December 11, 2012

Indisciplined West Indies must introspect

They must review why their bowlers conceded a shocking number of extras and their top-order batsmen batted so indifferently in the ODI series against Bangladesh

When Darren Sammy and his West Indies team got to Bangladesh, their objectives were clear: to win everything and leave as the No. 1-ranked T20 team in the world. They will leave with their mission not fully accomplished.

The 18-run win over the hosts in the sole T20 brought symmetry to a tour that West Indies began by sweeping the Test series. That T20 success also officially made Sammy's men the best on the planet in the shortest form of the game. But what transpired in between will have given their think-tank reasons for review and introspection.

Cricketing indiscipline was the bane of the team in the shorter games. A team will pay heavily if its bowlers are not on target, and so it proved in the 2-3 ODI series defeat.

With the exception of the first one-dayer, West Indies' bowlers conceded over 25 extras in every match. They also gave up four free hits, and most tellingly, gave away an unacceptable 55 wides in the five games; that's just about an extra ten overs the Bangladesh batsmen got to face.

Behind those untidy numbers was some erratic bowling. West Indies, as a group, strayed often in line and failed to keep to good lengths consistently, and this though they got five-wicket efforts in two matches, from Ravi Rampaul in the massive 160-run defeat in the second match, and from Kemar Roach in the two-wicket loss in the series decider; and four wickets from Sunil Narine in the victory in the third ODI.

Good one-day teams also are able to put up totals they can defend or chase successfully. But against Bangladesh, West Indies' batsmen did not do their work. Remarkably, only in one match - the fourth in Dhaka, largely due to Sammy's unbeaten 60 - did West Indies bat out their full quota of overs. That is a sin in limited-overs play, especially when batting first as they did in three of the five games. In those matches, they left a total of 31 balls unused.

Those figures reflected a great deal of impatience - all of the batsmen at various times playing the wrong attacking shots to the wrong balls, sometimes at the wrong times. The erratic nature of the play is emphasised by the fact that although Marlon Samuels got 126 in the third match, when West Indies got back into the ODI series, there were only two other 50-plus scores in the five matches - from Kieron Pollard (85) and Darren Bravo (51), both in the deciding match, and still West Indies could not muster more than 217.

You can't win many games playing like that. And so it proved. The question for the West Indies camp would be: why so much indifferent play?

In his defence of Chris Gayle at the end of the ODI series, Sammy made the point that cricket is a team sport. "We've got to pull together as a team. It's not every day the same people will perform... We just need more performances from the team and that would make us more successful."

West Indies' low scores in the ODIs therefore cannot be laid just at the feet of their best limited-overs batsman. But the fact cannot be escaped that Gayle's repeated failures were a factor in how the series went. Gayle once more experienced the levelling effect the game can have. Having been at the heart of much of West Indies' success in Tests, T20s and ODIs since his return to the side in May, he left Bangladesh without a fifty to his name in ten innings all told. In the one-dayers, his lack of impetus at the start of the innings was telling. The best opening stand he fashioned with his partners - Lendl Simmons (first two games) and Kieran Powell - was 48, with Simmons in the first match. And always Gayle was among the first three batsmen to be dismissed. It meant the team regularly lacked someone to give the innings momentum early and hold it together. Samuels, in the third ODI and in the T20, did so magnificently, but Bravo does not seem to have fully come to grips with batting in the limited-overs format yet.

Only Gayle can explain what went wrong for him in Bangladesh. But from a distance it did not seem as if he approached his innings with the same measured approach, the same focus, that had distinguished his previous play this year. West Indies, as a whole, did not play cohesively, not like they had been doing since their series against New Zealand. And an improving Bangladesh limited-overs unit punished them.

Gayle's miserly bowling in the T20, which helped to subdue the Bangladesh chase, was at least a positive way for him to end a low-key tour. But he and his mates will know they have to go back to the drawing board and work on their basics.

Garth Wattley is a writer with the Trinidad Express

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Jonathan on December 14, 2012, 18:06 GMT

    Rafelgibt u sound like a bangladeshi desperately clinging onto one ODI series result may i remind u who were falling to pace bowling on flat tracks.yes BD had good spinners problem is WI failed miserably.WI are the most humble team u will find so i dont know how u find them egoistic.

