Saad Shafqat
Saad Shafqat Saad ShafqatRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Writer based in Karachi

No thanks to the Pakistan board if the PSL succeeds

There does seem to be a market, and sufficient interest, in a T20 league in Pakistan, but the PCB's defensive mindset is not helping

Saad Shafqat

February 5, 2013

Comments: 17 | Text size: A | A

Umpires Russell Tiffin (left) and Rudi Koertzen confer, England v India, second Test, August 8, 2002
The PSL has pulled off a coup in terms of getting foreign umpires, if not players © PA Photos

Pakistan's national team may be battling it out in South Africa at the moment, but life at the PCB these days is heavily dominated by the domestic matter of the Pakistan Super League. It's still just an idea, and there isn't much yet to show for it beyond a name and a logo, but there is a distinct buzz about it. If the PSL's organisers are working their way down a checklist, then the first box - the one requiring them to create a bit of a stir - can certainly be ticked.

One reason for the chatter is that the event is shrouded in mystery. All that the PCB is willing to reveal at this point is that it will be a T20 league with five city-based franchises competing over 23 matches starting March 26, and that - judging from the player auction slabs - serious money will be involved. Beyond this, things are sketchy. The five cities have not been named, and PCB officials politely demur when questioned about finances in granular detail. "Everything will be revealed in due course," said Nadeem Sarwar, the PCB media manager, in a recent phone conversation. "Talk of financial matters like net capitalisation and broadcasting revenue is premature at this point, but I can assure you all details are being worked out with great efficiency and diligence."

An indication of the PCB's serious intent regarding PSL is the involvement of the ICC's ex-boss Haroon Lorgat as an advisor to the league. The naming of Mike Procter as a match referee, and the appointment of a four-person umpiring panel comprising Rudi Koertzen and Russell Tiffin, in addition to Asad Rauf and Aleem Dar, are also positive signs.

Pakistan cricket insiders have also warmly welcomed the naming of Salman Sarwar Butt as the league's managing director. A respected banker and noted cricket buff, Butt was instrumental in setting up Pakistan's domestic T20 competition, whose first edition in 2005 was sponsored by his then employer, ABN-AMRO Bank. Even in Pakistan's fractious cricket circles, no one has anything negative to say about him. During a recent phone chat, he confirmed that there was mounting interest in the PSL from broadcasters and potential team owners. "I cannot give you any names at the moment," he said, "but the interest in TV rights has come from outside Pakistan as well."

Butt (no relation to the Pakistan ex-captain) converses in a calm and reassuring manner, and seems clear about the limits of what he can create. When asked if he plans to reproduce the glitz and glamour of the IPL, which is inevitably held up as the gold standard for any franchise-based T20 competition, he refused to take the bait. "Lalit Modi is a legend, and what he did in creating the IPL was simply brilliant," said Butt. "Our effort is different - the scale is simpler, and we are struggling with certain limitations, but we are confident of delivering an impressive product."

It remains to be seen how effectively those limitations can be overcome. Ultimately, what will distinguish the PSL from Pakistan's standard domestic T20 tournament is the presence of overseas players and a substantial glamour quotient. PCB officials are claiming they can attract a host of high-profile stars - the Kevin Pietersens, Michael Clarkes, and Chris Gayles of the international game - but given the security perception surrounding Pakistan - already the England cricketers' association and the Federation of International Cricketers' Associations have advised players against participating - that appears a tall claim. Glamour too, at least in the conventional sense, will be hard to come by: Pakistan has no Bollywood equivalent, gossip and tabloid media are frowned upon, and the country's conservative outlook precludes the presence of sexualised cheerleaders.

Despite these constraints - each a barrier in some form to the league's commercial prospects - there is evidently still enough in the PSL to attract genuine business interest. Industry insiders say that both Pakistan's local private sports channel, Geo Super, as well as the UAE-based Ten Sports, are expected to bid for television rights and are interested in telecasting PSL matches on their platforms. Their reasons may be different - Geo Super needs it to validate its brand, while for Ten Sports this amounts to required maintenance of its long-term relationship with the PCB - but either way, it is oxygen for the PSL.

