain, no mercy to be shown.

Posted by aditya.pidaparthy on (May 17, 2012, 14:02 GMT)

The biggest bone of contention is the salary cap for domestic indian players who have not played for India, while there is no such rule for players from other countries who have not played international cricket. The rule was initially suggested to protect the U-19 players (who had won the 2007 world cup, just before the first IPL) from focussing too much on IPL and forgoing on first class cricket. But given the inequality of the application of that rule there will be complications.

Not to mention there will be teams who will negotiate an endorsement deal while paying a lesser "salary" for their IPL services. Something is not kosher with this.

Posted by Nutcutlet on (May 17, 2012, 12:56 GMT)

My overriding concern is the integrity of cricket & the honesty of cricketers. Aakash has made some valid points in his article, but what he should have said at some point is the enormous vulnerability of T20 (& by extension, the IPL specifically) format of the game to all manner of illegal practices. The IPL commands huge audiences, both inside the stadiums and on TV across the world - the contests take place in a cauldron: loud, glittery, pumped up - manic, indeed. Who will remember or care if bowler X bowled a wide in his second over and a no-ball in his 4th? Who will care while the dancing girls gyrate, the PA booms, the sceen flashes that latest tit-bit of spurious info or superfluous comment (What a massive hit!). All of these distract from the actual play itself. For those who care to reflect on what might really be going on, I would suggest that they start to watch very critically - because what you actually see, here & there, may well be driven by something dark & criminal.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Aakash ChopraClose
Aakash Chopra Aakash Chopra is the 245th Indian to represent India in Test cricket. A batsman in the traditional mould, he played 10 Tests for India in 2003-04, and has played over 120 first-class matches. He currently plays for Delhi in the Ranji Trophy; his book Beyond the Blues was an account of the 2007-08 season. Chopra made a formidable opening combination with Virender Sehwag, which was believed to be one of the reasons for India's success in Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04. He is considered one of the best close-in fielders India has produced after Eknath Solkar.

Late highs fail to mask wretched year

2014 in review: Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, 2014 was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh

    Enough with the on-field chatter

Ian Chappell: One of these days there's going to be an ugly altercation between players on the field

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Could McCullum win the Nobel Peace Prize?

The Beige Brigade salivate over B Mac's incredible feats and sixes, and the deliciousness that is Hagley Park

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Rudderless Shami proves too costly

Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days