| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A look at the batsmen and bowlers with the best boundary and dot-ball stats in T20 internationals
September 14, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: The Sehwag issue
Players/Officials:
Shane Bond
| Chris Gayle
| Harbhajan Singh
| Morne Morkel
| Kevin Pietersen
| Daniel Vettori
| Yuvraj Singh
Series/Tournaments:
ICC World Twenty20
|
|||
Over the last couple of years, T20 cricket has been all about clubs and franchises, with league tournaments mushrooming all over the world following the IPL's success. However, over the next three weeks, the focus shifts back to T20 cricket between countries. Here's a look at some of the top performers in T20 internationals, based not on the usual parameters of runs scored and wickets taken, the lists for which you can find here and here, but on ESPNcricinfo's ball-by-ball database, from which it's possible to get, among other numbers, dot-ball stats and batting and bowling performances during specific stages of a 20-over innings.
Dot-ball factor
In a format in which balls available are at a premium, those who waste the fewest deliveries are obviously a huge asset. The table below offers a reminder to England (if they ever needed one) and their fans of why Kevin Pietersen was such a key player: no batsman has a lower dot-ball percentage, among those who have scored 500 runs in T20 internationals. Out of 831 balls he faced, he went runless off only 255. Off the other 576 balls, he scored 119 fours and 32 sixes, and also took 348 singles, 71 twos and six threes.
Close behind him is Australia's Michael Hussey, whose dot-ball percentage is also outstandingly low. Both Hussey and Pietersen have achieved a low dot-ball percentage while maintaining averages of more than 30 - in Pietersen's case almost 38 - and a run rate of almost 8.50 per over.
The other player whose numbers stand out is Yuvraj Singh, who returns to the Indian team after winning his battle with germ-cell cancer. Yuvraj too averages more than 30, while his strike rate is the highest among batsmen who have scored 500 runs in T20 internationals.
| Batsman | Runs | Balls/ Dots | Average | Run rate | Dot ball % |
| Kevin Pietersen | 1176 | 831/ 255 | 37.93 | 8.49 | 30.69 |
| Michael Hussey | 566 | 403/ 126 | 33.29 | 8.42 | 31.27 |
| Shahid Afridi | 801 | 562/ 182 | 18.20 | 8.55 | 32.38 |
| Cameron White | 652 | 484/ 163 | 28.34 | 8.08 | 33.68 |
| Paul Collingwood | 583 | 459/ 155 | 18.80 | 7.62 | 33.77 |
| Yuvraj Singh | 601 | 400/ 139 | 31.63 | 9.01 | 34.75 |
| Mahela Jayawardene | 981 | 706/ 246 | 30.65 | 8.33 | 34.84 |
| Jacques Kallis | 642 | 525/ 185 | 40.12 | 7.33 | 35.24 |
| Suresh Raina | 658 | 477/ 169 | 32.90 | 8.27 | 35.43 |
| JP Duminy | 846 | 687/ 244 | 32.53 | 7.38 | 35.52 |
While those with the lowest dot-ball percentages are mostly middle-order batsmen, those who play the most dot balls are usually openers, since they bat when fielding restrictions are in place. (Thus they also get more opportunities to score runs in boundaries.)
The names on the list below are all of opening batsmen, with some of them not scoring off as many as 48% of the deliveries they face. The good ones are those who score plenty of runs off the deliveries that are not dots. Chris Gayle, for example, has a dot-ball percentage of 42.40, which is the sixth-highest among batsmen with 500-plus runs, but yet he scores 8.63 runs per over (strike rate 143.91). Mohammad Hafeez, on the other hand, only scores at 6.75 per over (strike rate 112.52) due to his relative lack of boundary hitting: 279 of his 575 deliveries are dots, and off the others he has struck 78 fours and 12 sixes, and taken 157 singles, 41 twos and eight threes.
| Batsman | Runs | Balls/ dots | Average | Run rate | Dot ball % |
| Mohammad Hafeez | 647 | 575/ 279 | 20.21 | 6.75 | 48.52 |
| Sanath Jayasuriya | 629 | 487/ 234 | 23.29 | 7.74 | 48.05 |
| Graeme Smith | 982 | 770/ 340 | 31.67 | 7.65 | 44.16 |
| Kamran Akmal | 778 | 619/ 271 | 25.09 | 7.54 | 43.78 |
| Salman Butt | 595 | 551/ 240 | 28.33 | 6.47 | 43.56 |
| Chris Gayle | 757 | 526/ 223 | 36.04 | 8.63 | 42.40 |
Boundary percentages
The list of batsmen with the highest percentage of runs in boundaries also has a few names who featured in the previous table. As mentioned earlier, it's most likely that openers will dominate this list, as there's less protection in the outfield when they are batting. However, there are a couple of non-openers who make it: Yuvraj combines a low dot-batting strike rate with a high percentage of runs in boundaries, which explains his outstanding strike rate and the fact that he is the only batsman to score 500-plus runs in T20 internationals at a strike rate of more than 150. Then there's Albie Morkel, who has scored crucial runs for South Africa down the order when there's little time to settle in. (Both Yuvraj and Morkel are among the select few who have struck more sixes than fours in Twenty20 internationals.)