Perhaps the strongest criticism of the PSL is that the PCB's intent appears rooted in negativity. In public statements and media interviews, Zaka Ashraf, the PCB chairman, has positioned PSL as some desperate manoeuvre to help lift Pakistan's image as a host cricketing nation

I was also able to speak to two potential team owners, one of whom went on the record. "We are fully behind this effort and keen to become a franchisee in PSL," said Atif Bajwa, CEO of Bank Alfalah, which is already a major sponsor of the Pakistan national team. Bajwa shied away from discussing team composition or monetary figures, but my second, anonymous, source, a well-heeled Karachi businessman, was more forthcoming. "I anticipate an upfront investment of US$5-6 million per year for acquiring and maintaining a PSL franchise," he said, adding that he was attracted to the business model because he felt he could generate a profit.

As with any other commercial cricket league, franchisees will have three chief sources of income from the PSL: their share of the broadcast rights, gate receipts, and advertising. Pointing to examples from the IPL, the Karachi businessman felt he could also use the platform of PSL team ownership to enhance revenues from his primary business (which in this particular case happens to be a media and entertainment empire). This gentleman was not too enamoured of the PCB, but he is nevertheless confident about the value of top-level cricket in Pakistan as a business product. "PCB are the custodians of Pakistan cricket, so we have no option but to deal with them," he said, "but it would be better if all affairs of the league were quickly passed over to a consortium of private team owners."

Perhaps the strongest criticism of the PSL is that the PCB's intent appears rooted in negativity. In public statements and media interviews, Zaka Ashraf, the PCB chairman, has positioned PSL as some desperate manoeuvre to help lift Pakistan's image as a host cricketing nation. The naked yearning for foreign stars and the clumsy announcement of a US$2 million life insurance policy for each overseas signing embody this approach, which only draws further attention to Pakistan's security stigma.

Even though cricket authorities in a number of countries have prohibited their players from participating in the PSL, such admonitions are only to be expected and one can't take them to heart. The good news is that the PSL is on the map and is getting discussed; given the constraints, any publicity is good publicity. There is enough of a market for the PSL to exist - and even succeed - but the PCB's defensive mindset is not helping. Pakistan's cricket board naturally has to set up the fundamentals, but it would do well to quickly hand over the reins to private enterprise, and then just stand aside and watch the show flourish.

Saad Shafqat is a writer based in Karachi

RSS Feeds: Saad Shafqat

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Hassaan272 on (February 7, 2013, 21:18 GMT)

Brilliant.. absolute brilliant.. Saad shafqat, a great neuro-scientist and an excellent and neutral writer.. Dont have words to praise your work..

Posted by Zahidsaltin on (February 6, 2013, 14:26 GMT)

The only thing which kept Pak cricket going was IPL's refusal to add Pak players. PSL is going to destroy our test and first class cricket.

Posted by getsetgopk on (February 5, 2013, 20:27 GMT)

umairasgharbutt: If PSL gets half the money involved in IPL there is a fear that our players wont have the same intensity at test level. We asians have a nasty habit of stop doing anything when our pockets are full. It happened to India and it will happen to Pak as well. I have said it before that IPL is a curse for Indian cricket and to be fair to India fans I'll say the same thing for PSL, tests will suffer but two things here justify PSL, 1st it'll bring international cricket to pak and 2nd its just ten days and hence i'm forced to support it, but as cricket fan, i think it will be a bad influence on bowlers line and length and will further degrade batsmens techniques.

Posted by getsetgopk on (February 5, 2013, 20:17 GMT)

HOpe it succeeds but if it doesn't I would be equally happy. These T20 leagues are a menace to Test cricket, the ultimate form of the game. Look at India, their test team doesn't seem to have any interest left in tests and all about IPL, look at BD and their BPL not that they were any good at tests to begin with but BPL will make sure they dont even think about improving.