  • Niles on December 13, 2012, 16:29 GMT

    How can people sit on their keypads and blame a coach for wides batsmen who are set, giving away their wickets? The only flaw with the Windies management at present is the selection process of the team. Fast bowling worried BD from the onset of the tour however WI always played 2 spinners 1 fast and 3 alrounders who is neither bowlers or batsmen a wicketkeeper that cant bat and 4 batsmen sometimes only three that deserves to be called batsmen. Get the team selection right and Windies can rule again. BTW it was a great effort put forth by BD and a well deserve series win, keep it up WI vs BD 2015 World cup finals. Predicted here first!!!

  • Carl on December 13, 2012, 12:58 GMT


    "Gayle never smiles...?"

    I believe you are watching a different Chris Gayle than the rest of us...

  • KH. RAFIQUE on December 13, 2012, 6:51 GMT

    Quite well written but little bit one sided i guess......Throughout the series WI were almost beaten by BAN.......1st test they won just lack of experience of BAN players......And 2nd test they got rid of the situation as SHAKIB played one criminal shot to got himself out and killed the hope for BAN to draw the match....In ODIs BAN should have registered 5-0 victory as they fail to hold their nerve in 3rd and 4th ODI......And last t20 match BAN was beaten by the bowling of GAYLE........So, if you analyze the whole tour then you will find that its BAN who played well rather than WI played below their part.....BAN force WI to do looked dim.....Im sorry to say but if WI not put themselves out of their 'egoistic I'm the world best' attitude (Though they are not) then some more miseries will soon to follow......

  • Dummy4 on December 13, 2012, 2:15 GMT

    I still can't believe how badly Gayle played. I honestly believe he is the best batsman on the planet and yet he failed time and time again on this tour. He never smiles; always has a dour expression on his face. perhaps the WI management should consider getting him psychiatric help.

  • Dummy4 on December 12, 2012, 23:58 GMT

    the fact that the coach continues to throw russel in these games when he clearly doesnt seem to have any common sense, or isnt able to adjust to the new conditions says my opinion, braddee and verasammy should have been on this odi team. but i must commend bd for their improvement..they played with the belief that they can win..and did so...

  • ethel on December 12, 2012, 21:40 GMT

    You are not wrong! I understand the scarcasm.I would have thought that he would have been able to show our bowlers how to swing the ball seeing that he was England bowling coach. It would appear that he has no clue. Secondlyl, we have fast bowlers who are able to put the fear in the Bangladesh batting but he seems to think that our so called spin bowlers could bother batsmen who are accustom to spin.Furthermore he left our best spin bowlers home.I just cannot "for the life of me" why is Chanderpaul not playing 50 over cricket .Oh, I forgot what he GIBson try to do to the senior players. Sammy is taking the place of a useful player in an of the three formats. By the same token,simonviller, does that not tell you that some thing is wrong with the head-Gibson.But there are ways to make that cow

  • Dummy4 on December 12, 2012, 20:43 GMT

    MijRahman and Ahmed Hussain, for me i don't care what people think about bangladesh or what other teams doing, if we are doing good then you will see their fear ingame .. just wait and watch time will come when others will ask for a visit or a series to play against Bangladesh. Cheers!

  • Carl on December 12, 2012, 12:40 GMT

    Gayle was not out in the second innings of the Kulna test, also scored 35 in the first ODI, so you can hardly state that he has failed in his last ten innings. He has however, been performing well below where we have become accustomed to seeing him, and I do believe that in part, it is down to a lack of planning. In cricket, as in life, fail to prepare...prepare to fail.

    Good comments regarding Roach. He needs more support in the ODI team, and its not as if we don't have the guys to provide it...

  • Dummy4 on December 12, 2012, 10:43 GMT

    I agree with Thomas Cherian. The Windies have the wrong strategy for 50 over matches. They have the T20 mindset emphasized by too many ineffective allrounders. ODIs need batsmen to build an innings and specialist bowlers need a bigger role. Any good ODI team should score at least 250 consistently. The management need to rethink otherwise the team will not be successful in this format.

  • No featured comments at the moment.