| Batsman | Runs | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s | Boundary % |
| Sanath Jayasuriya | 629 | 23.29 | 7.74 | 76/ 23 | 70.27 |
| Chris Gayle | 757 | 36.04 | 8.63 | 67/ 43 | 69.48 |
| Shane Watson | 731 | 27.07 | 8.87 | 56/ 47 | 69.22 |
| Graeme Smith | 982 | 31.67 | 7.65 | 123/ 26 | 65.99 |
| David Warner | 978 | 27.16 | 8.44 | 91/ 46 | 65.44 |
| Yuvraj Singh | 601 | 31.63 | 9.01 | 35/ 40 | 63.23 |
| Brendon McCullum | 1443 | 36.07 | 7.96 | 139/ 57 | 62.23 |
| Albie Morkel | 502 | 23.90 | 8.53 | 28/ 33 | 61.75 |
| Martin Guptill | 818 | 32.72 | 7.49 | 71/ 35 | 60.39 |
Examining the same set of stats between the 11th and 20th overs, the dot-ball percentages come down even further, to 23.81 for Michael Hussey, 25.26 for AB de Villiers, 26.02 for Dwayne Bravo and 26.43 for Suresh Raina. At the other end of the scale are Abdul Razzaq (36.84) and Kieron Pollard (34.39), both big hitters who believe fielders on the boundaries aren't a problem when the aim is to send the ball into the crowd.
MS Dhoni has a pretty high dot-ball percentage too in the middle overs, of 31.28% (which is the ninth-highest among batsmen who have scored 300-plus runs in the last ten overs). That, coupled with his relatively low boundary percentage of 43.65, means his run rate in the last ten overs is only 7.44. On the other hand, Yuvraj also has a relatively high dot percentage, of 30.68, but he scores 68% of his runs in boundaries, which lifts his run rate in these ten overs to 10.4 runs per over.
The bowlers
Dot-ball percentages
Just as minimising the dot-ball percentage is key for batsmen, maximising it is crucial for bowlers, to increase the pressure on batsmen and force them into errors. Among bowlers who have bowled at least 75 overs, South Africa's Morne Morkel has the highest dot-ball percentage, of 50.29. Not surprisingly, his economy rate and average are both excellent.
Trent Johnston in the second spot is a bit of a surprise, but his stats are obviously boosted by the fact that he has played a fair number of matches against the lesser teams. Most of the bowlers on the list below are new-ball bowlers, which you would expect, given that they bowl when the field restrictions are on, which gives them the best chance to bowl dots. Most of them also have an economy rate of less than seven, and averages of less than 22.
| Bowler | Balls | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | Dot % |
| Morne Morkel | 521 | 34 | 17.26 | 6.76 | 50.29 |
| Trent Johnston | 492 | 25 | 20.28 | 6.18 | 49.80 |
| Shane Bond | 465 | 25 | 21.72 | 7.00 | 48.82 |
| Dale Steyn | 498 | 31 | 17.87 | 6.67 | 46.99 |
| Mitchell Johnson | 609 | 36 | 20.11 | 7.13 | 45.32 |
| Sohail Tanvir | 459 | 21 | 25.47 | 6.99 | 45.32 |
| Stuart Broad | 795 | 41 | 23.70 | 7.33 | 44.28 |
| Umar Gul | 892 | 59 | 16.66 | 6.61 | 44.17 |
| Saeed Ajmal | 924 | 60 | 15.48 | 6.03 | 44.16 |
| Abdur Razzak | 461 | 29 | 17.96 | 6.78 | 44.03 |
Boundary percentages
The list of bowlers with the lowest percentage of runs in boundaries is dominated by spinners - and all of them high-class spinners who have learnt the art of bowling in 20-over cricket. Daniel Vettori leads the way, and has conceded more sixes than fours, which is perhaps a commentary on the size of the outfields in New Zealand as well. The one number in Harbhajan Singh's row that stands out is his average: while most of the others average less than 21, Harbhajan concedes 30 runs per wicket.