Posted by cricket-india on (February 5, 2013, 17:51 GMT)

per the author, the PCB has done everything right and its only crime is a craving to lift Pak's image as a cricket destination and offering tax-free incomes and life insurance policies for all players. but is it a crime to be desperate to lift the image of your country as a safe and enjoyable place to play cricket? if the PCB suceeds in with every step they take for the PSL (foreign umpires, TV rights, sponsors, involving lorgat, etc), the life insurance policies certainly won't turn off any prospective player. saad shafqat sees the PCB's desperation but sees it in a negative light; there's no need to. you have to commend the PCB for taking the bold PSL gamble against many (if not all) odds.

Posted by warneneverchuck on (February 5, 2013, 17:31 GMT)

@umairasgharbutt let PSl last first for 2-3 editions then talk about any IPl comparison.

Posted by umairasgharbutt on (February 5, 2013, 12:58 GMT)

first 2, 3 editions psl gonna struggle but after that it would has a potential to overcome ipl !

Posted by Energetic. on (February 5, 2013, 12:19 GMT)

It has a silly format 5 teams and still a semi-final just to knock out 1 lol all in one city good luck!

Posted by Selassie-I on (February 5, 2013, 11:34 GMT)

Posted by half_blood-prince on (February 5, 2013, 3:44 GMT) - Actually the ECB had the first T20 league, the rest are copies. Maybe higher profile, even 'better' copies, but copies none the less.

Personally I think Pakistan should go for it, why should they not have their own big money league? Especially as the BCCI don't seem to want the Paks in the IPL. Good luck Pakistan!

Posted by toopSTARS on (February 5, 2013, 11:04 GMT)

Well, watching the sub-continent teams' struggles at the Test level, do we really need the IPLs, the PSLs, the SLPLs and the BPLs??

Posted by JohnnyRook on (February 5, 2013, 10:16 GMT)

I am an Indian and I agree with the author that PSL doesn't really need foreign stars so much. Even if PCB focuses on local stars, PSL would be a huge hit in Pakistan because people are really cricket starved right now. If you host it in UAE to lure in foreign players, it would still be a decent success. However the headline "No thanks to the Pakistan board if the PSL succeeds" is downright ridiculous exaggeration. You are lucky to have Zaka Ashraf in top position right now. He seems a genuine and a decent person and if you do get cricket back in Pakistan soon, it would primarily be because of his efforts. Else you are more than welcome to re-elect Ijaz Butt. Boy he made Niranjan Shah and Kishan Rungta seem like Einstein and Newton.

Posted by badmaash on (February 5, 2013, 10:14 GMT)

Strange to see people commenting on how everyone else copied IPL, when IPL itself copied ICL

Posted by Ziach on (February 5, 2013, 10:05 GMT)

IPL is copy of Indian Cricket League. They were the true trend setters and pioneers of this format and all others including IPL copied them.

Posted by bluefunk on (February 5, 2013, 7:17 GMT)

I wish there were Indian players in the PSL, and Pakistani players in the IPL - very unfortunate that politics and the security situation are unlikely to allow this in the short-term.

Posted by half_blood-prince on (February 5, 2013, 5:45 GMT)

its not just about money and audience but its about standard and new ideas..ipl was a whole new concept thanks to lalit modi.big bash is not a copy of ipl but similar with few additions like cameras and glittering bails plus a standard commentry team..ive seen few overs of bpl and it shows the difference.

Posted by wiseshah on (February 5, 2013, 5:05 GMT)

big bash dont have audiences but BPL is fully packed and much better quality foreigners there. after IPL, its BPL, money wise and even audience number wise

Posted by half_blood-prince on (February 5, 2013, 3:44 GMT)

ONLY big bash is,to an extent equivalent to IPL...others are simply copies..

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Saad ShafqatClose

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

    Benn shows up in body and spirit

Tony Cozier: The spinner has brought in a sense of discipline into his bowling and behaviour on the field since his Test comeback

    The return of Bob Simpson

Rewind: When the 41-year-old former captain came out of retirement to lead Australia against India

Bowling to blame for India's poor overseas record

Kartikeya Date: The inability to build pressure by denying runs, even on helpful pitches, is India's biggest problem

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days