| Bowler | Runs | Wickets | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s | Boundary % |
| Daniel Vettori | 617 | 35 | 17.62 | 5.50 | 18/ 20 | 31.12 |
| Harbhajan Singh | 541 | 18 | 30.05 | 6.44 | 23/ 14 | 32.53 |
| Graeme Swann | 742 | 44 | 16.86 | 6.39 | 25/ 26 | 34.50 |
| Ajantha Mendis | 444 | 39 | 11.38 | 5.69 | 26/ 11 | 38.29 |
| Shahid Afridi | 1141 | 57 | 20.01 | 6.10 | 72/ 30 | 41.02 |
| Johan Botha | 727 | 36 | 20.19 | 6.24 | 50/ 18 | 42.37 |
| Saeed Ajmal | 929 | 60 | 15.48 | 6.03 | 61/ 25 | 42.41 |
| Sohail Tanvir | 535 | 21 | 25.47 | 6.99 | 45/ 10 | 44.86 |
The three bowlers who have conceded the highest percentages of runs in boundaries are all New Zealanders, with two of them conceding more than eight per over. Shane Bond's overall economy rate is much lower, which is due to his high dot-ball percentage - even though he concedes a few boundaries, he compensates by keeping it tight otherwise.
| Bowler | Runs | Wickets | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s | Boundary % |
| Kyle Mills | 895 | 31 | 28.87 | 8.39 | 94/ 33 | 64.13 |
| Tim Southee | 773 | 28 | 27.60 | 8.49 | 82/ 26 | 62.61 |
| Shane Bond | 543 | 25 | 21.72 | 7.00 | 64/ 12 | 60.41 |
| Brett Lee | 714 | 28 | 25.50 | 7.86 | 77/ 17 | 57.42 |
| Albie Morkel | 674 | 20 | 33.70 | 7.94 | 48/ 30 | 55.19 |
| Morne Morkel | 587 | 34 | 17.26 | 6.76 | 49/ 21 | 54.86 |
| Jacob Oram | 669 | 14 | 47.78 | 8.63 | 63/ 19 | 54.71 |
| Stuart Broad | 972 | 41 | 23.70 | 7.33 | 95/ 25 | 54.53 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
'You can't taint the whole IPL'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on spot-fixing, Adil Rashid's future, and yorkers in Test matches
Harsha Bhogle: The spot-fixing controversy teaches us about the pitfalls of insecurity and of the desire to keep up with the Joneses
The new Harmison? Or is it the new Caddick?
Numbers Game: Stuart Broad is destructive at his best, but at other times his bowling average is unusually high
Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Less cricket on TV? Hallelujah
Matt Cleary: Why Channel Nine should be applauded for not broadcasting domestic cricket in Australia
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (84)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Slowly but surely the world of cricket now no 4 his slow rate and protecting his wicket King Jacques is the best to ever play and stood the test of time. Average 40 and manage to be placed outside top 5 cricketers of all time. Think again and salute the God and give respect where its due. My plea
Posted by Neuen on (September 17, 2012, 4:03 GMT)The stats say nothing. All I can see is that they push the spinners around and hit a 4 now and then of the pace bowlers. But says nothing, If every guy scores 15 in your team you have 150. If every one gets 200 you have 200. 20 is a low score in cricket but strike rate is boss in this form
Posted by RobTay14 on (September 16, 2012, 23:15 GMT)Jayasuriya must not like running, but just hitting boundaries.
Posted byall subcontinient teams are best performance in t20 both in bowling and batting, so many stars in all three teams india pakisan and srilanka
Posted by@nicklarter YES! Put out first class stats from country cricket and see how many Irish appear.....I know others might get bored of Irish fans commenting aggressively all the time - we are just tired of being told we aren't good enough.... we blatantly are (thrashed Zim by 50 runs yesterday) - and we just want a fair shake. Why are there only 2 group games - could it be perhaps that the ICC dont want associates to be able to progress? Aus and Windies may find that its a double edged sword ....we may only be capable of beating Aus and Windies 1 in 4 times but if this is the 1 they are out! And this is a good Ireland team .....
Posted by Munkeymomo on (September 14, 2012, 23:12 GMT)@Nick Larter: Excellent point, just because you perform well against weaker sides doesn't mean you won't against better sides. Ireland have 2 high quality bowlers in Trent and Johnston. Expect them to do well.
Posted by ProdigyA on (September 14, 2012, 16:16 GMT)Rajesh your stats make my head spin. Amazing.
Posted by shiva89 on (September 14, 2012, 15:35 GMT)useless stats... does not detemine anything at last.
Posted byDoes Chris Gayle have any equals at the World Cup 20/20 ?
Posted by@MENDIS_Forever Giving excuses? Those edges happen only at the death and not everytime. Pace is NOT exactly a good thing in T20s nowadays. It is spinners who has proven to be better than Phasst bowlers. Change of pace is actually better than just raw pace. Of course you do need pace ,but that list only has Bond and Lee , both have been clobbered in this format. Bond in the 2007 WC, check that. Lee has been better but Stuart Clark outbowled him.